Google faces trial in US bid to end search monopoly
The outcome of the trial could fundamentally reshape the internet by unseating Google as the go-to portal for online searches. PHOTO: REUTERS
WASHINGTON - Alphabet's Google faces a historic trial on April 21 as US antitrust enforcers in Washington seek to force the tech giant to sell off its Chrome browser as part of a bid to restore competition to the market for online search engines.
The outcome of the trial could fundamentally reshape the internet by unseating Google as the go-to portal for information online. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) hopes it will prevent Google's dominance from extending to artificial intelligence.
DOJ attorney David Dahlquist said during his opening statement that DOJ officials were present in the courtroom to show that the case, started under President Donald Trump and carried forward under former president Joe Biden, has 'the full support of the DOJ both past and present.'
Google plans to appeal the final ruling in the case.
'When it comes to antitrust remedies, the US Supreme Court has said that 'caution is key.' DOJ's proposal throws that caution to the wind,' Google executive Lee-Anne Mulholland said in a blog post on April 20.
Assistant Attorney-General Abigail Slater rejected that assessment in remarks outside the courthouse on Monday morning.
'You know what is irresponsible? Leaving Google's monopoly abuse unaddressed,' she said.
US District Judge Amit Mehta is overseeing the three-week trial.
The US Department of Justice and a coalition of 38 state attorneys-general have proposed far-reaching measures designed to quickly open the search market and give new competitors a leg up.
Their proposals include ending exclusive agreements in which Google pays billions of dollars annually to Apple and other device vendors to make Google the default search engine on their tablets and smartphones.
Google would also have to license search results to competitors, among other requirements. And it would be made to sell its Android mobile operating system if other remedies fail to restore competition.
Prosecutors have said they expect testimony about how Google's agreements to be the default search engine on mobile devices have hampered distribution efforts by artificial intelligence companies. Witnesses from Perplexity AI and OpenAI are expected to take the stand.
Google sees the proposals as extreme, and said the court should stick to limiting the terms of its default agreements.
US Assistant Attorney-General for the Antitrust Division Abigail Slater (centre) and Deputy Attorney-General Todd Blanche speak to members of the media outside federal court in Washington.
PHOTO: BLOOMBERG
The US$1.9 trillion (S$2.5 trillion) tech company has been subsidising browser makers such as Mozilla by paying to remain the default search engine. Cutting off that financial support could threaten their existence, Google says. And ending payments to device makers would raise the cost of smartphones, the company claims.
Google plans to call witnesses from Mozilla, Verizon and Apple, which launched a failed bid to intervene in the case.
Few potential buyers of Chrome have the same incentive as Google to maintain the free open-source code that underpins it, and which others including Microsoft use as a basis for their own browsers, the company says.
The trial comes on the heels of a win for the DOJ in a Virginia court on April 17 where a judge ruled in a separate antitrust case that Google maintains an illegal monopoly in advertising technology.
Meta Platforms is currently facing its own antitrust trial over the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Nylon
17 hours ago
- Nylon
Google and Gentle Monster set to launch AI smart eyewear collaboration with Android XR
At the recent Google I/O 2025, the tech giant and South Korean global eyewear brand Gentle Monster announced that they will be teaming up to launch their first-ever AI smart eyewear collaboration with Android XR. Image courtesy of Google. During the announcement, General Manager and Vice President of Google XR, Shahram Izadi, shared that creativity and sophistication are essential design features for technology to integrate into everyday life and with Gentle Monster onboard as the first partner highlights a pivotal step in the evolution of AI smart eyewear into essential, lifestyle fashion items. Although no launch date for the collaboration has been set yet, Google foresees that the new partnership is looking to seamlessly integrate extended reality into everyday life by showcasing cutting-edge smart technology alongside the refined aesthetics of Gentle Monster.
Business Times
20 hours ago
- Business Times
We need a new deal for the Web
GIVEN that Google attracts more than 136 billion visits a month – as many as the next 12 most popular websites combined – it is easy to see how a US federal judge concluded last year that the company ran a monopoly in online search and had abused its market dominance. Last week, Judge Amit Mehta heard the final arguments about what remedies to impose. His conclusions are expected in August. The US justice department, which launched the antitrust lawsuit, is demanding that Google be broken up. It wants to force the company to sell its Chrome browser, ban the massive payments it makes to Apple, Samsung and Mozilla to be their default search engine, and share data with competitors. That would surely be a triumph for free-market competition, motherhood and apple pie. Yet, as ever with regulatory interventions, the skill lies in ensuring that any corrective action anticipates tomorrow's challenges rather than just trying to fix today's problems. That's especially tough right now. As the judge acknowledged, the digital economy is evolving fast thanks to the light-speed diffusion of artificial intelligence. Some suggest that AI might even undermine the financial viability of the open, human, ad-supported Web on which Google has gorged. However much it may (or may not) abuse its market dominance, Google remains the strongest champion of the existing Web and many users would miss it if it were gone. Since being invented 36 years ago, the Web has emerged as one of humanity's most precious resources, giving any online user anywhere access to almost all of the world's knowledge. It has also become the foundation on which many thousands of digital businesses have been built. But it has its darker deformities and there is a risk that AI might further degrade it in two insidious ways. First, the big AI companies are in effect strip-mining all websites for content to train their models and paying back almost nothing in return to sustain the ecosystem. At present, Google accounts for about 90 per cent of the global search market and directs a torrent of traffic – and advertising – to content sites. Even though they may (understandably) complain about the terms, some content creators fear the trade itself may be in jeopardy because far fewer users would visit their sites. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up AI models aggregate and summarise the Web's content rather than encouraging users to visit the original content source. That may destroy the financial incentives for creating new content. 'I think that is a risk,' Laura Chambers, chief executive of the technology company Mozilla, tells me. 'How can we ensure that the Internet remains healthy?' The obvious survival mechanism for creators is to build walled gardens by erecting more paywalls around their content, or to move to closed channels off the open Web. For many companies, it may make sense to deepen direct-to-consumer business models via social media or their own apps. But both trends would further devalue the richness, utility and universality of the Web. The second threat is that AI models are increasingly flooding the Web with machine-generated slop. For the first time in a decade, bots have overtaken humans on the Web, accounting for an estimated 51 per cent of total traffic, according to the data and US cybersecurity group Imperva. The ability of generative AI to create plausible content at minimal cost means this trend is only likely to accelerate. An AI-mediated Web could move it further towards a 'dark forest', an increasingly hostile space populated by predatory bots that seize on any living thing. We may not like our current surveillance capitalism, in which users are tracked and targeted with ads. Subordination capitalism would be still worse. Yet, there are more positive visions of the Web's future, as recently sketched out by Kevin Scott, chief technology officer of Microsoft, which runs Bing, a very distant second in search. The increasing interaction of bots means that new open protocols are being developed to enable interoperability on this agentic Web. That creates the possibility for a different Web architecture and a 'new deal', in which 'everybody's incentives are aligned, where the creators and consumers have their interests balanced and there aren't a bunch of weird intermediaries constraining how utility and value gets exchanged', Scott told The Verge. No one yet knows exactly how to build such a glorious future. But whatever Judge Mehta can do to help nudge us in that direction would be appreciated. FINANCIAL TIMES
International Business Times
21 hours ago
- International Business Times
'Time to Drop the Really Big Bomb': Elon Musk Accuses Trump on Being in Epstein Files as Public Break-Up Turns Ugly
Elon Musk escalated his growing feud with President Trump on Thursday by accusing him of hiding details from the public about the notorious sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting that revealing the truth would expose Trump's own involvement. Musk also hinted that Trump should be removed from office and replaced by 40-year-old Vice President J.D. Vance. Just minutes before Musk made the Epstein-related accusation, Trump posted on Truth Social claiming he had told Musk to leave his administration and described the billionaire as having gone "CRAZY!" "Time to drop the really big bomb," Musk posted on X soon after the multi-hour tirade against the president. "@realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files." Musk Makes Bombshell Claims "That is the real reason they have not been made public," he claimed. "Have a nice day, DJT!" Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted child sex offender, died in jail in 2019. In February, the Justice Department released over 100 pages of his phone records and flight logs as part of a "Phase One" release, which left many online investigators disappointed due to the lack of explosive details. Epstein's association with Trump has been public knowledge for years, with footage and photos showing them together at social events in the 1990s. The initial set of DOJ documents included Trump's name in the flight records, along with mentions of some of his family members — such as his first wife Ivana and daughter Ivanka — listed among Epstein's contacts. Advisors have quietly admitted that Trump's association with Epstein will probably come up again when more documents are released — though they maintain that the files don't contain any claims of misconduct by the president. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. "The President is focused on passing this historic piece of legislation and making our country great again." The contact list and flight records appear to have been taken straight from Epstein's notorious "little black book." One version of this book was made public during Ghislaine Maxwell's 2021 trial, while another was later sold at auction. The contact list from the 1990s includes 349 names, with 221 of them not previously disclosed in a 2015 exposé of Epstein associates published by the website Gawker. According to Alexander Historical Auctions, the copy that was auctioned off features 94 printed entries, some marked with black checkmarks made by hand, and five highlighted in yellow. "All five names, including that of Donald Trump, are well-recognized financial and industrial figures," the online auctioneer's webpage notes. Dirty War Intensifies For years, online conspiracy theorists have speculated that powerful people visited Epstein's private Caribbean island, Little St. James, where several underage girls and young women were reportedly abused. Among the prominent figures Epstein transported on various flights aboard his private jet—later dubbed the "Lolita Express"—were Trump, former President Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Prince Andrew. Epstein was found dead in his Manhattan jail cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center on August 10, 2019, with bedsheets wrapped around his neck, just a little over a month after being arrested on sex trafficking charges. In September of last year, Trump said he'd be open to releasing additional official documents tied to Epstein if re-elected — including the so-called "client list" of the late sex offender. "I don't think – I mean, I'm not involved," he noted. "I never went to his island, fortunately, but a lot of people did."
