
Heydon says EU's latest efforts to cut red tape of ‘limited benefit' to Irish farmers
Speaking at a meeting of EU agriculture ministers in Brussels, he said that while the proposals address some concerns raised by Ireland and member states, their impact on Irish family farms may be marginal.
He welcomed some changes, particularly to the performance clearance and amendment processes used by governments, which he said 'should go some way to ease the administrative burden for member states in relation to conditionality'.
However, Mr Heydon expressed doubt over the relevance of some elements of the package for Irish farmers. 'A first impression of these proposals may be of limited direct benefit to Irish farmers,' he said.
'Our family farm structure means that while we have very few very large farms, we equally do not have a large number of very small farms. So the initiatives related to the small farmer scheme are of little benefit to Ireland.
'We need to ensure that the end result delivers some real reduction in the administrative burden for farmers and for member states.'
In a later discussion on the EU's deforestation regulation (EUDR), which is due to come into effect next year, Mr Heydon said: 'There remains the potential for significant administrative burden… on primary producers in the beef and our dairy sectors.'
He urged the Commission to explore simplified implementation approaches and supported calls to delay enforcement. 'Ireland therefore supports the calls for a further delay in implementation to allow time to address these issues.'
ICMSA president Denis Drennan described the Commission's simplification proposals as 'unconvincing' and said the overall 'regulatory tide' shows no sign of easing.
'There's no real confidence in the Commission on this drive for simplification. We've seen and heard it all before and so far from the issues being simplified, they become steadily more cumbersome and complex year-on-year,' said Mr Drennan, who specified the EU Deforestation Regulations as a perfect example of 'talking' about simplification, while 'acting' to make things more complex.
IFA president Francie Gorman highlighted last week that this is now the second corrective package on the CAP within a year. 'This fact should serve as a lesson for the future and shape our discussions. Farmers need policies that are coherent, consistent, meaningful and implementable, with greater farmer input throughout, but particularly in design stage,' he said.
However, he warned that future simplification efforts must not undermine the common nature of the CAP or open the door to uncontrolled renationalisation.
'That would mark the end of CAP as we know it,' he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Irish Sun
11 minutes ago
- The Irish Sun
Anti-EU football hooligan ‘pimp' Karol Nawrocki wins Poland's presidential election after knife-edge vote
ANTI-EU football hooligan "pimp" Karol Nawrocki has won Poland's presidential election. According to the final result from the electoral commission, right-wing historian with a past of football hooliganism Nawrocki, 42, won the election with a slim 50.89% of the votes. Advertisement 2 Karol Nawrocki during the election evening of the second round of the Presidential election in Warsaw Credit: Getty 2 Marta Nawrocka and supported by Law and Justice party candidate for the President of Poland Karol Nawrocki during the election Credit: Getty Just six months ago, Nawrocki was a fairly unknown name - but in the run up to the election, the historian posted videos of himself at shooting ranges and boxing rings - cultivating a tough-guy image for voters. And the past two weeks have seen Nawrocki have to vehemently deny claims he had contacts in the criminal underworld and that he got prostitutes to pretend to be guests at a luxury hotel. But his campaign team were forced to admit that the new Polish leader did in fact engage in a bare-knuckle mass brawl between rival football hooligans. While his liberal opponent Rafal Trzaskowski played up his European credentials, Nawrocki met Donald Trump at the White House and received the US President's backing. Advertisement read more news Unlike other eurosceptics in central Europe like Hungary's Viktor Orban, Nawrocki supports giving military aid to help Ukraine in the bloody war with Russia. But he also revealed prior to his win that he will oppose membership in Western alliances for Ukraine. This view aligns with the falling support among Poles for Ukrainians, with the country having hosted more than a million refugees from across the border. His backers in the Law and Justice (PiS) party had supported fast-tracking membership in the EU and NATO for Kyiv while in power until late 2023. Advertisement Most read in The US Sun Latest Nawrocki's critics said he was fuelling unease over Ukrainian refugees at a time when the far-right is highlighting migration, the cost of living and security. He cited his campaign slogan, Poland First. "Let's help others, but let's take care of our own citizens first," he said on social media in April. Nawrocki's past has been a topic of intense public debate following a series of negative media coverage. Advertisement Robert Prevost elected as Pope Leo XIV - the first from North American There were questions over his acquisition of a flat from a pensioner -and even an admission that he took part in orchestrated brawls. Nawrocki, an amateur boxer, told a debate when confronted over reports he had been involved in mass organised fights between football hooligans: "All my sports activities were based on the strength of my heart, the strength of my muscles, my fists. "It was a fair competition, regardless of the form." His Law and Justice party backers have accused the government of orchestrating the controversies with the help of Poland's special services and liberal media. Advertisement Nawrocki portrayed the election as a referendum on the government, which he described as a metropolitan elite out of touch with their concerns. "I am simply one of you," he told voters in the eastern town of Biala Podlaska while on the campaign trail. More to follow... For the latest news on this story, keep checking back at The U.S. Sun, your go-to destination for the best celebrity news, sports news, real-life stories, jaw-dropping pictures, and must-see videos . Like us on Facebook at Advertisement


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
Thousands of companies must publish gender pay gap in their organisations
The landscape of gender pay gap reporting in Ireland undergoes a significant transformation, with new obligations on companies beginning this week. Larger organisations in Ireland have been reporting their gender pay gaps (GPG) since 2022. Thousands of additional organisations - those with 50 or more employees - are now required to publish their GPG data for the first time. With the EU Pay Transparency Directive due to be transposed into Irish Law in June 2026, gender pay gap reporting is the first step in supporting organisations on the journey to pay parity and equitable pay practice. For Irish businesses, leveraging gender pay gap reporting can be a powerful opportunity to drive long-term organisational success. Strategic thinking can support employee retention when we need to optimise the current workforce to drive performance, and to promote a strong employer brand to attract the talent to meet strategic workforce planning needs. The Imperative of Getting it Right For the newly in-scope organisations, the initial focus will naturally be on ensuring accurate data collection and calculation. This can be complex, involving meticulous attention to definitions of "pay" and "hours worked," and careful categorisation of employees across pay quartiles. The pitfalls of getting it wrong are significant: Reputational Damage: In today's transparent world, a poorly presented or inaccurate report can severely damage your employer brand. Publicly available data means scrutiny from current and prospective employees, clients/customers, and even investors. A perception of pay inequality can quickly erode trust and make it harder to attract top talent. Talented individuals, particularly women, may look to organisations that demonstrate a genuine commitment to equity. Internal Discontent: Employees are increasingly aware of pay transparency. If your report highlights significant gaps without a clear, credible explanation and actionable plan, it can lead to demotivation, decreased morale, and increased staff turnover. There is a heightened risk of increased internal complaints around pay and bonus comparisons, how salary bands are graded, why colleagues in similar roles are paid more/less and referrals for equal pay and discrimination claims. Legal Scrutiny: While direct financial penalties for non-compliance are not yet in place in Ireland, the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), the Circuit Court and the High Court can order an employer to take specific action to comply with the legislation. Irish data suggests average GPG was 12.6% in 2022 reducing to 11.2% in 2023. With the upcoming EU Pay Transparency Directive, organisations with an unexplained GPG of greater than 5% will have to engage in joint pay assessments where employers must justify the detailed rationale of their pay structures. Leveraging Strategic Opportunities The process of gender pay gap reporting forces organisations to scrutinise their talent management strategies, fostering genuine strategic thinking. Why are women concentrated in lower-paid roles? Are there sufficient pathways for career progression for female employees? Are unconscious biases at play in your recruitment or promotion processes? Are men taking family related leave? These are critical questions that, when addressed, can lead to fundamental improvements in your talent management strategies. Proactively identifying and addressing gender pay gaps demonstrate a strong employer brand with a tangible commitment to equality. This resonates deeply with employees, who are increasingly valuing workplaces that align with their personal values. When employees feel equitably compensated, they are more engaged, more productive, and more likely to stay with your organisation. This reduces recruitment costs and preserves invaluable institutional knowledge. This is significant in the context of Adare's HR Barometer survey which reported anticipated turnover in 2025 at 12.2% and an average cost of €10,125 per employee. In a competitive market for talent, being known as an organisation that champions equality and fairness is a powerful differentiator. It makes you more attractive to a diverse pool of candidates leading to a more innovative and representative workforce, crucial for navigating complex business challenges and fostering growth. Furthermore, for organisations engaging in tenders or seeking investment, a strong GPG report can be a compelling testament to your commitment to ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) principles. Looking Ahead: From Snapshot to Solution The June snapshot is just that - a snapshot. The real work begins after the numbers are published. Organisations must not only explain their gaps but also articulate clear, measurable actions they intend to take to reduce them. This might involve reviewing policies, enhancing leadership development programmes for women, supporting women to actively engage in the workforce during menopause, implementing flexible working solutions, or tackling unconscious bias through comprehensive training. Gender pay gap reporting is not just a compliance requirement; it is a strategic opportunity for organisations to enhance their talent management strategies, build a strong employer brand, improve employee engagement and retention, foster a diverse and inclusive workplace, and prepare for future regulations. By embracing transparency and taking proactive steps to address the gender pay gap, organisations can unlock significant benefits and drive long-term success. The time to act is now.

The Journal
an hour ago
- The Journal
Three-quarters of Irish universities fall in global rankings - but TCD still best in the country
THREE-QUARTERS OF Irish universities have fallen in global rankings, but Trinity College Dublin is still rated the best in the country. The rankings are based on quality of education, employability, quality of faculty, and research. Ireland's overall slip in the Global 2000, which is released today, is mainly due to research performance amid intensified global competition from well-funded institutions, the Centre for World University Rankings said. University College Dublin (UCD) is the only Irish university that ranked higher on the list than it did last year. Here's how they're all faring: Trinity College Dublin – 259th (250th in 2024) University College Dublin – 299th (301st last year) University College Cork – 545th (542nd) University of Galway – 707th (668th) University of Limerick – 926th (925th) Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland – 1013rd (no change) Dublin City University – 1151st (1134th) Maynooth University – 1323rd (1287th) Advertisement Harvard is the top university in the world for the fourteenth year in a row. However, other US institutions have declined in some areas amid slashed government funding and disputes over academic freedom and free speech. In the top ten, Harvard is followed by two other private US institutions, MIT and Stanford. The UK's Cambridge and Oxford are the world's highest-rated public universities, coming fourth and fifth. The rest of the global top ten are also private American universities: Princeton, Pennsylvania, Columbia, Yale, and Chicago. For the first time, China has surpassed the US as the country with the most universities in the Global 2000. While Oxford and Cambridge maintain their high rankings, the overall outlook for Britain is unfavourable, as 75% of universities have fallen down the list. The top ten universities in Europe this year are: Cambridge (UK, 4th), Oxford (UK, 5th), PSL (France, 19th), UCL (UK, 20th), Imperial College London (UK, 28th), Paris City University (France, 29th), ETH Zurich (Switzerland, 32nd), Paris Saclay (France, 34th), Institut Polytechnique de Paris (France, 35th), and Copenhagen (Denmark, 38th). Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal