French assisted-dying legislation on way to becoming law
May 28 (UPI) -- Lawmakers in France voted to legalize assisted dying for some terminally ill residents in the final stages of life and in "constant physical or psychological suffering," but they also backed a parallel piece of legislation making palliative care a legal right.
Members of Parliament in the lower house, the National Assembly, voted 305-199 in favor Monday after two weeks of debate, clearing the way for the bill to go the Senate before returning to MPs for a second reading -- but it is unlikely to become law before 2027.
Under the proposed law, patients would have to state their wish to die by lethal injection of their own free will, and have mental capacity to do so, with a two-day cooling-off period at the end of which the person confirms their decision.
Patients, who must be citizens or legal residents over the age of 18, would need to administer the lethal medication themselves, but in cases where the person is physically incapable, a medical professional would be permitted to do it.
If it becomes law, France will become the eighth country in the 27-member European Union to legalize the practice. Across the English Channel, England and Scotland are also midway through separate legislative processes for assisted dying bills.
President Emmanuel Macron weclomed the vote calling it an "important step" that was also respectful because it addressed the issue of terminally ill people currently unable to access palliative care.
"With respect for sensitivities, doubts and hopes, the path of fraternity that I wished for is gradually opening up. With dignity and humanity," he wrote in a post on X.
However, the practice has faced opposition in the nominally Catholic nation with the bill referred to as a "law on end-of-life," with support largely demarcated along the left-right divide where centrist and socialist MPs voted in favor while right and far right parties voted against.
Religious leaders from across the faith spectrum -- Catholics, Protestants, Jews, Muslims and Buddhists -- launched a joint campaign earlier this month against the "serious abuses" and the "radical shift" they argue the legislation would usher in.
Archbishop Moulins-Beaufort, president of the Archbishops Conference of France said the proposed law made a mockery of dignity.
"Killing cannot be the choice of brotherhood or dignity. It is the choice of abandonment and refusal to help until the end. This transgression will weigh heavily on the most vulnerable and lonely members of our society," he said.
The Archbishop of Lyon, Olivier de Germay, appealed to MPs to have the courage "to go against the tide" and say no to a "pseudo-solidarity that would amount to telling elderly people that we can help them disappear."
Archbishop Vincent Jordy of Tours, vice president of the bishops' conference, pointed to what he said was a "glaring shortage" of caregivers resulting in the 50% of French people eligible for quality palliative care -- which he said stopped people wanting to end their lives vast majority of cases -- being unable to access it.
Notably, the move is also strongly opposed by a significant proportion of health workers, which could prove problematic given their cooperation would be necessary for assisted dying to work.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' heads for showdown with Senate parliamentarian
House-passed legislation to enact President Trump's agenda is headed for a showdown with the Senate parliamentarian as Democrats plan to challenge key elements of it, including a proposal to make Trump's expiring 2017 tax cuts permanent. Senate Democrats are warning ahead of the fight that if Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) makes an end run around the parliamentarian to make Trump's tax cuts permanent, it would seriously undermine the filibuster and open the door to Democrats rewriting Senate rules in the future. Senate Republicans argue that it's up to Senate Budget Committee Chair Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) to set the budgetary baseline for the bill. They say it's not up to the parliamentarian to determine whether extending the 2017 Trump tax cuts should be scored as adding to the deficit. If Graham determines that extending Trump's tax cuts should be judged as an extension of current policy and therefore is budget neutral, it would allow Republicans to make the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act permanent, which is a top priority of Thune and Senate Finance Committee Chair Mike Crapo (R-Idaho). Democrats expect Senate Republicans to do just that, most likely by putting the question to a vote in the Senate, which Republicans control with 53 seats. That's what Thune did before the Memorial Day recess to set a new Senate precedent to allow Republicans to repeal California's electric vehicle (EV) mandate under the Congressional Review Act. Democrats will attempt to force the parliamentarian to rule that making the Trump tax cuts permanent would add to federal deficits beyond 2034 — beyond the 10-year budget window — and therefore violate the Senate's Byrd Rule. Such a ruling, if upheld on the Senate floor, would blow up Thune and Crapo's plan to make the 2017 tax cuts permanent. They would have to add language to sunset those tax cuts to allow the bill to pass the Senate with a simple-majority vote. Democrats are warning that another effort to circumvent the parliamentarian would open the door to a rewriting of the filibuster rule when their party recaptures control of Washington. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee who will co-lead the effort to challenge provisions in the Republican bill, said that filibuster reform is needed to stop circumventions of the parliamentarian. 'Part of my argument was if we don't go to something like the talking filibuster where it's public and takes effort [to block legislation], then there are going to be end runs around the filibuster and this is exactly, exactly what happened,' Merkley said after Senate Republicans ignored the parliamentarian and established a new precedent with a partisan vote to allow California's EV mandate to be overturned under the Congressional Review Act. Merkley has long advocated for requiring senators to actively hold the floor to block a bill. Under current Senate rules, lawmakers typically filibuster a bill simply by raising an objection. They don't need to occupy the floor to stop legislation. Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), who has called for eliminating the Senate filibuster for legislation, said Senate Republicans blew a hole in the filibuster rule when they circumvented the parliamentarian by voting to set a new precedent to expand the Congressional Review Act. 'It's clear that the Republicans can no longer say that they're opposed to getting rid of the filibuster because they just got rid of the filibuster when it suited them,' she said. 'We need a set of rules that apply across the board, and that's true whether you have Democrats in the majority or Republicans in the majority. 'Yes, it is time for filibuster reform,' she said. Democratic aides say they suspect Thune's decision before the Memorial Day recess to put a major procedural question up for a Senate vote was a dress rehearsal for Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Democrats say they plan to challenge the GOP plan to score the extension of Trump's expiring tax cuts as a matter of current policy during meetings with the Senate parliamentarian. Any item that fails to pass muster under the so-called Byrd Bath would be subject to a point-of-order objection on the floor, which could hold up the whole bill. A senior Senate Democratic aide said Merkley's staff argued to the parliamentarian in April that scoring the extension of Trump's tax cuts as a matter of current policy instead of current law would violate Senate precedent, as well as the Gramm-Rudman-Hollings Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985. The Democrats came away from those presentations hopeful that the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, would rule in their favor that Republicans could not score the extension of the 2017 tax cuts as budget-neutral. 'They felt that they were well received and had strong arguments in particular because there's a section in Gramm-Rudman-Hollings that defines baseline, and there are reasons for consistency with the Byrd Rule,' the Democratic aide said. Republicans were scheduled to argue their side of the case but then canceled the meeting, indefinitely postponing a ruling from the parliamentarian. 'The Republicans were scheduled to argue but then withdrew from that at the last minute, having convinced themselves that they had the authority' to set a current-policy baseline 'by empowering the chair of the Budget Committee,' the aide said. Democrats say that decision to postpone a verdict from the parliamentarian in April sets up a procedural showdown this summer that could wipe out the Republican plan to make Trump's tax cuts permanent. Under current law, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act is due to expire at the end of 2025. Therefore, using a current-law baseline would score an extension of those expiring tax cuts as adding significantly to federal deficits beyond 2035. That would require Senate Republicans to come up with trillions of dollars in new spending cuts to offset the cost of making the tax cuts permanent. Thune could opt to again circumvent the parliamentarian by having the Senate vote on whether the Republican Budget chair gets to set the baseline. But Democrats warn that would strike another blow against the Senate filibuster and hasten its future abolition. 'We have to let the dust settle and see who still recognizes the importance of the filibuster. There are a bunch of Democrats who would probably vote to get rid of the filibuster,' said Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.). Asked if Democrats would eliminate the filibuster once they regain power, the Colorado senator predicted: 'That temptation will be there.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Actions of the Trump administration will foster corruption, will not promote civility
Many in the United States consider Donald Trump to be a savior. To the contrary, he and the actions of some in his administration will foster corruption and ongoing incivility in our society. Consider the gift of a luxury Boeing 747 from Qatar to replace Air Force One. The jet fetched $400 million when new. Some estimates it will cost $1 billion to retrofit the plane to Air Force One standards. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth accepted the gift. Two provisions in the U.S. Constitution place restrictions on gifts to the president. The one relevant here prohibits the president or any elected official from receiving gifts from a 'King, Prince, or foreign State' without congressional approval. What kind of example does accepting this gift give to the rest of our country, especially to our youths? In a recent meeting at the Oval Office with Cyril Ramaphosa, the president of South Africa, Trump purported to show a mass burial site of white farmers. The photo was, in fact, a burial site from the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Trump purveyed other inaccuracies in the meeting, and has actually brought white South Africans to the U. S. while other refugees ― people of color. What message is being sent? Does this promote civility toward people of all races? Consider some in Trump's administration. Hegseth used his personal phone on a Signal chat exchange about national security issues, including a recent military strike in Yemen. He also reportedly has the unclassified app Signal installed on his computer in the Pentagon. More: Oklahoma voters ― Is this the Trump you had in mind? | Opinion Kristi Noem, the former governor of South Dakota (the first woman elected to that position), gained notoriety when she admitted to shooting her dog, Cricket, as well as a goat. These acts of cruelty were witnessed; otherwise, who knows if she would have admitted to them? Noem is now the director of Homeland Security. During a recent Senate hearing, she did not know the meaning of "habeas corpus," claiming that the term refers to the president's authority to deport criminals. In fact, the writ of habeas corpus requires the government to publicly justify detaining or imprisoning someone. Finally, there's Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the secretary of Health and Human Services, whose misunderstanding of health and medicine is epic. It's also worth mentioning Trump's 'big beautiful budget' bill, which contains a provision disallowing courts from using funds to hold executive branch officers in contempt. House Republicans want to cut Medicaid; their bill will also trigger over $500 billion in Medicare cuts. Meanwhile, the poor and retirees brace to lose their health care coverage. Unless you're fabulously wealthy, you'll suffer under this administration. The incompetence alone is damaging our country; corrupt actions threaten even more damage to the fabric of our society. For those who actually care about the U. S., now is the time to speak out and act. Nancy E. Snow is a professor of philosophy at the University of Kansas. She formerly was a philosophy professor at the University of Oklahoma and director of the Institute for the Study of Human Flourishing. This article originally appeared on Oklahoman: Trump administration does not promote civility | Opinion
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
House awaits package to codify DOGE cuts, while Senate digs into ‘big, beautiful bill'
The fight over President Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' is officially moving to the Senate this week, as the chamber convenes for the first full in-person stretch since the House approved the sprawling package late last month. Senate Republicans have signaled that they plan to make their imprint on the behemoth bill, whether it be ratcheting up spending cuts, watering down Medicaid changes, or reducing the rollback of green-energy tax credits, among other provisions. The chamber is staring down an ambitious timeline: Republican leaders want to send Trump the package by July 4, leaving the Senate little time to make its alterations, then send the package to the House for a final stamp of approval. That sprint will begin in earnest this week. Also this week, House Republicans are waiting on the White House to send over a package to claw back billions of funding, as the GOP conference looks to formally codify the cuts the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) made during the first few months of the Trump administration. On the House floor, lawmakers will consider a bill to create a report on esophageal cancer in honor of the late-Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.). Throughout the Capitol, committees are scheduled to hold hearings on the White House's 2026 budget request, as Congress gears up for the upcoming spending fight. Senate Republicans will dive into work on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' this week, as party leadership looks to meet its self-imposed deadline. Both conservatives and moderates have signaled that they would like to see changes made to the large bill, with spending cuts, changes to Medicaid, the rollback of green-energy tax credits and the increase of the state and local tax (SALT) deduction cap topping the list of potential issue areas. It remains unclear which provisions the Senate will tackle. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) has said there will be alterations, without specifying in which areas. Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.), meanwhile, has been urging the Senate to make minimal changes, pointing to the tenuous negotiations that led to the bill's passage in the House by a small margin. Trump, however, gave cover to the upper chamber last month, greenlighting the tweaks. 'I want the Senate and the senators to make the changes they want. It will go back to the House and we'll see if we can get them,' Trump said. 'In some cases, the changes may be something I'd agree with, to be honest.' 'I think it's going to get there,' he added of the package. 'I think they are going to have changes. Some will be minor, some will be fairly significant.' Senate Republicans are also watching closely to see what happens once the parliamentarian gets involved and begins to rule on key parts of the bill. Despite the potential for consequential hurdles, Republican leaders are holding firm in their plan of sending the package to Trump's desk for his signature by July 4 — a timeline that Johnson reaffirmed on Sunday. 'Yeah, they've always discounted us,' the Speaker said on NBC's 'Meet the Press' when asked if the party can complete its work by that deadline. 'I mean, I said I would do it out of the House before Memorial Day, and I was laughed at when I said that back early part of the year. But we beat it by four days, OK? We're going to get this done, the sooner, the better.' 'Because all these extraordinary benefits that we're talking about have to happen as soon as possible,' he added. 'And I'm convinced that the Senate will do it, do the right thing, send it back to us. We're going to get it to the President's desk, and we're all going to have a glorious celebration on Independence Day, by July 4th, when he gets this signed into law.' The White House this week is expected to send the House a package that would recoup $9.4 billion in funding, as Republicans look to formalize the changes DOGE has made — an outcome conservatives are itching for. It remains unclear when the White House plans to formally dispatch the legislation, commonly referred to as a rescissions package. A spokesperson for the Office of Management and Budget said the measure will in-part target the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which supports NPR and PBS, in addition to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) — all of which have been targets of DOGE. Last week, Johnson said the House would act on the package 'quickly.' '.@ElonMusk and the entire @DOGE team have done INCREDIBLE work exposing waste, fraud, and abuse across the federal government – from the insanity of USAID's spending to finding over 12 million people on Social Security who were over 120 years old,' Johnson wrote on X. 'The House is eager and ready to act on DOGE's findings so we can deliver even more cuts to big government that President Trump wants and the American people demand.' Movement on the package, however, is already behind schedule. The White House initially planned to send the House the rescissions package on April 28, but pushed back that date as the lower chamber worked to pass the 'big, beautiful bill' full of Trump's legislative priorities. Conservatives, meanwhile, have been itching for the House to codify the cuts DOGE has made. Last week, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) said the rescissions package was on its way to the House, writing on X: 'Personally I want to pass DOGE cuts every single week until the bloated out of control government is reigned back in.' A slew of House and Senate committees are scheduled to hold hearings on Trump's fiscal year 2026 budget request this week, as the panels prepare for the Sept. 30 government funding deadline. The White House unveiled its first budget request early last month, headlined by hefty cuts to non-defense programs and increases for defense and border funding. The administration publicized a more than 1,200-page appendix to the budget request last week, detailing the slashes the president is hoping to make. A number of panels will parse through those particulars in public this week. Tuesday: 10 a.m.: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies will review the budget request for the Education Department Witness: Education Secretary Linda McMahon 2:30 p.m.: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Financial Services and General Government will review the budget request for the Securities and Exchange Commission Witness: Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Paul S. Atkins Wednesday: 10 a.m.: House Appropriations Subcommittee on Departments of Transportation, and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies will review the budget request for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Witness: FAA Acting Administrator Chris Rocheleau 10 a.m.: Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies will review the budget request for the Commerce Department Witness: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Thursday: 11 a.m.: House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science, and Related Agencies will review the budget request for the Commerce Department Witness: Lutnick The House this week will vote on a bill requiring the Government Accountability Office (GAO) to prepare a report on esophageal cancer, in honor of Connolly, who died from the disease last month. The legislation — titled the Gerald E. Connolly Esophageal Cancer Awareness Act — advanced out of the House Oversight Committee last month, the same day Connolly passed away. Connolly initially introduced the bill, but it was renamed in his honor after his death. 'I know I'm not alone in that many of my Republican committee colleagues found Gerry Connolly to be a partner,' House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer (R-Ky.), a cosponsor of the bill, said in a statement. 'Esophageal cancer is one of the deadliest and fastest growing cancer diagnoses among Americans today. I was proud to join Ranking Member Gerry Connolly in introducing this bill. I urge my colleagues to support this commonsense, bipartisan legislation and join us in the fight to end esophageal cancer.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
