
Ministers talk about 'smashing the gangs' but real success still resembles 'stop the boats' slogan
Several floors up, in a nondescript building in central London, rows of analysts are working to make good on the government's promise to smash the gangs.
At first glance, this block of offices looks more like the type of workspace that would play home to a tech startup or advertising firm.
But the plasma screens pinned to the wall here are showing night-vision camera feeds from border force aircraft and maps detailing the routes of small boat crossings.
This is one of the government's command centres where officials gather intelligence about the dangerous journeys made week in week out by migrants attempting to get to the UK.
The information being brought together here often paints a bleak picture.
On the French side, violence around coastal launch points seems to have got worse.
Cars have been set on fire and local police officers followed home by those trying to facilitate crossings.
The organised smuggling gangs appear to be getting increasingly cavalier with the lives of migrants too - by cramming more people on to their flimsy vessels.
'Buy one get one free' prices on crossings
Sky News understands officials have even picked up social media adverts offering migrants 'buy one get one free' prices on crossings if an adult brings a child or someone with disabilities with them.
"Years ago it was safer, and it was payment by results… it's more cynical now," said one source.
This is explained by an increasing desperation from smugglers, as action from authorities starts to bite.
But if work to "smash the gangs" is bearing fruit, the results are not feeding through to crossing numbers - with figures for 2024 higher than a year earlier.
Deaths in the Channel are up too, and that's partly why the government is including laws in its new borders bill to make it a specific offence to endanger another life during a sea crossing.
'Children held over side of small boats'
One Home Office official says a tactic that's been used by some on board boats is to hold a child over the side of the vessel to avoid being rescued by the authorities.
There are also stories of scrambles on French beaches as desperate migrants attempt to board boats at the last minute, leading to deadly crushes in the centre of the dinghy - the area where women and children often sit.
3:25
Trafficking experts question the feasibility of gathering evidence to pursue these new crimes, while refugee groups say there's a risk that vulnerable people could inadvertently be criminalised.
The Tories also claim the move is performative as existing legislation passed by them can already deal with such offences.
But that's not the only echo of previous approaches to migration.
While the bill being published on Thursday repeals a majority of the Conservative's controversial Illegal Migration Act, some parts are being left in place.
One section keeps beefed up powers for the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper to decide how long migrants can be detained for, while another retains exemptions from modern slavery protections in some circumstances.
This has led to accusations of hypocrisy from human rights groups, given the critical tone adopted by many senior Labour figures towards the powers while they were in opposition.
Other refugee groups seem more relaxed though and say the retained sections are relatively minor, especially given the huge tranches of Tory legislation that is repealed in the bill.
That's not to say these groups are fully on side with the current approach.
"The most effective way to break the smuggling gangs' grip is to stop refugees from getting into the boats in the first place, which means giving them a legal way to apply for asylum in the UK without crossing the Channel", said Enver Solomon from the Refugee Council.
More safe routes doesn't appear to be on the government's radar though.
Asked repeatedly about whether upping safe and legal routes was part of the discussion, the home secretary told Sky News "the priority… is tackling the criminal gangs, because if you don't, those boats will continue and that will continue to hit our border security".
Back in the small boats command centre, one screen sets out the data the government will ultimately be judged on.
Above a bar chart of boat arrivals, a figure - coloured green for now - shows that crossing levels are currently lower than at the same point last year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
34 minutes ago
- The National
UK will 'potentially' support Israel in Iran conflict, says Rachel Reeves
Israel has unleashed air strikes across Iran for a third day and threatened even greater force as some Iranian missiles evaded Israeli air defences to strike buildings in the heart of the country. Planned talks on Iran's nuclear programme, which could provide an off-ramp, were called off. The region braced for a protracted conflict after Israel's surprise bombardment of Iran's nuclear and military sites on Friday killed several top generals and nuclear scientists. READ MORE: Why did Israel attack Iran and have they again broken international law? Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said on Sunday that if the Israeli strikes on Iran stop, then 'our responses will also stop'. Reeves told Sky News that she was 'not going to rule anything out at this stage' given the 'fast-moving situation'. Asked whether the UK would come to Israel's aid if asked, the Chancellor told Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips: 'We have, in the past, supported Israel when there have been missiles coming in. 'I'm not going to comment on what might happen in the future, but so far, we haven't been involved, and we're sending in assets to both protect ourselves and also potentially to support our allies.' Pushed again on whether the UK would deploy assets in support of Israel if asked, she said: 'What we've done in the past (…) is help protect Israel from incoming strikes. So a defensive activity.' She added: 'I'm not going to rule anything out at this stage (…) it's a fast moving situation, a very volatile situation. 'But we don't want to see escalation, we want to see de-escalation.' Iran said Israel struck two oil refineries, raising the prospect of a broader assault on Iran's heavily sanctioned energy industry that could affect global markets. The Israeli military, in a social media post, warned Iranians to evacuate arms factories, signalling what could be a further widening of the campaign. READ MORE: Ian Murray 'does not understand how devolution works', SNP minister says US president Donald Trump has expressed full support for Israel's actions while warning Iran that it can only avoid further destruction by agreeing to a new nuclear deal. New explosions echoed across Tehran and were reported elsewhere in the country early on Sunday, but there was no update to a death toll put out the day before by Iran's UN ambassador, who said 78 people had been killed and more than 320 wounded. In Israel, at least 10 people were killed in Iranian strikes overnight and into Sunday, according to Israel's Magen David Adom rescue service, bringing the country's total death toll to 13.


Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Woman wins £8k compensation payout over 'holiday row' with Scots charity
A judge ruled Lydia Magloire should be paid nearly £8,000 as compensation for "financial loss and injury to feelings" from Edinburgh charity Earth in Common. A French woman who sued an Edinburgh charity has won thousands of pounds in compensation from her former employers, a judge has ruled. Lydia Magloire took legal action against Edinburgh non-profit Earth in Common. Edinburgh Live covered the proceedings at the Employment Tribunal in February where Ms Magloire alleged she suffered detriment due to being French, among other claims. Employment Judge Macleod ruled that Ms Magloire should be paid "£7,642.48 by way of compensation for financial loss and injury to feelings". The judge released his decision on June 5, dismissing the claims of racial discrimination but carrying other claims, reports Edinburgh Live. A report states: "The claimant's claim of indirect discrimination on the grounds of race fails, and is dismissed". However, Judge Macleod found the respondent refused to grant Ms Magloire annual leave and warned her "if she took her holidays she would be dismissed". The report also states Ms Magloire "was dismissed because she raised a protected disclosure" and "was therefore automatically unfairly dismissed". At the Edinburgh Employment Tribunal, Ms Magloire claimed she was 'humiliated' by the company on the basis of her English proficiency. She also claimed one of her managers had a 'strong Aberdeen accent' that was 'hard to understand'. Representing herself at the tribunal, Ms Magloire alternated between answering questions in English and speaking through an interpreter. She became involved with the organisation as a volunteer in 2019, eventually beginning employment at the charity in 2021 as a coordinator. Her employment was terminated on August 21, 2023. The court heard that Earth in Common dismissed Ms Magloire for 'unsatisfactory performance,' which she contested. Join the Daily Record WhatsApp community! Get the latest news sent straight to your messages by joining our WhatsApp community today. You'll receive daily updates on breaking news as well as the top headlines across Scotland. No one will be able to see who is signed up and no one can send messages except the Daily Record team. All you have to do is click here if you're on mobile, select 'Join Community' and you're in! If you're on a desktop, simply scan the QR code above with your phone and click 'Join Community'. We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don't like our community, you can check out any time you like. To leave our community click on the name at the top of your screen and choose 'exit group'. If you're curious, you can read our Privacy Notice. The court heard Earth in Common dismissed Ms Magloire due to 'unsatisfactory conduct'. The charity claimed Ms Magloire refused to engage with email correspondence, lead workshops, and she booked an extended holiday without approval during one of the charity's busiest months in 2023. Ms Magloire contested that her performance was unsatisfactory, claiming Ms Murray was aware of her intention to take holiday and that she booked the trip prior to her leave being approved to secure cheaper tickets. She told the court she was 'surprised' by her dismissal as she thought that she was doing a 'great job' in her role. She acknowledged her English speaking and writing was not the best but she was improving her proficiency. Ms Magloire added: 'I was very sad. I invested myself a lot in the company. I was totally destroyed emotionally.' Ms Magloire secured new employment at the Edinburgh Zoo in December 2023 where she works 37.5 hours per week as a groundskeeper. She now earns more income than when she was employed at Earth in Common, where she worked 26 hours per week. Earth in Common was founded in 2013 by Evie Murray in an effort to give locals access to outdoor spaces in an urban environment. It repurposed unused land at the northern extremity of Leith Links into community crofts. The charity also runs a cafe and farm shop, which sells local produce. It regularly holds community events focusing on skill-building, exercise, and mental wellbeing.


Scotsman
4 hours ago
- Scotsman
Scottish politics isn't necessarily as bitter and divided as it seems
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I have a confession to make. It's not something I'm proud of, because who would be, but it is something you should know. I am English. I understand it's a shock, especially if you've somehow missed our video content, award-winning podcast and my appearances on whichever broadcaster will have me. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad A saltire flag and Union Jack flutter in the wind. Picture: JeffIt means, nearly five years ago, I came to Scottish politics with things to learn. I was an experienced journalist in Westminster, but had not lived the Scottish experience. I merely adopted Scotland, I wasn't born in it. Moulded in it. As such, aside from my extensive reading as a dedicated student of the game, my expectations were it would not be like any other patch. The views on both sides of the independence debate were too entrenched, the vitriol felt was too strong, the wounds were too deep. Now, as I walk off into what I hope is a sunset, I can tell you I was wrong. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Scottish politics isn't nearly as bitter and divided as it can seem at times, especially online. Working in Westminster, I see the loudest and most vocal critics of each side having a beer together in Parliament. I listen to SNP MPs talking about trips they've been on with Tories, and the funny experiences they won't share publicly 'til they leave Parliament. Following issues that go beyond the debate of the day, I witness Labour working with the SNP, and hear of rivals having a regular snooker game. Alexander Brown has been here since Boris Johnson was Prime Minister | Getty Images More importantly, they're just nice. It's nowhere near as tribal as you think. I've routinely been called a Sturgeonista (despite my accent) or a Tory stooge online and, while I'm grateful for balance, it's also not representative of what politics is. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad These people don't hate each other. They aren't arguing with each other in comment sections. Sometimes the outrage is simply manufactured, playing to the gallery encouraging people to lose their minds, shortly before going for tea in the Parliament canteen. I'd add that given how biased everyone feels the media is, we sure do spend a lot of our time speaking to all the different parties. In short, Scottish politics, despite the myth of Scottish exceptionalism, is not that dissimilar to politics in the rest of the UK. Sure, there's an independence debate, but the main issues facing the country are the NHS, education, the green transition, access to rural services. Other than the ferries' farce, it's basically the same. Now you can argue that independence could fix those, but it's still the same problems as down here. That's not an argument for unionism, just a reminder that what happens in Westminster really does matter. To paraphrase one of the few successful, albeit accidental separatists, we're all in this together. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad My other main takeaway is that despite these shared values, successive UK administrations have still been a bit scared of Scotland. No prime minister has done a sit-down. Ministers avoid doing huddles in case they're caught out. You deserve better and it's appalling this has not changed since I started. This is all a long-winded way of saying I'm leaving The Scotsman, but my love of Scotland is going nowhere.