Venezuela Slams US 'Kidnapping' as Toddler Returned in Deportation Flight
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
A 2-year-old Venezuelan girl who had been separated from her parents due to deportation policies arrived Wednesday in Caracas, reuniting with her mother amid international controversy. Maikelys Espinoza returned aboard a flight carrying over 220 deported migrants. Venezuelan state television broadcast images of First Lady Cilia Flores holding the child at the airport before personally delivering her to her mother at the presidential palace, where President Nicolás Maduro was also present.
Venezuela's government has repeatedly condemned the separation as a "kidnapping," criticizing U.S. immigration enforcement. The U.S. justified the deportation by alleging that the girl's parents were linked to the Tren de Aragua, a Venezuela-based criminal gang recently designated a terrorist organization by President Donald Trump.
The child's mother was deported to Venezuela on April 25. Her father had been previously transferred to a maximum-security prison in El Salvador in March, as part of a sweeping Trump administration policy invoking an 18th-century wartime law to accelerate deportations. Hundreds of Venezuelan migrants, including approximately 180 who were held at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay for up to 16 days, have since been deported.
While the administration claims these individuals are affiliated with Tren de Aragua, it has provided limited public evidence supporting those claims.
Reporting by the Associated Press contributed to this story.
This is a developing news story and will be updated as more information is available.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Coinbase Moves to Bring Oregon Securities Suit to Federal Jurisdiction
Coinbase (COIN) is petitioning a federal court to take over jurisdiction of Oregon's lawsuit accusing it of selling unregistered securities, arguing the state is improperly interfering with federal efforts to clarify digital asset regulations. In a filing late Monday evening, Coinbase argued that Oregon Attorney General Dan Rayfield's lawsuit which it initiated in April over alleged trading of unregistered securities represents an overreach, and seeks to establish a patchwork regulatory landscape conflicting directly with ongoing bipartisan efforts at the federal level. "This lawsuit is a regulatory land grab," the filing reads. "Dissatisfied with the federal government's recent enforcement decisions, Oregon's new Attorney General has set out to dictate the future of crypto and the nationwide platforms on which they trade." Coinbase further argues that Oregon's lawsuit ignores recent bipartisan federal efforts to clarify crypto regulations, improperly tries to create independent state-level oversight of digital asset platforms, and wrongly resurrects claims previously dismissed by federal regulators. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) dropped its enforcement action against Coinbase in February, weeks after the inauguration of President Donald Trump. The exchange made a $1 million donation to Trump's inaugural committee. "What you have here is Oregon, and only Oregon, trying to revive the SEC case, which was dismissed with prejudice," said Ryan VanGrack, Coinbase Vice President of Legal in an interview. "A lone Attorney General is trying to inhibit regulatory clarity and impede consumers' freedom to choose when and how they invest in crypto," VanGrack said. Coinbase points out in the filing that the state's Attorney General might not even have the authority to file the case. "Oregon-based securities transactions are generally regulated by the Division of Financial Regulation, not the Attorney General," Coinbase wrote. "The Attorney General nonetheless seeks to stretch his limited enforcement authority beyond the breaking point to install himself as the commissar of crypto for Oregon and beyond." In an interview, VanGrack explicitly rejected the idea that Oregon's lawsuit is simply a partisan issue. Rather than framing it as a straightforward "red state vs. blue state" conflict, he emphasized a more nuanced approach, highlighting how states of various political leanings have dropped or not pursued similar actions. "Crypto has become more bipartisan, and we have other statewide litigation in which red states and blue states have dismissed their actions," he said, highlighting Vermont, a traditionally Democratic state, as well as Kentucky, considered politically "red" federally but led by a Democratic governor, and Illinois, typically seen as a blue state, all dismissing crypto-related litigation. "It's less about red or blue; it's that there are a few holdovers," VanGrack said, emphasizing that crypto regulation and clarity have increasingly become bipartisan goals federally. He suggested Oregon's action is an outlier driven not necessarily by partisan politics, but by the specific motivations of its Attorney General. "The motivations for this lawsuit are transparent," VanGrack concluded. "It's not about the law, and it's not about a desire to help Oregonians. It's about the politics. It's an effort to grab headlines at Oregon's expense." Coinbase has pledged to vigorously defend its position, stating clearly it has no intention of voluntarily exiting Oregon's market. "We are not pulling out of the state unless we are required to," VanGrack affirmed. "We are going to fight, because what Oregon has done is wrong."Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Exclusive-US made 'tough' requests to Vietnam in trade talks, sources say
By Francesco Guarascio and Phuong Nguyen HANOI (Reuters) -The U.S. has sent a "long" list of "tough" requests to Vietnam in its tariff negotiations, including demands that could force the country to cut its reliance on Chinese industrial goods imports, two people briefed about the matter told Reuters. Washington wants Vietnam-based factories to reduce their use of materials and components from China and is asking the country to control more carefully its production and supply chains, one of the people briefed on the talks said, without elaborating on whether quantitative targets were included. The list is part of an "annex" to a framework text prepared by U.S. negotiators, according to four people familiar with the matter. One of them, who had direct access to the document, said the list was sent to Hanoi at the end of May after the conclusion of a second round of talks with Washington aimed at avoiding 46% "reciprocal" tariffs on imports from Vietnam. The sources declined to be named because those discussions were not public. Reuters reported on Monday that the Trump administration wants countries to provide their best offers on trade negotiations by Wednesday, citing a draft letter to negotiating partners. It was unclear which countries would receive the letter, but it was directed at those with active negotiations that included meetings and exchanges of documents. Washington has been engaged in such talks with countries including Vietnam, the European Union, Japan and India. The sources described the U.S. requests to Vietnam as "tough" and "difficult". It is unclear how Hanoi will respond to Washington's requests and whether it will send its own proposal by Wednesday. The U.S. Trade Representative did not respond to a request for comment outside U.S. business hours. Vietnam's trade ministry did not reply to a request for comment. A source briefed on the matter said if U.S. requests to effectively cut Vietnam's reliance on China were met, they could pose a serious challenge to the Southeast Asian country's economy. Its sprawling manufacturing industry, which produces consumer goods including Apple devices and Nike shoes, is closely integrated into its much bigger neighbour's supply chains. It might also complicate Vietnam's long-standing policy of maintaining good relations with China, a major foreign investor but also a source of security concerns due to conflicting claims in the South China Sea. BOOMING TRADE Vietnam has nearly tripled its exports to the United States since the start of the U.S.-China trade war in 2018, when the first Trump administration imposed wide-ranging tariffs on Beijing, pushing some manufacturers to move production south. But as exports to the U.S. boomed, Vietnam also vastly expanded imports from China, with their inflow almost exactly matching the value and swings of exports to the United States over the years, each totalling around $140 billion in 2024, data from the U.S. and Vietnam show. U.S. officials have long accused Vietnam of being used as a waypoint for Chinese goods destined for the United States. At times, according to the allegations, goods had "Made in Vietnam" labels despite having received no or insufficient added value in the country - allowing Chinese exporters to avoid high U.S. duties on their goods. Aware of the U.S. criticism, Hanoi has launched a crackdown on illegal transhipment of goods. The effect has yet to be seen in trade flows, however, as exports to the United States and imports from China both reached a record high in April, according to the latest data. Vietnam has also repeatedly shown its willingness to reduce non-tariff barriers and to import more U.S. goods, in line with long-standing requests from Washington. In recent weeks, officials have reiterated plans to buy U.S. planes and have signed or pledged multiple non-binding agreements, including on the purchase of farm products and energy. That may, however, not be enough, as U.S. negotiators seek real contracts, one of the people said. Sign in to access your portfolio
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
NATO Ally's Government in Turmoil as Far Right Leader Exits Coalition
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Dutch far-right leader Geert Wilders pulled his PVV party out of the coalition that governs the Netherlands, plunging the NATO ally into political turmoil and potentially a new set of elections. Wilders, who has been dubbed the "Dutch Donald Trump", withdrew the PVV because it would not agree to the much stricter asylum rules he had demanded. This is a developing article. Updates to follow.
