logo
ChatGPT was down — Here's what happened during the quick OpenAI outage

ChatGPT was down — Here's what happened during the quick OpenAI outage

Tom's Guide9 hours ago

OpenAI seems to be down, as ChatGPT is not working for a lot of people right now.
Reports began appearing on the outage tracking site Down Detector at around 9:30am BST / 1:30am PT / 4:30am ET, with a sudden spike happening shortly after.
According to OpenAI's status page, this seemed to only be affecting the API level (the implementation of ChatGPT tech into other apps), but it was more widespread than that.
Fortunately, a fix was implemented quickly afterwards and operations seem to have returned to normal.
Update:
Date: 2025-06-26T09:21:29+00:00
Title: BREAKING: ChatGPT is operational again
Content:
OK I'm calling it. After receiving reports from other folks and testing ChatGPT myself, it looks as if service has been restored.
We'll keep a look out in case there's a dreaded second spike, but for now, I'm calling it. Downdetector reports are down to 102, which is considered normal.
Update:
Date: 2025-06-26T09:13:41+00:00
Title: Well, that was fast...
Content:
No need to call it yet, but that spike has massively fallen off — indicating that a fix has been implemented. We'll keep monitoring!
Update:
Date: 2025-06-26T09:10:21+00:00
Title: Who is affected right now?
Content:
Looking at the UK heatmap on downdetector, there seems to be a huge concentration in London and Manchester, as well as reports cropping up from Glasgow, Cambridge and Birmingham.
Update:
Date: 2025-06-26T09:08:58+00:00
Title: Here come the X posts
Content: DOWN AGAIN? #chatgptJune 26, 2025
Looking like people are starting to share their frustrations!
Update:
Date: 2025-06-26T09:06:23+00:00
Title: What components are down?
Content:
This is an interesting question to answer, as I'm hearing one thing from OpenAI, and another from the people using the service.
According to OpenAI, the issue affects the APIs — the tools developers use to implement ChatGPT into their apps. This is causing slow down or stopping access to it at the moment.
Meanwhile, if you take a look at what the users are reporting, they're saying ChatGPT access is unavailable right now more broadly.
We'll keep investigating.
Update:
Date: 2025-06-26T09:02:35+00:00
Title: U.S. may not be affected
Content:
Now, this could just be because everyone in the U.S. is probably asleep. But this outage report is completely focused on the UK and Europe.
Looking at Status Gator gets us a little more information on this, as the heat map is particularly prominent in Europe right now.
Update:
Date: 2025-06-26T08:58:39+00:00
Title: That's a big spike
Content:
Welcome to the OpenAI outage live blog! So far, 1269 concurrent reports have been made over the past hour.
We're getting an understanding of what's happening, and reaching out to OpenAI for comment.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Meta Scores AI Fair Use Court Victory, but Judge Warns Such Wins Won't Always Be the Case
Meta Scores AI Fair Use Court Victory, but Judge Warns Such Wins Won't Always Be the Case

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

Meta Scores AI Fair Use Court Victory, but Judge Warns Such Wins Won't Always Be the Case

AI companies scored another victory in court this week. Meta on Wednesday won a motion for partial summary judgment in its favor in Kadrey v. Meta, a case brought by 13 authors alleging the company infringed on their copyright protections by illegally using their books to train its Llama AI models. The ruling comes two days after a similar victory for Claude maker Anthropic. But Judge Vince Chhabria stressed in his order that this ruling should be limited and doesn't absolve Meta of future claims from other authors. "This ruling does not stand for the proposition that Meta's use of copyrighted materials to train its language models is lawful," he wrote. "It stands only for the proposition that these plaintiffs made the wrong arguments and failed to develop a record in support of the right one." The issue at the heart of the cases is whether the AI companies' use of protected content for AI training qualifies as fair use. The fair use doctrine is a fundamental part of US copyright law that allows people to use copyrighted work without the rights holders' explicit permission, like in education and journalism. There are four key considerations when evaluating whether something is fair use. Anthropic's ruling focused on transformativeness, while Meta's focused on the effect the use of AI has on the existing publishing market. These rulings are big wins for AI companies. OpenAI, Google and others have been fighting for fair use so they don't have to enter costly and lengthy licensing agreements with content creators, much to the chagrin of content creators. For the authors bringing these cases, they may see some victories in subsequent piracy trials (for Anthropic) or new lawsuits. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.) In his analysis, Chhabria focused on the effect AI-generated books have on the existing publishing market, which he saw as the most important factor of the four needed to prove fair use. He wrote extensively about the risk that generative AI and large language models could potentially violate copyright law, and that fair use needs to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Some works, like autobiographies and classic literature such as The Catcher in the Rye, likely couldn't be created with AI, he wrote. However, he noted that "the market for the typical human-created romance or spy novel could be diminished substantially by the proliferation of similar AI-created works." In other words, AI slop could make human-written books seem less valuable and undercut authors' willingness and ability to create. Still, Chhabria said that the plaintiffs did not show sufficient evidence to prove harm from how "Meta's models would dilute the market for their own works." The plaintiffs focused their arguments on how Meta's AI models can reproduce exact snippets from their works and how the company's Llama models hurt their ability to license their books to AI companies. These arguments weren't as compelling in Chhabria's eyes -- he called them "clear losers" -- so he sided with Meta. That's different from the Anthropic ruling, where Judge William Alsup focused on the "exceedingly transformative" nature of the use of the plantiff's books in the results AI chatbots spit out. Chhabria wrote that while "there is no disputing" the use of copyrighted material was transformative, the more urgent question was the effect AI systems had on the ecosystem as a whole. Alsup also outlined concerns about Anthropic's methods of obtaining the books, through illegal online libraries and then by deliberating purchasing print copies to digitize for a "research library." Two court rulings do not make every AI company's use of content legal under fair use. What makes these cases notable is that they are the first to issue substantive legal analyses on the issue; AI companies and publishers have been duking it out in court for years now. But just as Chhabria referenced and responded to the Anthropic ruling, all judges use past cases with similar situations as reference points. They don't have to come to the same conclusion, but the role of precedent is important. It's likely that we'll see these two rulings referenced in other AI and copyright/piracy cases. But we'll have to wait and see how big of an effect these rulings will play in future cases -- and whether it's the warnings or greenlights that hold the most weight in future decisions. For more, check out our guide to copyright and AI.

Steam is down — live updates on outage
Steam is down — live updates on outage

Tom's Guide

timean hour ago

  • Tom's Guide

Steam is down — live updates on outage

Starting around 9:50 a.m. Pacific, reports of issues with Steam started to pick up on the outage tracker DownDetector with some warnings on other tracking sites. Steam is a major platform with hundreds of thousands if not millions of users. And the initial spikes have only hit around 2,000 reports. Steam is in the midst of its annual Summer Sale and could be getting hit with high traffic We're monitoring the Steam outage and will keep you posted as we learn more. Update: Date: 2025-06-23T16:53:25+00:00 Title: Steam Store "offline" Content: Over on an unofficial Steam Status page, the Store is listed as offline. Other services seem to be working normally from what we can see. Update: Date: 2025-06-23T16:50:34+00:00 Title: Outage started early Content: On the West Coast of the U.S. reports started to pick up around 9:50 a.m. Pacific and spiked at around 3000 reports at 10:30 a.m.

Marc Benioff says AI does up to 50% of Salesforce's work and predicts ‘digital labor revolution'
Marc Benioff says AI does up to 50% of Salesforce's work and predicts ‘digital labor revolution'

San Francisco Chronicle​

timean hour ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

Marc Benioff says AI does up to 50% of Salesforce's work and predicts ‘digital labor revolution'

Artificial intelligence now performs up to half the internal work at Salesforce, according to founder and CEO Marc Benioff, who says his company is spearheading a 'digital labor revolution' that will reshape the future of work. 'AI is doing 30% to 50% of the work at Salesforce now,' Benioff said during an episode of The Circuit with Emily Chang on Thursday, citing software engineering and customer service as key areas transformed by automation. He added that the company's internal use of AI has helped reduce hiring needs while boosting productivity. Benioff's bullish stance on AI is centered around a new platform called Agent Force, which deploys 'digital employees' to handle tasks ranging from customer service and analytics to marketing and branding. Salesforce aims to reach one billion active agents by the end of the year. 'It's the fastest-growing, most exciting thing we've ever done,' he said, noting that more than 5,000 customers are already using the technology. Benioff said the company's flagship AI agent has reached 93% accuracy in customer interactions, including with major clients like Walt Disney Co. Still, he emphasized the importance of vigilance, especially around security and misinformation. 'You have to be completely paranoid,' he said. At 59, Benioff continues to embrace his role as a tech industry disruptor. A self-taught programmer who sold his first software product as a teenager, he worked under Larry Ellison at Oracle before founding Salesforce in 1999. The idea for the company, he said, came to him while swimming with dolphins in Hawaii. Salesforce went on to revolutionize enterprise software by delivering it via the internet, pioneering the software-as-a-service model and becoming a global CRM leader with clients like Apple, Amazon and Boeing. Despite his enthusiasm, he acknowledged the technology's disruptive impact on labor. Salesforce has already cut over a thousand jobs, and Benioff predicts that today's CEOs may be the last to manage entirely human workforces. He estimates AI could unlock $3 to $12 trillion in global productivity. Benioff said he meditates daily, weaves Hawaiian spiritualism into company culture, and once spent over $20 million to license Einstein's likeness for Salesforce's AI branding. He proudly describes himself as 'the Taylor Swift of tech.' To illustrate his embrace of AI, Benioff said he co-authored the company's latest business plan with an AI assistant — an exercise he described as making the CEO job 'less lonely.' He is also blunt when it comes to competition. Benioff dismissed Microsoft's Copilot as 'repackaged ChatGPT,' drawing a contrast with Salesforce's more autonomous Agent Force platform. He supports breaking up Big Tech, saying the industry has 'probably been too big.' While facing criticisms over shifting diversity initiatives and political opportunism, Benioff remains committed to corporate responsibility. You can 'do well and do good,' he said, referring to Salesforce's 1-1-1 model, which pledges 1% of company equity, product and employee time to philanthropic causes. 'I think it's a false narrative,' he said. 'The people who are creating the future are here. This isn't the first gold rush we've been through.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store