‘One-size-fits-all approach doesn't work': Plan to save the NDIS billions
Billions of dollars in disability payments could be funnelled to struggling children through daycare programs under a plan to ease the financial strain of the nation's insurance scheme while ushering in a new era of early intervention.
Taxpayers would save $12.1 billion over the next decade if 10 per cent of National Disability Insurance Scheme payments were set aside for people not currently on the scheme – including children needing temporary support – and the current model of individual support plans was reserved for Australians with life-long disabilities, a report says.
It can take years of waiting and one-on-one specialist appointments to gain support under current NDIS procedures. Removing some of that red tape and allowing children with autism and developmental difficulties – and their parents – to receive support directly at childcare and primary schools would be more effective and cheaper, according to the Grattan Institute report.
This new era of the disability scheme, known as 'foundational supports', could be funded using the existing NDIS envelope, the think tank's report says, and should be brought in over the next five years if the new-look system is to pile the least amount of pressure on federal and state budgets.
Governments could save an additional $34 billion over 10 years by not needing to find extra money for the new disability system.
Foundational supports were meant to roll out on Tuesday under the original deadline set by previous NDIS minister Bill Shorten. However, that start date has been pushed back to at least December as the states and federal government negotiate details.
Grattan Institute disability program director Samuel Bennett said the NDIS had transformed the lives of tens of thousands of people but had grown 'too big, too fast'.
'Something needs to be done,' Bennett said.
'Time has shown a one-size-fits-all approach doesn't work. What children and families really need is evidence-based early intervention – preferably available where the child already lives, learns and plays – rather than navigating this bureaucratic nightmare that is today's NDIS.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mercury
36 minutes ago
- Mercury
Free lung cancer checks to give Aussies a fighting chance
Don't miss out on the headlines from Cancer. Followed categories will be added to My News. Australia's first new national cancer screening program in almost two decades kicks off this week. From July 1, Australians with a high risk of developing lung cancer can be screened for the disease free of charge. Lung cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in Australia. The National Lung Cancer Screening Program (NLCSP) will offer low-dose computed tomography (CT) scans to people aged 50-70 years who smoke or have a history of smoking and who don't have the symptoms or signs of lung cancer. One of the major challenges with treating lung cancer is that by the time patients present with symptoms, the disease is often at an advanced stage. Early diagnosis means greater treatment options and a higher chance they will be effective. It is estimated there were more than 15,000 new cases and nearly 9,000 deaths from lung cancer in Australia in 2024. The $260 million screening program, which is expected to save hundreds of lives a year. Mark Brooke, CEO of the Lung Foundation of Australia said the NLCSP was a transformative leap forward in ending the stigma and inequality that existed for lung cancer in Australia. 'It gives us hope that lung cancer can be diagnosed earlier offering patients more choice in treatment options and the chance to live well for longer,' he said. 'Lung Foundation Australia will continue to focus on supporting people at risk of lung cancer particularly those facing stigma and in priority populations, to ensure the gold standard of care is available to all Australians.' People wanting to access the screening will need to meet the following eligibility criteria: •Aged between 50 and 70 years. •Show no signs or symptoms suggesting you may have lung cancer. •Currently smoke or have quit smoking in the past 10 years. •Have a history of tobacco cigarette smoking of at least 30 pack-years. The patient's healthcare provider assists patients in determining whether they meet these criteria and will also assess whether the patient is suitable for screening based on specific criteria, which may be temporary, for example, being able to lie down flat to complete a CT scan. The healthcare provider is most likely to be a general practitioner (GP) or a health worker at an Aboriginal Health Service. 'Pack-year' calculations are made by multiplying the number of cigarette packs smoked per day by the number of years the person has smoked. For example, one pack-year is equal to smoking 20 cigarettes (one pack) per day for one year, or 40 cigarettes per day for six months. Once the patient has agreed to participate in the lung screen, the healthcare provider will make a referral for a low-dose CT scan. The scan requires the patient to lay on a table with their arms above their head while the machine takes images of their chest. The procedure takes about 10 to 15 minutes and does not involve any needles. For rural and remote communities that don't have access to radiology clinics, from November mobile lung cancer screening trucks using world-first technology will take mobile CT services directly to eligible patients nationally. The healthcare provider will receive scan results, and the National Cancer Screening Register (NCSR) will send patients a text message, email or letter (depending on the patient's registered communication preference) about what to do next. Full details about the program and eligibility are available are available here. Originally published as Free lung cancer checks to give Aussies a fighting chance
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
NDIS Children: The areas where one in 10 tweens are on the NDIS
But participation data reveals another dynamic that will make moving children off the scheme more complicated: the highest rates of children on the NDIS continue to be in regional and outer-metropolitan areas, where schools tend to have poorer resourcing and families have fewer other options to get help. Loading The trend underscores the equity issues at stake as the federal and state governments seek to move children off the scheme and onto an as-yet undesigned 'foundational supports' system in the long term, with the NDIS serving as a lifeline in areas without other services. NDIS participation rates in lower socio-economic regional areas are as much as double those in wealthy city areas. In NSW, North Sydney has one of the lowest participation rates for children, with 3.5 per cent of both nine to 14-year-olds and under-eights, whereas on the NSW Mid North Coast, those rates are 10.1 per cent for older children and 9.7 per cent for younger children. In Melbourne's inner east, 4.6 per cent of under-eights and 4.8 per cent of older children are on the scheme. This is a far lower participation rate than at Loddon, near Bendigo, where 8.7 per cent of young children and 10.5 per cent of older children are participants. The highest participation rates in March 2025 were in northern Adelaide and South Australia's Barossa Valley, where more than 11 per cent of 9 to 14-year-old children are NDIS participants, as are more than 8 per cent of children under nine years old. But even in inner-city areas, where families have more access to services, children's participation rates increased in the two years to March 2025. The exception is in the Northern Territory – a sign of continued challenges in accessing the NDIS in more remote areas. Laverty, who is now chief executive of disability service Aruma, said the higher uptake among regional families was no surprise as they can struggle to get help for learning delays at school, or access services such as speech therapy in the private system. Once eligible, children can linger on waitlists for months. 'Aruma has waiting lists of families seeking support that miss out because of allied health shortages in country Australia,' Laverty said, noting this was exacerbated by the lack of state and territory services outside the NDIS. Laverty said wait times meant the window for early intervention could often close before a child got the help they needed. 'That delay is resulting in children missing out on the intervention that may prevent them ever needing an NDIS package in the long term,' he said. While the 2023 independent NDIS review recommended children younger than nine enter the scheme under early intervention pathways, to reduce the need for supports over their lifetime, a NDIA spokesperson said most children entered the scheme under developmental delay provisions. 'Over half of the children with developmental delay continue in the scheme after being diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder,' they said. In December, the federal government announced $4.5 million over two years for the NDIA to design and consult on an early intervention pathway to better support children younger than nine with developmental delay or disability. with Millie Muroi Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.
Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Protein: Behind the supplement we can't get enough of
Although protein is important for overall health, much of its popularity stems from the macronutrient's association with two things: building muscle and weight management. Protein is key to maintaining muscle and supporting bone growth. Credit: Getty 'Dietary protein is involved in appetite regulation. It helps us feel fuller for longer,' says Associate Professor Nick Fuller, from the University of Sydney. However, while it can play a role in curbing hunger, Fuller says that increasing your protein intake over the recommended daily intake (RDI) is not always the answer; in fact, it can have the opposite effect. Loading 'The body can't store protein, so once its needs are met, protein will be used for energy or stored as fat,' he says. When it comes to muscle mass, again, protein is only one piece of the puzzle. 'Eating protein is the queen, exercise is the king, together they make the kingdom,' says Evangeline Mantzioris, program director of the nutrition and food sciences degree at the University of South Australia. 'In other words, you won't get muscle mass just by eating protein or eating lots of it, you need to do resistance training as well.' How much protein we need from our diet varies throughout the lifespan. Some individuals, such as children and teenagers experiencing growth spurts, have higher protein needs. Additionally, peri- and post-menopausal women and older adults require more protein to prevent muscle loss. However, the recommended daily intake for adults ranges from 0.75 for women to 0.84g/kg for men of body weight, which is around 46-64 grams of protein each day. Most of us get sufficient protein from our diets without the need for supplementary products like powders. Credit: iStock That's equivalent to about 180 grams of cooked chicken per day, for an average healthy adult, including those looking to manage their weight or build lean muscle. While many people are focused on adding protein to their diet by consuming commercial products, '99 per cent of healthy Australians are actually meeting their protein needs without them', says Mantzioris. 'Even if people think they aren't getting a healthy amount of protein, they probably are through their main meals,' she says. Do we really need commercially processed protein-supplemented foods and beverages? According to the experts, the simple answer is no. 'Protein has become this cult-like fixation,' Fuller says. 'One minute it's no carbs, then no sugar, keto and now it's high protein, it's just another dieting fad that we don't need.' Another issue with consuming highly processed protein-rich products is that, aside from protein, they don't offer any other dietary benefits or include ingredients that aren't good for us. Loading 'In some cases, 'high protein' products, such as bars and cereals, are marketed in a way to make them appear healthy, when in fact they may contain high quantities of sugar, sodium, or saturated fat, and would be classified as a 'discretionary' food,' Rebuli says. 'Look past the marketing on the package and check the nutrition information panel and ingredient list, or look for the health star rating.' But perhaps worst of all, is that the extra protein is often 'taking up the serving of another food type, which contains nutrients and vitamins that you do need, which can mean some people aren't getting their recommended serving of those,' adds Mantzioris. It's all about balance and going back to basics. 'We did not evolve on supplements, we evolved on whole foods like dairy, meat and fish,' says Mantzioris. Other foods naturally high in protein include eggs and plant foods like legumes, beans, nuts, seeds, and soy products. 'These remain the best source of protein for most people', she says. Make the most of your health, relationships, fitness and nutrition with our Live Well newsletter. Get it in your inbox every Monday.
