SF fountain that divides public opinion to be fenced off
SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) — A controversial fountain along San Francisco's waterfront has been ordered closed off from the public. The Vaillancourt Fountain across from the Ferry Building at Embarcadero Plaza is being fenced off in the interest of public safety, according to city officials.
A representative with the San Francisco Recreation and Parks Department told KRON4.com that a recent report had made it clear that the fountain, in its current state, is a potential hazard.
'The Vaillancourt Fountain was designed for people to interact with,' an official said. 'This report made it clear that is no longer safe.'
Two Bay Area restaurants named among 'world's best' by prestigious global ranking
According to a Rec and Parks official, parts of the fountain are 'cracked, corroded, or missing,' including a key support rod in one of the structure's arms. The fountain also contains hazardous materials like lead and asbestos.
'As a result, we are fencing it off,' a parks official said.
People will still be able to view the fountain, but not to walk through it or get close to it.
Installed in 1971, the Vaillancourt Fountain divides public opinion. Fans of brutalist architecture and preservationists have defended the 710-ton sculpture, which has been inactive as a fountain for the past year due to a pump failure.
Recently, plans were unveiled for a $30-million renovation of the Embarcadero Plaza and adjoining Sue Bierman Park. The fountain was not pictured in renderings for the planned renovations.
Armand Vaillancourt, the Canadian artist behind the fountain, visited SF last month to try and urge city officials to preserve the structure. Parks officials maintain that the report will have no impact on long-term plans for the future of Vaillancourt Fountain.
'This step is strictly about ensuring public safety,' officials told KRON4. 'It doesn't impact the timeline or scope of the broader Embarcadero Plaza and Sue Bierman Park Renovation Project.'
Parks officials maintain that long-term decisions regarding the fountain's future will follow public process established by the San Francisco Arts Commission, including review from the Visual Arts Committee, and will include opportunities for community impact.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Minnesota DNR to offer 4 elk tags for 2025 hunting season
Jun. 10—ST. PAUL — The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources is offering four elk licenses this year — down from 10 in 2024 — and the tags will be limited to the Caribou-Vita area of northeast Kittson County, the DNR said Tuesday, June 10. Minnesota hunters have through Thursday, July 3, to apply for one of the four elk licenses, the DNR said. "We are reducing opportunities for elk harvest this year to make sure Minnesota's elk populations continue to thrive," Kelsie LaSharr, Minnesota DNR elk coordinator, said in a statement. "The number of permits available is based on the lower-than-expected number of elk we counted during our 2025 aerial flights and recent trends in population growth. "The DNR will continue to work with Tribal Nations, local landowners, agricultural producers, legislators, local government officials and state agencies to manage Minnesota's elk sustainably." The Red Lake Nation in March announced that it will offer 20 tribal elk tags in northwest Minnesota this year — double the number offered last year — for a season that will begin Sept. 15. Much of northwest Minnesota falls within an area covered by a treaty that Red Lake tribal leaders signed with the U.S. government on Oct. 2, 1863. As part of the 1863 Old Crossing Treaty, the Pembina and Red Lake bands of Ojibwe ceded some 11 million acres of land in northwest Minnesota and eastern and northeastern North Dakota to the U.S. government. There are currently three recognized herds in northwest Minnesota: Grygla, Kittson Central and Caribou-Vita. The Grygla area zone remains closed to state-licensed elk hunters, and this year, the Kittson Central zone will also be closed to state-licensed hunters. The Red Lake Band, meanwhile, will offer 10 "either-sex" tags good for either a bull or a cow elk and 10 "antlerless" tags, Jay Huseby, wildlife director for the Red Lake DNR, told the Herald in March. The band won't be taking any elk from the Grygla herd, which has lagged below management goals for more than a decade, Huseby said. The Minnesota DNR tallied 63 antlerless elk and 12 bulls in the Kittson Central herd near Lancaster in early January during its annual winter aerial survey. By comparison, the DNR counted 50 antlerless elk and 25 bulls in the Kittson Central herd during the 2023 survey. The DNR didn't fly the elk survey in 2024 because there wasn't enough snow to accurately spot elk from the air. All of the elk in the Caribou-Vita survey block, where the herd ranges between northeast Kittson County and Vita, Manitoba, were on the Canadian side of the border during the January 2025 survey. The DNR counted 128 antlerless elk and six bulls on the Manitoba side of the border. That was down from 227 elk — 96 in Minnesota and 131 in Manitoba — during the 2023 survey, but the DNR only surveyed the first 4 3/4 miles of Manitoba this year, LaSharr told the Herald in a February story, an area that represented about 25% of the Manitoba survey block. The DNR counted 18 antlerless elk and six bulls in the Grygla herd, down from 18 antlerless elk and 11 bulls in 2023. Minnesota hunters can apply for one of two seasons: * Two licenses are available to harvest either a bull or antlerless elk in the Caribou-Vita (Zone 30) during the A season, Saturday, Sept. 13, through Sunday, Sept. 21. * Two licenses are available to harvest an antlerless elk in the Caribou-Vita (Zone 30) B season, Saturday, Sept. 27, through Sunday, Oct. 5. This is a once-in-a-lifetime hunt for Minnesota residents. Successful applicants who choose not to purchase a permit will be eligible for future elk hunts and receive an application point toward their 10-year application history preference. Given the reduction in available state permits this year, no tags will be available for the 10-year application history pool or for eligible agricultural landowners who reside within elk range, the DNR said. Hunters must select a season and can apply individually or in parties of two at any license agent, online at or by telephone at (888) 665-4236. There is a nonrefundable application fee of $5 per hunter. Total license cost for selected applicants is $288. Successful hunters must present the animal within 24 hours of harvest for registration and collection of biological samples to screen for diseases or other health-related issues. In 2024, 4,307 individuals or parties (up to two people) applied for one of the 10 state-issued elk licenses, DNR statistics show. If a similar number of individuals or parties apply this year, the odds of drawing a tag would be about 0.093%, or 1 in 1,077. * On the web: More information is available on the DNR's elk hunting webpage at . For more on Minnesota's elk, check out the DNR's elk management webpage at .
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Shocking anti-ICE riots in LA remind me of two violent mobs I lived through
A new view on old terrors I'm a single person. Scared. This is my country. My entire life. My ancestors came from the old world. Russia. My mother was born in Liverpool. Inheritance? Nothing. Immigrants, they came with nothing. No relatives here — nobody. Grandma, who spoke no English, scrubbed stoops on the Lower East Side. Grandpa, a tailor who made no money, kept just enough to apply for legitimate citizenship. To pay for their taxes, mortgage, children, doctors, schooling, food, old age, transportation, future — no help from the government. Forget stories about immigrants arriving with hidden jewels sewn into their skirts. There were no gems. No hems. Hard-knock life When I was in public school, long ago but so painful that even now I remember it clearly — even though at this moment I can't remember where I left my phone — back then I was given a used secondhand dress. Pale blue. Silky fabric. Garnished with fluffy fake fur. Excited, I paraded in it around our house. Enter tragedy. A stain. From where, how I got it, who knows. Nothing but a scissor would've removed it. I was crazy. Inconsolable. 'No problem,' said my mother. 'I'll wash it.' WASH? Accented with fake fur? The fake-o crapola immediately turned stiff — like cardboard — and peeled off. My mother worked two jobs to be able to feed me, dress me, take me to doctors, buy medicines because I was always ill. But this was my only party dress. I was inconsolable. That's 90 years ago. I still remember it. By the time I could buy my own clothes I was a working reporter in Asia. The recent unrest and turmoil in Los Angeles has reprised two terrors I survived. One in Jakarta, another in Tehran. Jakarta. An ungovernable mob flooded the roads. Barricaded the streets. Angry about some official edict. Came with guns, flames, knives, flags, signs, the usual. We were locked in traffic. Terrified. Me a foreigner. Alone except the driver, who knew to call someone as our car was rocked side to side, bottles thrown at our windows — and people came to save us. Thrilling escape Another time. Iran. A guest of the Shah, I was up country in Isfahan, a hotel owned by his then-Majesty's twin sister Princess Ashraf. I was in their official black car. Their official driver. En route back to Tehran. It was the first days, the exact moment, the move had begun to oust the Shah. A small village through which we drove saw their movie theater set on fire. If not protected by the Shah, who knows what might've happened. His people caught us en route, escorted us with guns to the hotel, watched as I packed up and then threw me at 5 a.m. onto a plane out of Iran and home. That story — and its saga of embassy personnel sheltered by my late friend Canadian Ambassador Ken Taylor — I mightn't be here today. He, too, spirited me out and onto a waiting Pan Am jet. The story was immortalized in Ben Affleck's 2012 Oscar-winning movie 'Argo.' It's terrifying. They looking to turn us into Syria, Iran, Venezuela, Russia — the cauldrons from which they fled?
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Lawsuit accuses province of failing to protect Saskatchewan River delta, violating treaty obligations
Cumberland House Cree Nation says the provincial government is not protecting the Saskatchewan River system, and now it's time to take the province to court. Lawyers for the First Nation in northeastern Saskatchewan filed a statement of claim Tuesday in Saskatoon Court of King's Bench, alleging the government has failed to uphold its treaty obligations. It names the government of Saskatchewan as the defendant. For generations, the people of Cumberland House Cree Nation have depended on the Saskatchewan River delta, the largest freshwater river delta in North America, stretching 9,700 square kilometres from northeast Saskatchewan into western Manitoba, the lawsuit says. But government-approved activities upstream — such as dams, irrigation and industrial and urban uses — have dramatically reduced the amount of water that reaches the delta, continually degrading the ecosystem, the lawsuit says. That has affected the ability of the people there to exercise their treaty rights to maintain their way of life, Cumberland House Cree Nation Chief Rene Chaboyer said at a Tuesday news conference in Saskatoon. "We feel that our hand is being forced to … move forward into the court of law to seek justice, and today's a very important day in the history of our community, our province, in our country." He and other community members spoke about how the delta has changed over their lifetimes: the water is no longer safe to drink, species of fish have disappeared, moose are migrating elsewhere, birds are changing their migration patterns and muskrats are hard to find, they said. "Back in the day, it was healthy.… Nowadays it's scary," Chaboyer said. Treaty 5 covers an area of about 260,000 square kilometres in parts of what are now Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. It was signed in 1875, with the ancestors of Cumberland House signing on in 1876. The inhabitants agreed to share their land with the newcomers in exchange for promises, including that Cumberland House would be free to continue to hunt, fish, trap and harvest in the treaty territory, the lawsuit says. "The treaties are what allowed the newcomers to come and settle in Saskatchewan, and the treaties were only made because of that promise that Cumberland House Cree Nation could continue to maintain its way of life," Tim Dickson, the First Nation's lawyer, said at Tuesday's news conference. "That treaty promise is part of the foundation of Canada and of Canadian law. It's protected by the Canadian Constitution and it's enforceable in court." WATCH | Massive Saskatchewan irrigation plan threatens wildlife, opponents say: The Saskatchewan River delta is the First Nation's homeland and "essential" to their culture and identity, Dickson said. CBC News has reached out to the Saskatchewan government for its response to the lawsuit. Activities upstream — including hydroelectric dams, water diversion and withdrawal of water for irrigation, industrial uses and drinking water — have starved the delta of its vital sediment and polluted the water, Cumberland House is arguing in its lawsuit. The proposed construction of the $1.15-billion Lake Diefenbaker irrigation megaproject, which the government has committed to beginning this year, is also seen as "a very serious threat," Dickson said. Cumberland House has tried to engage with the province on the project, but "there has been very little engagement from the government," Dickson said. Instead, residents have watched as, year after year, the delta degrades. The loss of the delta would be felt not just by the people who live there, but by everyone, said Cumberland House Cree Nation Coun. Beverly Goulet. At the end of Tuesday's news conference, she responded to a question asked earlier by a journalist about how much compensation the community was seeking. "Instead of worrying about money, because we certainly can't take it with us when we pass … remember the children," Goulet said. "That's who we want to protect, because we've done enough damage to this planet. Like, what are they going to have? What have we done? "So, let's all think about that."
