Modifications, Uber, not reading the terms: Common reasons why your insurance claim might be declined
A woman cancelled an overseas holiday when her mother became ill and was shocked to discover she was not eligible for reimbursement.
Photo:
123RF
Insurers can pay billions of claims each year, but many people are still disappointed, when they have a claim turned down or receive less than they expected.
Insurance and Financial Services Ombudsman Karen Stevens says her office is dealing with more complaints than ever before from people for whom the process has not gone as expected.
"For years and years, we would do around 3000 complaints a year and 300 investigations," she said. "By the end of this financial year, we'll be over 500 investigations - it's gone way up.
"Last year, we had just on 5000 complaints into the office."
She said part of the rise was due to increasing public awareness about what the scheme offered, but there were also misunderstandings about what insurance could be expected to provide.
"The biggest consumer issue that we've got most of the time is a lack of understanding on scope of cover. Because they pay their premiums, they think that they're covered for basically every contingency."
Here are some of the things that might seem small, but could affect your ability to make a claim.
Stevens said insurance policy exclusions were something that caught people out frequently.
Many policies include things that will not be covered and it's important to check what these are, so you know what to expect.
"One that immediately springs to mind that I was looking at last night was in a travel context, where a woman and her husband and family were going on holiday.
"They had travel insurance. She found out that her mother was very unwell and not likely to last the time that they were going to be away, so she cancelled her trip.
"The problem was that there was an exclusion in the policy that quite clearly said that they wouldn't have unlimited cover, if the person who was unwell had been in a rest home of any sort in the 12 months prior to becoming seriously unwell or dying."
That meant they had limited cover of up to $1000 per adult, which did not cover the costs of the trip.
"She said, 'Oh, but there was nothing wrong with her, until she got pneumonia in hospital'. Well, that's fine, but the policy had an exclusion that actually had nothing to do with her wellness or anything else at the time."
Stevens said modifications made to cars could be a problem.
"If an insurer is unaware of the modifications, there's a specific exclusion, if they haven't been told about them and priced accordingly. They're likely to find out, when they go to claim, that not only are they not covered, but of course, our draconian laws on non-disclosure, which still stand, mean that they probably won't have any cover going forward either.
"You know, vehicle modifications are still a big one in New Zealand."
Consumer NZ insurance specialist Rebecca Styles said insurers could have a broad definition of what would count as modification.
Styles said, if someone had been given lower premiums or a lower excess based on where a car would be parked, and then parked elsewhere, that could be a problem.
"The insurer will have the ability, under the policy, to say, 'Well, terribly sorry, but we're either not paying your claim, because you're in breach of a condition or will avoid the policy', again, depending on the policy wording."
Styles said State, for example, had a list of broad examples of when someone should notify it about a change to where a car was kept.
"Where you park your car is considered a 'risk factor', so that would be taken into account, when pricing your policy - you usually park in a garage, but moved house and now park on the street.
"While I haven't come across instances of an insurer declining a claim because of this, in the policy, there is a requirement to let the insurer know."
If you're paying your insurance on a monthly basis and miss some, you could find your policy is cancelled.
Styles pointed to a State policy that said people who missed a payment would get a notice and, if it remained unpaid, the policy could be cancelled.
Insurers want to be notified before you start using your car for something like Uber or DeliverEasy, and some don't offer cover for these activities.
Taking "reasonable care" is a standard requirement for most insurance policies.
That means, if you leave your car unlocked with the keys in it, you might not have cover if someone steals it.
This can be an issue in situations, such as where people leave their keys on the beach, while they go for a swim.
Stevens' office said many travel insurance policies also had a requirement that people not leave items unattended, even for very short periods of time.
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
h] Related
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Australia's lowest paid workers to get above-inflation wage increase
Australia correspondent Nick Grimm spoke to Lisa Owen about the nation's Fair Work commission ruling Australia's lowest paid workers will recieve an above inflation wage increase, as well as long-term national study that has found a third of Australian men have used some form of intimate partner violence in their lifetime. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Erin Patterson tells her murder trial she regrets saying she wanted 'nothing to do with' in-laws
By Melissa Brown and Joseph Dunstan Erin Patterson has spent the day in the witness chair in her trial in Morwell. Photo: ABC News: Anita Lester Erin Patterson has become emotional on the witness stand at her murder trial as she expressed regret about messages she wrote about her in-laws. Patterson resumed giving evidence in her own defence on Tuesday, as she fights charges of murdering her parents-in-law Don and Gail and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson by serving them a beef Wellington meal containing death cap mushrooms. She is also charged with the attempted murder of Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson at the lunch, held in July 2023. On Tuesday, Patterson was asked about her multiple separations from her husband, Simon. She outlined to the Supreme Court, sitting in the regional Victorian town of Morwell, how they formally separated at the end of 2015 and divided their assets up equally, without lawyers. Patterson told the jury she continued to attend Patterson family events after the formal separation, and that Heather Wilkinson would always make a point of talking to her at church. She said her relationship with Don and Gail also did not change after the separation. "I was just their daughter-in-law … they just continued to love me," she said, her voice breaking. But by late 2022, Patterson told the court there were tensions between her and Simon over finances, including school fees, a child support application by Erin, and Simon declining to pay an anaesthetist's fee for their son. "I was hurt," Patterson told the court. "We'd never had any conflict over money that I could remember before this." Ian Wilkinson arrives at court in Morwell with his daughter. Photo: ABC News Mandy took Patterson through Facebook group messages in which she expressed frustration with her parents-in-law about their reluctance to get involved in their dispute about finances and said: "This family I swear to f***ing god." Patterson told the court she was feeling hurt, frustrated and "a little bit desperate". She became emotional as she said she regretted saying it, and some other similar messages which were read to court. "I wish I'd never said it. I feel ashamed for saying it and I wish that the family didn't have to hear that I said that," she said. "They didn't deserve it." Tanya and Matthew Patterson, Don and Gail Patterson's children, have been in court for Erin Patterson's evidence. Photo: ABC News Patterson also told the court about her love of mushrooms, saying she enjoyed eating them because they tasted good and were "very healthy". She said she developed an interest in wild mushrooms in early 2020 when she and her children would go for walks at the Korumburra Botanic Gardens during lockdown. "The first time I noticed them I remember because the dog was eating some and I picked all the mushrooms that I could see because I wanted to try to figure out what they were to see if that might be a problem for him," she said. She told the court it was difficult to identify the species. Patterson said she found field and horse mushrooms in the paddock near her home and "eventually" consumed them. "It was a process over several months in the lead-up to it, but when I got to a point where I was confident about what I thought they were … I cut a bit off one of the mushrooms, fried it up with some butter, ate it, and then saw what happened," she said. "They tasted good and I didn't get sick." She told the jury she regularly bought dried mushrooms at Asian grocery stores and used them in dinners because they had a more interesting flavour. Earlier on Tuesday morning, Patterson told the court about multiple experiences that she said caused her to lose faith in the health system, including incidents with her children. She told the jury how her daughter cried for long durations as a newborn and she believed she was in pain, but was told she was just being an over-anxious mother and dismissed her concerns. "I didn't like hospitals before it, like who does, but I didn't trust that these people knew what they were doing, and I was just in a heightened state of anxiety ever after about my daughter's health. "I don't want to lose her." Patterson also answered questions about whether or not she had been diagnosed with cancer. Throughout the trial, the court has heard a cancer diagnosis was the reason Patterson invited her parents-in-law and Ian and Heather Wilkinson to the beef Wellington lunch that ended in the ingestion of poisonous cap mushrooms. On Tuesday Patterson told the court she never had ovarian cancer, but that she had been experiencing chronic headaches, fatigue, abdominal pain, sudden weight gain and fluid retention. She told the court she often googled her symptoms and went to GPs concerned about what the results suggested, including times when she thought she had a brain tumour, multiple sclerosis and auto-immune conditions. "I think I wasted a lot of time, not just my time, but medical people's time, through all my 'doctor Googling'," she told the court. "It's hard to justify it but with the benefit of hindsight I can see that … I just lost so much faith in the medical system that I decided that anything to do with my health and the children's health [I'll sort myself]." Erin Patterson's defence barrister Colin Mandy SC spent the day questioning the accused. Photo: ABC News Mandy also took Patterson back to evidence she gave on Monday about suffering from low self-esteem, particularly around her weight. Patterson said she had had body image issues since she was a teenager. "When I was a kid, Mum would weigh us every week to make sure we weren't putting on too much weight and so I went to the extreme of barely eating then, to through my adulthood going the other way and bingeing, I suppose, for want of a better word. She became visibly emotional as she said she was was bulimic, binge eating two-to-three times a week through her 20s. - ABC

RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
How pulling out of a long-planned new infant formula standard left the government with an expensive problem
Photo: RNZ Creating a stand alone infant formula food standard for New Zealand would be "complex", "costly" and "require significant resources", the government was warned. The warning was issued to Cabinet ministers by Food Safety Minister Andrew Hoggard as the government considered opting out of tougher trans-Tasman baby formula rules last year. It is revealed in a newly released Cabinet paper from Hoggard. Despite the warning, Cabinet decided to opt out anyway, and Hoggard announced New Zealand would create its own standard. But since then, the government has been looking at how it could opt back in with Australia if exemptions to the labelling issues opposed by industry could be negotiated. The heavily redacted Cabinet paper shows Hoggard warned there would be "cost implications" if New Zealand chose to go it alone. "Significant resources will be required to develop the standard," Hoggard wrote. "Should New Zealand opt out, we will require a process to review industry applications for new ingredients for infant formula including food safety risk assessments and management. This is essential to ensure we maintain the assurance of our export partners and equivalence of our food safety system. Andrew Hoggard Photo: RNZ / Angus Dreaver "This work requires a specialist team with expertise in food science, nutrition, risk assessment, toxicology, genetic modification, dietary assessment and social science." The minutes of that Cabinet decision also noted the "potentially significant negative economic impacts" on formula companies if the standard was adopted. Ministers also agreed to "continue discussions" with Australia to allow New Zealand to opt into the standard in the future, the minute noted. Hoggard's warning about the cost of opting out of the trans-Tasman standard was echoed by others Photo: RNZ Just days before the Cabinet decision, Fonterra, which was in favour of adopting the proposed new standards, had raised concerns with MPI officials about the "complexity" of creating a New Zealand-alone standard. Fonterra questioned whether the ministry had the resources to implement and monitor such a standard. "We would be concerned if resource was diverted away from other dairy sector priorities," it wrote to an MPI official on July 31. MPI officials themselves were also concerned. An internal memo from late August warned that developing a New Zealand standard would be "complex" and require input from a host of specialists to assess "composition and labelling requirements." An RNZ investigation has previously revealed how a handful of formula companies, led by Danone, The a2 Milk Company and an industry lobby group, intensely lobbied the government against adopting the new trans-Tasman infant formula standards, which were more than 11 years in the making. The lobbying included bombarding senior ministers with emails, letters, surveys and legal advice, as well as having at least six meetings with Hoggard in the six months leading up to the decision. Newly released documents from MPI show industry representatives met with MPI officials 18 times over the issue between May 2023 and July 2024. Fonterra attended two meetings, Danone, which strongly opposed the standards, had three, including one where it brought seven executives. Fonterra and a2 typically brought only two executives to the meetings. The a2 Milk Company met with officials four times, as did the industry lobby group Infant Nutrition Council. The Dairy Companies Association of New Zealand (DCANZ), headed by Hoggard's sister , also had two meetings with MPI. Two of the 18 meetings were regular MPI Dairy Product Safety Advisory Council meetings, attended by multiple dairy companies. They are included in the total count because the infant formula standards were discussed at these meetings. Representatives from INC, Danone, Fonterra, DCANZ and Synlait attended. MPI told RNZ that DCANZ "has advised that they did not take a position on the options in these meetings." In addition to the many meetings, emails showed that the INC had at least two phone calls with MPI staff in July, though these were not officially recorded as meetings. MPI also held "targeted stakeholder engagement" with a handful of formula companies in October to discuss how infant milk should be regulated. It met with Danone, a2, Fonterra, Nestle, INC, and the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Fonterra, Nestle and the Ministry of Health supported New Zealand opting into the FSANZ standards. In a statement, MPI said the consultation was part of its process to explore next steps. "This engagement informed a wider and ongoing process to develop options for the Minister to consider. These types of engagements are common practice and allow those who are affected by Government regulations to provide expert feedback," New Zealand Food Safety Deputy Director General Vince Arbuckle said. New Zealand "remains committed" to the joined food system with Australia, he said. In a statement, Hoggard's office said the situation with infant formula had not "materially changed" recently and he had nothing to add.