
Sig Sauer, faced with lawsuits over a popular pistol, gets protection in New Hampshire
Sig Sauer, aced with lawsuits over a popular pistol, gets protection in New Hampshire (Image: AP)
CONCORD: Faced with mounting lawsuits over a popular pistol, New Hampshire-based Sig Sauer asked for - and got - protection in the form of a new state law that makes it harder to take the gunmaker to court.
Supporters in the Republican-led Legislature said the law was needed to help a major employer. The lawsuits say Sig Sauer's P320 pistol can go off without the trigger being pulled, an allegation the company denies.
The law covers all gun manufacturers and federal firearm licensees in product liability claims regarding the "absence or presence" of four specific safety features. One of those features is an external mechanical safety that people suing Sig Sauer say should be standard on the P320, based on its design.
Claims can still be filed over manufacturing defects.
Those who have sued Sig Sauer in New Hampshire and elsewhere include police, federal law enforcement officers, and other experienced gun users from multiple states who say they were wounded by the gun.
The manufacturer has prevailed in some cases. It is appealing two recent multimillion-dollar verdicts against it, in Pennsylvania and Georgia.
George Abrahams a US Army veteran and painting contractor in Philadelphia who won his case, said he had holstered his P320, put it in the pocket of his athletic pants and zipped it up before going downstairs.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
가장 편안한 농장 게임. 설치 필요 없음
Taonga
플레이하기
Undo
"All I did was come down the stairway and there was a loud explosion, and then the excruciating pain and bleeding," he told The Associated Press in 2022. He said the bullet tore through his right thigh.
The company, which employs over 2,000 people in a state with permissive gun laws, says the P320 has internal safety mechanisms and "has undergone the most rigorous testing and evaluation of any firearm, by military and law enforcement agencies around the world."
It says the problem is user error or incompatible holsters, not the design.
"Do you want people to be able to sue car manufacturers because they sell cars that don't have air conditioning?" state Rep Terry Roy, a Republican from Deerfield, told the House during debate in May.
Opponents criticized the bill as a special exemption in liability law that has never been granted to any other New Hampshire company.
"I think there is a difference between helping out a large employer and creating an exemption that actually hurts people and doesn't give them their day in court," state Rep David Meuse, a Democrat from Portsmouth, said in an interview.
His district covers Newington, where Sig Sauer is headquartered.
A 2005 federal law gives the gun industry broad legal immunity. New Hampshire was already among 32 states that have adopted gun immunity laws in some form, according to the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. Some states also have repealed gun industry immunity statutes or weakened them.
Sig Sauer seeks help A Sig Sauer executive asked New Hampshire lawmakers for help in April, two weeks after a Pennsylvania-based law firm filed its most recent lawsuit in federal court in Concord on March 26 over the design of the P320.
The firm represents over 100 people who have filed such lawsuits, including more than 70 in New Hampshire.
"We're fighting all these court cases out of town and every single court case we have to fight takes away money from Granite State residents and workers that we can employ and technology," testified Bobby Cox, vice president of governmental affairs for the company.
The measure took effect once Republican Gov Kelly Ayotte signed it on May 23.
Legislators said it doesn't apply to the current lawsuits. However, lawyers for Sig Sauer mentioned it as part of their argument to dismiss the March case or break up and transfer the claims of 22 plaintiffs to court districts where they live. A hearing on the matter is set for July 21.
Ayotte's office did not respond to an AP request seeking comment, but it told The Keene Sentinel that she's "proud to protect New Hampshire companies that create thousands of good-paying jobs from frivolous lawsuits."
"Out-of-state trial lawyers looking to make money will not find a venue in New Hampshire," Ayotte's office said in an emailed statement to the newspaper.
Robert Zimmerman, the plaintiffs' lead attorney in Pennsylvania, said the goal of the lawsuits is to get the weapon's design changed so that it's safe for the people who use it.
New Hampshire was the chosen location because federal rules allow lawsuits against a company in its home state, Zimmerman said.
Those lawsuits have been assigned to one federal judge in Concord.
"Sig is trying to strategically decentralize this case and make every client go to 100 different courthouses and slow down the process for both sides to get a just outcome, which is a trial that is decided on the merits," Zimmerman said in an interview.
Sig Sauer gets protection The lawsuits accuse Sig Sauer of defective product design and marketing and negligence.
During the House debate, Roy said he owns a P320 and it's one of his favorite guns, "but you can buy them with or without safeties."
The plaintiffs say "the vast majority" of P320 models sold don't come with the safety, "even as an option."
Sig Sauer says some users prefer the faster draw time granted by the absence of an external safety; others want the feature for added security.
Sig Sauer offered a "voluntary upgrade" in 2017 to include an alternate design that reduces the weight of the trigger, among other features.
The plaintiffs' lawyers say the upgrade did not stop unintentional discharges.
States, industries and immunity "It's not a great look" when a manufacturer can carve out a statutory exemption for itself, but it's also not unusual, said Daniel Pi, an assistant professor at the University of New Hampshire Franklin Pierce School of Law.
In Tennessee, Gov Bill Lee signed a bill in 2023 following a deadly school shooting that gives gun and ammunition dealers, manufacturers and sellers additional protections against lawsuits.
This year, Tennessee lawmakers passed another bill to further limit liability for gun companies.
In a different industry - pesticides - governors in North Dakota and Georgia signed laws this year providing legal protections to Bayer, the maker of Roundup, a popular weed killer. Bayer has been hit with 181,000 claims alleging that the key ingredient in Roundup causes non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Bayer disputes those claims.
The Louisiana Legislature passed a bill that would protect nursing homes from most lawsuits and cap damages. Republican Gov Jeff Landry hasn't acted on it yet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Classroom ‘scam': ACB summons Sisodia, AAP claims diversion tactic
New Delhi: Former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia on Friday alleged that BJP was using FIRs as a distraction tactic to hide its own failures in governance. Sisodia was called by the anti-corruption branch in a case related to alleged corruption in the construction of classrooms in state-run schools and was questioned for nearly three years. The former deputy chief minister, who had also the education department in AAP govt when the tenders for the construction of classrooms were floated, alleged that BJP was using investigations to divert attention. "Just like all previous probes led to nowhere, this one will also come to nothing," Sisodia said. He claimed that the ruling party had "failed" to do any "meaningful work" in Delhi since assuming office in Feb and "wasted" 100 days "without improving electricity, water, education or healthcare". "BJP, driven by political vendetta, is misusing its agencies to register FIRs in cases where there is no wrongdoing. This is a completely politically motivated case. In the last 10 years, BJP has used every agency to dig into the lives of AAP leaders, yet found nothing. All they do is file fake FIRs and keep dragging the matter. Nothing came out of it earlier, and nothing will come out of it now," he said. Asserting that the accusations had no basis, the AAP functionary said BJP MP Manoj Tiwari levelled allegations against him in the matter. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Pedro Carbo: Inicia hoy con Amazon CFD y construye un segundo ingreso. InvestIQ Registrarse Undo "I filed a defamation case against him. He is out on bail in the defamation case," Sisodia said. Addressing a press conference, former CM and senior AAP functionary Atishi also termed it as a "fake" case. "In the past ten years, over 200 cases have been filed by BJP-controlled agencies against AAP leaders. But despite extensive investigations, raids and examination of files by ED, CBI, Delhi Police and ACB, not a single rupee of corruption has been recovered from any AAP leader," Atishi said. Delhi BJP president Virendra Sachdeva claimed that during their time in office, AAP leaders never provided the requested information to the investigating agencies, which resulted in the probe progressing very slowly. "Now that the BJP is in power in Delhi, the investigative agencies are receiving full cooperation, and not only Manish Sisodia and Satyendar Jain, but several other AAP leaders will soon land in jail," Sachdeva claimed.


NDTV
21 minutes ago
- NDTV
Madras High Court Stays Probe Agency ED Action Against Producer Vikram Ravindran, Associate
Chennai: In a major setback for the Enforcement Directorate (ED) in the high-profile TASMAC money laundering probe, the Madras High Court has stayed proceedings against Tamil film producer Vikram Ravindran and his associate, ruling that the ED's search and seizure operation was without authority and jurisdiction. The court also directed the ED to return all properties seized during the raid including electronic devices, with a caveat that the petitioners must not tamper with or alienate the contents of the returned items. Delivering a scathing verdict, the court noted that the ED failed to produce any incriminating material that would justify initiating proceedings against the petitioners. Despite being given two opportunities to submit evidence justifying the search, the agency could not furnish any document that suggested Mr Ravindran and his friend were involved in money laundering linked to the Rs 1,000 crore TASMAC scam. "The material presented in a sealed cover does not contain any semblance of information, which may have led them to believe that the petitioner may be involved in the offence of money laundering," the court said. It said no incriminating documents were in the ED's possession when the search was first authorised. The petitioners said they had no role in TASMAC operations and were not named in any of the 41 first information reports filed by the state's directorate of vigilance and anti-corruption. The ED earlier claimed to possess incriminating documents and alleged the duo's involvement. Alleging a Rs 1,000 crore scam in TASMAC, the government arm that sells liquor, the ED accused distilleries and bottle manufacturing firms of colluding in corrupt practices amounting to over Rs 1,000 crore. In a significant development during the hearing, the ED said it had no authority to seal the petitioners' properties and agreed to de-seal the premises. This comes at a time when the Supreme Court has already stayed the ED probe into the TASMAC case, expressing concern over the agency's aggressive approach. The Supreme Court questioned the very basis of criminal action against a state-run corporation, particularly when FIRs were registered against individuals and not the corporation itself. It had also warned that the ED was "crossing all limits" and "breaching the federal structure". The ruling DMK has repeatedly alleged that central agencies like the ED are being misused by the BJP-led Union government to target Opposition-ruled states and political rivals. The BJP has denied all such charges. Opposition parties have highlighted the ED's alleged coercive role in extracting large political donations under the now-scrapped electoral bonds scheme.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Woman arrested for her newborn's murder
Kottayam: To hide the birth of her child from family members, a 21-year-old woman killed her newborn in Mezhuveli, Pathanamthitta. On Friday, Elavumthitta police recorded the arrest of the woman from a private hospital in Chengannur where she was undergoing treatment for excessive bleeding. She was taken to police station where she was subjected to detailed interrogation, after which her arrest was recorded. Police said the woman, who is unmarried, killed the one-day-old baby in a remote area behind her house on Tuesday. Police said she committed the crime in order to hide the baby's birth from her family. Even though her family members resided in the house where the incident took place, she managed to hide the matter from others, police said. After the autopsy was conducted at the govt medical college hospital in Kottayam, the infant's body was handed over to the woman's family. According to the district police chief, the cause of death was head injury, and the forensic surgeon will be visiting the crime spot next week. The surgeon will inspect how the wound on the head was inflicted and will hand over the report to police. Police had earlier recorded the statement of panchayat member D Binu and registered a case of unnatural death. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo During the police investigation, the accused confessed to the crime and said that she planned for the baby's death by abandoning it in the unoccupied yard behind her house. She gave birth to the child, which she conceived with her partner, inside the house while her family was unaware of her pregnancy. She also said that fell in the toilet while holding the baby due to which the child's head hit the floor. She also cut the umbilical cord and covered the baby's mouth with her hand to muffle its cries. When she started bleeding, the woman approached the hospital where doctors enquired about the baby. When she could not give a proper answer, the doctors informed police. Police later found the infant's body wrapped in a leaf. During the interrogation, the woman also gave details of her partner. She was taken to the house for gathering evidence. The accused was presented before court.