Hassan, Noem lock horns over habeas corpus
Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) tussled with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a committee hearing Tuesday over habeas corpus, which the administration is considering suspending as it increasingly comes into focus in the legal fights over President Trump's immigration agenda.
'What is habeas corpus?' Hassan asked during the hearing before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. 'Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country, to suspend their right to —' Noem responded.
Hassan then interjected, 'Let me stop you, ma'am. Habeas corpus, excuse me, that's incorrect.'
Habeas corpus requires the government to bring someone they are detaining before a court and justify the legality of their detention.
It has become a key legal tool for migrants to contest the administration's immigration crackdown. Among others, it has been used by Venezuelans to challenge the Trump administration's use of the 1798 Alien Enemies Act to swiftly deport them to a Salvdoran megaprison and foreign students to contest their immigration detention over participation in pro-Palestinian activism.
'If not for that protection, the government could simply arrest people, including American citizens, and hold them indefinitely for no reason,' Hassan said. 'Habeas corpus is the foundational right that separates free societies like America from police states like North Korea.'
The New Hampshire Democrat then asked Noem at the hearing if she supports habeas corpus.
'I support habeas corpus, I also recognize that the president of the United States has the authority under the Constitution to decide if it should be suspended or not,' Noem responded.
Her comments echo those of White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, who suggested earlier this month that the president may try to suspend habeas corpus to carry out mass deportations without bringing individuals for court hearings.
The Constitution provides that 'the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in cases of rebellion or invasion the public safety may require it.'
Noem last week indicated she believed current immigration conditions could warrant a suspension. Any move by the White House to unilaterally revoke the writ by declaring an 'invasion' at the southern border is all but certain to spark lawsuits.
The restrictions were laid out in Article I of the Constitution, which defines the legislature. But the specific phrasing does not explicitly tie the suspension power to Congress, leaving ambiguity that the administration believes also vests Trump with the authority.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
Judge: Trump administration can dismantle Institute of Museum and Library Services
WASHINGTON — A federal judge on Friday denied a request by the American Library Assn. to halt the Trump administration's further dismantling of an agency that funds and promotes libraries across the country, saying that recent court decisions suggested his court lacked jurisdiction to hear the matter. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon had previously agreed to temporarily block the Republican administration, saying that plaintiffs were likely to show that Trump doesn't have the legal authority to unilaterally shutter the Institute of Museum and Library Services, which was created by Congress. But in Friday's ruling, Leon wrote that as much as the 'Court laments the Executive Branch's efforts to cut off this lifeline for libraries and museums,' recent court decisions suggested that the case should be heard in a separate court dedicated to contractual claims. He cited the Supreme Court's decision allowing the administration to cut hundreds of millions of dollars in teacher-training money despite a lower court order barring the cuts, saying that cases seeking reinstatement of federal grants should be heard in the Court of Federal Claims. The American Library Assn. and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees filed a lawsuit to stop the administration from gutting the institute after President Trump signed a March 14 executive order that refers to it and several other federal agencies as 'unnecessary.' The agency's appointed acting director then placed many staff members on administrative leave, sent termination notices to most of them, began canceling grants and contracts and fired all members of the National Museum and Library Services Board. The institute has roughly 75 employees and issued more than $266 million in grants last year. However, a Rhode Island judge's order prohibiting the government from shutting down the institute in a separate case brought by several states remains in place. The administration is appealing that order as well.
New York Post
an hour ago
- New York Post
Trump says Elon Musk will face ‘very serious consequences' if he funds Dems in future elections
WASHINGTON — President Trump warned Saturday that his former ally Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he starts bankrolling Democratic candidates for office after their nasty public split over a Republican spending bill working its way through Congress. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News' Kristin Welker in an interview. 'He'll have to pay very serious consequences if he does that,' the president added. Advertisement 3 Musk and Trump have been feuding after the Tesla CEO spoke out on the president's 'big beautiful' bill. AP 'Is there anything else you just want people to know about the status,' Welker asked. 'No, not at all. We're doing great,' Trump replied. 'The bill is great. It looks like we're going to get it passed. Looks strongly like we're going to get it passed.' Advertisement 3 Musk was part of cabinet meetings during the first few months of Trump's second term. Molly Riley/White House / SWNS Musk knocked Trump during a multi-day X tirade over the debt increases contained in the 'big beautiful bill' earlier this week and said without his hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions, the president would never have been re-elected in 2024. Here is the latest on Donald Trump and Elon Musk's feud He also claimed credit for delivering the GOP a 53-47 majority in the Senate — and holding onto its majority in the House. Advertisement 3 Trump has hit back at Musk's comments in the ongoing feud. The Tesla and SpaceX billionaire contributed more than a quarter of a billion dollars to Republican candidates in the 2024 cycle, federal campaign filings show.
Gizmodo
an hour ago
- Gizmodo
Musk Deletes His ‘Really Big Bomb' Claiming Trump Appears in Epstein Files
In the middle of their very public breakup, a scorned Elon Musk decided to drop a 'really big bomb' on Donald Trump, accusing the president of appearing in the Epstein files. Sometime Saturday, it seems the billionaire decided he wanted to try to disarm that bomb, as he deleted his posts claiming that Trump has links to the famous child sex trafficker. Musk and Trump had been acting catty for a couple of days by the time Musk went nuclear, going back and forth over Musk's opposition to Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill'—a proposal that includes the largest cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs in history. Musk objected to the bill, but not because it would be devastating to low- and middle-income households, but seemingly rather because it was going to hurt his own bottom line by ending electric vehicle tax credits that Tesla benefits from. Musk tried to kill the bill by posting incessantly about it, creating a rift among Republicans who will essentially need everyone in the party to be on board in order to get the thing passed. Trump, annoyed, took some shots at Musk for his dissent, which led to Musk just blowing the whole thing up. He said Trump appeared in the Epstein files and 'That is the real reason they have not been made public.' Funnily, he also doubled down by saying, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Those posts are now deleted—though have, of course, been archived, screenshotted, and quoted many times over. So, too, has a post in which Musk supported the idea that Trump should be impeached. He hasn't gotten around to taking down his post claiming that Trump's tariffs will cause a recession, so, it's clear the two aren't fully ready to make up, even if there is a de-escalation. We're also starting to get more of a picture of what has been happening behind the scenes while these two air out each other in public. A report published Saturday by the Washington Post claims that Trump was 'dejected' during Musk's crash out, and tried to rationalize Musk's behavior by calling him 'a big-time drug addict.' Musk had apparently been acting erratically for quite some time (not exactly a shock if you've scrolled through his posts on Twitter for like, 30 seconds), and a reported physical conflict with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent that saw Musk supposedly throw his shoulder into Bessent was the breaking point where the billionaire started to get pushed out, per the Post. Trump opted not to pour gasoline on the situation—a shocking decision from a guy not exactly known for his restraint—but also is apparently not interested in reconciling with Musk. An official within the administration told the Post that even if they do make up, 'It'll never be the same.'
