&w=3840&q=100)
WhatsApp had no plans to compete with Facebook: Co-founder Brian Acton
By Kurt Wagner and Sabrina Willmer WhatsApp co-founder Brian Acton said that his messaging company had no plans to build social networking features to compete with Facebook before he sold the company to Mark Zuckerberg, a claim that bolsters Meta's defense as it faces federal antitrust allegations. 'We had no ambition to build Facebook-like functionality like a feed or any Facebook-like features,' Acton said Tuesday during testimony at a federal courthouse in Washington. He also said that WhatsApp could have stuck with a subscription business instead of selling targeted ads if the service had remained independent. Acton's comments came as part of the US Federal Trade Commission's antitrust trial against Meta Platforms Inc., which is in its sixth week. The agency alleges that Meta has created an illegal social networking monopoly thanks to its purchases of WhatsApp and Instagram more than a decade ago, and is seeking a breakup of the company. Meta has disputed the allegations and argued that it faces vast competition from several rivals, including TikTok and Apple Inc., that the FTC is overlooking. ALSO READ: Google Messages adopts 'Delete for Everyone' from WhatsApp: What is it Meta's acquisition of WhatsApp is a key part of the case, with FTC lawyers arguing that Meta viewed the messaging app as a legitimate social networking competitor before buying it in 2014 after a $19 billion offer. While WhatsApp didn't offer social-networking features at the time — it was a private messaging app akin to texting — lawyers for the FTC have said that several rival messaging apps were pushing into social networking around that time. It also surfaced private messages and emails from Meta executives fretting that WhatsApp may do the same. 'The biggest competitive vector for us is for some company to build out a messaging app for communicating with small groups of people, and then transforming that into a broader social network,' Meta Chief Executive Officer Zuckerberg wrote to the company's board of directors in February 2013, back when the company was called Facebook. Zuckerberg courted WhatsApp co-founder Jan Koum for over a year before the deal while Meta tracked the growth and feature sets for several mobile messaging apps, including WhatsApp, documents show. Lawyers for Meta, meanwhile, have argued that WhatsApp had no plans to push into social networking, or launch a competitive advertising business. A handwritten note from Acton that read 'No Ads! No Games! No Gimmicks!' was displayed in court earlier in the trial, and former employees and board members have testified that there were no plans for such features. Acton was called to the stand Tuesday by Meta in an effort to hammer home this point. ALSO READ: Meta removes 23K Facebook pages linked to investment scams in India, Brazil During his testimony, Acton was asked by an FTC lawyer whether Meta included advertising value in its offer for WhatsApp. He said he didn't know what exactly went into Meta's calculation, but assumed that advertising would be a component, given its business. Acton also acknowledged under FTC questioning that WhatsApp would have continued its push to add features had it not been acquired by Meta. Separately, he said he had opposed Facebook's launching a business version of WhatsApp, since it would dilute end-to-end encryption, and that the commercial offering was introduced after he left the company. Part of the FTC's case has focused on trying to prove that the deals led to consumer harm that would not have happened had WhatsApp or Instagram stayed independent. In response to questions from Meta's lawyer, Acton said Meta had offered a 'fair valuation' for WhatsApp given the size of its audience. Acton also noted the success of its subscription model in seven countries in 2014 and said he believed there was an opportunity for WhatsApp to make even more money off subscriptions by raising prices. ALSO READ: 'Facebook is no longer the culture', says Zuckerberg on fading relevance Acton has had a colorful history with his former employer since leaving Meta in 2018. He made billions by selling his business — he's now worth $4.5 billion, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index — but eventually left the company after Meta started formulating plans to monetize the app via advertising. Acton thought that doing so would jeopardize the privacy of WhatsApp users, and he has since signaled some regret about selling the app. After Facebook's Cambridge Analytica privacy scandal in 2018, Acton tweeted '#DeleteFacebook.' The case is Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., 20-cv-03590, US District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Mangaluru man loses Rs 24 lakh in online investment scam
Mangaluru: A man allegedly lost Rs 24.2 lakh in an online investment scam. The complainant stated that in March last year, while browsing Instagram, he clicked on an advertisement link related to trading, which redirected him to a group called 'Fyers Market Discussion Group'. A person named Sharon Trivedi then added the complainant to a WhatsApp group and sent an application form encouraging him to invest in trading. After filling out the form and registering, Sharon sent a link for the complainant to download and install an app. Sharon Trivedi remained in constant contact and explained various attractive schemes, particularly about Institutional Stock and IPO Placement, urging the complainant to invest money. The app's customer support also instructed the complainant to deposit money and provided multiple bank account numbers and IFSC codes for the same. Similarly, through another Instagram advertisement, the complainant came across a different trading company. A person named Ishita Paul, using different WhatsApp numbers, provided information about trading and sent the complainant a website link. Following the instructions on the website, the complainant invested money and again received several bank account numbers and IFSC codes from the customer support team. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch CFD với công nghệ và tốc độ tốt hơn IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Between April 21, 2024, and May 31, 2025, the complainant transferred a total of Rs 24.2 lakh in multiple instalments via UPI, RTGS, and IMPS to various bank accounts provided by these unknown individuals. Although the fraudsters returned a small amount initially to gain trust, when the complainant asked for the remaining amount, he was asked to pay tax and commission. Despite paying these additional amounts, he was again asked to pay a 10% security deposit to withdraw the rest of the funds. This raised suspicion, and upon further inquiry, the complainant realised he had been cheated. The complainant waited in the hope of recovering the invested money, but, having received nothing, finally filed a complaint at police station. A case has been registered at CEN Crime police station.
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
END OF THE RACE? Overtaxed and outraced by illegal betting, horse racing in Hyderabad gasps for survival
1 2 3 4 5 6 Hyderabad: Once the sport of kings and a thriving weekend affair, horse racing is now limping along — crippled by steep taxes and outpaced by a booming underground betting scene. At Hyderabad Race Club, official collections have nosedived from Rs 1,217 crore in 2016–17 to just Rs 141 crore in 2024–25 — a near 90% drop. The sport slump began after a steep 28% GST was imposed on every rupee wagered, not just on winnings. Industry insiders say most of this money hasn't disappeared. It has simply changed lanes, flowing into illegal betting networks where punters can avoid the tax hit and pocket more. Hyderabad's illegal betting network is now estimated to be worth around Rs 2,000 crore annually. In cities like Bengaluru, it's believed to be at least two-and-a-half times higher. "No punter has stopped betting. Even now, thousands turn up at racecourses. But they're placing bets elsewhere, creating a flourishing underground market worth thousands of crores in less than a decade, leaving both race clubs and the government poorer," said V Narender Reddy of the Telangana Race Horse Owners Association and a punter with over three decades of experience. How does illegal betting work? Punters are increasingly turning to 'trusted' circles on messaging apps like WhatsApp, placing bets via phone calls or using small third-party apps. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Keep Your Home Efficient with This Plug-In elecTrick - Save upto 80% on Power Bill Learn More Undo To ensure payment, most illegal operators require the bet amount to be deposited in advance, a system they built on mutual trust and reputation. On a recent race day in June, one of the owners at Hyderabad Race Club wasn't watching the horses on the local track. Instead, he was glued to a screen showing a live race from Mysore — part of Inter Venue Betting (IVB), where punters bet on races held in other cities. Tote counters and bookmakers were just a few hundred metres away, yet he remained fixed to his phone. He was on a call with dozens of others placing bets in real time. Snippets of conversations could be overheard — "10 lakh", "15 lakh", "10,000" … all being wagered on a race hundreds of kilometres away. "Here, I just have to pay 5% cut to the bookie. But if I use the legal channel, half my money goes into taxes," he said, while simultaneously placing bets via a WhatsApp group where odds and stakes are shared before each race, just like at official counters. A few hundred metres away, a 52-year-old man stared blankly at the big screen after losing his third bet of the day. "I'm done for the day. Lost Rs 3,000," he said. "I do place bets at the counter too but prefer doing it over the phone. It's simply more profitable," he said, adding that he has been visiting the race club for over 30 years. 'A dying ecosystem' Be it the number of owners, horses, trainers, or stud farms — the entire ecosystem has shrunk significantly in the past decade. "Many owners, especially locals, have exited in recent years as they're not even earning enough to maintain their horses. Today, around 60% of owners at Hyderabad Race Club are from outside the state," said LVR Deshmukh, a veteran trainer who has held a licence since 1995 and has trained several champion horses. He currently manages 47 horses; the maximum a trainer can handle is 60. According to the club and owners, the number of horses has dropped from around 1,000 to just 650. The number of registered trainers stands at 23. Meanwhile, the cost of owning and maintaining a horse has at least doubled, while stake money has remained largely stagnant. "We used to get a horse for Rs 5 lakh: now it's Rs 20 lakh. Monthly maintenance has shot up to Rs 35,000. Earlier, the club offered loans to help buy horses, but that's stopped due to losses. Owners are spending Rs 40 crore per year from their own pockets just to keep the sport alive," said PSN Reddy, general secretary of the state owners' association, which has about 500 members. They also are planning to put forth a proposal before the club to make it mandatory for every voting member to own a horse as a step to strengthen the sport. Measures to revive the sport While club officials and punters admit that the situation has improved slightly after the removal of Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) in the recent budget, they believe the only way to revive the sport is by reducing GST to 12% or 16%. "From auto drivers to the mafia, everyone is encouraging illegal betting. The only way to stop this is by reducing GST. This will bring at least Rs 1,300 crore back into legal channels — even if we go by 2016–17 figures — and revive race clubs, which provide direct employment to around 15,000 and indirect jobs to over a lakh," said R Surender Reddy, chairman, Hyderabad Race Club. He added that all race clubs in the country have made several representations to the government over the years, seeking a reduction in GST, but have received no positive response. Seconding Reddy, Ananta Vatsalya, a cricketer-turned-trainer, said slashing GST is the only way to save the sport. "Right now, 90% of betting happens illegally, and it's not benefitting anyone in the ecosystem. Small owners are completely wiped out, and many have reduced the number of horses they buy as they are paying more and earning less. To revive the sport, GST must be reduced," he added. They also say that doing away with tax on total amount collected and imposing it only on commissions earned can also help clubs trot back to some semblance of normalcy. LOSING PACE: How Hyderabad Race Club Collections Fared Year Total collection (in Rs crore) 2014-15 Rs 975.18 2015-16 Rs 1, 166.35 2016-17 Rs 1, 271.83 2017-18 Rs 761.16 2018-19 Rs 632.11 2019-20 Rs 521.44 2020-21 Rs 105.17 2021-22 Rs 277.96 2022-23 Rs 353.26 2023-24 Rs 210.83 2024-25 141.68
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Promised 200% profit on investment, 2 duped of 3cr
Mumbai: The west region cyber police are probing two cases where complainants were lured with high returns in online share trading leading to a loss of Rs 3 crore. In the first case, a transport businessman lost over Rs 2 crore when he joined a WhatsApp group. He sent money to various bank accounts provided by a woman. In the second case, a 50-year-old man, working for a start-up, lost over Rs 40 lakh after the same set of accused duped him of Rs 41 lakh. The businessman received a WhatsApp message with the name of a known share trading company. The message sender communicated with him in a highly professional manner. The accused added the businessman to two WhatsApp groups. A woman, Sharon Trivedi, and Mehul Goyal, among others, were group admins. The accused sent him a link and made him download an app. The group admins lured him by saying he would get a 200% profit if he traded through their app. The accused gave him bank account numbers and Trivedi asked him to deposit money. He transferred money and could see his investment and profit in the app. In 12 transactions, he sent a total of Rs 2.53 crore. When he tried to withdraw money he couldn't. Trivedi told him to deposit Rs 2 crore. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo He realised it was a fraud and went to the police. In the second case, the complainant told police he saw an ad about online share trading. He clicked a link and was added to a WhatsApp group whose admins were Goyal, Trivedi, and others. He was asked to download an app for trading and given bank accounts to transfer money for trading. Two days after he started sending money, he tried to withdraw money and could withdraw Rs 100. Later, he sent Rs 40.54 lakh. On May 20, Trivedi told him that the value of his investment was Rs 2.18 crore and said she had subscribed to an IPOfor Rs 3.09 crore for him. She asked him to pay Rs 91.55 lakh more. He said he didn't have money and asked her to return his investment, but she refused.
