logo
China's elite don traditional garb for annual 'Two Sessions' talking shop

China's elite don traditional garb for annual 'Two Sessions' talking shop

Yahoo04-03-2025

Sporting military uniforms and multi-coloured traditional garb, delegates from all four corners of China descended on the capital on Tuesday for the country's largest annual political event -- a red-carpet cameo for the ruling elite.
China's "Two Sessions" kick off this week, with thousands of representatives of the country's top consultative political body and its rubber-stamp parliament gathering to talk about everything from economic policy to social issues.
Security was tight around Beijing, with plainclothes police officers and elderly volunteers in red armbands monitoring for anything that could spoil the tightly choreographed conclave.
On nearby Chang'an Avenue, cars trudged along in traffic and pedestrians were stopped for security checks.
Many delegates sported the typical dark suit and tie of career Communist officials.
But that was punctuated with the occasional pop of colour and traditional dress from representatives of China's 55 officially recognised minority groups.
Yang Xiaohua, a delegate from southwestern Yunnan province, was wearing the intricately embroidered dress of her Naxi minority group as she arrived in the stately Great Hall of the People for her third year.
A delegate to the Chinese People's Political Consultative Conference, the middle school teacher said she planned to propose education-related policies.
She said she thought the ruling Communist Party was giving "more and more weight" to delegates' opinions.
"There are surprises every time," she told AFP.
"I think there's not much to say about China's overall direction, we are very satisfied."
"Life has got better and better for ethnic minorities, so we hope the country will prosper and flourish, so that people can work and exist in peace."
- 'Challenges' -
Handfuls of representatives dressed in dark green uniforms of China's military brushed past journalists in the Great Hall.
But other delegates were more keen to chat as they made their way to the assembly room.
Wu Haiying, of northeastern Jilin province, said she hoped to work with the party to provide women with a better "childbearing environment".
But she acknowledged the country was facing difficulties -- particularly in the economy.
"But even so, in the process of national development and progress, we will still experience challenges – in economic development, individual development, career development," she said.
Attending the two sessions as a CPPCC representative for the third year, Wu said "the feeling of seeing old friends is very good".
Outside the theatre-like assembly room was an elaborate floral display in different shades of pink, with pots around the hall.
- Optimistic delegates -
Inside, delegates including President Xi Jinping and his top brass stood to sing a rendition of China's national anthem.
Tuesday's CPPCC was low-stakes compared to the almost simultaneous gathering of China's legislature, the National People's Congress (NPC), which starts on Wednesday.
That meeting is widely expected to see Beijing hash out plans for a response to the many economic headwinds China is facing, from trade war threats abroad to sluggish consumption and a proper crisis at home.
Delegates, unsurprisingly, put on an optimistic face when asked for comment by journalists.
"I believe that in dealing with global and domestic economic development, China's economy will escape this puzzle," Ruan Hongxian, from southwestern Yunnan province, told AFP.
"And I believe that China's economy will be even better developed in the future."
mya-oho/je/dhw

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk's administration allies become targets
Musk's administration allies become targets

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Musk's administration allies become targets

Elon Musk's allies inside the Trump administration are newly vulnerable after the mogul's bitter public breakup with the president. MAGA loyalists are taking advantage of the Trump-Musk rift to threaten the standing of anyone in the administration who's perceived as too close to the Tesla CEO. Leading that charge is former Trump adviser Steve Bannon, whose long-running animosity toward Musk peaked last week with the former calling to deport Musk from the US and the latter deeming Bannon a 'Communist retard.' Among the potential Bannon targets: David Sacks, the venture capitalist tapped by Trump as artificial intelligence and cryptocurrency czar. Sacks has invested in Musk's SpaceX and, like Musk, is a member of the so-called PayPal Mafia (early PayPal employees and founders who are a Silicon Valley force). 'You're dangerous. It's all about you, not the country,' Bannon recently said on his War Room podcast of Sacks and his All-In Podcast co-hosts. But the administration's close ties to the crypto industry and Sacks' help to the Trump campaign mean he's likely to avoid the chopping block. 'As a trusted ally and early supporter of President Trump, David Sacks sacrificed a thriving entrepreneurial career to serve as the President's AI and Crypto Czar,' White House spokesman Harrison Fields said in a statement, adding that Sacks 'is deeply committed to advancing the president's vision' on both issues. That leaves lesser-known figures brought in by Musk to bear the brunt of the speculation about more exits — talk that Silicon Valley is monitoring closely, and with good reason. One person familiar with the situation told Semafor that there are ongoing conversations inside the administration 'regarding the future of some of these big names that came to the federal government in that wave of Elon coming here.' This person described possible forthcoming departures as more of a 'mutual separation' than a forced ouster. A number of Musk allies are still working with the Department of Government Efficiency, and officials are said to be cognizant of those who may now have conflicts of interests or dualing loyalties. The White House's longer-term goal in the wake of the Trump-Musk spat is to underscore that DOGE 'isn't just a fad,' this person added, and some in the administration are discussing ways to separate its mission from 'the personality behind the original initiative.' 'Maybe we don't call it DOGE,' the person suggested. 'The mission is what we want to stay focused on.' Sacks hosted Trump for a fundraiser last summer at his home on San Francisco's Billionaire Row, cementing his role as a tech industry conduit to the White House. He's got a rare office in the White House complex, two sources told Semafor, and is playing a lead role in shepherding crypto legislation through Congress — as well as drafting a long-awaited administration report, expected in July, that will shape other industry-friendly policies. Sacks 'brought Silicon Valley to the table with him well before Musk jumped on board' the Trump campaign, one tech industry insider said. Since then, 'he has avoided all of the third rails that Musk grabbed' by focusing his efforts on cementing crypto-friendly policy and competing with China on AI. That hasn't stopped Bannon from going after him, particularly after the All-In podcast — co-hosted by Sacks and a favorite stop for administration officials — scrapped plans to release an episode about the Trump-Musk battle. 'Folks like Bannon are trying to drive a wedge between tech right and MAGA right,' said one crypto executive, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'I don't see it sticking.' A spokesperson for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, where part of Sacks' work is housed, did not respond to requests for comment. A number of other top DOGE staffers departed the administration when Musk did, including Katie Miller — the wife of Trump's influential deputy chief of staff, Stephen Miller. It's clear that, even before Trump and Musk traded barbs last week, the administration expected a shift in staff once the tech mogul left Washington. But any remaining administration players who are tied to Musk can't be breathing entirely easy yet, given that conversations are ongoing about how to shape DOGE more in Trump's image than his former friend's. In that sense, the MAGA right may not have to push too hard to get some people Musk hired out of the administration. Still, it seems unlikely Bannon will succeed in expanding his manhunt to people as senior as Sacks, who was Team Trump long before Musk — and who has ties to industries like crypto that the administration wants to keep close. Bannon will need the backing of much heavier hitters if he wants to bring down Sacks. Bannon and his wing of the GOP — including agitator Laura Loomer — have proved more influential than initially predicted. 'Influence comes from the people. When you have the people's support, you're influential,' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., said in February. 'He's a big voice of MAGA, and that's helpful for the President's agenda. He's someone that pushes back when people aren't in line.' Some DOGE staffers are worried about being cut in the wake of the Trump-Musk feud, The Wall Street Journal recently reported. Trump and his administration remain firmly behind DOGE's efforts despite the drama with Musk himself, The New York Times reported. Trump pulled NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally, shortly after the tech billionaire left the White House, Semafor scooped.

Opinion - Despite military purges, China's next war ‘could be imminent' and spread fast
Opinion - Despite military purges, China's next war ‘could be imminent' and spread fast

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion - Despite military purges, China's next war ‘could be imminent' and spread fast

'There's no reason to sugarcoat it,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 31 at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security conference. 'The threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' Hegseth is right: America needs to urgently prepare for war. War is coming to East Asia, and Taiwan — to which Hegseth was referring — is a target of Chinese aggression. Chinese President Xi Jinping, after all, has staked his personal legitimacy on annexing it as China's 34th province. Yet the U.S. and its partners have to be ready for anything at any place and at any time. Why? The Chinese regime, which is mobilizing all of society for war, is now unstable. It is not clear who, if anyone, is in charge. Therefore, the regime could take us by surprise. One thing we know: Xi's most senior loyalist in uniform has disappeared from public view. Gen. He Weidong, a vice chairman of the Communist Party's Central Military Commission and the second highest-ranked uniformed officer, was last seen in public on March 11, at the end of the Communist Party's major political event of the year, the so-called Two Sessions. Many report that Xi sacked He. It's true that Xi, since being named general secretary of the party in November 2012, has purged many military officers, ostensibly for 'corruption,' and restructured the People's Liberation Army. Both moves resulted in his taking firm control of the military. Some have therefore assumed that Xi, for some reason, turned on his most important supporter in the military in March. However, it is not likely that Xi took down He. On the contrary, it is much more probable that Xi's adversaries removed that general. While Xi loyalists were being removed from public view, PLA Daily, the Chinese military's main propaganda organ, ran a series of articles praising 'collective leadership,' a direct rejection of Xi's continual calls for unity, centralization of control and complete obedience to his rule. These articles, which began appearing last July, were written by people aligned with the top-ranked uniformed officer, Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Gen. Zhang Youxia. The propaganda pieces could not have appeared if Xi were in complete control of the military. Moreover, He's disappearance was followed by the disappearance of another Xi loyalist, Gen. He Hongjun. Rumors started that both generals had died by suicide in May at the military's 301 Hospital in Beijing. Whether they are alive or not, they are out of the way, so their disappearance spells trouble for Xi. 'Gen. He Weidong was instrumental in Xi's earlier purges in the military, so his disappearance could indicate a great threat to Xi's authority,' Charles Burton of the Sinopsis think tank noted in comments to me this month. The recent disappearances follow the sackings of, among others, Gen. Li Shangfu, a defense minister, Gen. Wei Fenghe, one of Li's predecessors and perhaps as many as 70 in the Rocket Force, the branch responsible for the country's nuclear weapons. Given all the turmoil in the Chinese military, America and its partners need to focus on more than just Taiwan. In fact, the main island of Taiwan might be the least likely target. To start hostilities by attacking Taiwan's main island, China would need to launch a combined air-land-sea operation. To do that, Xi would have to give a general or admiral almost complete control over the military. The appointed flag officer would thereby become the most powerful figure in China. Even in the calmest of times, Xi would be reluctant to create such a rival for power, but this is by no means a calm moment in Beijing. China's leader seems to have lost substantial influence recently — so much so that there is speculation he could be pushed out of power in the coming months. Whoever is controlling the purges — Xi or his political enemies — the Chinese military does not look ready to launch a complex operation such as a Taiwan invasion. Either Xi does not have the power to order an invasion because the military no longer answers to him, or Xi does not trust the most senior officers, a precondition for such a complex undertaking. Despite all the turmoil in the leadership ranks, Hegseth was right to talk about an imminent war. The disruptive leadership moves in China have not prevented the Chinese military from engaging in low-level but especially provocative actions in the last couple of months against countries to China's south and east. We do not know whether China's regime has made the decision to go to war, but its series of dangerous actions clearly reveals it has made the decision to risk war. And war, if it begins somewhere, will likely spread. For one thing, the Chinese leadership will not be able to deal with incidents responsibly. In senior Communist Party circles these days, only the most hostile answers are considered acceptable. Another factor is the existence of alliance and semi-alliance networks in the region. Four of China's targets, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, and Australia, are U.S. treaty allies, and one, Taiwan, is protected by the United States. China, for its part, could bring in its friends. Moreover, the U.S. should be prepared for conflict with the world's most destructive weapons. 'China has spent the last five decades investing in building nuclear proxy forces in Pakistan, North Korea and Iran to create nuclear crises to divert Washington's attention away from the Taiwan Strait,' Richard Fisher of the International Assessment and Strategy Center told me this month. 'China's investment in Russia's war in Ukraine is in the same vein.' As Blaine Holt, a retired U.S. Air Force brigadier general, said after Hegseth's comments, 'Millions of lives now hang in the balance.' Gordon G. Chang is the author of 'Plan Red: China's Project to Destroy America' and 'The Coming Collapse of China.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Despite military purges, China's next war ‘could be imminent' and spread fast
Despite military purges, China's next war ‘could be imminent' and spread fast

The Hill

time8 hours ago

  • The Hill

Despite military purges, China's next war ‘could be imminent' and spread fast

'There's no reason to sugarcoat it,' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on May 31 at the Shangri-La Dialogue, Asia's premier security conference. 'The threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent.' Hegseth is right: America needs to urgently prepare for war. War is coming to East Asia, and Taiwan — to which Hegseth was referring — is a target of Chinese aggression. Chinese President Xi Jinping, after all, has staked his personal legitimacy on annexing it as China's 34th province. Yet the U.S. and its partners have to be ready for anything at any place and at any time. Why? The Chinese regime, which is mobilizing all of society for war, is now unstable. It is not clear who, if anyone, is in charge. Therefore, the regime could take us by surprise. One thing we know: Xi's most senior loyalist in uniform has disappeared from public view. Gen. He Weidong, a vice chairman of the Communist Party's Central Military Commission and the second highest-ranked uniformed officer, was last seen in public on March 11, at the end of the Communist Party's major political event of the year, the so-called Two Sessions. Many report that Xi sacked He. It's true that Xi, since being named general secretary of the party in November 2012, has purged many military officers, ostensibly for 'corruption,' and restructured the People's Liberation Army. Both moves resulted in his taking firm control of the military. Some have therefore assumed that Xi, for some reason, turned on his most important supporter in the military in March. However, it is not likely that Xi took down He. On the contrary, it is much more probable that Xi's adversaries removed that general. While Xi loyalists were being removed from public view, PLA Daily, the Chinese military's main propaganda organ, ran a series of articles praising 'collective leadership,' a direct rejection of Xi's continual calls for unity, centralization of control and complete obedience to his rule. These articles, which began appearing last July, were written by people aligned with the top-ranked uniformed officer, Central Military Commission Vice Chairman Gen. Zhang Youxia. The propaganda pieces could not have appeared if Xi were in complete control of the military. Moreover, He's disappearance was followed by the disappearance of another Xi loyalist, Gen. He Hongjun. Rumors started that both generals had died by suicide in May at the military's 301 Hospital in Beijing. Whether they are alive or not, they are out of the way, so their disappearance spells trouble for Xi. 'Gen. He Weidong was instrumental in Xi's earlier purges in the military, so his disappearance could indicate a great threat to Xi's authority,' Charles Burton of the Sinopsis think tank noted in comments to me this month. The recent disappearances follow the sackings of, among others, Gen. Li Shangfu, a defense minister, Gen. Wei Fenghe, one of Li's predecessors and perhaps as many as 70 in the Rocket Force, the branch responsible for the country's nuclear weapons. Given all the turmoil in the Chinese military, America and its partners need to focus on more than just Taiwan. In fact, the main island of Taiwan might be the least likely target. To start hostilities by attacking Taiwan's main island, China would need to launch a combined air-land-sea operation. To do that, Xi would have to give a general or admiral almost complete control over the military. The appointed flag officer would thereby become the most powerful figure in China. Even in the calmest of times, Xi would be reluctant to create such a rival for power, but this is by no means a calm moment in Beijing. China's leader seems to have lost substantial influence recently — so much so that there is speculation he could be pushed out of power in the coming months. Whoever is controlling the purges — Xi or his political enemies — the Chinese military does not look ready to launch a complex operation such as a Taiwan invasion. Either Xi does not have the power to order an invasion because the military no longer answers to him, or Xi does not trust the most senior officers, a precondition for such a complex undertaking. Despite all the turmoil in the leadership ranks, Hegseth was right to talk about an imminent war. The disruptive leadership moves in China have not prevented the Chinese military from engaging in low-level but especially provocative actions in the last couple of months against countries to China's south and east. We do not know whether China's regime has made the decision to go to war, but its series of dangerous actions clearly reveals it has made the decision to risk war. And war, if it begins somewhere, will likely spread. For one thing, the Chinese leadership will not be able to deal with incidents responsibly. In senior Communist Party circles these days, only the most hostile answers are considered acceptable. Another factor is the existence of alliance and semi-alliance networks in the region. Four of China's targets, South Korea, Japan, the Philippines, and Australia, are U.S. treaty allies, and one, Taiwan, is protected by the United States. China, for its part, could bring in its friends. Moreover, the U.S. should be prepared for conflict with the world's most destructive weapons. 'China has spent the last five decades investing in building nuclear proxy forces in Pakistan, North Korea and Iran to create nuclear crises to divert Washington's attention away from the Taiwan Strait,' Richard Fisher of the International Assessment and Strategy Center told me this month. 'China's investment in Russia's war in Ukraine is in the same vein.' As Blaine Holt, a retired U.S. Air Force brigadier general, said after Hegseth's comments, 'Millions of lives now hang in the balance.' Gordon G. Chang is the author of 'Plan Red: China's Project to Destroy America' and 'The Coming Collapse of China.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store