
Lost secret cult temple buried beneath London's streets for 1,700 years
In 1954, builders clearing a World War II bombsite in central London unearthed the remains of a Roman temple honouring Mithras, an ancient Roman-era deity, buried beneath the rubble
In 1954, diggers clearing a World War II bombsite in the heart of London unearthed something extraordinary amidst the debris. The find quickly ignited curiosity across the capital, with onlookers flocking to Cannon Street to sneak a peek at the treasure half-buried just metres from the northern banks of the River Thames.
Unbeknown to them, they were witnessing one of the most significant archaeological discoveries in London's 2,000-year history. While working on the site, the team accidentally dug up the head of a statue of Mithras, an ancient Roman-era deity - but that was just the beginning.
Buried metres beneath the surface lay the remnants of a long-forgotten underground temple dating back at least 1,700 years. This temple was erected in honour of Mithras, a mythical sun-god linked with covenant, light, oath and justice, stemming from ancient Iranian pagan belief.
This religion, known as Mithraism, was prevalent across the Roman Empire in the third century, drawing followers from Europe, North Africa and the Middle East.
Mithraism resonated with Romans from all walks of life, from high-ranking members of the Roman Imperial Army to ordinary citizens - but devotees typically kept a low profile, performing their rituals in secret.
The cult's followers would congregate in hidden locations, away from prying eyes. Their specially built temples, known as tauroctony by historians of the time, often featured shrines depicting Mithras' killing of a bull within a cave, a story central to Mithraism, reports MyLondon.
After three weeks of digging, the site was fully exposed, much to the joy of onlookers including Winston Churchill, who expressed his excitement over the discovery.
However, instead of being treated with the respect it deserved as a heritage site, the temple was dismantled and reassembled above ground at a more visitor-friendly location.
William Grimes, the first archaeologist to uncover the temple, was disheartened by the project, as it left out many of the temple's original archaeological features.
To correct this mistake, the City of London Planning Authority decided in 1962 that the temple should be taken apart again and rebuilt at its original location.
In 2010, Bloomberg chose to buy the site where the temple was first found to set up their European headquarters. As part of the purchase, Bloomberg agreed to manage the temple.
After years of meticulous restoration, the temple was finally unveiled to the public in its original subterranean chamber in November 2018. Here, archaeologists discovered over 400 fragments of ancient Roman writing-tablets. Among these fascinating finds were the earliest known mention of London and the oldest hand-written document in Britain.
Little is understood about the Mithraic religion, but it's thought to have been favoured by members of the Roman army. They likely saw it as an exclusive fraternal brotherhood.
Their enigmatic ceremonies, including a seven-step initiation for newcomers, would have been conducted on a central nave running through the spooky temple, dimly illuminated by candles and oil lamps.
The statue of Mithras would have been positioned at one end of the temple's rounded apse. Here, a priest or group of priests may have led congregational prayers and hymns to their deity.
Interestingly, the temple was constructed on the banks of the Walbrook, a long-lost river now coursing beneath the streets of London.
Artefacts such as coins, pottery, shoes, lucky charms and an amber gladiator amulet were found preserved in the river's mud. The river flows through Shoreditch, past Liverpool Street and into the Thames.
The London Mithraeum, situated at 12 Walbrook, London EC4N 8AA, is open to the public and does not require pre-booked tickets. It remains closed on Mondays, Christmas and New Year bank holidays.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Belfast Telegraph
8 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
Captain of MV Matthew carrying 2.2 tonnes of cocaine ‘feared for his life'
A retired marine engineer who was captain of the MV Matthew while it was carrying more than 2.2 tonnes of cocaine claimed that he feared for his life and his family if he did not follow instructions, a court has heard. Iranian Soheil Jelveh, 51, said there was an element of fear on board the vessel, and admitted he was aware that the consignment on the ship was not 'spare parts'. He said that he was captain in name but he had to follow orders like everyone else. The non-jury Special Criminal Court in Dublin was told on Tuesday that he was in fear of being killed and that his family, who were in Dubai, would also be killed. The court was also told that a number of the crew were hired by a transnational organised crime group for the operation. Jelveh is one of seven men charged with offences arising from the seizure of 2.25 tonnes of cocaine with an estimated value of more than 157 million euros (£132 million), which was on board the ship the MV Matthew, a Panamanian-registered bulk carrier. Ukrainians Mykhailo Gavryk, and Vitaliy Vlasoi, both 32; Iranians Jelveh and Saeid Hassani, 39; Filipino Harold Estoesta, 31, and Dutch national Cumali Ozgen, 49, all pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine for sale or supply on board the MV Mathew between 24 and 26 September 2023. Ukrainian national Vitaliy Lapa, aged 62, with an address at Rudenka, Repina Str in Berdyansk, pleaded guilty to attempting to possess cocaine for sale or supply between 21 and 25 September 2023. Jamie Harbron, aged 31, of South Avenue, Billingham in the UK, also pleaded guilty that on a date between September 21 and September 25, 2023, both dates inclusive, he attempted to have cocaine in his possession for the purpose of sale or supply, an offence under the Misuse of Drugs Act. Detective Superintendent Keith Halley told the court in Dublin that messages sent to crew members of the MV Matthew told them to consider moving the bags containing drugs on to a lifeboat and then release it into the sea as Irish authorities got closer to the vessel. The court heard that Ozgen, who was described in court by his barrister Brendan Grehan as having a lack of sea experience, was to go into the lifeboat with 22 tonnes of drugs in 'one of the worst storms'. Six men who were arrested on board ignored instructions from the LE William Butler Yeats naval vessel a number of times. Detective Halley, who was a Revenue Customs liaison for Irish police, gave evidence that the authorities received information about a fishing trawler being used to import drugs, which led to the formation of a joint task force between gardai, the Revenue Customs Service and the Irish Naval Service. Jelveh, a father of two, claimed he felt violated by people in the 'head office' who were not present on the vessel, and that there was a threat over him that was not there in relation to his co-accused. Jelveh qualified as a maritime engineer in 1997 and worked as a marine engineer until 2008 and moved through the ranks to became first deck officer. He became captain in 2019. He had since retired and was working as a football coach. Prosecution barrister John Berry SC told the court that the crew had attempted to set the drugs on fire as they attempted to flee Irish authorities and head into the high seas. Messages discovered in a WhatsApp group, called The Deck Officers, revealed how the crew was instructed to be ready to burn the cargo and head towards Sierra Leone if a helicopter tried to intercept the ship. The crew were told to 'make sure everything is burnt' and to use paint thinner to set the cargo alight. They were also ordered by people not on board the vessel not to communicate with Irish authorities. The crew had been ordered by authorities to steer the vessel towards the Irish coast and dock at Cork. The court heard that they were willing to comply with the instructions, however, they were going full steam ahead to the high seas and were planning on travelling to Sierra Leone. The court was told that the crew had been making efforts to deter the arrival of the Army Ranger Wing to allow for the removal of the drugs. Footage and photographs shown to the court revealed there was smoke coming from the lifeboat after an attempt was made to set the drugs alight. Cans of paint, used to set it on fire, were also found on the life raft. Detective Halley also told the court today that the people instructing the crew had 'immense capabilities, unlimited resources and a global reach'. He said it became apparent through the message groups that those who were controlling the vessel and sending instructions on what to do were based in Dubai. They had sent messages instructing the crew to keep going, including reassuring messages like 'just relax and this will all be over soon'. They also gave the wrong information that Irish authorities could not board the vessel. The sentence hearing is taking place before Ms Justice Melanie Grealy Judge Sarah Berkeley and Judge Grainne Malone. The sentencing hearing continues on Wednesday.

Leader Live
12 hours ago
- Leader Live
Roman artefacts found along Hynet project pipeline route
An archaeological investigation plan has been submitted to Flintshire County Council before work on the new pipeline takes place. The project involves the construction of a 26km underground pipeline from Elton, Cheshire to the Point of Ayr gas terminal in Talacre - work on which is expected to start this summer. At the Point of Ayr gas terminal, it will then transport carbon dioxide to a platform in the Douglas oil and gas field in the Irish Sea where it will be pumped into depleted oil and gas reservoirs rather than released into the atmosphere. The pipeline will capture 109 million tonnes of carbon over 25 years during phase one of operation - equivalent to taking 60.1 million cars off the road for a year. (Image: Hynet project) A Written Scheme of Investigation (WSI) has been submitted to Flintshire Council - setting out how archaeological investigation will take place along the route ahead of construction. A total of 79 targeted trial trenches were located to test - of which 45 have already been completed as part of an earlier phase. Oxford Archaeology were commissioned to undertake the trial-trench evaluation on the 26km route of new pipeline. Eight of the trenches in Cheshire West revealed a total of 13 archaeological features, alongside a small group of artefacts from just three trenches. A trench to the south of Saughall, near Chester, produced the most significant archaeological features identified by the evaluation; comprised a cobble and sandstone surface (perhaps a footing for a building)and a step-profiled ditch. Both were associated with Roman pottery, ironwork, and glass dating to the mid-second to mid-third century AD. MORE NEWS: Of the 22 trenches in Flintshire, 14 revealed archaeological features - the earliest datable feature comprised a single pit found on gently sloping ground at Pentre Halkyn, which contained Bronze Age pottery. The report states that the results of further investigation work to take place will "inform development of an appropriate mitigation strategy for any significant archaeological remains". If the evaluation reveals little of archaeological significance, then no further work may be necessary. Liverpool Bay CCS seeks approval from Flintshire Council to approve the Written Scheme of Archaeology - which is needed for work to commence.


Reuters
15 hours ago
- Reuters
Any Trump deal with Iran must tackle nuclear watchdog's blind spots
VIENNA, June 3 (Reuters) - U.N. inspectors monitoring Iran's Fordow nuclear site confronted a major gap in their knowledge last year as they watched trucks carrying advanced uranium-enriching centrifuges roll into the facility dug into a mountain south of Tehran. While Iran had notified the International Atomic Energy Agency that hundreds of extra IR-6 centrifuges would be installed at Fordow, the inspectors had no idea where the sophisticated machines had come from, an official familiar with the U.N. monitoring work told Reuters on condition of anonymity. The episode encapsulated how the U.N. nuclear watchdog has lost track of some critical elements of Iran's nuclear activities since U.S. President Donald Trump ditched a 2015 deal that imposed strict restrictions and close IAEA supervision. Key blind spots include not knowing how many centrifuges Iran possesses or where the machines and their parts are produced and stored, quarterly IAEA reports show. The agency has also lost the ability to carry out snap inspections at locations not declared by Iran. The U.S. has started new talks with Iran, aiming to impose fresh nuclear restrictions on Tehran. For any deal to succeed, though, those IAEA blind spots will need to be closed, according to more than a dozen people familiar with Iran's atomic activities, including officials, diplomats and analysts. "There are gaps in our knowledge of Iran's nuclear programme that must be addressed in order to have a baseline understanding of its current scale and scope," said Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group think-tank. "That may take months to piece together but it's critical if the IAEA and parties to the negotiations are to have confidence in the non-proliferation benefits of an agreement." The IAEA, which answers to 180 member states, declined to comment for this article. The Iranian foreign ministry and Iran's Atomic Energy Organisation didn't respond to queries. Iran has long held that it was entitled to scrap its commitments to enhanced IAEA supervision under the 2015 deal after the U.S. unilaterally withdrew. It rejects Western accusations that it is at least keeping the option of building a nuclear weapon open, saying its aims are purely peaceful. The Islamic Republic has nonetheless made big strides in uranium enrichment in recent years. When the U.S. and world powers struck the nuclear deal with Iran in 2015, they sought to limit Tehran's "breakout time" - how long it would need to produce enough fissile material for a single atom bomb - to at least a year by capping the purity to which it could enrich uranium at below 4%. Now that breakout time has all but evaporated. Iran has installed ever more advanced centrifuges and is enriching to up to 60% purity, close to the roughly 90% of weapons grade. According to a confidential report by the IAEA at the weekend, Iran has enough uranium enriched to that level for nine nuclear weapons if refined further, by an agency yardstick. No other country has enriched uranium to such a high level without producing weapons, the watchdog added. Nuclear power plants often use fuel enriched to between 3% and 5%. A European official who follows Iran's nuclear programme told Reuters the enrichment programme was now so advanced that, even if it was shut down entirely, the Iranians could restart and rebuild it in the space of a few months. After five rounds of discussions between Iranian and U.S. negotiators, several obstacles remain. Among them are Iran's rejection of an American demand that it commit to scrapping enrichment and its refusal to ship its existing stockpile of highly enriched uranium abroad. Given the window has closed to restore as long a breakout time as in 2015, any new deal would instead have to bolster IAEA supervision of the nuclear programme, said the official who also requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter. Roughly three years ago Iran ordered the removal of all the surveillance and monitoring equipment added by the 2015 deal, including surveillance cameras at the workshops that make centrifuge parts. At that point the IAEA had already not had access to those cameras' footage for more than a year. While the IAEA sees the roughly 20,000 centrifuges installed at Iran's enrichment facilities, it does now know how many more have been produced in recent years and are now elsewhere. A U.S. State Department spokesperson said IAEA monitoring was critical for the international community to understand the full extent of Iran's nuclear programme, though adding it was not in America's interest to "negotiate these issues publicly". The 2015, Obama-era deal capped the purity to which Iran could enrich uranium at 3.67%, well below the 20% it had already reached then, and restricted the number and type of centrifuges Iran could use and where. Enrichment was not allowed at Fordow. Iran, meanwhile, agreed to the snap inspections and an expansion of the IAEA's oversight to include areas like centrifuge production and its stock of so-called yellowcake uranium that has not been enriched. IAEA reports showed Iran adhered to limits on key elements of its nuclear programme, including enrichment, until more than a year after Trump abandoned the pact in 2018, during his first term. The U.S. president decried a "horrible one-sided deal" that did not address other issues such as Iran's ballistic missile programme or its role in regional conflicts. His withdrawal prompted Tehran to retaliate, both by eventually pushing far beyond those enrichment and centrifuge limits and by scrapping the extra IAEA supervision put in place after the 2015 deal. Iran is still, however, providing IAEA inspectors with regular access to its facilities as part of longer-standing obligations as a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, under which there is no cap on enrichment levels but nuclear technology must be used for peaceful purposes. U.S. and Iranian negotiators started their new nuclear talks in April, with Trump having threatened military action if no pact is struck. IAEA chief Rafael Grossi said in Washington in April that it is important Iran accept "indispensable" restrictions to enable his agency to reassure the world about Iran's intentions, without specifying the curbs. He has also said last week any new deal should provide for "very robust inspection by the IAEA". The IAEA says it cannot currently "provide assurance that Iran's nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful". Diplomats have for years expected that any new deal will task the IAEA with creating a so-called baseline, a complete picture of where all areas of Iran's nuclear programme stand, filling in gaps in the agency's knowledge as much as it can. Establishing a baseline will be particularly challenging since some blind spots have lasted so long they cannot fully be filled in; the IAEA has said in quarterly reports to member states it has lost "continuity of knowledge" and will not be able to restore it on production and inventory of centrifuges, certain centrifuge parts and yellowcake. "Assembling that puzzle will be an essential part of any deal. We know establishing that new baseline will be hard," said Eric Brewer, a former U.S. intelligence analyst now at the Nuclear Threat Initiative, a non-governmental organisation focused on security and based in Washington. "It will depend in part on how cooperative Iran is." Even then, there is a significant risk the IAEA would lack a complete picture of Tehran's activities, he added. "Is that uncertainty acceptable to the United States?" Brewer said. "Important question."