logo
How Ukraine smuggled drones into Russia to destroy prized nuclear bombers

How Ukraine smuggled drones into Russia to destroy prized nuclear bombers

Telegraph2 days ago

It hardly seemed credible.
Drone after drone, emerging from the top of a shipping container parked by the side of an unremarkable road somewhere deep inside Russia.
Each tiny device buzzed as it rose laden with explosives on its kamikaze mission to destroy some of the Russian military's most prized assets.
As they flew overhead, filming their progress, their targets came into view: rows of strategic bombers, some capable of carrying nuclear weapons.
The attack comes at a critical juncture in the war, with Donald Trump's peace plan hanging by a thread.
But the extraordinary story of how the drones were deployed to launch their attack started many months earlier.
Over a period of weeks, they were smuggled into Russia under the supervision of Ukraine's domestic intelligence agency, the SBU, which presumably had to alter its targeting plans after Russia relocated the bulk of its strategic bomber fleet.
The drones were then concealed inside special containers placed inside commercial cargo lorries whose roof panels had been modified to retract at the touch of a remote control button.
By all accounts, the drivers had no idea about the nature of the dangerous cargo they carried.
Local residents near the Olenya base in Russia's far north described watching a driver running around in panic as FPV drones repeatedly launched from the back of his lorry.
He later told police that he had been instructed to park his vehicle in a lay-by near the town of Olenegorsk where somebody would meet him.
Footage from elsewhere in Russia showed drones rising from the back of another lorry as passers-by stood by helplessly.
It was not the first time that lorries had been used by the Ukrainians in the war.
A truck carrying explosives was remotely detonated to help bring down part of the Kerch Bridge connecting Crimea to the Russian mainland in 2020.
But this was rather more sophisticated, with reports that the drones had been trained using artificial intelligence to hit the weakest points of the bombers parked along the aprons of the airbases.
Fearing Ukraine's growing strike capacity, Russia had only weeks earlier moved many of its strategic bombers to bases like Olenya and Belaya, 1,000km and 2,500km from the front line, where it was assumed they would be well beyond the enemy's reach.
Other bases in Ryazan and Ivanovo were also targeted, both of which are within 600 miles of the Ukrainian border.
For the Russian air force, the planes targeted were prize assets: the iconic Tupolev Tu-95 'Bear', a long-range strategic bomber capable of carrying both nuclear and conventional warheads; the Tu-160 'Blackjack', the largest combat aircraft in the world, and the Tu-22M3 'Backfire', the supersonic strike workhorse of the fleet.
The Russians, however, had not counted on Ukraine's Mossad-like ingenuity nor their desperation to strike at the long-range bombers that had inflicted so much destruction and bloodshed on its cities and people.
For the most part, Operation Web, as it has been designated, did not rely on long-range drones or missiles, but instead on small, hand-held first-person view drones of the kind that has proved so effective on the battlefield.
Russian military bloggers were quick to liken it to the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbour in 1941
An exaggeration, clearly — yet in terms of chutzpah, in terms of scope and quite possibly in terms of damage, Ukraine's near-simultaneous attacks on four airfields deep inside Russia marks an unprecedented moment in the war.
If Ukrainian officials are to be believed, as many as 40 of Russia's most sophisticated, expensive and destructive strategic bombers were eliminated in little more than a couple of hours.
Such claims await the confirmation of an independent battle damage assessment, yet whatever the real number is there can be little doubt what a humiliating blow Ukraine has inflicted on Russia – or what a powerful message Kyiv has sent its allies in the West.
For night after night before the surprise assault, Ukraine's cities had reeled under some of the most intense Russian bombardment of the war. Dozens had died, children among them, yet there was no sign of the Kremlin relenting.
As his envoys prepared to present his peace terms at a second round of negotiations in Istanbul, Vladimir Putin seemed determined to project Russia's total military dominance. So confident does he remain that his forces will prevail on the battlefield that the Russian president contemptuously ignored requests to share his proposals with Kyiv in advance.
Yet hours before the talks were due to begin, Volodymyr Zelensky, the Ukrainian leader, had a pointed message of his own to deliver.
He had been involved in Operation Web from its conceptualisation 18 months ago. There had been coordinated attacks on Russian airfields before. On the night of August 13 last year, Ukraine unleashed what was then its largest drone assault of the war on Russian territory, striking four airbases in Kursk, Voronezh and Nizhny Novgorod. Yet these bases were all within a few hundred miles of the Ukrainian border.
Operation Web was conceived on a much, much grander scale.
On the night before it was initiated, Ukraine had suffered perhaps its most intense airstrikes of a bloody week, with officials in Kyiv saying that 472 drones and seven ballistic and cruise missiles had struck targets across the country, including the capital.
By Sunday morning, Ukraine appeared to have exacted a measure of revenge after two transport bridges were blown up in the neighbouring regions of Bryans and Kursk just as trains were passing. Seven people were killed, Russians officials said, blaming Ukraine.
Yet these attacks were but a prelude.
Among the planes destroyed, Ukrainian intelligence officials said, were not just Tu-95 and TU-22M3 bombers but also an A-50 'Mainstay', one of just a handful of Airborne Early Warning and Control aircraft Russia has left in its arsenal. The A-50, worth an estimated £230 million, is a flying radar and command post that is vital for coordinating fighter jets and air defences as well as for situational awareness. They are thought to be irreplaceable.
According to Ukrainian intelligence officials, all those knowingly involved in the operation have returned safely home, their mission accomplished in the most astonishing way.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

China's factory activity hit by tariffs; KKR pulls out of Thames Water rescue talks
China's factory activity hit by tariffs; KKR pulls out of Thames Water rescue talks

The Guardian

time32 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

China's factory activity hit by tariffs; KKR pulls out of Thames Water rescue talks

Update: Date: Title: Introduction: China's May factory activity shrinks as tariffs hit demand Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. Evidence is mounting that Donald Trump's trade war is disrupting manufacturing activity around the globe. China's manufacturing activity in May shrank at its fastest pace in two and a half years, according to the latest survey data, as firms were hit by a fall in new orders, and weaker export demand. The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing purchasing managers' index, released this mornng, fell to 48.3 in May, down from 50.4 in April. Any reading below 50 shows a contraction, and this is the lowest reading since September 2022. During April, the US and China imposed tit-for-tat tariffs on each others exports, resulting in triple-digit levies, before the two sides reached a deal on 12 May to lower those tariffs to 10% for 90 days. Today's PMI report indicates the Trump trade war hurt demand. Dr. Wang Zhe, senior economist at Caixin Insight Group, explains: 'Overall, in May, manufacturing supply and demand declined, dragged by overseas demand. Employment continued to shrink, while prices remained weak. Logistics were delayed moderately, with manufacturing stocks remaining stable. Business optimism recovered slightly from April's low. 'Currently, unfavorable factors affecting China's economic development remain relatively prevalent. Uncertainty in the external trade environment has increased, adding to domestic economic headwinds 'Major macroeconomic indicators showed a marked weakening at the start of the second quarter. The downward pressure on the economy has significantly intensified compared to preceding periods. Yesterday, a survey of US factories also showed a drop in production last month, with several manufacturers blaming tariffs for pushing up prices and hitting demand. That helped to push the US dollar close to a three-year low against a basket of other currenciess. 8am BST: OECD begins Ministerial Council Meeting in Paris 8am BST: OECD to release latest global economic outlook 10am BST: Eurozone inflation flash reading for May, 10.15am BST: UK Treasury committee hold hearing with Bank of England policymakers Update: Date: 2025-06-03T06:18:31.000Z Title: KKR pulls out of a deal to inject fresh equity into Thames Water Content: Newsflash: Thames Water's efforts to avoid nationalisation have taken a blow. US investment firm KKR has walked away from the chance to take a stake in the troubled water utility, putting its future in fresh doubt. Thames had selected KKR as a 'preferred partner' at the end of March, as it looked for a partner to take a stake in its business. But today, Thames told the City that KKR has indicated that it will not be in a position to proceed, and its preferred partner status has now lapsed. Sir Adrian Montague, Chairman of Thames Water, says: 'Whilst today's news is disappointing, we continue to believe that a sustainable recapitalisation of the Company is in the best interests of all stakeholders and continue to work with our creditors and stakeholders to achieve that goal. The Company will therefore progress discussions on the senior creditors' plan with Ofwat and other stakeholders. The Board would like to thank the senior creditors for their continuing support.' Thames, which is struggling under a debt pile of close to £20bn, also says that 'certain senior creditors' have been working on alternative transaction structures to seek to recapitalise the business. It will now 'progress discussions on the senior creditors' plan with Ofwat and other stakeholders,' it says. Significant announcement from troubled Thames Water. Its preferred equity partner KKR has pulled out of plans to invest billions the company requires to survive. "KKR has indicated that it will not be in a position to proceed". If a deal can't be reached, and Thames falls into bankruptcy, then the company could be takenn into a special administration regime by the UK government. Update: Date: 2025-06-03T06:17:42.000Z Title: Introduction: China's May factory activity shrinks as tariffs hit demand Content: Good morning, and welcome to our rolling coverage of business, the financial markets and the world economy. Evidence is mounting that Donald Trump's trade war is disrupting manufacturing activity around the globe. China's manufacturing activity in May shrank at its fastest pace in two and a half years, according to the latest survey data, as firms were hit by a fall in new orders, and weaker export demand. The Caixin/S&P Global manufacturing purchasing managers' index, released this mornng, fell to 48.3 in May, down from 50.4 in April. Any reading below 50 shows a contraction, and this is the lowest reading since September 2022. During April, the US and China imposed tit-for-tat tariffs on each others exports, resulting in triple-digit levies, before the two sides reached a deal on 12 May to lower those tariffs to 10% for 90 days. Today's PMI report indicates the Trump trade war hurt demand. Dr. Wang Zhe, senior economist at Caixin Insight Group, explains: 'Overall, in May, manufacturing supply and demand declined, dragged by overseas demand. Employment continued to shrink, while prices remained weak. Logistics were delayed moderately, with manufacturing stocks remaining stable. Business optimism recovered slightly from April's low. 'Currently, unfavorable factors affecting China's economic development remain relatively prevalent. Uncertainty in the external trade environment has increased, adding to domestic economic headwinds 'Major macroeconomic indicators showed a marked weakening at the start of the second quarter. The downward pressure on the economy has significantly intensified compared to preceding periods. Yesterday, a survey of US factories also showed a drop in production last month, with several manufacturers blaming tariffs for pushing up prices and hitting demand. That helped to push the US dollar close to a three-year low against a basket of other currenciess. 8am BST: OECD begins Ministerial Council Meeting in Paris 8am BST: OECD to release latest global economic outlook 10am BST: Eurozone inflation flash reading for May, 10.15am BST: UK Treasury committee hold hearing with Bank of England policymakers

UK-EU reset may resolve many issues over Irish Sea border, but lack of consensus is worrying
UK-EU reset may resolve many issues over Irish Sea border, but lack of consensus is worrying

Belfast Telegraph

time42 minutes ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

UK-EU reset may resolve many issues over Irish Sea border, but lack of consensus is worrying

The combination of Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump as globally powerful leaders has had a seismic impact on European politics. Suddenly security is a major concern across the continent — including for the United Kingdom and Ireland. While it doesn't make Brexit irrelevant, it does help to place it in context. Our European neighbours are also our most reliable partners.

Tuesday briefing: Is Britain's move to ‘war-fighting' readiness enough to ensure its security?
Tuesday briefing: Is Britain's move to ‘war-fighting' readiness enough to ensure its security?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Tuesday briefing: Is Britain's move to ‘war-fighting' readiness enough to ensure its security?

Good morning. The government's strategic defence review was launched on Monday and billed as a blueprint to modernise the military so that, in the words of Keir Starmer, the UK is 'safer and stronger, a battle-ready, armour-clad nation with the strongest alliances and the most advanced capabilities'. Reviews like this one come along every decade or so – but the context now appears more urgent than at any time since the end of the cold war. In the place of the old consensus that the UK simply needed to be ready for (deeply questionable) deployments to places such as Iraq and Afghanistan is a view that the threats now are much closer to home, and much closer to existential. 'UK armed forces have begun the necessary process of change in response to this new reality,' the review said. 'But progress has not been fast or radical enough.' Even within its carefully conceived terms of reference – which insisted on maintaining a role in the Indo-Pacific region and the Middle East, and did not allow for proposals to increase overall spending beyond what Starmer has already set out – the review amounts to a severe critique of the state of the armed forces. Today's newsletter explains the problems, the proposed solutions and the views of those who suggest that all of this is answering the wrong question. Here are the headlines. Israel-Gaza war | A series of recent deadly airstrikes on school buildings sheltering displaced people in Gaza were part of a deliberate Israeli military bombing strategy, the Guardian has learned. The strikes followed a loosening of controls on actions targeting Hamas operatives at sites with large numbers of civilians present, sources said. Health | The proportion of people surviving cancer in the UK has doubled since the 1970s amid a 'golden age' of progress in diagnosis and treatment, a report says. Half of those diagnosed will now survive for 10 years or more, up from 24%, according to the first study of 50 years of data on cancer mortality and cases. US news | Mohamed Sabry Soliman, 45, has been charged with a federal hate crime and multiple other offences after he allegedly used a makeshift flamethrower and incendiary devices to burn people in Boulder, Colorado who were raising awareness about Israeli hostages in Gaza. Iran | Tehran is on the brink of rejecting US proposals on the future of its nuclear programme after a US draft insisted on the suspension of enrichment of uranium inside the country. The US proposal also offered no clear route map for lifting sanctions. Scotland | A Scottish Labour councillor has defected to Reform UK on the eve of a pivotal Holyrood byelection, as the rightwing populist party's leader, Nigel Farage, defended a controversial advert attacking Anas Sarwar that has prompted accusations of racism. The review published yesterday is the first since 2010; John Healey, the defence secretary, says it is a departure from past iterations because it is externally led. When the review was launched, the government said it would 'consider the threats Britain faces, the capabilities needed to meet them, the state of UK armed forces and the resources available'. Led by Lord Robertson – a former defence secretary and Nato secretary general who conducted Labour's last defence review in 1998 – it has consulted 150 external experts, received 8,000 submissions to a call for evidence, and runs to 48,000 words. What is the current state of Britain's armed forces? Most judges of the UK's military readiness paint a dire picture of the armed forces as not being fit for purpose, and the review's call for a 'truly transformational' approach implicitly adopts the same view. In a report on the lessons from the Ukraine war published last year, the House of Lords' international relations and defence committee said that the armed forces 'lack the mass, resilience and internal coherence necessary to maintain a deterrent effect and sustain prolonged conflict'. Philip Stephens of the Financial Times wrote that (£) those conclusions 'are viewed within Whitehall as wholly uncontroversial'. There are plenty of numbers pointing to that conclusion. In 2010, the regular army was 110,000; now it is short of its target of 73,000, the smallest since the Napoleonic wars. Across all the armed forces, the number is down from 192,000 in 2010 to 136,000 today. Even before the war in Ukraine, ammunition stockpiles were in decline, and in 2023, Gen Sir Richard Barrons – who has been working alongside former US presidential adviser Fiona Hill on Robertson's review team – said the UK would probably use up its existing supplies in a 'busy afternoon' . RAF aircraft numbers fell from 724 in 2016 to 564 in 2023, a reduction of 22%. And the Royal Navy has two aircraft carriers that have had serious mechanical problems, without enough sailors to crew the ships needed to protect and supply them – or enough fighter jets to fill them. What does the defence review say is necessary? The review suggests that a military 'optimised for conflicts primarily fought against non-state actors' needs to be drastically rethought to contend with the prospect of 'state-on-state war' through ''whole-of-society' preparations'. It presents Russia as an 'immediate and pressing' danger to the UK, and China as a 'sophisticated and persistent challenge', while Iran and North Korea are termed 'regional disruptors'. To be ready to meet those challenges, the review lists 62 recommendations; the government has accepted every one in principle. The most eyecatching measures were trailed beforehand, from £6bn in spending on six 'always on' munitions factories to a new cyber command unit coordinating offensive digital operations. There will be a £15bn investment in modernising the production of nuclear weapons, and a pledge to build 'up to' 12 new attack submarines. And through the force multiplying effects of artificial intelligence and a £2bn investment in drones, the review promises a 'ten times more lethal British Army'. Ben Quinn has a more detailed breakdown. More conventionally, Healey had reportedly hoped to increase the size of the army by a few thousand. But he appears to have lost that fight with the Treasury, at least for now. And of the £350bn the UK is expected to spend on defence over this parliament, only £10bn is thought to be new spending committed through the strategic defence review. When will the new capacity come online? Part of the explanation of the disconnect between major announcements and new spending is the length of time that much of what is proposed will take to be enacted. The new submarines will not launch until the late 2030s. There is no timeline on the new munitions factories, while Healey said there would be no increase in the number of troops until after the next election. And on the fundamental question of how much the UK will spend on defence, Keir Starmer has promised 2.5% of GDP by 2027-28 but described 3% as an 'ambition' to be pursued at some point during the next parliament – that is, by 2034, if it materialises at all. As one source familiar with the budget process quoted by the Economist puts it: 'Basically, all their investment is for an era when Putin will be dead.' The UK's 2.5% pledge may soon start to look behind the pace against its European allies: defence ministers meeting in Brussels this week are expected to agree a 3.5% target, with the main question whether that should be scheduled for the early 2030s or later in the decade, the Economist reports. The review says that a rapid move to 2.5% and subsequent lift to 3% should make what is proposed affordable in the end – but warns that 'it may be necessary to go faster'. So is the plan enough to ensure the UK's security? The government pointed out that this is the first defence review since the end of the cold war that has not resulted in cuts. And it is important to note that, while the armed forces are undoubtedly weaker than they once were, the UK retains the world's sixth-largest defence budget. That puts it behind the US, Russia, China, India and South Korea – but the government is likely to observe that its alliance with other European countries means that it will have considerably greater impact. (The review describes a 'Nato first' outlook, and says: 'We will never, in the future, expect to fight a major, 'peer' military power alone.') Even if the threat from Vladimir Putin is far greater than might have been understood a decade ago, Russia's war in Ukraine has so depleted its resources that it is thought to be years away from being able to consider such a conflict. In this analysis, Dan Sabbagh writes that 'Britain is not under direct military threat and is not likely to be any time soon'. But there is still a sense of a military that is fundamentally overstretched. In 2023, David Richards, the former chief of the defence staff, said in the House of Lords: 'This country must stop deluding itself that it can have a global role. We are a medium-sized country with a faltering economy. 'The UK must focus ruthlessly on the Euro-Atlantic theatre, not state that this is our priority but then spread our efforts so thinly that we are strong nowhere.' In contrast, Robertson, Hill and Barrons describe 'the connection between Euro-Atlantic security and that of other regions such as the Middle East and Indo-Pacific'. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion What is the broader economic context? Others suggest that the plans should be subjected to a much more fundamental critique. Paul Johnson of the Institute for Fiscal Studies noted yesterday that if the UK plans to spend an additional £10-15bn on defence while spending more on other priorities like health and pensions, 'the only choice that is available … is some really quite chunky tax increases'. Meanwhile, claims that military spending can boost the economy may look questionable when compared with the impact that the same money might have if spent on green energy or healthcare, among other priorities. (This Greenpeace analysis makes that case.) Unsurprisingly, others, like the Stop the War Coalition, the Green party and some within Labour, question whether a boost to defence spending can possibly be the right priority at a time when public services are generally agreed to be creaking. They also note that cutting the international aid budget to serve the military may have unintended consequences. Ellie Chowns, the Greens' defence spokesperson in the House of Commons, said yesterday: 'Security is not just based on arms expenditure and threats, but on real leadership that uses diplomacy and development too.' Mark O'Connell's long read about Mr Beast is gimlet-eyed, quietly droll, and utterly convincing that his subject is worth the intention. He is 'some type of genius,' O'Connell writes – 'a prodigy of a form that, as degraded as it is, deserves to be taken seriously as one of the signature artefacts of our time'. Archie They're free to use, refreshing to the mind and body and transcendentally beautiful – so who would want to harm America's national parks? Donald Trump, comes the inevitable reply. Margaret Sullivan explains why his administration is so determined to despoil the things that make life worth living. Alex Needham, acting head of newsletters Henry Hill has an essential column on the Conservative party's impatience with Kemi Badenoch: 'The balance of opinion inside the party seems to be not whether there will be a challenge ... but when.' Archie He wrote Jerusalem, saw angels in his local park and inspired artists ranging from Gilbert and George to Patti Smith. Now the poet William Blake is being celebrated, in an exhilarating piece by Philip Hoare, as a queer icon centuries ahead of his time. Alex From ChatGPT to Google, artificial intelligence is an increasingly inescapable part of our daily lives. Emine Saner speaks to the film-makers, writers and academics who are doing their best to avoid it, given its impact on the environment and even, potentially, on human nature itself. Alex Tennis | Jack Draper missed out on the chance of a place in the French Open quarter-finals, losing in four sets to the inspired world No 62, Alexander Bublik. Draper's compatriot Cameron Norrie was beaten by Novak Djokovic in straight sets. In the women's draw, French wildcard Lois Boisson beat third seed Jessica Pegula to reach the French Open quarter-finals and send shock waves around Roland Garros. Formula One | Max Verstappen has issued a veiled apology for his crash with George Russell by admitting it 'was not right and should have not happened'. The four-time world champion was hit with a 10-second penalty by the stewards for causing a collision with Russell with two laps remaining of Sunday's Spanish Grand Prix. Football | Lisa Nandy has removed herself from the final decision over who will lead the new football regulator, after it emerged the preferred candidate had donated to the culture secretary's Labour leadership campaign. David Kogan revealed last month that he had given money to Nandy during her bid to succeed Jeremy Corbyn in 2020. 'Starmer pledges to make Britain 'battle-ready' with drones and AI' says the Guardian, while the Times has 'Tax rises loom to put Britain on war footing'. The i paper leads with an interesting angle: 'British over-18s offered taste of military life with 'gap year' in army, navy and RAF'. The Express naturally finds cause to criticise: 'Budget delay won't 'cut the mustard' as Russia threaten'. 'Police in major new hunt for Madeleine' – that's the Telegraph and the Mirror also covers that with 'New Maddie search'. The Mail goes with 'Tory warnings over 'backdoor blasphemy law''. The Financial Times splashes on 'Musk launches $300mn share offer for xAI in bid to refocus on business'. A terrible case from an inquest leads Metro: ''Bullied' soldier dead 3 weeks in bed at barracks'. Keir Starmer needs you: Britain readies for war Former Guardian security editor Richard Norton-Taylor talks through the strategic defence review and Britain's new plans to be ready for war A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad In Indonesia, the architecture firm Shau created the Microlibrary Project to promote literacy but its inventive, ecologically minded structures offer much more, including respite from the heat. The Hanging Gardens microlibrary, completed in 2019, has a rooftop garden, while another, Bima, has a facade of 2,000 discarded ice-cream buckets providing natural lighting and cross-ventilation. Shau co-founders Daliana Suryawinata and Florian Heinzelmann, who have built eight libraries since 2012, call the spaces 'laboratories for experimentation', and they are popular with young people who come to read, learn, garden and play. Their goal is to increase the number of libraries to 100 by 2045. And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store