logo
No AI, no job. These companies are requiring workers to use the tech

No AI, no job. These companies are requiring workers to use the tech

IOL News2 days ago

From Duolingo to Meta to e-commerce firm Shopify and cloud storage company Box, more companies are mandating their executives and teams implement AI-first strategies in areas such as risk assessment, hiring and performance reviews
Luis von Ahn hoped to send a clear message to his 900 employees at Duolingo: Artificial intelligence is now a priority at the language-learning app.
The company would stop using contractors for work AI could handle. It'll seek AI skills in hiring. AI would be part of performance reviews, and it'll only hire people when things can't be automated. The details, outlined in a memo in April and posted on professional networking site LinkedIn, drew outrage.
Some cringed at AI translations suggesting that learning languages need human context. Many users threatened to quit Duolingo. Others blasted the company for choosing AI over its workers. The backlash got so loud that three weeks later, von Ahn posted an update.
'To be clear: I do not see AI as replacing what our employees do (we are in fact continuing to hire at the same speed as before),' von Ahn wrote in the update on LinkedIn. 'I see it as a tool to accelerate what we do, at the same or better level of quality. And the sooner we learn how to use it, and use it responsibly, the better off we will be in the long run.'
From Duolingo to Meta to e-commerce firm Shopify and cloud storage company Box, more companies are mandating their executives and teams implement AI-first strategies in areas such as risk assessment, hiring and performance reviews. Some of the directives are being detailed in public memos from top leaders, in some cases spurring outrage. Others are happening behind closed doors, according to people in the tech industry. The implication: AI is increasingly becoming a requirement in the workplace and no longer just an option.
'As AI becomes more popular and companies invest more heavily … the tools will start being embedded in the work [people] already do,' said Emily Rose McRae, an analyst at market research and advisory firm Gartner. 'The work they do will change.'
Meta plans to replace humans with AI to assess risks as it relates to the privacy reviews of its products, according to NPR. The company told The Post it's rolling out automation for 'low-risk decisions,' like data deletion and retention, to allow teams to focus on more complicated decisions.
At Shopify, everyone is expected to learn how to apply AI to their jobs, CEO Tobi Lütke wrote in an April 7 memo to staff. The tech would also be a part of prototyping, performance and peer review questionnaires, and teams would have to demonstrate why AI couldn't do the job before requesting new hires.
'AI will totally change Shopify, our work, and the rest of our lives,' Lütke's memo, which went viral on social media, said. 'We're all in on this!'
In response, some people pushed back. 'I cannot in good conscience recommend any company that is so recklessly throwing their good humans to the wind while putting all their faith in computer code that does not work a good portion of the time,' Kristine Schachinger, a digital marketing consultant responded to Lütke on X.
Following von Ahn's memo, Duolingo Chief Engineering Officer Natalie Glance shared details about what the strategy meant for her team. AI should be the default for solving problems and productivity expectations would rise as AI handles more work, she wrote. She also advised her team to spend 10 percent of their time on experimenting and learning more about the AI tools, try using AI for every task first, and share learnings.
'We don't have all the answers yet - and that's okay,' she wrote in an internal Slack message she later posted on LinkedIn.
'Duolingo was not the first company to do this and I doubt it will be the last,' said Sam Dalsimer, Duolingo spokesman.
Many white-collar workers across industries are already using AI in their work, from summarizing documents to writing emails and reports to research and data crunching. And Microsoft, Zoom and Google have been increasingly packing AI into many of their work products.
At Box, CEO and co-founder Aaron Levie expects the company to use AI to eliminate tasks that clog up people's workflows, automate more so that the company can reinvest savings to achieve more and foster more experimentation. He also wants to train employees to be proficient in AI.
'In engineering, we're probably in the final generation where you can go into a company with no AI coding expertise,' Levie said in an interview with The Post. 'What we've found internally and with more and more customers is that AI is really helping accelerate doing more, getting better work done, and solving problems faster.'
AI is already becoming a factor in some job interviews. Google software engineering candidates are given access to AI tools to solve problems, said Ryan J. Salva, senior director of product at Google. While Google doesn't have any mandates on using AI, it expects people to get the job done in the most efficient way, including using AI.
'I would be surprised if they did not use AI most of the time,' he said about developer interviews.
Some directives are less about rules, and more about pushing employees to 'wake up' and use AI. 'Here's the unpleasant truth,' Micha Kaufman, Fiverr founder and CEO, wrote in a memo. 'AI is coming for your jobs. Heck it's coming for my job too.'
His memo advised employees to become prompt engineers and master the latest AI solutions in their fields. He then spent three hours huddled in a meeting room with 250 workers discussing his expectations, including that new hires be proficient in AI, employees double or triple their output and strive to automate their jobs. The goal is to redirect people to tasks that only they can do, such as generating innovative ideas or using human judgment, Kaufman said in an interview.
'If you don't do this now, your value in the industry is going to drop, and you're going to be doomed,' he said.
Similarly, Wade Foster, co-founder and CEO of workflow automation platform Zapier, posted on X that he now expects aspiring employees to be equipped with AI skills. 'We're setting a new standard at Zapier. 100% of new hires must be fluent in AI.'
This 'AI-first' mandate isn't being well-received by everyone. People worry about AI replacing them at work, lowering the quality of products and services, and creating problematic outcomes such as misinformation and errors.
'AI first = Employees last,' said Chris Craig, a West Hollywood founder and CEO. 'This is poor leadership.'
Some companies, lured by the promise of efficiency, are expected to adopt AI without making necessary workflow and structural changes, McRae of Gartner said. As a result, they'll probably fail to get their return on investment and frustrate workers in the meantime, she added.
Moving too fast could backfire. After heavily touting its AI focus, Klarna, a Swedish fintech company, recently pulled back.
AI helped the company lower vendor expenses, increase internal productivity and better manage operations with fewer employees, according to a company filing submitted with the Securities and Exchange Commission in March. From 2022 to 2024, Klarna shrank its headcount by 38 percent (Klarna said its AI assistant handles tasks equivalent to more than 800 full-time roles). But the company ultimately went too far in its attempts to cut costs, Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told Bloomberg in May. The company told The Washington Post it recognizes AI's limitations, especially in nuanced interactions, and plans to recruit more human gig workers while investing in the tech.
'We've learned that successful deployment hinges on thoughtful implementation,' said Clare Nordstrom, a Klarna spokesperson. 'Quality customer experience requires balance, which is why we're investing in advanced technology with a human touch.'
At many start-ups, AI-first strategies are nothing new, said Roy Bahat, head of venture capital firm Bloomberg Beta, which invests in the future of work and AI start-ups.
'Most start-ups don't even need to think about having a policy about [AI] because if they're not already built from the ground up using AI, they're missing something.'
AI will steadily make its way into some workplaces regardless of mandates, McRae said. That's because increasingly, generative AI will be integrated into workers' tools seamlessly. They may use AI and not even realize it, she said. But until then, she expects more companies to join the AI-first bandwagon.
'Everyone needs to understand that the tools we're using are new and our understanding of them will change.'
THE WASHINGTON POST

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

We must all reclaim our information space
We must all reclaim our information space

Mail & Guardian

timean hour ago

  • Mail & Guardian

We must all reclaim our information space

Elon Musk. (File photo) More South Africans arrived in the United States this week. But it is an old resident who made the most headlines. Elon has left the Doge office. He did so in bizarre pomp and ceremony, with Donald Trump looking to save both their faces with a predictably awkward golden key award ceremony. Musk and his Javier Milei-inspired chainsaw are no longer a factor in Washington. The same cannot be said for public life. Musk owns X/Twitter, one of the biggest social media platforms on the planet. He's had a huge following on it long before he took control in 2022. He relishes using that influence to peddle all manner of absurdity and falsity. Musk has been the figurehead of the open conspiracy of tech oligarchs that reign in the White House. They have made no secret of their willingness to do whatever is asked of them, knowing that the reciprocation will be ample (or indeed, the punitive repercussions for a failure to toe the line would be grave.) Meta owner Mark Zuckerberg's sycophantic about-turn on moderation was a perfect example of that reality playing out in real time. In that now infamous announcement video, he waxed lyrical about how he created Facebook to be a democratic marketplace of free ideas. That is a lie, of course. He created Facebook so college boys could rate women on the internet. Regardless, with other media and search engine owners included in the cohort, the fact remains that a few powerful men control the dominant means of creating and sharing information in 2025. Those white South Africans arriving as refugees in the US should be all the reminder we need of how pernicious a narrative can be; and that real-world consequences need not be grounded in truth or rational reasoning. It bears repeating: there is no white genocide in South Africa. It is imperative that we, as individual news consumers and practitioners, reclaim our information space. For as much as the oligarchs strut with the swagger of impunity, that is far from the case. While this would be an obvious segue into launching into a pitch to get you to subscribe, the struggle we face goes beyond promoting ideas of established media. There's a war going on for our attention. The mistake would be in thinking we have to take sides. We have to respect each other and the process of sharing ideas civilly, with a respect for the truth. If our engagement begins and ends with a retweet, our society will begin to look even bleaker. The algorithm only wins if you surrender to it.

Daily Maverick partners with Cape Town summit to champion informed dialogue on AI
Daily Maverick partners with Cape Town summit to champion informed dialogue on AI

Daily Maverick

time13 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Daily Maverick partners with Cape Town summit to champion informed dialogue on AI

The new AI Empowered summit in August aims to make artificial intelligence accessible and accountable to ordinary professionals, educators, creatives and citizens – using AI to think bigger, move faster and lead faster. Daily Maverick is proud to announce its support for a new summit focused on making artificial intelligence (AI) accessible, actionable and relevant for South Africans. AI Empowered (AIE) will take place on 7 and 8 August 2025 at the Cape Town International Convention Centre. How do we prepare for a future we don't fully understand? As AI accelerates into every part of our lives, South Africans need more than buzzwords. We need clarity, access and serious conversation. It's easy to feel like AI is something happening out there – in techland, in code, in jobs that don't look like yours. But AI is already shaping how we work, how we learn and how we're governed. And in a country like South Africa – where inequality, unemployment and institutional fragility run deep – it's not a trend to observe; it's a force to understand, urgently. PwC South Africa's 'Value in Motion' report estimates that AI could add R129-billion to the country's GDP by 2030, with Africa as a whole standing to gain up to R1.9-trillion. The sectors with the greatest potential impact? Healthcare, education, financial services, agriculture and government. But that future doesn't build itself. And if we don't engage critically with what AI is and what it isn't, we risk repeating the mistakes of every other digital divide. Bringing AI down to Earth That's what makes this summit worth noticing – not for its glitz, but for its grounding. Inspired by the Entrepreneurs' Organization Cape Town, AIE is attempting to make AI accessible and accountable to ordinary professionals, educators, creatives and citizens. It positions itself as a summit about humans, using AI to think bigger, move faster and lead faster. Over two days, AIE will host conversations that go beyond the hype and into the real questions facing South Africans and the world today. With input from local and global thinkers in ethics, policy, education, tech and law, AIE is not selling a product; it's opening a conversation. What's on the table? Yes, there'll be a programme – three stages, 1,500 attendees, keynote speeches, panels and workshops. There'll be big names like Western Cape premier Alan Winde, AI ethics advocate Nazareen Ebrahim and Shoprite CTO Chris Shortt. And, yes, there's a track on how AI is already transforming business strategy, law, creative industries and climate science. But the real value might be in the tone: less promise, more proof. Less marketing, more meaning. AI in a South African context According to the World Economic Forum's Future of Jobs report, 44% of core job skills are expected to change in the next five years due to automation and AI. South Africa, with its complex labour market and education challenges, can't afford to sleepwalk through that shift. At the same time, AI presents enormous opportunities for scale and reach. Already, homegrown innovation is using AI for language translation in education, telemedicine in rural clinics and agricultural optimisation in drought-stricken provinces. What's needed now is not just policy, but participation. Why Daily Maverick is watching closely At Daily Maverick, we don't partner lightly. We're here because we believe that a better-informed public is the foundation of any future worth having. And AI, like climate change or inequality, is now a civic issue, not just a technological one. Join the conversation If you're curious, cautious or just craving clarity. Because South Africa can't afford to wait for others to define the future.

Nigeria slaps Meta with $290m in fines for invasive practices
Nigeria slaps Meta with $290m in fines for invasive practices

Daily Maverick

time15 hours ago

  • Daily Maverick

Nigeria slaps Meta with $290m in fines for invasive practices

Found guilty of data sharing and other invasive practices, the parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram was issued with a $290-million penalty. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, was recently hit with three fines totalling more than $290-million in Nigeria. The fines were imposed by Nigeria's Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission, the Nigerian Data Protection Commission and the Advertising Regulatory Council of Nigeria. Meta was accused of invasive practices against data subjects and consumers in Nigeria. The company denied the allegations and has challenged the fines in court. What are the violations for which Meta has been fined? The trouble began on 4 January 2021 when WhatsApp updated its privacy policy to introduce mandatory data-sharing with Facebook (now Meta) and its subsidiaries. The main change allowed WhatsApp to share user business interaction data with Facebook for marketing and advertising purposes. The updated policy did not include an opt-out provision. It was a 'take it or leave it' policy. In other words, if users did not consent to the updated terms, they would no longer be able to use WhatsApp. This triggered a Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission investigation into Meta, conducted jointly with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission. The probe was conducted from May 2021 to December 2023. Meta has allegedly not complied with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission, and failed to appoint a Data Protection Compliance Organisation. That's an entity licensed to assist data controllers and processors in achieving compliance with Nigeria's data protection regulations. It has not submitted its mandatory Nigeria Data Protection Regulation reports for two consecutive years. Nigeria is the most populous country on the continent, with about 236 million people. It has about 107 million internet users. The most used social media platforms at the end of 2024 were WhatsApp, Facebook, TikTok, Instagram and Telegram. Meta owns WhatsApp, Facebook and ­Instagram and has threatened to pull Facebook and Instagram services from the country. The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has said quitting Nigeria won't absolve Meta of its liability. Facebook has about 51.2 million users in Nigeria, while Instagram has about 12.6 million. What have regulators found against Meta? The investigation uncovered several violations. These included: Unauthorised data sharing: Meta was found to have shared Nigerian users' personal data without their consent. This included cross-border transfers and storage, violating the Nigeria Data Protection Commission and the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Act. Discriminatory practices: Meta allegedly treated Nigerian users differently from those in other jurisdictions with similar regulations. Meta offers stronger privacy protections in the European Union because of the General Data Protection Regulation. Nigerian regulators have highlighted this double standard. Denial of data self-determination: The company was accused of denying Nigerian users the right to control how their data is used, compelling them to accept exploitative privacy policies. Abuse of market dominance: The Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission said the company abused its dominant market position to enforce unfair privacy policies. Tying and bundling: Meta was found to have engaged in tying and bundling practices, which are considered anti-competitive. Tying occurs when a company requires customers to buy a secondary product or service as a condition of buying a primary product or service. For example, if Meta required users to accept Facebook's terms and automatically enrol in WhatsApp or Instagram services (or allow data sharing across them) to use Facebook, then that could be considered tying. This is because it can limit consumer choice, stifle competition and force people to accept products or terms they don't want. Bundling occurs when a company sells multiple products or services together as a package, or makes it difficult to buy them separately. For example, Meta might bundle multiple services such as Facebook, Instagram and Messenger in such a way that users must accept a single privacy policy that covers all, even if they only use one service. This can shut out smaller competitors and prevent users from choosing alternatives. After remediation efforts failed, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission issued its final order in July 2024. It imposed a $220-million fine along with penalties from other agencies, bringing the total to $290-million. In addition to the fine, the commission has ordered Meta to comply with Nigerian laws and cease practices it described as the 'exploitation' of Nigerian consumers. After completing its inquiry, the agency shared its findings with Meta. The company proposed a 'remedy package'. But the commission rejected this as inadequate. What made Meta vulnerable to such fines? Meta has failed to localise its data practices. It appears dismissive of Nigerian sovereignty and regulatory authority. For example, Meta has been transferring Nigerian users' data overseas without protecting them as required by Nigeria. Meta's annual revenue in Nigeria is between $200-million and $300-million. But many Nigerians in the diaspora use Facebook and Instagram to communicate with people inside the country. Revenue from those users is likely to raise the figure considerably. The company has faced similar sanctions for data violations worldwide, including a $1.4-billion fine in Texas and a $1.3-­­billion fine in Europe. It has also been penalised in India, South Korea and Australia. What are the implications of the fines? Meta now faces heightened scrutiny from Nigerian regulators. It will have to adhere to local data protection and consumer rights laws. This includes appointing a Data Protection Compliance Organisation and submitting audit reports as stipulated by the Nigerian Data Protection Regulation. The fines and regulatory measures may also compel Meta to reassess its operations in Nigeria. It might adjust its services to align with local laws. Meta has also been ordered by the courts to reimburse the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission $35,000 for the cost of the investigation. And it has been told to take the following measures: Reinstate the rights of Nigerian users to determine the control and use of their data without losing functionality or deleting the application; Set its privacy policy to comply with data protection laws in Nigeria; Stop sharing WhatsApp users' information with other Facebook companies and third parties until users have actively consented to this; Revert to the data sharing practices adopted in 2016, including establishing an opt-in screen; Terminate the tying and transfer of data without consent; and Add a visible link on its platforms for Nigerian users, leading to educational content about the risks of manipulative and unfair data practices. These videos will be developed in collaboration with approved NGOs and academic institutions. Other social media entities operating in Nigeria will be watching closely to see what is required. How dependent is Nigeria on these social media platforms? Many Nigerian businesses and entrepreneurs use Facebook and Instagram for marketing, customer engagement and sales. The platforms offer cost-effective advertising and direct communication channels with many customers. These platforms also provide valuable analytics on customer behaviour, content performance and demographics. Businesses use these services to refine their marketing strategies and make data-driven decisions. Content creators in Nigeria use Facebook and Instagram to build audiences, monetise content and collaborate with brands. The African creator industry, valued at £2.4-billion in 2024, is expected to continue to grow significantly. The music genre Afrobeats has also gained popularity across Nigeria and globally with the assistance of these platforms. Nigeria's ecosystem of homegrown and African social media platforms is growing, offering local alternatives to global giants such as Facebook and Instagram. While none match their scale, platforms including Crowwe, ChatAfrik and Nairaland are making strides in content sharing, chat, forums and business promotion. The information and communications technology sector contributed about 20% to Nigeria's real gross domestic product in the second quarter of 2024. The rapid expansion of the digital technology industry in recent years highlights its strong potential to stimulate economic growth. Nigeria's digital economy has also seen significant growth because of increased internet access and mobile usage. DM First published by The Conversation. Tolu Olarewaju is an economist and lecturer in management at Keele University. Jagannadha Pawan Tamvada is a professor of entrepreneurship at Kingston University.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store