JD Vance refers to Sen. Alex Padilla as 'Jose Padilla' days after LA incident
Vice President JD Vance referred to Senator Alex Padilla as "Jose Padilla" during a visit to Los Angeles on Friday, just days after Padilla was forcibly removed from a press conference while attempting to question Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem about immigration. JD Vance referred to Alex Padilla as 'Jose Padilla.'(REUTERS)
'I was hoping Jose Padilla would be here to ask a question, but unfortunately, I guess he decided not to show up because there wasn't the theater,' Vance told the press.
Vance's remark has since gone viral on social media, sparking reactions.
One person wrote on X, 'Everything is in one side and JD Vance smile one side. Meme guys start shipping few masterpieces of JD please.'
Another wrote, 'Vance delivered that with a smile and a jab perfect way to call out political theater without breaking a sweat.'
A third person commented, 'To be fair, no one knows who Alex is, but everyone knows Jose Padilla the famous criminal.'
Another user wrote, 'It's hilarious because Padilla kept saying who he was and that he's a senator and Vance playing into that by calling him the wrong name on purpose.'
Also Read: Donald Trump said Democrat Senator Alex Padilla 'looked like an illegal,' claims biographer Padilla Removed from Noem's Press Conference
On June 13, Sen. Padilla was forcibly removed and handcuffed at a media briefing in Los Angeles led by Kristi Noem on immigration. According to video footage, Padilla was escorted into a hallway, shoved face-first to the ground, and handcuffed.
The Department of Homeland Security claimed Padilla did not properly identify himself and alleged he lunged toward Secretary Noem.
Padilla disputes the account. He said he had been waiting for a separate scheduled briefing with military officials when he learned Noem was in the same building and decided to attend her media event.
"I was there peacefully," he told reporters. "At one point, I had a question, and so I began to ask a question. I was almost immediately forcibly removed from the room, I was forced to the ground, and I was handcuffed."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
21 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump again snubs spy chief Tulsi Gabbard's take on Iran's nuclear programme, says ‘she is wrong'
US President Donald Trump said that the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, was 'wrong' when she earlier stated said that the US believed Iran wasn't building a nuclear weapon, whereas he suggested that it would be 'very hard to stop' Israel's strikes on Iran in order to work out a possible ceasefire. He bluntly said, 'She's wrong.' Trump echoed remarks made by Gabbard when speaking to reporters on Tuesday. 'I don't care what she said. I think they were very close to having it," he had said. While testifying to Congress in March that the US intelligence community continued to believe that Tehran was not building a nuclear weapon, Tulsi said, 'The (intelligence community) continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon.' She took to X on Friday and clarified, 'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly. President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.' She added her testimony was taken "out of context in a way to manufacture division'. Tulsi in March called Iran's enriched uranium stockpile as unprecedented for a state without such weapons and mentioned the government was monitoring the situation closely. She also specified that Iran had begun conversing about nuclear weapons in public, 'emboldening nuclear weapons advocates within Iran's decision-making apparatus.' The assessment presented by Gabbard has not altered, Reuters reported citing a source with access to US intelligence reports. US spy services also assessed that it would take up to three years for Iran to build a warhead with which it could strike a target of its choice. Some experts, however, argue that Iran could produce and deliver a crude, untested nuclear device in a much shorter timeframe, though its effectiveness would be uncertain. Trump has often dismissed the conclusions of US intelligence agencies, which he and his supporters have accused, without offering evidence, of being part of a "deep state" conspiracy of officials working against his presidency. During his first term, he frequently clashed with US intelligence agencies, notably over their judgement that Moscow interfered in the 2016 presidential election to benefit him, as well as his willingness to accept Russian President Vladimir Putin's denials of involvement. The White House stated that Trump would decide involvement in the Iran-Israel conflict over the next two weeks. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu defended a week of airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military facilities, claiming that Tehran was close to acquiring a nuclear warhead. Iran, however, denies pursuing nuclear weapons, insisting that its uranium enrichment programme is intended solely for peaceful purposes. (With inputs from Reuters and AP)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
‘Maybe it won't be necessary': Trump still undecided on Iran strike as diplomacy continues
Trump said that striking Iran's underground Fordo nuclear facility 'maybe won't be necessary', hinting at a continued window for diplomacy read more President Donald Trump has hinted that US involvement in the ongoing Israel-Iran war might 'won't be necessary,' a day after setting a two-week deadline for potential American strikes on the Shi'ite nation. 'I would say two weeks would be the maximum,' Trump told reporters on Friday (June 20). When asked whether Israel was capable of destroying Iran's underground Fordo nuclear facility, Trump said, 'Maybe it won't be necessary.' The president's statement indicates he still remains undecided on a potential military action against Iran and is open to a non-military approach. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Airstrikes unlikely to destroy Iranian nuclear sites' A US military campaign could damage Iran's nuclear sites, such as Fordo and Natanz, but experts warn that airstrikes cannot erase Iran's nuclear programme altogether. Such an attack might instead strengthen Tehran's determination to develop nuclear weapons for self-preservation. Analysts caution that US involvement in the conflict could lead to significant repercussions. Iran might retaliate against the roughly 40,000 US troops in West Asia or critical infrastructure, including the Strait of Hormuz, which carries 20 per cent of the world's oil supply. Diplomacy between US and Iran Washington and Tehran are engaged in both direct and indirect talks, with the US pressing Iran to halt its uranium enrichment programme. US special envoy Steve Witkoff and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi have held multiple phone conversations since Israel's attacks started, marking the most substantive direct dialogue since April 2025 negotiations in Oman and Italy. According to three diplomats cited by Reuters, who spoke anonymously due to the sensitivity of the issue, Araqchi insisted that Tehran would not resume negotiations unless Israel ceased its strikes. The discussions also touched on an American proposal from May 2025 to establish a regional consortium for uranium enrichment outside Iran, which Tehran has so far rejected. A regional diplomat close to Tehran noted that Araqchi hinted at potential 'flexibility' on the nuclear issue if Washington could pressure Israel to end the conflict. Trump disagrees with DNI's remarks on Iran Meanwhile, Trump on Friday asserted thaty his director of national intelligence was 'wrong' when she testified that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had not taken steps to revive the country's suspended nuclear weapons programme. A reporter asked, 'What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon? Your intelligence community said they have no evidence.' The president responded, 'Then my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Your DNI [director of national intelligence], Tulsi Gabbard,' the reporter replied. 'She's wrong,' Trump said.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Trump hints firing Fed Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, calls him 'numbskull'
The Republican leader, who regularly berates Powell over the bank's decisions not to lower interest rates, took to Truth Social to smear the banker as a 'numbskull,' 'moron' and 'obvious Trump Hater' read more US President Donald Trump arrives to attend the G7 Leaders' Summit at the Rocky Mountain resort town of Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, June 15, 2025. File Image/Reuters US President Donald Trump escalated his criticism of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell on Friday – publicly mulling whether to fire the official and appoint himself to the central bank. The Republican leader, who regularly berates Powell over the bank's decisions not to lower interest rates, took to Truth Social to smear the banker as a 'numbskull,' 'moron' and 'obvious Trump Hater.' 'I fully understand that my strong criticism of him makes it more difficult for him to do what he should be doing, lowering Rates, but I've tried it all different ways,' said Trump, who appointed Powell during his first term. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'I've been nice, I've been neutral, and I've been nasty, and nice and neutral didn't work!' Powell's term does not conclude until next year. He has said his dismissal would be unlawful, and that he has no intention of stepping down voluntary if Trump asks. 'I don't know why the Board doesn't override this Total and Complete Moron!' Trump posted. 'Maybe, just maybe, I'll have to change my mind about firing him? But regardless, his Term ends shortly!' Trump lashed out after the Fed held interest rates steady for a fourth consecutive meeting on Wednesday, forecasting higher inflation and cooler growth as Trump's tariffs take hold. The projections were its first since Trump unleashed sweeping 10 percent tariffs on almost all trading partners in April.
