Second petition filed in Supreme Court over judges' seniority row
Another petition filed in Supreme Court over judges' seniority row
The Islamabad High Court Bar Association has filed a fresh petition in the Supreme Court, challenging the president's authority to transfer judges without public interest justification.
This marks the second major challenge to judicial transfers in recent days.
Filed under Article 184(3) by Bar President Riasat Ali Azad, the petition contends that the president does not have unlimited powers under Article 200(1) of the Constitution to reassign judges between high courts.
It argues that judicial transfers should only occur in the public interest.
The petition follows a similar move by five judges of the Islamabad High Court (IHC) have filed a petition in the Supreme Court of Pakistan, challenging judicial transfers and their impact on seniority.
The 49-page constitutional petition, filed under Article 184(3) through senior lawyers Munir A. Malik and Barrister Salahuddin, argues that the President of Pakistan misused Article 200(1) by overriding the Judicial Commission's authority in transferring judges.
The petition contends that judicial transfers cannot be made without public interest and should not affect the seniority list.
It further states that Article 200 only allows temporary transfers, and the current process violates Article 175(A) of the Constitution.
The judges have urged the Supreme Court to invalidate the Islamabad High Court's current seniority list, citing its inconsistency with Article 194 and the Constitution's Third Schedule.
The petition specifically challenges the appointment of Justice Sarfraz Dogar as acting Chief Justice of IHC, stating that he had only served two weeks in the high court before assuming administrative control.
It also calls for Justices Khalid Soomro and Muhammad Asif to be barred from judicial work.
The President of Pakistan, the federal government, the Judicial Commission, the Supreme Court registrar, and multiple high court registrars have been made respondents in the case.
The five petitioning judges are Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, Justice Babar Sattar, Justice Tariq Mehmood Jahangiri, Justice Saman Rafat Imtiaz, and Justice Sardar Ejaz Ishaq Khan.
The petition also asserts that the failure of transferred judges to take a fresh oath is a constitutional violation.
It claims that seniority begins in the high court where a judge first takes the oath, and altering it through transfers is an unconstitutional interference in IHC's administration.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
4 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Ministry of Law and Justice: Rs1,912.481m earmarked for 10 schemes
ISLAMABAD: The federal government has earmarked Rs 1,912.481 million for seven ongoing and three new schemes of the Ministry of Law and Justice under the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) for the fiscal year 2025-26. The budget document showed an increase of 41 percent in funds allocated for various schemes of the Ministry of Law and Justice. As per the budgetary documents, the government allocated Rs 1,696.481 million for ongoing schemes, which include Rs 170 million for automation of federal courts/tribunals phase-II; Rs 27 million for archiving and digitalising of legislations and record of the Ministry of Law and Justice; Rs 201.785 million for the construction of legal facilitation centre, Islamabad High Court (IHC); Rs 19.325 million for strengthening of Planning and Monitoring Unit in the Ministry of Law and Justice; Rs 30 million for construction of new building for Supreme Court, Branch Registry at Karachi; Rs110 million for strengthening and capacity enhancement of legal wings of Ministry of Law and Justice and federal ministries/divisions, Islamabad, and Rs 1,138.371 million for construction of litigants facilitation centre for litigants of District Court in Islamabad. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
6 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Taxmen get more powers to target unregistered taxpayers
ISLAMABAD: The government, through the Finance Bill 2025-26, has proposed to grant extensive discretionary powers to tax officers and Commissioners to restrict the operations of bank accounts or transfer of immovable property for any individual who fails to register under the Federal Sales Tax Act. Arshad Shehzad, advocate of the Supreme Court, explained that the Finance Bill 2025-2026 intends to add new Sections 14AC, 14AD, and 14AE to the Act in order to promote sales tax registration and enhance economic documentation. According to the explanatory notes from the board, these provisions aim to strengthen enforcement measures, including restrictions on bank account operations, the transfer of immovable property, sealing of business premises, property seizure, and the appointment of a receiver to compel compliance from unregistered individuals. While this initiative appears to be directed at strengthening enforcement, it also bestows excessive discretionary powers upon tax officers. Shehzad argues that a comprehensive mechanism already exists under the law for compulsory registration, penal actions, and the recovery of sales tax, including default surcharges, penalties, and other consequences for non-registration. These additional measures would only grant more discretionary authority to tax officials and may lead to unnecessary conflicts. Shehzad emphasises that the implementation and enforcement of existing laws are far more important than introducing harsh, coercive measures repeatedly. Shehzad suggests that the government should focus on building confidence within the business community, utilising the database of unregistered individuals in a pragmatic manner to integrate new taxpayers into the tax system without creating an atmosphere of harassment. Any measure that create a negative perception among businesses could hinder growth and lead to capital flight; therefore, all such measures that threaten the confidence of businesses and trade should be avoided, he concluded. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Sister challenges Mahrang's detention in apex court
A sister of Baloch rights activist Dr Mahrang Baloch has approached the Supreme Court against an order of the Balochistan High Court (BHC) in her sister's detention case. A division bench of the BHC on April 15 dismissed Dr Mahrang's petition against her detention under the Maintenance of Public Order (MPO) Ordinance, 1960, stating that an alternative remedy was available to the activist in the shape of a representation. The bench had also converted the petition into a representation and directed its office to present it before the competent authority constituted for the purpose of deciding representations under the MPO. The petitioner, Nadia Baloch, contended that the BHC erred in holding that a petition could be filed before a court only after exhausting the option of filing a representation. The petition argued that the high court in its writ jurisdiction is competent to intervene and directly grant relief to a petitioner by determining the legality of an MPO order without the need of the detained person making a representation. It said that the BHC did not consider Dr Mahrang's right to file habeas corpus petition. "[This is her] high prerogative right and a constitutional remedy for all matters if illegal confinement," the petition said.
