logo
6 Americans detained in South Korea for trying to send rice and Bibles to North Korea by sea

6 Americans detained in South Korea for trying to send rice and Bibles to North Korea by sea

SEOUL, South Korea — Six Americans were detained Friday in South Korea for trying to send 1,600 plastic bottles filled with rice, miniature Bibles, $1 bills and USB sticks toward North Korea by sea, police said.
The Americans were apprehended on front-line Gwanghwa Island before throwing the bottles into the sea so they could float toward North Korean shores on the tides, two Gwanghwa police officers said. They said the Americans are being investigated on allegations they violated the law on the management of safety and disasters.
The officers, who requested anonymity because they weren't authorized to speak to media on the issue, refused to provide personal details of the Americans in line with privacy rules.
Gwanghwa police said they haven't found what is on the USB sticks.
The U.S. Embassy in South Korea had no immediate public comment.
For years, activists have sought to float plastic bottles or fly balloons across the border carrying anti-North Korea propaganda leaflets and USB thumb drives carrying South Korean dramas and K-pop songs, a practice that was banned from 2021-2023 over concerns it could inflame tensions with the North.
North Korea has responded to previous balloon campaigns with fiery rhetoric and other shows of anger, and last year the country launched its own balloons across the border, dumping rubbish on various South Korean sites including the presidential compound.
In 2023, South Korea's Constitutional Court struck down a controversial law that criminalized the sending of leaflets and other items to North Korea, calling it an excessive restriction on free speech.
But since taking office in early June, the new liberal government of President Lee Jae Myung is pushing to crack down on such civilian campaigns with other safety-related laws to avoid a flare-up tensions with North Korea and promote the safety of frontline South Korean residents.
On June 14, police detained an activist for allegedly flying balloons toward North Korea from Gwanghwa Island.
Lee took office with a promise to restart long-dormant talks with North Korea and establish peace on the Korean Peninsula. Lee's government halted frontline anti-Pyongyang propaganda loudspeaker broadcasts to try to ease military tensions. North Korean broadcasts have not been heard in South Korean front-line towns since then.
But it's unclear if North Korea will respond to Lee's conciliatory gesture after vowing last year to sever relations with South Korea and abandon the goal of peaceful Korean reunification. Official talks between the Koreas have been stalled since 2019, when U.S.-led diplomacy on North Korean denuclearization derailed.
Kim writes for the Associated Press.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump cancels trip to push ‘big, beautiful bill' across finish line
Trump cancels trip to push ‘big, beautiful bill' across finish line

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump cancels trip to push ‘big, beautiful bill' across finish line

(NewsNation) — President Trump is making one final push to get the 'big, beautiful bill' he's championed across the finish line. NewsNation confirmed that Trump has called off a weekend trip to his Bedminster Golf Club in New Jersey to focus on the bill and lobby Republicans who remain on the fence with what the spending package currently includes. The White House on Thursday dug in on its expectation that Congress will pass the massive reconciliation package containing Trump's key agenda items by next week, despite a vital setback from the Senate parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough. 'We expect that bill to be on the president's desk for signature by July 4,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. Trump says Iran must open itself to inspection to verify it doesn't restart its nuclear program Trump's optimism about the bill's deadline to pass has wavered a bit than in the past. The legislation calls for tax cuts for families, no tax on tips or overtime, a child tax credit increase, extension of the 2017 tax cuts, and clean energy tax cuts. Trump claims that if it doesn't pass, the country would see a 68% tax increase. 'It's a great bill,' he said. It's a massive tax cut. It will be interesting to see if we get any Democratic votes. If I were a Democrat, I would vote for this bill all day long because it's tax cuts and many other things that are common sense.' The Latest: Trump emboldened to accelerate his agenda after nationwide injunction ruling Trump also held a White House event on Thursday to pressure Republican holdouts to support his so-called 'big, beautiful bill' ahead of the deadline. The gathering featured 'everyday Americans' who the administration claims will benefit from 'many different provisions in the bill.' Truck drivers, firefighters, law enforcement, health care workers, tipped workers, and others were in attendance. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

The College-Major Gamble
The College-Major Gamble

Atlantic

time36 minutes ago

  • Atlantic

The College-Major Gamble

This is Atlantic Intelligence, a newsletter in which our writers help you wrap your mind around artificial intelligence and a new machine age. Sign up here. When I was in college, the Great Recession was unfolding, and it seemed like I had made a big mistake. With the economy crumbling and job prospects going with it, I had selected as my majors … journalism and sociology. Even the professors joked about our inevitable unemployment. Meanwhile, a close friend had switched majors and started to take computer-science classes—there would obviously be opportunities there. But that conventional wisdom is starting to change. As my colleague Rose Horowitch writes in an article for The Atlantic, entry-level tech jobs are beginning to fade away, in part because of new technology itself: AI is able to do many tasks that previously required a person. 'Artificial intelligence has proved to be even more valuable as a writer of computer code than as a writer of words,' Rose writes. 'This means it is ideally suited to replacing the very type of person who built it. A recent Pew study found that Americans think software engineers will be most affected by generative AI. Many young people aren't waiting to find out whether that's true.' I spoke with Rose about how AI is affecting college students and the job market—and what the future may hold. This interview has been edited and condensed. Rose Horowitch: There are a lot of tech executives coming out and saying that AI is replacing some of their coders, and that they just don't need as many entry-level employees. I spoke with an economics professor at Harvard, David Deming, who said that may be a convenient talking point—nobody wants to say We didn't hit our sales targets, so we have to lay people off. What we can guess is that the technology is actually making senior engineers more productive; therefore they need fewer entry-level employees. It's also one more piece of uncertainty that these tech companies are dealing with—in addition to tariffs and high interest rates—that may lead them to put off hiring. Damon: Tech companies do have a vested interest in promoting AI as such a powerful tool that it could do the work of a person, or multiple people. Microsoft recently laid thousands of people off, as you write in your article, and the company also said that AI writes or helps write 25 percent of their code—that's a helpful narrative for Microsoft, because Microsoft sells AI tools. At the same time, it does feel pretty clear to me that many different industries are dealing with the same issues. I've spoken about generative AI replacing entry-level work with prominent lawyers, journalists, people who work in tech—the worry feels real to me. Rose: I spoke with Molly Kinder, a Brookings Institution fellow who studies how AI affects the economy, and she said that she's worried that the bottom rung of the career ladder across industries is breaking apart. If you're writing a book, you may not need to hire a research assistant if you can use AI. It's obviously not going to be perfectly accurate, and it couldn't write the book for you, but it could make you more productive. Her concern, which I share, is that you still need people to get trained and then ascend at a company. The unemployment rate for young college graduates is already unusually high, and this may lead to more problems down the line that we can't even foresee. These early jobs are like apprenticeships: You're learning skills that you don't get in school. If you skip that, it's cheaper for the company in the short term, but what happens to white-collar work down the line? Damon: How are the schools themselves thinking about this reality—that they have students in their senior year facing a completely different prospect for their future than when they entered school four years ago? Rose: They're responding by figuring out how to produce graduates that are prepared to use AI tools in their work and be competitive applicants. The challenge is that the technology is changing so quickly—you need to teach students about what's relevant professionally while also teaching the fundamental skills, so that they're not just reliant on the machines. Damon: Your article makes this point that students should be focused less on learning a particular skill and more on studying something that's durable for the long term. Do you think students really will shift what they're studying? Will the purpose of higher education itself change somehow? Rose: It's likely that we'll see a decline in students studying computer science, and then, at some point, there will be too few job candidates, salaries will be pushed up, and more students will go in. But the most important thing that students can do—and it's so counterintuitive—is to study things that will give you human skills and soft skills that will help you endure in any industry. Even without AI, jobs are going to change. The challenge is that, in times of crisis, people tend to choose something preprofessional, because it feels safer. That cognitive bias can be unhelpful. Damon: You cover higher education in general. You're probably best known for the story you did about how elite college students can't read books anymore, which feels related to this discussion for obvious reasons. I'm curious to know more about why you were interested in exploring this particular topic. Rose: Higher ed, more than at any time in recent memory, is facing the question of what it is for. People are questioning the value of it much more than they did 10, 20 years ago. And so, these articles all fit into that theme: What is the value of higher ed, of getting an advanced degree? The article about computer-science majors shows that this thing that everyone thought is a sure bet doesn't seem to be. That reinforces why higher education needs to make the case for its value —how it teaches people to be more human, or what it's like to live a productive life in a society. Damon: There are so many crisis points in American higher education right now. AI is one of them. Your article about reading suggested a problem that may have emerged from other digital technologies. Obviously there have been issues stemming from the Trump administration. There was the Claudine Gay scandal. This is all in the past year or two. How do you sum it all up? Rose: Most people are starting to realize that the status quo is not going to work. There's declining trust in education, particularly from Republicans. A substantial portion of the country doesn't think higher ed serves the nation. The fact is that at many universities, academic standards have declined so much. Rigor has declined. Things cannot go on as they once did. What comes next, and who's going to chart that course? The higher-education leaders I speak with, at least, are trying to answer that question themselves so that it doesn't get defined by external forces like the Trump administration.

California Gov. Newsom sues Fox News for defamation, here's what we know
California Gov. Newsom sues Fox News for defamation, here's what we know

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

California Gov. Newsom sues Fox News for defamation, here's what we know

California Gov. Gavin Newsom has accused Fox News of defamation in a $787 million lawsuit, saying it intentionally misled viewers during immigration enforcement protests in his state. The June 27 filing, brought in a Delaware federal court, says Fox news reporters and hosts incorrectly reported what President Donald Trump said and edited video of Trump's comments to make it appear that Newsom lied about when the two men spoke during the events. Filings in the case repeatedly reference the $787 million settlement Fox agreed to in 2023 with Dominion, a voting machine company, after the news network repeated Trump's claims that the 2020 election was stolen using their equipment. "If Fox News wants to lie to the American people on Donald Trump's behalf, it should face consequences ‒ just like it did in the Dominion case," Newsom said in a statement provided to USA TODAY. "I believe the American people should be able to trust the information they receive from a major news outlet. Until Fox is willing to be truthful, I will keep fighting against their propaganda machine." In a statement, Fox dismissed the lawsuit as "frivolous." "Gov. Newsom's transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him," the statement reads. "We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed.' According to the filing, Newsom brought the case after Fox host Jesse Watters and reporter John Roberts claimed he lied about when he last spoke by phone with Trump during June protests in Los Angeles. Newsom's filing claims he last spoke with Trump for approximately 16 minutes by phone on June 7, one day before the president deployed 2,000 California National Guard troops over Newsom's objections to quell protests in Los Angeles. "At no point (on June 7) did President Trump raise the demonstrations in Los Angeles which had begun that day, nor discuss the use of the National Guard," according to the filing. "And when Governor Newsom attempted to discuss the situation in Los Angeles, President Trump steered the topic away," the filing states. Trump told reporters on June 10 he had spoken with Newsom 'a day ago,' implying a conversation took place the same day he deployed 700 Marines to Los Angeles. Newsom refuted Trump's claim in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter, minutes later, saying 'There was no call. Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to.' Newsom's lawyers argue Watters' program edited a video of Trump to support the president's claim and make Newsom look like he lied about their communication. They also allege that Roberts hedged Trump's words to make it appear that he was talking about the June 7 call and that Newsom was lying. Newsom is suing as an individual, not in his capacity as governor. Newsom's lawyers argue in the filing that the incident meets the legal standard for defamation and potentially harmed the governor's standing with voters in future elections. Additionally, they claim it violated California's Unfair Competition Law, which outlaws 'deceptive and unfair business practices.' While it is unclear what kind of response the governor's lawsuit against Fox News will have amongst California voters, a recent poll shows his approval rating has dropped for the month of June. The Public Policy Institute of California surveyed 1,591 adults and state residents on a number of issues including the governor's approval, the president's approval and national issues. In the June statewide survey, only 44% of adults and 46% of likely voters approve of Governor's Newsom's job performance. Only 41% of adults and 45% of likely voters approved of the way that the California Legislature is handling its job. The survey also showed only 3-in-10 Californians approved of President Trump. Ernesto Centeno Araujo covers breaking news for the Ventura County Star. He can be reached at ecentenoaraujo@ This article originally appeared on Palm Springs Desert Sun: Gov. Gavin Newsom sues Fox News for defamation, what to know

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store