Technology to enforce teen social media ban 'effective', trial says, but this is at odds with other evidence
Technologies to enforce the Australian government's social media ban for under 16s are "private, robust and effective".
That's according to the preliminary findings of a federal government-commissioned trial that has nearly finished testing them.
The findings, released today, may give the government greater confidence to forge ahead with the ban, despite a suite of expert criticism. They might also alleviate some of the concerns of the Australian population about privacy and security implications of the ban, which is due to begin in December.
Play Video
Pause
Skip Backward
Skip Forward
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
0:00
Loaded
:
0%
0:00
Stream Type
LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
1x
Playback Rate
Chapters
Chapters
Descriptions
descriptions off
, selected
Captions
captions settings
, opens captions settings dialog
captions off
, selected
Audio Track
Picture-in-Picture
Fullscreen
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text
Color
White
Black
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Text Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Opaque
Semi-Transparent
Transparent
Caption Area Background
Color
Black
White
Red
Green
Blue
Yellow
Magenta
Cyan
Opacity
Transparent
Semi-Transparent
Opaque
Font Size
50%
75%
100%
125%
150%
175%
200%
300%
400%
Text Edge Style
None
Raised
Depressed
Uniform
Drop shadow
Font Family
Proportional Sans-Serif
Monospace Sans-Serif
Proportional Serif
Monospace Serif
Casual
Script
Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values
Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Cardiologist Reveals: The Simple Morning Habit for a Flatter Belly After 50!
Lulutox
Undo
For example, a report based on a survey of nearly 4,000 people and released by the government earlier this week found nine out of ten people support the idea of a ban.
But it also found a large number of people were "very concerned" about how the ban would be implemented. Nearly 80 per cent of respondents had privacy and security concerns, while roughly half had concerns about age assurance accuracy and government oversight.
Live Events
The trial's preliminary findings paint a rosy picture of the potential for available technologies to check people's ages. However, they contain very little detail about specific technologies, and appear to be at odds with what we know about age-assurance technology from other sources.
Discover the stories of your interest
Blockchain
5 Stories
Cyber-safety
7 Stories
Fintech
9 Stories
E-comm
9 Stories
ML
8 Stories
Edtech
6 Stories
From facial recognition to hand movement recognition
The social media ban for under 16s was legislated in December 2024. A last-minute amendment to the law requires technology companies to provide "alternative age assurance methods" for account holders to confirm their age, rather than relying only on government-issued ID.
The Australian government commissioned an independent trial to evaluate the "effectiveness, maturity, and readiness for use" of these alternative methods.
The trial is being led by the Age Check Certification Scheme - a company based in the United Kingdom that specialises in testing and certifying identity verification systems. It includes 53 vendors that offer a range of age assurance technologies to guess people's ages, using techniques such as facial recognition and hand-movement recognition.
According to the preliminary findings of the trial, "age assurance can be done in
Australia
".
The trial's project director, Tony Allen, said "there are no significant technological barriers" to assuring people's ages online. He added the solutions are "technically feasible, can be integrated flexibly into existing services and can support the safety and rights of children online".
However, these claims are hard to square with other evidence.
High error rates
Yesterday the
ABC
reported the trial found face-scanning technologies "repeatedly misidentified" children as young as 15 as being in their 20s and 30s.
These tools could only guess children's ages "within an 18-month range in 85 percent of cases". This means a 14-year-old child might gain access to a social media account, while a 17-year-old might be blocked.
This is in line with results of global trials of face-scanning technologies conducted for more than a decade.
An ongoing series of studies of age estimation technology by the United States'
National Institute of Standards and Technology
shows the algorithms "fail significantly when attempting to differentiate minors" of various ages.
The tests also show that error rates are higher for young women compared to young men. Error rates are also higher for people with darker skin tones.
These studies show that even the best age-estimation software currently available - Yoti - has an average error of 1.0 years. Other software options mistake someone's age by 3.1 years on average.
This means, at best, a 16-year-old might be estimated to be 15 or 17 years old; at worst, they could be seen to be 13 or 19 years of age. These error rates mean a significant number of children under 16 could access social media accounts despite a ban being in place, while some over 16 could be blocked.
Yoti also explains businesses needing to check exact ages (such as 18) can set higher age thresholds (such as 25), so fewer people under 18 get through the age check.
This approach would be similar to that taken in Australia's retail liquor sector, where sales staff verify ID for anyone who appears to be under the age of 25. However, many young people lack the government-issued ID required for an additional age check.
It's also worth remembering that in August 2023, the Australian government acknowledged that the age assurance technology market was "immature" and could not yet meet key requirements, such as working reliably without circumvention and balancing privacy and security.
Outstanding questions
We don't yet know exactly what methods platforms will use to verify account holders' ages. While face-scanning technologies are often discussed, they could use other methods to confirm age. The government trial also tested voice and hand movements to guess young people's ages. But those methods also have accuracy issues.
And it's not yet clear what recourse people will have if their age is misidentified. Will parents be able to complain if children under 16 gain access to accounts, despite restrictions? Will older Australians who are incorrectly blocked be able to appeal? And if so, to whom?
There are other outstanding questions. What's stopping someone who's under 16 from getting someone who is over 16 to set up an account on their behalf? To mitigate this risk, the government might require all social media users to verify their age at regular intervals.
It's also unclear what level of age estimation error the government may be willing to accept in implementing a social media ban. The legislation says technology companies must demonstrate they have taken "reasonable steps" to prevent under 16s from holding social media accounts. What is considered "reasonable" is yet to be clearly defined.
Australians will have to wait until later this year for the full results of the government's trial to be released, and to know how technology companies will respond. With less than six months until the ban comes into effect, social media users still don't have all the answers they need.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
'Life is full of unexpected surprises': The mystery of Iran's robotic voice calls amid blackout
As Iran reels from escalating conflict and sweeping internet restrictions, a new and deeply unsettling phenomenon has gripped the Iranian diaspora : calls to loved ones inside the country are being intercepted by robotic, pre-recorded voice messages. This bizarre development, first widely reported after a nationwide internet blackout, has left families anxious, experts puzzled, and the world asking—who is really behind the voice on the line? 'Life is full of unexpected surprises, and while some of these can bring joy, others may present challenges.' For Iranians and their families, the greatest challenge now is simply being heard. A disturbing new reality for Iranians abroad Since Wednesday, Iranians living in the UK, U.S., and across Europe have described a surreal experience: dialing family members' mobile numbers in Iran, only to be greeted by a mechanical voice. The message, sometimes in English and sometimes in Farsi , ranges from eerily philosophical to outright nonsensical. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like How Much Money Should You Have Before Hiring a Financial Advisor? SmartAsset Learn More Undo It urges the listener to 'close your eyes and imagine a peaceful place'. Other callers have encountered a more stilted, AI-generated voice with not so perfect English being heard speaking: 'Alo? Alo? Who is calling? I can't heard you. Who you want to speak with? I'm Alyssia. Do you remember me? I think I don't know who are you'. Live Events For many, the experience is not just unsettling—it's terrifying. 'Calling your mom and expecting to hear her voice and hearing an AI voice is one of the scariest things I've ever experienced,' said a 30-year-old woman in New York. Who is behind the voice? The origins and purpose of the robotic messages remain shrouded in mystery. Five telecommunications and cybersecurity experts who reviewed recordings for AP offered several theories: Government Control: Four out of five experts believe the Iranian government is likely responsible, using the messages as a tool to restrict, monitor, or confuse communications during a period of heightened security concerns. Iranian cybersecurity specialists suggest the diversions may also serve to prevent hacking attempts or sow confusion among the population. Foreign Interference: One expert posited that Israel or another foreign actor could be behind the calls, as a form of psychological warfare . Technical Explanation: Alp Toker , director of NetBlocks, explained that during internet outages, calls may be redirected to a default gateway message. The content, he noted, appears hastily generated using text-to-speech or AI, and is likely a standard fallback when calls cannot be completed. Notably, neither the Iranian nor Israeli governments have commented on the phenomenon, and the true source remains unconfirmed. The human toll: isolation and helplessness The timing of these messages is critical. They began as Israel launched airstrikes on Iranian nuclear and military sites, prompting retaliatory missile and drone strikes from Iran. In response, the Iranian government imposed a sweeping internet blackout, cutting off WhatsApp and other messaging services. With digital communication down, families turned to direct phone calls—only to find this new barrier. For many, the inability to reach family is more than an inconvenience. Ellie, a British-Iranian, described her desperation to contact her diabetic mother in Tehran, who was running low on insulin and trapped on the city's outskirts. 'I don't know why they're doing this,' she said, her voice breaking. As of Saturday, NetBlocks reported that international internet access was partially restored in some regions after 62 hours of severe disruption. Yet, overall connectivity remains below normal, and many Iranians—both inside and outside the country—are still struggling to reconnect with family and access independent information.
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy's ‘message' to employees: Make no mistake, they're coming, and they're …
Amazon CEO Andy Jassy delivered a stark warning to his 1.5 million employees this week, telling them that artificial intelligence will fundamentally reshape the company's workforce in the coming years. In a company-wide memo, Jassy announced that AI agents and generative AI systems will reduce the need for human workers in many current roles. "We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today," Jassy wrote in the June 17 memo, adding that the company expects this transformation "will reduce our total corporate workforce" within the next few years. The announcement affects Amazon's 350,000 corporate employees working in software engineering, marketing, and other white-collar positions. Jassy painted a future dominated by AI agents, autonomous software systems that can perform complex tasks like research, coding, and automation. Jassy predicted there will be "billions of these agents, across every company and in every imaginable field," handling everything from shopping to travel to daily chores. CEO's "fewer people" message targets Amazon's corporate workforce by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Jassy highlighted the company's extensive AI integration, citing over 1,000 generative AI services and applications currently in development or deployed. These range from the next-generation Alexa+ personal assistant to AI-powered shopping tools used by tens of millions of customers worldwide. The company has also rebuilt its customer service chatbot with generative AI and implemented AI across its fulfillment network for inventory management and demand forecasting. Despite the job displacement warning, Jassy framed the changes as an opportunity for employees willing to adapt. He urged workers to "be curious about AI, educate yourself, attend workshops and take trainings," emphasizing that those who embrace the technology will be "well-positioned to have high impact." Read: Amazon CEO's full address to employees Today, in virtually every corner of the company, we're using Generative AI to make customers lives better and easier. What started as deep conviction that every customer experience would be reinvented using AI, and that altogether new experiences we've only dreamed of would become possible, is rapidly becoming reality. Technologies like Generative AI are rare; they come about once-in-a-lifetime, and completely change what's possible for customers and businesses. So, we are investing quite expansively, and, the progress we are making is evident. You can see it in what we're rolling out in Alexa+, our next generation Alexa personal assistant that's meaningfully smarter, more capable, and is the first personal assistant that can take significant actions for customers on top of providing intelligent answers to virtually any question. You can see it with our AI shopping assistant that's being used by tens of millions of customers around the world to discover new products and make more informed purchase decisions. You can see it in an increasing array of shopping features like "Lens" (very cool to be able to take a picture of an item and have it pull up the shopping result), "Buy for Me" (where I can ask our shopping agent to buy an item on another merchant's website for me), or Recommended Size (where we can predict the right size for you based on prior purchases and how different apparel brands run fit-wise relative to each other). You can see it in how we're helping our independent sellers more easily create new product detail pages or get advice on how to be even more effective as a seller in our marketplace. Nearly half a million selling partners are using these services, and the listings they're creating are measurably better. You can see it in Advertising where we've built a suite of AI tools that make it easier for brands to plan, onboard, create and optimize campaigns. In Q1 alone, over 50K advertisers used these capabilities. And, you can see it in what we're delivering in AWS for builders, whether it's custom silicon (Trainium2) to provide better price-performance on model-training and inference, services that make it much easier to build Foundation Models (SageMaker), or leverage leading frontier models and do GenAI inference at scale (Bedrock), our own frontier model (Nova) to give customers leading intelligence at lower latency and cost, or services to make it much easier for developers to write code (Q and QCLI). We're also using Generative AI broadly across our internal operations. In our fulfillment network, we're using AI to improve inventory placement, demand forecasting, and the efficiency of our robots—all of which have improved cost to serve and delivery speed. We've rebuilt our Customer Service Chatbot with GenAI, providing an even better experience than we'd had before. And, we're assembling more intelligent and compelling product detail pages from leveraging GenAI. I could go on, but you get the idea. While we've made a lot of progress, we're still at the relative beginning. There are a few reasons we believe this and want to go even faster. First, we have strong conviction that AI agents will change how we all work and live. Think of agents as software systems that use AI to perform tasks on behalf of users or other systems. Agents let you tell them what you want (often in natural language), and do things like scour the web (and various data sources) and summarize results, engage in deep research, write code, find anomalies, highlight interesting insights, translate language and code into other variants, and automate a lot of tasks that consume our time. There will be billions of these agents, across every company and in every imaginable field. There will also be agents that routinely do things for you outside of work, from shopping to travel to daily chores and tasks. Many of these agents have yet to be built, but make no mistake, they're coming, and coming fast. Second, and what makes this agentic future so compelling for Amazon, is that these agents are going to change the scope and speed at which we can innovate for customers. Agents will allow us to start almost everything from a more advanced starting point. We'll be able to focus less on rote work and more on thinking strategically about how to improve customer experiences and invent new ones. Agents will be teammates that we can call on at various stages of our work, and that will get wiser and more helpful with more experience. If we build and leverage the right agents, it's going to rapidly accelerate our ability to make customers lives easier and better every day, and it's going to make our jobs even more exciting and fun than they are today. And third, we're going to keep pushing to operate like the world's largest start-up-- customer-obsessed, inventive, fast-moving, lean, scrappy, and full of missionaries trying to build something better for customers and a business that outlasts us all. You will continue to see steam and I take actions to help us move faster, have more ownership, and invent more easily. AI will be a substantial catalyst here. Today, we have over 1,000 Generative AI services and applications in progress or built, but at our scale, that's a small fraction of what we will ultimately build. We're going to lean in further in the coming months. We're going to make it much easier to build agents, and then build (or partner) on several new agents across all of our business units and G&A areas. As we roll out more Generative AI and agents, it should change the way our work is done. We will need fewer people doing some of the jobs that are being done today, and more people doing other types of jobs. It's hard to know exactly where this nets out over time, but in the next few years, we expect that this will reduce our total corporate workforce as we get efficiency gains from using AI extensively across the company. As we go through this transformation together, be curious about AI, educate yourself, attend workshops and take trainings, use and experiment with AI whenever you can, participate in your team's brainstorms to figure out how to invent for our customers more quickly and expansively, and how to get more done with scrappier teams. When I first started at Amazon in 1997 as an Assistant Product Manager, I worked on leaner teams that got a lot done quickly and where I could have substantial impact. We didn't have tools resembling anything like Generative AI, but we had broad remits, high ambition, and saw the opportunity to improve (and invent) so many customer experiences. Fast forward 28 years and the most transformative technology since the Internet is here. Those who embrace this change, become conversant in AI, help us build and improve our AI capabilities internally and deliver for customers, will be well-positioned to have high impact and help us reinvent the company. There's so much more to come with Generative AI. I'm energized by our progress, excited about our plans ahead, and looking forward to partnering with you all as we change what's possible for our customers, partners, and how we work. Andy AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
5 hours ago
- Time of India
Rise of 'MAGA Mark'? Why Meta employees 'horrified' as CEO Mark Zuckerberg ditches his T-shirts for luxury jackets, $900K watch
Meta employees are reportedly 'horrified' by CEO Mark Zuckerberg's support for the Trump administration and his new, more conservative avatar. As per a Financial Times report, the billionaire has reportedly undergone a political transformation that has left employees 'grieving' and feeling 'horror and betrayal.' An Unsettling Shift in Workplace Culture More than 40 current and former Meta employees, most of whom requested anonymity, reportedly shared their concerns with FT , painting a grim picture of the internal environment. The culture at Meta, once shaped by Zuckerberg's image as a casual, innovation-driven tech leader, is now seen as shifting toward a space that some insiders feel is more aggressive and ideologically rigid. These employees described the atmosphere as emotionally chaotic, with many staffers feeling alienated by the company's perceived new direction. From Geek Icon to Conservative Symbol Zuckerberg, once known for his low-profile fashion and engineering-centric public persona, is now being linked with far-right media figures and hyper-masculine influencers. He has built friendships with prominent names associated with the "manosphere"—a network of online voices that critique progressive values and emphasize traditional masculinity. UFC president Dana White and podcaster Joe Rogan are reportedly among Zuckerberg's close associates in this ideological space. The CEO's evolving personality has even earned him a satirical nickname among employees: 'MAGA Mark.' by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 40세 넘고 PC만 있으면? 이 게임 완전 내 거임! Hero Wars 플레이하기 Undo Recently, a video of Zuckerberg calling corporate culture in the US, "culturally neutered" and clamouring for more "masculine energy," in Rogan's podcast has gone viral. Internal Pushback and Tense Exchanges The unease reached a peak during a meeting where Zuckerberg's comments on a Rogan podcast were brought up. In the interview, he called for a boost in 'masculine energy' at the workplace—statements that drew criticism and jokes, including a comedian dubbing him the 'emperor of the Broman Empire.' When employees questioned this ideological turn, Zuckerberg allegedly responded with a brusque dismissal, indicating that dissenting opinions wouldn't be entertained. A Dramatic Image Makeover The Financial Times notes that Zuckerberg's outer transformation has mirrored his political one. He's reportedly traded his trademark plain grey T-shirts for flashier attire—luxurious shearling jackets, gold accessories, and even a high-end $900,000 Greubel Forsey timepiece. The tech mogul has also altered his appearance, reportedly replacing his clean-cut look with a vibrant, styled ginger mullet—an image widely circulated and commented upon in media outlets like The Daily Beast. Possible Role in Trump's Inner Circle Sources also revealed that there have been behind-the-scenes conversations about Zuckerberg potentially joining Trump's advisory panel on science and technology. A political insider told FT that at various functions, former President Donald Trump enjoys showcasing Zuckerberg, suggesting a deepening rapport. Driven by Comparison with Elon Musk? Some Meta staff believe the CEO's transformation may stem from professional rivalry. As Elon Musk continues to be celebrated as an audacious visionary in the tech community, Zuckerberg is reportedly striving to revamp his image to gain similar admiration. According to one insider, the social media magnate has long desired broader public approval—a need that may be influencing his current trajectory.
