Czech Republic blames China for cyberattack on foreign ministry
May 28 (UPI) -- The Czech Republic accused China on Wednesday of being responsible for a "malicious cyber campaign" that targeted an unclassified network of the foreign ministry.
Little information about the cyberattack was made public, the Czech government said it began in 2022, affected an institution designated as Czech critical infrastructure and that it was perpetrated by well-known China-backed hackers APT31.
"The Government of the Czech Republic strongly condemns this malicious cyber campaign against its critical infrastructure," the Czech foreign affairs ministry said in a statement.
"Such behavior undermines the credibility of the People's Republic of China and contradicts its public declarations."
APT31, which stands for Advanced Persistent Threat Group 31, is a collection of China state-sponsored intelligence officers, contract hackers and support staff that conduct cyberattacks on behalf of the Chinese government.
Seven Chinese nationals were charged in the United States in late March for their involvement in APT31, which federal prosecutors said has targeted U.S. and foreign critics of the Chinese government, business, and political officials over the last 14 years.
The Czech government said Wednesday it tied APT31 to the cyberattack through an "extensive investigation," which "led to a high degree of certainty about the responsible actor."
"The Government of the Czech Republic has identified the People's Republic of China as being responsible," it said.
NATO and the European Union -- both of which Czech is a member of -- were quick to condemn China following Prague's revelation.
"We stand in solidarity with the Czech Republic following the malicious cyber campaign against its Ministry of Foreign Affairs," the security alliance said in a statement.
NATO did not blame China but acknowledged the Czechs' accusation of Beijing for the attack and said that it has observed "with increasing concern the growing pattern of malicious cyber activities stemming from the People's Republic of China."
Similarly, the EU did not directly point the finger at China for the attack on the Czech Republic, but said there have been cyberattacks linked to Beijing targeting EU and its member stats.
"In 2021, we urged Chinese authorities to take action against malicious cyber activities undertaken from their territories. Since then, several Member States have attributed similar activities at their national level," the EU's high representative, Kaja Kallas, said in a statement.
"We have repeatedly raised our concerns during bilateral engagements and we will continue to do so in the future."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Trump wants to score trade deals in Canada. He's unlikely to get them.
President Donald Trump will arrive in the Canadian Rockies on Sunday for a meeting of the world's economic powerhouses facing a potentially calamitous tariff deadline and a burgeoning crisis in the Middle East. But he's unlikely to leave the three-day summit with a breakthrough on either front. Trump is eager to use the G7 meetings to show progress toward an array of trade deals with the U.S.'s most critical allies. The gathering also takes on heightened importance in the wake of an Israeli attack on Iran that sent oil prices skyrocketing and injected fresh uncertainty into the global economy. But Trump officials are struggling to lock down trade pacts that they predicted were imminent in the wake of a first deal with the U.K. nearly a month ago. Even early chatter of a deal with Japan by this week's conference appears unlikely, said two people close to the White House, granted anonymity to discuss internal deliberations. And now, with the U.S. occupied by turmoil in the Middle East, Trump aides and advisers are tempering expectations for what the G7 may ultimately produce. 'Everybody just wants to survive,' said Ivo Daalder, president of the Chicago Council on Global Affairs and a former U.S. ambassador to NATO. 'There's not a lot of interest in making deals.' In a call with reporters on Friday, a senior U.S. official granted anonymity to preview the summit offered little in the way of specific goals, saying only that Trump sought to 'make progress' in a range of areas including 'making America's trade relationships fair and reciprocal.' The lowered stakes reflect the plodding pace of negotiations with economic partners since April, when Trump blew up their trade ties in pursuit of new deals that he's insisted must be more favorable to the United States. Leaders across Europe are projecting resolve despite the prospect of punishing tariffs come early July. The reduced expectations also underscore how quickly Trump's return to office has fractured the close Western alliance that the U.S. long claimed to lead. Whereas the G7 once prided itself on speaking with one authoritative voice on critical economic and national security matters, most leaders are now just hoping to escape the summit site in Kananaskis, Alberta, without opening a new front in their fight with Trump, diplomatic experts and others involved in the summit preparations said. The G7 countries have already abandoned hopes of signing a traditional joint statement, upending decades of precedent over worries that Trump and his counterparts are too far apart on a number of key issues. The nations instead plan to issue a handful of 'leaders' statements' on more specific issues where all or most of them can reach agreement. The move averts the risk of a repeat of the last Canada-hosted summit, when Trump in 2018 abruptly rejected the statement via an incensed tweet from Air Force One. Back then, negotiators had spent hours haggling over a single word in a line related to trade amid Trump's vows to impose steeper tariffs on allies, said one of the people close to the White House. But shortly after reaching agreement, then-Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau criticized the U.S. tariffs, enraging Trump and prompting him to pull his support. New Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has sought to sidestep conflict with the rest of his agenda as well, with multilateral meetings on topics like energy security and drug trafficking aimed at emphasizing areas of common ground. As for the White House, it's shied away from making grand promises. A potential trade deal with Japan is unlikely to be finalized. And while officials cautioned that Trump could always broker a surprise agreement in meetings with other world leaders, there's little expectation that the summit will yield more than commitments to keep talking. 'Everyone's in really different spots in their trade relationships,' one of the people close to the White House said of the several parallel efforts to strike new trade agreements. 'I would be shocked if they came out with anything like the U.K.-U.S. framework in that environment.' Still, Trump and his aides view the G7 as a high-profile opportunity to reassert American primacy over even their closest allies, said advisers and others involved in the global preparations. Trump is likely to jump at any chance to demonstrate his administration's strength on the world stage, even if just rhetorically — forcing the rest of the group to decide when to go along and when to risk confrontation. 'A success on the U.S. side would be going to the summit and being seen as not being pushed around by other leaders,' said Caitlin Welsh, a former senior National Security Council official during Trump's first term. The president may get plenty of opportunities to cultivate that image. In addition to trade issues, Trump's response to Israel's attack on Iran will be closely watched for clues as to whether the U.S. will join the fray. Trump is also likely to face greater pressure to impose sanctions on Russia over its war in Ukraine — a step that he's publicly floated but remains reluctant to take. The president on Thursday said he was 'very disappointed in Russia' over its resistance to peace talks. But he quickly added that he was 'very disappointed in Ukraine also' in a sign of the wide gap between Trump's attitude toward the war and the rest of the G7's steadfast support for Ukraine. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was among those invited by Carney, has vowed to seek another sitdown with Trump at the summit. But even the prospect of a brief meeting has raised some concerns within the G7 over whether it's worth the risk that at any moment Trump and Zelenskyy's relationship could go sideways again — and sink U.S. support for Ukraine in the process. 'The value is only in maintaining the status quo,' Daalder said of discussions with Trump on the topic. But for Trump, the trade war that has consumed his first months in office is just as likely to dominate his three days in Canada. The president is expected to hold a series of bilateral meetings on the summit's sidelines, as the administration tries to push ahead trade deals in differing stages of negotiation. Trump has also tried to up the pressure on his G7 allies, vowing to greenlight a market-rattling return to steep tariffs on July 9 should they fail to clinch agreements in the coming weeks. The push still isn't expected to generate any quick victories in an area where negotiations are often measured in years rather than weeks. Yet allies in the U.S. and abroad are hoping that simply being back at the center of it all, surrounded by world leaders eager for a bit of his time, will prove enough progress for Trump to call off an even more severe trade war. 'He's completely comfortable with an outcome that ends in tariffs,' one of the people close to the White House said. 'But a lot of it depends on whether there's progress being made, and if he feels the countries are serious.' Amy Mackinnon contributed to this report.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Russia adviser Fiona Hill's alarming conclusion
Fiona Hill's assessment of the Russian threat to Britain is a classic example of how a seemingly rational argument based on a false premise and scanty evidence can lead to a mad conclusion (Russia is at war with Britain and US is no longer a reliable ally, UK adviser says, 6 June). It is especially alarming that this conclusion was reached by one of the three principal authors of the recent strategic defence review. The false premise is that Vladimir Putin's invasion of Ukraine is the first step to make Russia 'a dominant military power in all of Europe'. Evidence that Britain is already under attack is provided by 'the poisonings, assassinations, sabotage operations … cyber-attacks and influence operations ... sensors … around critical pipelines, efforts to butcher undersea cables'. It follows that Britain's economy and society must be geared up to resist the Russian menace. Deny the premise and the argument for a 'whole society' mobilisation against Russia collapses. What it reveals is the strength of the warmongering mood of official Britain. This is not to deny that we have to take precautions against the real danger of a significant US pullout, perhaps amounting to rendering article 5 of the Nato treaty meaningless, and that the Russians can be quite ruthless in exploiting an advantage if they think they have one. But this is a far cry from proposing, as the strategic defence review does, a national mobilisation in face of an immediate and pressing Russian Skidelsky Emeritus professor of political economy, Warwick University, Richard Balfe Former MEP, Anthony Brenton British ambassador to Russia, 2004-08, Thomas Fazi Author and journalist, Anatol Lieven Senior fellow, Quincy Institute for Responsible Statesmanship, Ian Proud Senior diplomat, British embassy, Moscow, 2014-18, Geoffrey Roberts Professor, University College Cork, Richard Sakwa Emeritus professor of Russian and east European studies, University of Kent, Brigitte Granville Professor of international economics and economic policy, Queen Mary University of London
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Will $5,000 Invested in Amazon Stock Make You $100,000 in a Decade?
A recent survey conducted by Charles Schwab found that Amazon was the third most-purchased stock among retail investors in May. Amazon's strong position in online retail, digital advertising, and cloud computing services could drive double-digit revenue growth through 2030. Amazon has developed about 1,000 generative artificial intelligence applications to improve the efficiency of its retail operations, which should lead to higher profit margins. 10 stocks we like better than Amazon › Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN) stock has fallen 3% year to date while the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) has advanced 3%. But Wall Street anticipates a stronger performance from the retail giant over the next year. The median target price among 71 analysts is $240 per share, which implies 13% upside from its current share price of $212. Tariffs are a big reason the stock has struggled in 2025, but sentiment appears to be on the upswing since the Trump administration de-escalated trade tensions with China. A recent survey from Charles Schwab shows Amazon was the third most-popular stock among retail investors in May. Can Amazon turn $5,000 invested today into $100,000 over the next decade? Here are my thoughts. Amazon has a strong position in three growing industries. The company operates the most popular online marketplace worldwide as measured by traffic, and it is the largest online retailer as measured by revenue. Amazon is also the third-largest ad tech company, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) is the largest public cloud. The investment thesis is simple: Amazon's strong position in those industries should drive double-digit sales growth annually through the end of the decade. I say that because those industries are expanding at a double-digit pace. The estimates below come from Grand View Research: Retail e-commerce sales are projected to grow at 11.6% annually through 2030. Ad tech spending is forecast to increase at 14.4% annually through 2030. Cloud computing sales are projected to grow at 20.4% annually through 2030. Additionally, Amazon should become more profitable over time as two tailwinds drive its margins higher. First, the company is building 1,000+ generative artificial intelligence (AI) applications to automate and optimize tasks like coding, customer service, inventory management, and logistics. It's also infusing warehouse robots with generative AI so human workers can instruct them in natural language. Second, digital advertising and cloud computing services earn higher margins than retail. Amazon in the first quarter reported double-digit sales growth in its advertising and cloud segments versus single-digit sales growth in its retail segments. That means the high-margin revenue streams are increasing more quickly, which will lift its total profit margin over time. As a caveat, Amazon could struggle with tariffs in the near term. About one-third of sellers on the marketplace are based in China, and those brands account for a material percentage of advertising revenue. However, to quote portfolio managers at Baron Capital, "The company has repeatedly proven its ability to navigate complex environments and emerge stronger." Wall Street estimates Amazon's earnings will increase at 10% annually through 2026. That makes the current valuation of 35 times earnings look expensive, but I suspect analysts are underestimating the company. Amazon topped the consensus estimate by an average of 21% in the last six quarters. I think that trend will continue due to its strong position in three growing industries. Amazon stock must increase 20-fold (1,900%) to turn $5,000 into $100,000 during the next decade. Returns of that magnitude are possible, but they happen infrequently. In fact, only five stocks in the S&P 500 increased at least 20-fold during the last decade as of June 12, 2025. They are listed below: Nvidia: +27,250% Advanced Micro Devices: +5,030% Axon Enterprise: +2,180% Texas Pacific Land: +2,050% Fair Isaac: +1,910% However, I doubt Amazon can generate a 20-fold return in the next decade simply because the company is already worth $2.3 trillion. And multiplying that number by 20 would take its market value to $46 trillion, which is approximately what the entire S&P 500 is worth today. That seems an unlikely outcome. Nevertheless, I think Amazon is a worthwhile long-term investment at its current price. The company has a strong position in three growing industries and a track record for beating Wall Street's earnings estimates. That combination led to Amazon stock outperforming the S&P 500 by 40 percentage points over the last three years, and I expect continued outperformance in the next three years. Before you buy stock in Amazon, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Amazon wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 174% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Charles Schwab is an advertising partner of Motley Fool Money. John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Trevor Jennewine has positions in Amazon, Axon Enterprise, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Amazon, Axon Enterprise, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends Charles Schwab and Fair Isaac and recommends the following options: short June 2025 $85 calls on Charles Schwab. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Will $5,000 Invested in Amazon Stock Make You $100,000 in a Decade? was originally published by The Motley Fool
