Pentagon sends second aircraft carrier to Mideast as Iran tensions rise
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has ordered additional forces to the Middle East, including the USS Carl Vinson carrier strike group and aircraft, as the U.S. vows to continue its strikes against Iran-backed Houthi rebels and as tensions with Tehran are increasing over its nuclear program.
The Carl Vinson will arrive in the region after completing exercises in the Indo-Pacific. The department is also prolonging the Harry S. Truman carrier strike group's deployment in the region, Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell said in a statement Tuesday. The unusual two-carrier presence repeats a show of force by the Biden administration last year.
"Secretary Hegseth continues to make clear that, should Iran or its proxies threaten American personnel and interests in the region, the United States will take decisive action to defend our people,' Parnell said.
Hegseth has also reinforced U.S. military capability in the Middle East with more warplanes, the Pentagon said Tuesday, amid the bombing campaign in Yemen and tensions with Iran.
The Pentagon's brief statement did not specify which aircraft were being deployed or where precisely they were sent.
However, as many as six B-2 bombers have relocated in the past week or so to a U.S.-British military base on the Indian Ocean island of Diego Garcia, according to U.S. officials, speaking on condition of anonymity.
Maintenance crew work on B-2 stealth bombers at Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri in March 2011. |
US AIR FORCE / VIA REUTERS
Experts say that puts the B-2s, which have stealth technology and are equipped to carry the heaviest U.S. bombs and nuclear weapons, in an ideal position to operate in the Middle East.
"Should Iran or its proxies threaten American personnel and interests in the region, the United States will take decisive action to defend our people," Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell said in a statement.
The U.S. military's Strategic Command has declined to say how many B-2s have reached Diego Garcia and noted that it does not comment on exercises or operations involving the B-2.
U.S. President Donald Trump threatened Iran on Sunday with bombing and secondary tariffs if Tehran did not come to an agreement with Washington over its nuclear program.
While B-2 bombers have been employed to strike buried Houthi targets in Yemen, most experts say use of the stealthy bomber is overkill there and the targets aren't buried so deeply.
However, the B-2 is equipped to carry America's most potent bomb — the 30,000-pound GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator. That is the weapon that experts say could be used to strike Iran's nuclear program.
There are only 20 B-2 bombers in the Air Force's inventory so they are usually used sparingly.
The moves come after Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said Monday the U.S. would receive a strong blow if Trump followed through with his threats.
Revolutionary Guards Aerospace Commander Amirali Hajizadeh threatened U.S. forces in the Middle East, noting American bases in the Middle East and adding: "They are in a glass house and should not throw stones."
One official said that the U.S. military was also moving some air defense capabilities from Asia to the Middle East.
In his 2017-2021 term, Trump withdrew the U.S. from a 2015 deal between Iran and world powers that placed strict limits on Tehran's disputed nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Trump also reimposed sweeping U.S. sanctions.
Since then, Iran has far surpassed that deal's limits on uranium enrichment.
Western powers accuse Iran of having a clandestine agenda to develop nuclear weapons capability by enriching uranium to a high level of fissile purity, above what they say is justifiable for a civilian atomic energy program. Tehran says its nuclear program is wholly for civilian energy purposes.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said last week that there would be no direct negotiations with the U.S. as long as the Trump administration maintains its "military threats.' In an interview with NBC News over the weekend, Trump said "if they don't make a deal, there will be bombing.'
The deployments also come as the U.S. has launched a series of strikes against Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen, which Trump said have "decimated' the group. The Houthis began attacking commercial ships in the Red Sea in late 2023, ostensibly in support of the Palestinians after the Israel-Hamas war erupted in Gaza.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Mainichi
11 hours ago
- The Mainichi
US and China are holding trade talks in London after Trump-Xi phone call
LONDON (AP) -- High-level delegations from the United States and China are meeting in London on Monday to try and shore up a fragile truce in a trade dispute that has roiled the global economy, A Chinese delegation led by Vice Premier He Lifeng is due to meet U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer at an undisclosed location in the city. The talks are due to last at least a day. They follow negotiations in Geneva last month that brought a temporary respite in the trade war. The two countries announced May 12 they had agreed to a 90-day suspension of most of the 100%-plus tariffs they had imposed on each other in an escalating trade war that had sparked fears of recession. Since then, the U.S. and China have exchanged angry words over advanced semiconductors that power artificial intelligence, "rare earths" that are vital to carmakers and other industries, and visas for Chinese students at American universities. President Donald Trump spoke at length with Chinese leader Xi Jinping by phone last Thursday in an attempt to put relations back on track. Trump announced on social media the next day that trade talks would be held on Monday in London. The U.K. government says it is providing the venue and logistics but is not involved in the talks. "We are a nation that champions free trade and have always been clear that a trade war is in nobody's interests, so we welcome these talks," the British government said in a statement.
The Mainichi
12 hours ago
- The Mainichi
Editorial: Amid global warming threat, Japan's financial sector must help protect planet
Neglecting climate change initiatives to appease the U.S. administration of Donald Trump will create a breeding ground for future problems. Major financial institutions in Japan and the U.S. have successively withdrawn from the Net-Zero Banking Alliance (NZBA), an international framework aiming for decarbonization. Following the departure of U.S. banks including Citigroup Inc., Japan's three megabanks, including Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group Inc., followed suit this spring. The NZBA is a system that encourages financial institutions to select their investment and lending targets based on whether they are contributing to decarbonization, thereby promoting the exit of businesses with a large environmental impact, such as coal-fired power generation. It is expected that the initiative will prove effective in pushing for the realization of a carbon-free society with the power of finance to influence corporate activities. The tide has changed, however, with the return of Trump, who has dismissed the climate crisis as "fake." Criticism within the ruling Republican Party has grown over financial institutions aligning themselves to restrict investments and loans for fossil fuel businesses. In some U.S. states, there have been moves to exclude NZBA member banks from transactions, on the grounds their stance contradicts the Trump administration's energy policy. U.S. banks that have left the NZBA are already actively investing and lending for fossil fuel projects. The Japanese megabanks have not provided reasons for their departure, but it is believed that they became wary of the risk of their business in the U.S. being disadvantaged under the scrutiny of the Trump administration. The banks stress that they will strengthen climate change measures, but by following the lead of American banks, they cannot evade being labeled deceptive. The NZBA was launched in 2021 at the proposal of Mark Carney, former governor of the Bank of England and current Prime Minister of Canada. Leading financial institutions worldwide signed up, pledging to collaborate on decarbonization, aiming for net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. European banks that place an emphasis on climate change measures and many in emerging and developing countries have not withdrawn. Within Japan, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Group Inc. remains a member of the alliance. The target of keeping the average global rise in temperatures to no more than 1.5 degrees Celsius compared to pre-industrial levels as a measure against global warming is under threat. It is essential to make efforts to keep international cooperation on decarbonization from backpedaling. Megabanks operating globally bear a responsibility to act with the planet's interests in mind.
Yomiuri Shimbun
12 hours ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Ukraine's Previous President Says He Knows How to Win over Trump
Serhiy Morgunov/For The Washington Post Poroshenko at his party's office in February. KYIV – The walls of the windowless meeting room where former Ukrainian president Petro Poroshenko receives his guests are festooned with mementos from his political glory days – particularly those celebrating his past relationship with President Donald Trump. Poroshenko is seeking to leverage that experience to rebuild his political profile as the man who can deal with the mercurial American president, especially since his chief rival and Ukraine's current leader, President Volodymyr Zelensky, has struggled to secure lasting support from Trump. But Poroshenko, a businessman whose candy empire made him a billionaire, will have to clear his name first. Elected amid a wave of pro-Western sentiment in 2014, he later persuaded Trump to become the first U.S. president to arm Ukraine with lethal weapons. In 2019, he lost his reelection bid to Zelensky – a comedian known for playing a president on TV – and a feud has simmered between the two men ever since. Earlier this year, Ukraine slapped sanctions on Poroshenko, who is now opposition leader in parliament and widely believed to be eyeing another presidential run whenever a ceasefire is reached and Ukraine can safely organize elections. He has already been subject to multiple corruption investigations. Ukraine's state security services said the latest sanctions were based on allegations of threats to national security, which Poroshenko denies. The day before the sanctions were announced, Zelensky warned a decision had been made that was about 'protecting our state and restoring justice.' The sanctions have restricted Poroshenko from accessing his bank accounts. He has also been banned from travel, penalties that he says are politically motivated and intended to diminish his influence and that are only harming Ukraine. Poroshenko is now fighting them in court. In the meantime, he insists Ukraine's ongoing negotiations with Russia and its dealings with the United States must include opposition voices like his – or they risk losing legitimacy and key Western support. 'I've worked with President Trump for more than three years and I'm proud I have a legacy of that,' the 59-year-old said in a recent interview, referring to their overlap in office from 2016 to 2019. 'Each meeting with Trump is an opportunity. An opportunity to deliver your position and to find one of joint interest. And that's why I'm demanding to be in the United States – because I want to save Ukraine.' As one of the largest donors to Ukraine's military, Poroshenko said he fears the banking restrictions will slow the war effort by hampering his financial assistance to troops on the front lines, which he said amounts to around $1 million a week. The travel ban means he is unable to lobby for support for Ukraine in Europe and Washington. He also fears that the sanctions against him will be used to discredit Ukraine's democracy at a time when the country urgently needs Western support. 'I hate the idea that the case of Poroshenko can be harmful for Ukraine in Ukrainian-American or Ukrainian-European relations,' he said. Political analyst Volodymyr Fesenko said the sanctions have so far actually helped Poroshenko politically and were 'most likely a political mistake' by the Zelensky administration 'because the electoral rating of Poroshenko and his party increased as a result, and Poroshenko received a lot of media attention.' Still, analysts say that Poroshenko's ratings suggest any presidential bid remains a long shot and that in Zelensky's camp, the fears are more about how the billionaire might use his wealth to back other potential candidates, including those with military backgrounds. Many expect the popular Gen. Valery Zaluzhny, who served as Ukraine's military chief until he was fired in 2024, to also make a run for office – potentially pitting him against Zelensky. He is now Ukraine's ambassador to the United Kingdom. Elections delayed Ukraine was set to have a presidential election in 2024, but the vote was delayed by the martial law imposed after the Russian invasion on Feb. 24, 2022. Organizing elections during a period of martial law would violate Ukraine's constitution. But as speculation looms over future presidential contenders, Russia has seized on Ukraine's lack of elections to try to discredit Zelensky and cast him as illegitimate. Earlier this year, Trump called Zelensky a 'dictator without elections,' stirring fears that Washington was backing Russia's claims and could tie future military support to elections. Despite Poroshenko's own political ambitions and his public feuds with Zelensky, he has publicly supported the position that no vote should be organized before a real ceasefire. 'I'm extremely against any election during the war,' he said. Still, he claims the sanctions – which could ban him from participation – are proof enough that there are those in government already preparing for the possibility of elections in the near future. 'I am the living evidence of that,' he said. Anton Grushetsky, executive director of the Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, said that even while most politicians say publicly that they are against elections, 'actually, secretly, I think all of them are preparing in case … we have a successful ceasefire for Ukraine with some security guarantees.' Zelensky's reelection is by no means assured. In the first year after the 2022 invasion, the country – and its politicians – united behind him as a wartime leader. But a failed military counteroffensive in 2023, analysts said, created an opening for renewed criticism of his approach – including from Poroshenko's camp. Opposition lawmakers have also asserted that they are being excluded from key talks over the country's future. Poroshenko's lawmakers in his European Solidarity party are his main avenue for criticizing Zelensky, Grushetsky said. 'As a party leader, [his] statements are quite nice, quite calm … like a responsible Ukrainian politician,' Grushetsky said. 'A lot of this dirty job is done by other party members, not by Poroshenko.' A former Ukrainian official who worked with Poroshenko and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal politics said Poroshenko's team increasingly relies on a Trump-style narrative that if he had been in power, the 2022 Russian invasion would not have happened. Their comments amount to: 'You fools all made a mistake back in 2019. You voted for the wrong guy and now you have a war crisis.' 'I think it plays more against the stability in the country,' the former official said. 'It is trying to segregate society, and we don't need things like that.' The Trump factor Divisions between the two camps were on full display earlier this year as relations soured between Trump and Zelensky, culminating in a disastrous Oval Office visit in which Trump berated the Ukrainian president and canceled his meetings with him. Many lawmakers in Ukraine saw the dressing down of Zelensky as a setup intended to discredit him in Washington. Poroshenko, however, said the confrontation – which he described as 'a catastrophe' – was the result of repeated miscalculations by Zelensky and his team in their early dealings with Trump. But Poroshenko's own experience with Trump reveals how difficult it can be to reach any lasting political agreements with the U.S. leader. Sitting at the head of a long table in his meeting room this spring, Poroshenko pointed at a paper framed on the wall behind him. It was the Crimea Declaration, signed by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in 2018. Russia illegally annexed and occupied the Ukrainian peninsula in 2014. Pompeo later declared that 'the United States rejects Russia's attempted annexation of Crimea and pledges to maintain this policy until Ukraine's territorial integrity is restored.' 'This is a result of my foreign policy,' Poroshenko said. 'And this is not just some copy. This is original.' But after four years out of office, Trump has returned stronger, more experienced and surrounded by a new posse of advisers. The stakes for Ukraine and the world are even higher than they were in his last term, before the 2022 invasion – and Ukraine's war has become a point of contention in U.S. domestic politics. In April, the Trump administration proposed a peace plan to Ukrainian officials that included U.S. recognition of Crimea as Russian – a direct violation of the declaration that hangs framed on Poroshenko's wall. Still, Poroshenko said that even if some of Trump's policies have changed, his approach hasn't. 'I know Trump. … He makes a decision without any briefing from the State Department or from the Department of Defense. He very much trusts in his intuition,' he said. 'And those who go to the negotiation with him should take that into consideration. Or, if you don't like it, simply don't go.' Poroshenko last visited Washington in February, before he was banned from travel. He met with U.S. officials and attended the National Prayer Breakfast, where Trump made a speech. After Zelensky's disastrous Oval Office visit, Politico reported that Trump officials then reached out to opposition politicians in Ukraine, including senior members of Poroshenko's party. When asked what was discussed in the conversations, Poroshenko paused, then replied: 'No comments.'
