
Malcolm Potts, irreverent evangelist for contraception, dies at 90
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'Malcolm felt we were heading for catastrophe if we didn't do a better job in family planning,' said Stefano Bertozzi, a former dean at the University of California Berkeley School of Public Health, where Dr. Potts held an endowed chair in population and family planning. The two met when they were working on HIV prevention in Africa for different organizations.
Advertisement
Dr. Potts, shown in 2011, worked with the University of California Berkeley.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH/NYT
'He was a ferocious ally for women having unfettered access to the tools they needed to manage their own fertility,' Bertozzi said in an interview.
The British-born Dr. Potts was rumpled, tweedy, and irreverent. He was of a generation that did not pander to political correctness, and he had a collection of ties printed with condoms. He was also one of Berkeley's most popular professors. His classes on human sexuality, at which he dispensed policy points, naughty anecdotes, and common sense, were filled to overflowing. Bertozzi called him the Bernie Sanders of Berkeley.
Advertisement
'He was the biggest feminist I ever met -- and the most unlikely,' said Alisha Graves, a public-health policy expert and former student of Dr. Potts's. Together the two of them founded OASIS (the initials stand for Organizing to Advance Solutions in the Sahel), an organization that serves women in the Sahel, a region just below the Sahara that encompasses 10 countries and has been battered by climate change, poverty, and high rates of fertility -- as well as its terrible byproduct, maternal mortality.
The focus of Dr. Potts was global, but his first brush with the fallout from unwanted pregnancies happened at home.
A newly minted obstetrician, he was fresh out of medical school at the University of Cambridge when he was posted to a busy hospital in North London. There, he regularly treated women suffering from incomplete abortions -- meaning that they were still pregnant but losing blood.
It was the early 1960s, abortion was not yet legal in England, and, Dr. Potts said, the experience was an epiphany.
He opened a clinic to provide contraception to single women and vasectomies to men. And he joined a lobbying group of medical professionals working for the legalization of abortion in Britain, which happened in 1967.
Dr. Potts became a well-known booster of oral contraceptives; he once told a newspaper reporter that the Pill was so safe, he would give it to his 2-year-old daughter. He famously appeared on David Frost's late-1960s talk show, 'The Frost Programme,' to debate the merits of oral contraceptives with a conservative gynecologist. The gynecologist averred that they were so dangerous, he would prescribe them only to prostitutes. Dr. Potts responded by pouring a bag of rice onto a table and picking out two grains, to indicate the percentage of women at risk of death from taking birth control pills. He then counted out 27 grains to illustrate the percentage of women at risk of dying from an unintended pregnancy.
Advertisement
'It would be a service to mankind if the Pill were available in vending machines and cigarettes were placed on prescription,' Dr. Potts told Reader's Digest in 1969. (It was a sign of the times that cigarettes were then sold in vending machines, like candy.)
In 1968, Dr. Potts became the medical director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation. In that position, he saw firsthand how the low status of women in poor countries led to harsh outcomes in their reproductive health.
He began to research ways to provide safe abortions in places where medical care was delivered in less-than-optimal conditions. He read about Harvey Karman, an eccentric activist and psychologist in training at the University of California Los Angeles, who had come up with a way of performing abortions that was safer and less painful than what was then the more frequently used method, dilation and curettage. Vacuum extraction, as the technique is called, is now the most common surgical procedure for ending a pregnancy.
Dr. Potts sought out Karman, and together they refined the device he invented to perform vacuum extraction. They wrote about it for the Lancet, the British medical journal, whose editors were unaware that Dr. Potts's co-author was not a medical doctor. Dr. Potts received a grant from the US Agency for International Development to provide the device to International Planned Parenthood Federation clinics around the world.
Advertisement
In India, Potts traveled to Mumbai (then known as Bombay) to provide vasectomies; he set up a clinic on a train station platform because men there were fearful of hospitals. In Thailand, he organized a community-based distribution system of birth control pills and condoms, training market vendors, shopkeepers, teachers, and one undertaker to dispense them properly.
A decade ago, Dr. Potts started a company called Cadence with Nap Hosang, an obstetrician who was his colleague at Berkeley, and Samantha Miller, a pharmaceutical industry veteran, to produce a birth control pill that could be sold without a prescription. After years of holdups by the Food and Drug Administration, exacerbated in recent months by layoffs at the agency, it has yet to be approved.
Zena, as it's called, is a combination progesterone-estrogen pill that carries a low risk of blood clots. (An online questionnaire, should the pill receive the go-ahead, would evaluate each woman's risk.)
The company has been more successful with its Morning After Pill, which is sold online, in convenience stores and in vending machines on college campuses.
David Malcolm Potts was born Jan. 8, 1935, in Sunderland, England, the youngest of three sons of Kathleen (Cole) Potts and Ronald Windle Potts. He grew up in Newcastle and attended Cambridge, where he earned his medical degree and a doctorate in embryology.
He was married four times. His marriages to Dera Joyce Cook and Caroline Merula Deys ended in divorce. His third wife, Marcia Jaffe Potts, died in 1993. His fourth wife, Martha Madison Campbell, died in 2022.
Advertisement
In addition to Iler, his stepdaughter, Dr. Potts leaves a son, Oliver Macdonald, from his first marriage; a daughter, Sarah Deyes Longlands, and a son, Henry Potts, from his second; a daughter, Sandra Potts Jaffe, from his third; two stepsons, Douglas Iler and Bruce Iler; seven grandchildren; and four great-grandchildren.
Dr. Potts was the author of a number of books -- not only practical textbooks on contraception, but also quirkier fare, including 'Queen Victoria's Gene: Haemophilia and the Royal Family' (1995), written with his brother William, which suggested that Queen Victoria had been illegitimate. They noted that none of her ancestors had possessed the genetic mutation for hemophilia, which she famously passed along to royalty throughout Europe. Therefore, they argued, her father could not have been Prince Edward.
When the book came out, Dr. Potts told The Sunday Times of London that he thought Queen Victoria's body should be exhumed for DNA testing to settle the matter. A spokesperson for the royal family responded, 'I don't think there's been any attempt ever to dig up members of the royal family.'
This article originally appeared in
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
UnitedHealthcare is suing British newspaper The Guardian for defamation, alleging that the outlet falsely accused them of enticing nursing homes to enroll in a special program that works to restrict medical expenses for elderly patients. "The Guardian knowingly published false and misleading claims about our Institutional Special Needs Program, forcing us to take action to protect the clinician-patient relationship that is crucial for delivering high-quality care. The Guardian refused to engage with the truth and chose instead to print its predetermined narrative," UnitedHealthcare told Fox News Digital in a statement. The Guardian article, published May 21, claimed that UnitedHealthcare is pursuing cost-cutting tactics that jeopardize the health of nursing home patients. The article claims that the health insurance giant provides what amounts to secret bonuses to enroll in a program that stations medical staff that reports directly to UnitedHealthcare, and in practice works to reduce hospitalizations for patients, some of whom allegedly may urgently need the care. Unitedhealthcare Ceo Murder Suspect Luigi Mangione Indicted In New York The article also claims UnitedHealthcare financially entices nursing homes to join their "Institutional Special Needs" program, and allegedly illegally had nursing homes share confidential patient data with the insurer so that it could skirt federal law and market programs to patients – some of whom lack the capacity to make financial decisions on their own – and families. The Guardian also alleged that UnitedHealthcare leaned on nursing home staff to convince patients to sign DNR's, even if they had expressed a desire for all medical options to be used to save their life. "A recent article published by The Guardian presents a narrative built largely on anecdotes rather than facts. It is unfortunate that the article misrepresents a program that, in reality, improves health outcomes for seniors through on-site clinical care, personalized treatment plans, and enhanced coordination among caregivers. We stand firmly behind the integrity of our programs, which consistently receive high satisfaction ratings from our members," UnitedHealthcare said in a statement in response to the article in May. Read On The Fox News App The lawsuit alleged that The Guardian used a "heavily cropped screenshot" of an internal UnitedHealthcare email which they claim, when seen in full, contradicts their reporting. The suit also accuses The Guardian of "gratuitously" linking its report to the assassination of their former CEO Brian Thompson. Unitedhealth Shares Slide As Criminal Probe Report Adds To Investor Fears "The Guardian knew these accusations were false, but published them anyway," the lawsuit stated. The Guardian told Fox News Digital it stood by its reporting. "The Guardian stands by its deeply-sourced, independent reporting, which is based on thousands of corporate and patient records, publicly filed lawsuits, declarations submitted to federal and state agencies, and interviews with more than 20 current and former UnitedHealth employees – as well as statements and information provided by UnitedHealth itself over several weeks. It's outrageous that in response to factual reporting on the practice of secretly paying nursing homes to reduce hospitalizations for vulnerable patients, UnitedHealth is resorting to wildly misleading claims and intimidation tactics via the courts," a representative from The Guardian said. Click To Get The Fox News App When asked by Fox News Digital for clarification regarding the "heavily cropped screenshot," a representative for The Guardian said the image was in fact a "visual illustration" and the so-called missing information was provided "in an on-record comment and a denial from UnitedHealth" in the proceeding paragraph. The Guardian rep also claimed that UnitedHealthcare never asked the press outlet to alter the article source: UnitedHealthcare sues The Guardian for defamation after explosive nursing home story
Yahoo
11 hours ago
- Yahoo
Handwritten notes reveal Churchill's penicillin concern ahead of D-Day
Winston Churchill's push to obtain penicillin in time to treat casualties expected from D-Day has come to light in documents seen by BBC News. Official papers unearthed by the National Archives reveal the prime minister's frustration and concern over slow progress securing supplies of what was then seen to be a brand new "wonder drug". The BBC was shown the papers ahead of the anniversary of the Normandy landings on 6 June 1944. Even months after D-Day, the wartime prime minister called efforts "very disappointing" and bemoaned the fact the US was "so far ahead" despite the drug being a "British discovery". Penicillin was discovered in London by Professor Alexander Fleming in 1928. Despite attempts to produce a usable medicine from the bacteria-killing mould, this had not been achieved by the start of World War Two. But an Oxford team of scientists, led by Howard Florey, carried out the first successful trials. With large-scale production difficult in the UK, they took their research to the United States, where drug companies expanded output. Before the development of penicillin, blood poisoning could follow even minor wounds with no cure available. So with the anticipation of the huge military effort ahead, supplies of the drug were seen as essential. Early in 1944, the prime minister was complaining to his ministers about Britain's inability to produce it at scale. He scrawled in red ink on a Ministry of Supply report that said the Americans were producing greater quantities: "I am sorry we can't produce more". Later in the year, in response to explanations from officials, he said: "Your report on penicillin showing that we are only to get about one-tenth of the expected output this year, is very disappointing." On another report, he instructs: "Let me have proposals for a more abundant supply from Great Britain". Less than a fortnight before D-Day, health officials could report that sufficient supplies had been obtained, most from the US, but only for battle casualties. Dr Jessamy Carlson, modern records specialist at The National Archives, said: "The files give a glimpse into the extraordinary levels of preparation undertaken in advance of the D-Day landings. "Only six weeks before, penicillin is just reaching our shores in quantities which will allow it to play a major role in improving the outcomes for service personnel wounded in action." But what's now seen as the first true antibiotic would not be fully available to the general public till 1946. A telegram in the same files shows a doctor from Cornwall, who was treating a 10-year-old child in 1944, pleading with the authorities for the medicine: "No hope without penicillin". The plea was rejected, with supplies said to be only available for military use. With antibiotics now part of everyday life (and arguably too widely used), the documents seen by the BBC shed new light on the urgent efforts by Churchill and others to secure enough of one such drug for the first time to save lives during the struggle to liberate northern Europe. Major feared Churchill archive would be broken up How a tiny village became a penicillin powerhouse Pharmacists warn drug shortage affecting cancer patients
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump team set to destroy $12m worth of HIV drugs and contraceptives that were bought before closing USAID
Roughly $12 million worth of HIV-prevention drugs and contraceptives purchased by the U.S. Agency for International Development will likely be destroyed after President Donald Trump dismantled the organization, according to a report. These drugs have been sitting in distribution centers in Belgium and the UAE since January, when Trump ended the agency's spending, The Washington Post reported. Now, negotiators have been instructed to sell the drugs or else they'll be thrown out, according to the outlet. 'The mandate that [the USAID negotiator] has been given is 'get us money for it, and if you can't do that, we're just going to trash it,'' someone with knowledge of the situation told the Post. These supplies include more than 26 million condoms, 2 million doses of injectable birth control, millions of packages of oral birth control, hundreds of thousands of implantable contraceptive devices, and over 50,000 vials of a drug that prevents HIV contraction, the Post reports. Some of these supplies were earmarked for 18 countries, meaning those governments may never get the aid even though it was already purchased, according to the Post. When contacted for comment, a senior State Department official told The Independent that the Post has 'once again delivered fake news' and the 'story is full of inaccuracies.' Atul Gawande, a former assistant USAID administrator, told the Post the potential destruction of these drugs is 'inconceivable.' Meanwhile, Former USAID head Andrew Natsios called the decision 'nuts.' 'At this point, just give it away instead of destroying it, for heaven's sakes,' he told the Post. Trump cut off USAID funds in January, saying the organization that provides humanitarian aid abroad is 'not aligned with American interests.' The Trump administration is also poised to ask Congress for $8.3 billion in cuts to foreign aid efforts, which range from climate work to LGBTQ+ programs, The Independent previously reported. The decision has derailed the projected end of the AIDS pandemic and means the number of AIDS-related deaths could jump from six million to 10 million in the next five years unless aid is reinstated, The Independent previously reported. Data projections indicate there will be 3.4 million more orphans who have lost at least one parent to AIDS, and 600,000 more newborns could contract HIV by 2030. 'All the gains that we've seen over the last 20 years will start being steadily reversed,' Professor Francois Venter, a leading HIV doctor at the University of Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, previously told The Independent. Hadja, a 27-year-old mother of three in Uganda, previously told The Independent she has lost access to lifesaving medication since Trump effectively shut down USAID. 'Our lives depend on medicine – without it, our lives are shortened,' she said. 'If I die, my children will suffer.'