logo
Judge finds manatee die-off proves Florida broke endangered species law

Judge finds manatee die-off proves Florida broke endangered species law

Yahoo24-04-2025

State biologists examine a manatee that starved to death during the big die-off. (Photo via FWC)
Back in the 1990s, when I was on the criminal court beat, I sat through more murder trials than Perry Mason and Ben Matlock combined.
Every case concerned a tragedy, but occasionally there were moments of comedy. One case involved two hitmen who were so inept, they got lost trying to find their target in St. Petersburg. They were so lost, they wound up in Tampa.
There was another murder trial of sorts recently that involved inept killers. In April, it reached its startling conclusion.
Criminal trials are always called 'The State v. The Alleged Killer.' Not this one. In this one, the state wasn't the prosecutor. It was the defendant.
The case didn't involve just one death, either, but nearly 2,000. The victims did nothing to deserve their fate. They were manatees, and they starved to death because the seagrass they depend on for food was wiped out by the consequences of human pollution.
The case was styled as Bear Warriors United v. Lambert. That's as in Alexis Lambert, whom Gov. Ron DeSantis recently appointed as secretary of the Florida Department of Environmental Prot– well, you can't really say 'Protection,' can you? The agency utterly failed to protect the manatees.
Because of the DEP's failure, a federal judge ruled on April 11 that the agency had violated the Endangered Species Act. Nobody shouted out 'Guilty, guilty, guilty!!' as in a famous 'Doonesbury' cartoon, but they sure could have.
'In a state where it's so hard to ever win anything for the environment in court,' said Katrina Shadix, founder of Bear Warriors United, 'this is a big victory.'
The question is: What happens next, in the penalty phase?
'We are going to be compelling the state of Florida to care about the Endangered Species Act,' predicted Jessica Blome, one of the attorneys who represented the Bear Warriors.
The scene of the crime for these many manatee murders was the Indian River Lagoon, once considered the most biodiverse estuary in North America.
The lagoon stretches for 156 miles along Florida's Atlantic coast. It was once blanketed with mangroves, salt marshes, and seagrass. In those days, the lagoon boasted more than 600 species of fish and more than 300 kinds of birds, not to mention dolphins and manatees galore.
'The water used to be clear and the seagrass abundant,' said Peter Barile, a marine scientist who grew up near the shores of the Indian River Lagoon. 'Now the lagoon is dominated by harmful macroalgae.'
He said one particularly bad species called 'Caulerpa' has taken over.
What went wrong? For years, the state and local governments allowed pollution to flow into the lagoon, fueling a series of toxic algae blooms that killed nearly all of the seagrass.
Leaky septic tanks were a major contributor to the blooms, according to Barile. It didn't have to be that way. In 2010, the Legislature passed a law requiring septic tank owners to get an inspection every five years to make sure they weren't polluting the state's waterways.
But septic tank owners rebelled, and two years later legislators repealed the inspections — a move the sponsor of the repeal later conceded was a mistake.
Once the algae blooms wiped out their seagrass, the manatees suffered, especially when the weather turned cold and they sought refuge in the warmth of the lagoon. That's how hundreds of manatees became malnourished. The starvation situation grew so dire, biologists began tossing lettuce out for the hungry manatees to feed on — an unprecedented step.
Despite multiple warnings about what would happen if the seagrass disappeared, Barile said, 'the state let things go on for decades and let builders and the septic tank industry continue dumping waste, and we got a Sewage Apocalypse.'
One of the people issuing those warnings over the years was Barile. Among his many attempts to convince decision-makers to do something, he met with a gubernatorial candidate named Ron DeSantis in 2018.
The candidate seemed open to what Barile was saying. He definitely grasped who would gain from reining in the pollution and promised to fix it.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'If you're doing this right and you're solving the problem, the community stands to reap benefits far in excess of that because you're talking about the fishing industry, you're talking about tourism, you're talking about property values,' DeSantis said at the time.
Then, after he was elected, the governor opted NOT to solve the problem.
DeSantis did convene a panel of respected scientists to recommend ways to prevent toxic algae blooms. But when they turned in their recommendations, he ignored nearly all of them.
Instead, he hired an Israeli company to dump a hydrogen peroxide mixture into our waterways to chase the blooms away temporarily.
But the algae keep coming back because he didn't do anything to stop the pollution that fuels it.
Not even after the manatees started dying.
In most of the murder cases I covered, the accused presented what attorneys call the 'SODDI defense.' That's short for 'Some Other Dude Did It.'
Similarly, the DEP's defense in this suit was: Hey, this wasn't OUR fault.
While the death of so many manatees was 'undeniably tragic,' DEP communications director Alexandra Kuchta said in an emailed statement to me this week, 'the state of Florida has responded with unprecedented investments to improve water quality and restore habitats, especially in critical ecosystems like the Indian River Lagoon.'
In court, 'their argument was, 'We complied with the Clean Water Act, therefore we are immune from being found to have violated the Endangered Species Act,' Blome told me.
To me, that's like saying, 'I was obeying the speed limit when I ran over that pedestrian, so I can't possibly be held responsible for the tire marks on his face.' One doesn't have anything to do with the other.
U.S. District Judge Carlos Mendoza apparently felt the same way.
'Compliance with the Clean Water Act … is just one piece of the regulatory puzzle the state must solve,' he wrote in his 21-page order.
Manatees were dying because of the consequences of the pollution the DEP allowed to flow into the lagoon. That's why, even though its actions may comply with the Clean Water Act, the DEP has repeatedly violated the Endangered Species Act's protection of that threatened marine mammal, the judge ruled.
Don't assume the judge was a pushover for environmental groups. Just last year, he rejected a lawsuit filed by the Save the Manatee Club and its allies that attacked the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the DEP for setting inadequate standards for water quality.
The Endangered Species Act legal argument was a novel one, Shadix told me, but it proved effective.
The DEP's attorneys apparently didn't know how to counter the Bear Warriors complaint. They failed to call as a witness any scientists like Barile to testify, Blome told me. Instead, they called DEP regulators to talk about their water quality rules and enforcement, both of which have proven to be inadequate.
In fact, they conceded that, with the DEP's current level of cleanup efforts, restoring the lagoon's seagrass beds would likely take another 12 to 17 years. That's a loooooong time to put up with dirty water, repeated algae blooms, and manatees going hungry (and dolphins too).
It sounds to me like DEP missed the point of the case. At one point during the hearing, Blome told me, the lead attorney for the DEP stood up waving a letter and dramatically announced that the manatee die-off had officially ended.
The judge didn't think much of that move.
'Defendant believed this letter was a proverbial smoking gun establishing that manatee takings were no longer occurring,' he wrote. 'But even assuming the [die-off] has ended, that would not move the needle in FDEP's favor.'
That's because the conditions that caused the die-off haven't changed much. There was a previous manatee die-off in 2013, and there could be another one this year or next or some other time before full seagrass restoration.
'Is there an ongoing risk of manatee takings in the northern Indian River Lagoon?' the judge wrote. 'The answer is clearly yes.'
Meanwhile, the lack of seagrass beds has affected everything from the manatees' reproduction rate to their feeding behavior — another violation of the Endangered Species Act, which forbids humans from altering either one.
As for the DEP's bragging about its recent efforts to clean up the lagoon at last, the judge noted that those efforts were 'perhaps not so much admirable as legally required.'
I'd like to point out that Florida had a hand in creating the law that the DEP violated.
A major co-author of the Endangered Species Act was a Florida man named Nathaniel Reed — a Republican, I might add. Reed was a birder and a butterfly collector, and he loved fishing so much his mother joked he emerged from the womb with a fly rod in his hands.
The first endangered species list included quite a few Florida animals, including not just the manatee but also the panther, Key deer, and alligator.
The alligators have bounced back so strongly that they're now in every single body of water larger than a mud puddle. That proves that listing a species as endangered doesn't have to be the final word on their future. With hard work and planning, some species can be restored.
But this case marks the second Endangered Species Act case in the last two years that showed Florida officials under DeSantis haven't been taking the law seriously.
Last year, U.S. District Judge Randolph Moss ruled that the DEP was doing an end-run around the act to speed up issuing permits for developers to wipe out wetlands.
The judge ordered the DEP to stop issuing those permits, in effect halting a lot of wetlands-destroying development all over the state. That includes a pair of new 'towns' in Lee and Collier Counties expected to generate so much traffic they're likely to kill off our recovering panther population.
In that case, the DEP's defense was to say, basically, that they broke the law because protecting endangered critters is reeeeeeally haaaaaaard. Imagine a teenager complaining about homework and you've got the right tone.
''It's hard' is NOT a reason to not comply with federal law,' an Earthjustice attorney told me after the judge's ruling, enunciating what I think is one of the bedrock principles of the law.
The DEP is appealing that case, and my guess is that it will wind up appealing this decision as well. Our state officials would rather keep arguing than admit that they disregarded the death of an iconic Florida animal in favor of helping big-money campaign donors keep fouling our waterways.
By the end of this week, Bear Warriors United is scheduled to submit to the judge its proposed punishment for the DEP. Shadix and Blome told me they're considering asking the agency be required to spell out how it's going to speed up cleaning the lagoon and regrowing the seagrass.
If I were the judge, I'd make the penalty even tougher. I would require that everyone from DeSantis on down to the lowliest bureaucrat to march down and line up next to the lagoon. Then I would require each and every one of them to issue a public apology for not fixing this problem sooner.
Then, to really bring it home to them, I'd require them to do the apology right at lunchtime, and tell them they weren't allowed to eat anything for the next six hours.
I don't want this punishment to seem cruel and unusual, but I think making them feel a little of the desperation of the dying manatees would go a long way toward doing justice.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opponents rally as Ford government barrels ahead with Bill 5
Opponents rally as Ford government barrels ahead with Bill 5

Hamilton Spectator

time2 hours ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Opponents rally as Ford government barrels ahead with Bill 5

After an atypically quick process, the Ford government last week passed Bill 5, leaving a large group of opponents scrambling to carry on the fight Bill 5, the Protect Ontario by Unleashing our Economy Act, was passed on June 4, pushed through just before the legislature adjourned for a 137-day summer break. The bill includes sweeping changes to the province's endangered species and environmental protection laws. It also creates 'special economic zones' that can override provincial and municipal laws for certain projects the province wants to fast-track, the likes of Northern Ontario's Ring of Fire. Premier Doug Ford said in a press conference June 5 that he was simply trying to speed up the process to bolster the economy in the face of U.S. tariffs and other threats. 'Bill 5 is going to bring prosperity, especially to our First Nations community, and support them with prosperity, growth, and job opportunities, and we just look forward to getting out throughout the province,' said Ford. Opponents, including many First Nations groups, weren't embracing the changes. 'Our chiefs have made it clear that they fully reject Bill 5, and the Chiefs of Ontario stand by and defend the position of the chiefs,' said Ontario Regional Chief Abram Benedict in a release. 'First Nations rights holders must be at the table, and the government must fulfill its constitutional and treaty obligations.' The Chiefs of Ontario also invited Ford to their annual assembly on June 17-19 to 'understand the real consequences' that the legislation will have. At his press conference, Ford added that many chiefs are on board with Bill 5 and are 'excited for an opportunity – they're excited to be equity partners.' Another controversial part of Bill 5 comes with the changes being made to the Endangered Species Act, which has seen many protections removed. Ontario Nature's Shane Moffat told The Observer that these new changes were a huge concern. 'The scrapping of the Endangered Species Act is a stunning move by this government in the middle of a global biodiversity crisis. That is just one of the most short-sighted decisions I've ever seen,' said Moffat. He added that this legislation will allow developers to register and then be able to operate simply without any 'clear requirements to protect air, water, forests, other important natural ecosystems and species habitats.' Kitchener Centre MPP and Green Party deputy leader Aislinn Clancy echoed that sentiment, and criticized the speed at which the bill was pushed through. 'There were different kinds of filibustering, delays for votes, and interruptions of the normal process. The government itself allocated time, and it put a firm stop on things, so used their toolbox to kind of limit further debate on the bill,' said Clancy. She said there was hope that the widespread opposition to the bill could lead to a better dialogue with the community. 'If there was more time over the summer, the government could kind of hear from their communities about the disapproval and the lack of support this has in our communities. Clancy added that there has been a pattern from the Conservative government of putting legislation through without consultation. 'They put it together without consulting with Indigenous people in the first place. 'Right off the start, they've broken trust and broken norms and gone back on their word. So, I think the opposition parties were trying to express how unpopular this bill was.' Clancy noted that another issue that faces this bill is the major conflict of interest that could arise from the power the bill gives to the cabinet. 'It puts the cabinet in an unhealthy position where they could make decisions to pursue their interests and put the needs of a corporation ahead of anything else,' she explained. She pointed to the likes of controversies around the Ontario Place redevelopment, a new landfill site in Dresden and the construction of Highway 413 through the Greenbelt as examples of what might be pushed through under Bill 5. 'They could use these special economic zones anywhere in Ontario to justify overriding all rules. I don't think anybody should be complacent about this power grab. They should be speaking out against this awful threat to democracy,' said Clancy. Now that the bill has passed, opposition MPPs and nature groups have to shift gears from stopping this bill to attempting to get it repealed. Clancy added that this will be similar to the Greenbelt situation, where people were in the streets working to get that piece of legislation repealed. 'I anticipate that, over the summer, Indigenous communities have said, 'This is idle no more, part two. So they've been determined to block roads. I think there will be court challenges. I think political parties, partner organizations, and environmental groups, labour is galvanized by this as well,' said Clancy. She added that many groups will come together to show that they believe in 'due process and fair democracies'. 'I think we're going to see a lot of groups uniting across the province and demonstrating a really aggressive distaste for this kind of sweeping, authoritarian-style, Trump-style legislation.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Cayce mayor claims funds for employee bonuses came from grant. Staff disagrees
Cayce mayor claims funds for employee bonuses came from grant. Staff disagrees

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Cayce mayor claims funds for employee bonuses came from grant. Staff disagrees

Last year, amid a tense budget season for the city of Cayce, the city council axed a proposed pay bump for staff and instead adopted a one-time retention bonus. Last year's decision became a point of contention during this year's budget season, with the city's mayor and its staff disagreeing on where the money came from. At the city's last council meeting in June, Mayor Elise Partin called out Councilman Hunter Sox for comments he made at a May meeting about last year's budget process and how he found money in the budget for staff retention bonuses. Sox also posited there had been enough money for the cost-of-living adjustments, which were ultimately cut from the budget in favor of the one-time bonuses. 'I also understand [that money] was recurring and we could've used that for a cost-of-living adjustment then,' Sox said at the May meeting. At the next meeting, in June, Partin encouraged Sox to set up a meeting with the finance director to make sure he understood the numbers. 'What [the finance director] told me about that money was vastly different from what you shared in the last meeting. It actually included using some money that was a gift from the Boyd Foundation and another grant so I know you want to get that right,' Partin said, during the June 3 council meeting. But the money for staff bonuses didn't come from the Boyd Foundation, a Columbia-based nonprofit that funds a number of projects throughout the Midlands, or from other grants, a city staff member clarified after the meeting. The bonuses were directly funded by excess operating revenues at the end of the year, city spokesperson Ashley Hunter confirmed in a statement to The State. 'The public accusation that our Cayce financial staff utilized charitable donations from the Boyd Foundation or another grant to fund staff retention bonuses is something we take very seriously,' Hunter said. 'If the allegation were true, this would be a misappropriation of funds, a breach of the public's trust and could have caused a revocation of our Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting ... our city staff and leaders worked tirelessly to make sure this was a fiscally responsible budget.' The $2.1 million grant from the Boyd Foundation was allocated to be used for a visitor's center building at the city's 12,000 Year History Park. Sox said he believed Partin targeted the comment at him during the council meeting in an attempt to discredit his work on the previous year's budget and that it was disrespectful to the city's finance staff. 'She knows it'll be a campaign talking point for me and wants to find a way to not get me re-elected and not let me have any sort of win,' said Sox, who will be up for re-election alongside Mayor Pro-Tem Tim James in the fall. 'I don't need to win. The win is for the taxpayer and for staff, not for me.' Partin said she wasn't immediately available to answer questions, but said in a statement that she had a meeting with the finance director and 'took notes and understood that there was not money left over' during the last budget process. 'At the time, I was sharing information that I had gotten directly from the city's finance director, and I was not aware that it was incorrect. If it is I still need information that would explain my notes and what was said,' Partin told The State over text. The spat is another in a long line of disagreements and tense conversations that've happened within the walls of Cayce's city hall in the last few years, as Partin and other council members have sparred over everything from seats on various government boards to disagreements over whether to take something into executive session. 'It's simply the mayor trying to continue to be divisive and build up ill will in the community. It's sad, but that seems to be the climate right now,' Councilman Phil Carter told The State. At the May meeting, things were tense between Partin and Mayor Pro-Tem Tim James as the council voted to go into executive session to discuss the search for a new city manager. Partin advocated for discussing the matter in open session. Council members pushed back. After consulting the town's attorney, who explained the matter was something that can be discussed during executive session, James and Carter argued for taking the matter into executive session, which council ultimately did. 'If council doesn't want to take a vote on it, doesn't want to be transparent, that's fine,' Partin said. 'We're very transparent,' James responded. The friction comes as a number of top administrators in the city have either left or announced plans to leave. Within the last year, Cayce has cycled through two police chiefs and two city managers. At a May council meeting, outgoing City Manager Jim Crosland announced that the city's finance director was also set to leave.

Florida black bear caught on camera taking a dip in hot tub, napping 6 hours under lanai
Florida black bear caught on camera taking a dip in hot tub, napping 6 hours under lanai

CBS News

timea day ago

  • CBS News

Florida black bear caught on camera taking a dip in hot tub, napping 6 hours under lanai

Residents of an affluent community in Southwest Florida were shocked to find an uninvited guest in their midst over the weekend, one with fur, claws and a taste for luxury. On June 8, landscapers at Punta Gorda Isles spotted a black bear running through a backyard and called 911, according to CBS affiliate WINK. Punta Gorda police officers then went to the residence to warn the homeowner about the bear in his yard. Bear caught on security camera lounging in hot tub and lanai Homeowner Lynn Martin said at first he thought they were joking — that's until he checked his home security cameras. The bear was caught on video taking a dip in his hot tub. It then moved to a couch underneath a lanai, a a type of covered outdoor area commonly found in Hawaiian and Florida architecture. "He just took the pillows off of the couch and was getting ready to take a nap," Martin said. And nap it did — for nearly six hours. FWC responds with bear trap and hazing techniques Punta Gorda police contacted the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. They sent officers who placed a trap on the property. FWC officials then used hazing techniques to encourage it to leave. The bear eventually moved to a nearby vacant lot and climbed a tree. FWC placed a trap at the base of the tree and maintained a presence in the area. People who live in the neighborhood said the bear clearly meant no harm. "He's not looking for any trouble, that's for sure," Martin said. The following day, the bear was spotted napping in another tree in the neighborhood. The FWC waited for the bear to wake before trapping it. The bear was then safely relocated back to its natural habitat. Deadly black bear attack reporter near Naples This was not the first encounter with a black bear in Florida this year. On May 5, black bears attacked and killed a man and his dog near Naples, according to the FWC. Robert Markel, 89, and his dog were not killed at the same time, according to the FWC which believes more than one bear was involved. That night, FWC officers killed the three bears in the area. DNA samples from the scene and the bears were sent to Gainesville for testing. Necropsy results revealed that one bear contained the partial remains of Markel, according to the FWC. Testing showed that the same bear's DNA was present on Markel's body, inside his home and on the dog's body. Wildlife officials have not explicitly said that bear is the one that killed Markel, an autopsy by the Collier County Medical Examiner found that Markel's cause of death is consistent with a bear attack. Florida man bit by bear while protecting dog near Pensacola A few weeks after Markel's attack, a man in Gulf Breeze, near Pensacola, reported that he had been bitten by a bear while protecting his dog. The man said he had just gotten home from work and was letting his dog out when the wild animal charged at them in his backyard. The man said after the bear bit him, he kicked it in the face. He said that's when the bear charged him again. He said he was able to make it to the house, shut the door on the bear and call 911. The man was taken to the hospital where he was treated and released. Florida's growing black bear population leads to more encounters Florida's black bear population, once classified as threatened, has rebounded in recent decades. The state has more than 4,000 black bears, according to the FWC. Bear sightings and interactions with people have become more common, particularly in rural areas of north and central Florida. The FWC has an interactive bear map to show bear related calls. FWC tips: What to do if you encounter a bear "First things first, stand your ground. Make yourself look large, talk to the bear in a calm fashion. Do not run, do not play dead. If you have small dogs or small children, pick them up. Make yourself look large. If a bear is touching you, you need to fight back. So if you're in Florida and you know you're having a conflict with a bear, fight back, because people have successfully been able to fight off bears," Mike Orlando, the FWC's bear management program coordinator, said. He added it's important to never intentionally approach a bear and never feed one, either intentionally or unintentionally.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store