
Jane Street Boss Says He Was Duped Into Funding AK-47s for Coup
(Bloomberg) -- The indictment reads like a cinematic plot: A Harvard Fellow and another activist allegedly wanted to buy AK-47s, Stinger missiles and grenades to topple South Sudan's government. What they lacked was enough cash.
Now, Jane Street co-founder Robert Granieri concedes he put up the money — saying he was duped into funding the alleged coup plot. The admission from the wealthy recluse behind a Wall Street trading powerhouse stems from the US prosecution of Peter Ajak, the Harvard Fellow who was accused last year of scheming to install himself atop the East African nation.
'Granieri is a longtime supporter of human rights causes,' his lawyer said in a statement. 'In this case, the person Rob thought was a human rights activist defrauded Rob and lied about his intentions.'
The case came to light in March 2024, when federal prosecutors in Arizona charged Ajak and Abraham Keech with conspiring to illegally export arms to their home country. Both have pleaded not guilty.
While prosecutors haven't said where the defendants obtained several million dollars for an attempt to buy military-grade weaponry, Ajak's lawyers pointed to Granieri in a recent filing — saying the 53-year-old financier was 'vital to the plan.'
'Without the significant financing that Mr. Granieri could and agreed to provide, the alleged conspiracy would have been impossible,' they wrote in the document filed in late May.
The lawyers accused authorities of selectively prosecuting two Black men, even though support also came from Granieri and Garry Kasparov, the chess champion and prominent Russian dissident. The US hasn't accused either of them of wrongdoing.
Kasparov came to know Ajak when the chessmaster was chair of the Human Rights Foundation. He later connected Ajak with Granieri, according to people familiar with the situation, who asked not to be identified discussing the legal case.
'My record and my values are clear, and they remain unchanged,' Kasparov said in a statement sent by a spokesperson, in response to questions about the case. 'I have spent much of my life standing up for civil rights and promoting democracy around the world.'
To industry outsiders, Jane Street is probably best known as the former employer of Sam Bankman-Fried, before he left to build a crypto empire that imploded.
But across Wall Street, the market-making firm is a source of fascination — known for turning mathematicians into traders who mint profits. It generated $20.5 billion in net trading revenue last year, helping it leap past the likes of Bank of America Corp. and Citigroup Inc.
Despite Jane Street's ascent in the industry, Granieri has kept a low profile. He's one of the firm's four founders — and the only one still there. Yet he's not featured on the company's website, and public photos of him are scarce.
The firm's success has allowed Granieri to pour money into other ventures and causes. He helped build the Scarlet Pearl, a casino resort on the Gulf Coast in Mississippi, was a major financial backer for Republican presidential candidate Nikki Haley, and has donated to the Equal Justice Initiative and Institute for Justice.
He also channeled money into causes Kasparov backed around the globe.
South Sudan — slightly larger than France — became the world's youngest country after seceding from Sudan in 2011 following more than 20 years of civil war.
The bloody regional conflict displaced millions of people, drew attention from human rights activists and gained mainstream awareness after actor George Clooney championed intervention in the early 2000s. Despite emerging as an independent nation, stability still eludes its people.
Ajak aimed to change that.
After escaping life as a child soldier in Sudan in the 1990s, he resettled in the US as one of the 'Lost Boys.' He went on to study at the Harvard Kennedy School before returning to Sudan as a World Bank economist. After South Sudan's independence, Ajak became a prominent opposition activist and political prisoner there, later seeking asylum in the US.
One sticking point in the court case is how much, if anything, US authorities knew about Ajak and Keech's alleged plan to topple South Sudan's government.
Attorneys for both men have signaled in court that they plan to pursue a 'public authority' defense, essentially claiming that US officials had supported their plan. Prosecutors said Ajak was told by the State Department in October 2023 that it wouldn't fund plans for non-democratic regime change.
Ajak and Keech are accused of forging ahead regardless. For that, they needed financial backing.
The financing took shape early last year amid a flurry of meetings. Some were at the law firm Paul Hastings, where Ajak's former pro bono attorney, Renata Parras, worked, according to the May filing. Another attendee was public-relations specialist Michael Holtzman, who previously advised the State Department, that filing says. Prosecutors haven't accused Parras or Holtzman of wrongdoing.
'Based on the government's indictment of Peter, it would seem he lied to me and others about his intentions from the outset,' Holtzman said in a statement. Parras didn't respond to a request for comment.
The search for cash culminated at a Midtown Manhattan condominium building that February, according to prosecutors. That's where Granieri first met Ajak, people with knowledge of the matter said. The next day, charging documents allege, Ajak sent an encrypted message to an undercover agent, writing: 'We are getting the funding.'
The financier later transferred $7 million in two stages, according to people with knowledge of the payments.
Within a few weeks of the condo meeting, prosecutors say Ajak and Keech inspected a cache of weaponry inside a Phoenix warehouse. They were soon arrested.
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
21 minutes ago
- News18
Trump Claps Back At Putin's Iran Ceasefire Offer: ‘No Thanks, Help With Ukraine First'
US President Donald Trump said that he bluntly rejected an offer from Vladimir Putin to help mediate the conflict between Iran and Israel as he told the Russian President that what the world needs is for Moscow to end its war in Ukraine. Donald Trump said that Vladimir Putin asked him, 'Can I help you with Iran?" Firing back, Donald Trump told the Russian President, 'No. I don't need help with Iran. I need help with you." The US President- who has touted ceasefire in Western Asia as a major diplomatic victory- made it clear that he doesn't want Russia involved in the Iran-Israel standoff as he pressed Vladimir Putin to focus on ending Moscow's grinding war in Ukraine.


Indian Express
22 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Funding freeze to court reprieve, the Harvard vs Washington case to academic autonomy
A US court has blocked the Trump administration's attempt to bar international students from enrolling at Harvard University, handing the Ivy League institution a crucial legal victory. But even as Harvard celebrates the reprieve, the deeper confrontation over academic freedom, political interference, and institutional autonomy continues to escalate. The ruling by US District Judge Allison Burroughs offers immediate relief to nearly 7,000 international students, including approximately 800 from India, who had been caught in a geopolitical crossfire. Yet the university remains at the centre of a campaign by the US government to assert control over its admissions, curriculum, and funding, raising questions that go well beyond immigration policy. Judge Burroughs, who issued the preliminary injunction, described the administration's actions as a likely violation of the First Amendment, characterising the crackdown as retaliatory and ideologically driven. 'Freedom of thought, expression, and speech,' she wrote, 'are pillars of a functioning democracy and an essential hedge against authoritarianism.' The ruling halts enforcement of a presidential proclamation that sought to suspend Harvard's ability to host international students and threatened visa revocations. That executive order, issued under the guise of national security, followed a broader campaign against Harvard. The Trump administration is intensifying talks with Harvard University and anticipates reaching an agreement by the end of June to resolve its ongoing dispute with the nation's oldest and wealthiest university, according to The Washington Post on Wednesday. Speaking on Friday, Trump suggested that a resolution to the months long standoff sparked by the administration's decision to cut billions in grants and block the admission of international students could be announced 'within the next week or so.' While the injunction secures short-term protection for students and scholars, still, Harvard remains under duress. Its research grants are frozen, its tax exemption threatened, and investigations into foreign ties are ongoing. The university has filed two ongoing lawsuits seeking to unfreeze $2.5 billion in federal funding and to block future immigration actions targeting its student body. Seven legal scholars told The Harvard Crimson that Harvard's case is 'likely to succeed,' with UNC Law Professor Michael Gerhardt calling the government's demands 'egregiously illegal'. Geoffrey R Stone, former dean at Chicago Law, added: 'The government actions are a pretty conspicuous violation of the First Amendment'. An amicus brief from organisations including the ACLU and Cato Institute warned against an 'ideological takeover of private institutions,' asserting that the First Amendment 'prohibits the government from imposing ideological admissions, hiring, and programmatic requirements'. These voices reinforce the court's conclusion: Harvard appears to be defending not just itself, but a constitutional principle. Internally, debate is intensifying. Some university officials have discussed negotiating a settlement with the administration to stabilise its finances and global programs. Others argue that even appearing to yield would erode Harvard's credibility as a bastion of academic independence. An alumni group, Crimson Courage, has urged the university to stand firm: 'We cannot defend truth if we are willing to bend it under pressure.' At the heart of the dispute is a stark ideological divide. The Trump administration has accused Harvard of promoting antisemitism, coordinating with the Chinese government, and failing to uphold 'viewpoint diversity.' Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem's revocation of Harvard's Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification was issued without concrete evidence, sparking alarm across the academic world. Other elite institutions have responded differently. Columbia, Brown, and Princeton have avoided court battles, opting for quieter negotiations. Harvard stands alone in choosing confrontation, turning the university into both litigant and lightning rod. In March, the Task Force announced it was reviewing approximately 256 million dollar in federal contracts awarded to Harvard, along with an additional 8.7 billion dollar in what it described as 'multi-year commitments.' The inquiry stemmed from allegations that the university had failed to adequately address antisemitic harassment on campus. Following this, the government sent two letters to Harvard on April 3 and April 11 outlining a range of 'broad, non-exhaustive areas of reform' it deemed essential for the university to continue receiving federal funds. Among the proposed measures were the elimination of all diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, disclosure of disciplinary actions related to antisemitic incidents since October 7, 2023, and the identification of students considered 'hostile to American values.' In response on April 14, Harvard President Alan Garber rejected the demands, saying that the reforms infringed on the university's First Amendment rights and institutional autonomy. He condemned the federal government's approach of tying funding to compliance, arguing that the proposed conditions bypassed legal standards and due process required by law. 'The government's terms also circumvent Harvard's statutory rights by requiring unsupported and disruptive remedies for alleged harms that the government has not proven through mandatory processes established by Congress and required by law,' Garber wrote. Two days later, on April 16, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) informed Harvard that it was freezing 2.2 million dollar in multi-year grants and suspending a separate 60 million dolalr contract.


Time of India
36 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump meets with Zelenskyy, says higher NATO defence spending may deter future Russian aggression
Live Events (You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit Wednesday and suggested that increased spending by the trans-Atlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5 per cent of gross domestic product annually on core defence requirements as well as defence-and security-related spending. That target had been 2 per cent of GDP."Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine," Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after seeing Zelenskyy. "And hopefully we're going to get that solved."Trump also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022."He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him," Trump said. "He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia.'"Trump's meeting with Zelenskyy was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St. Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis' funeral. Trump also had a major confrontation with Zelenskyy earlier this year at the White in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Trump for the US assistance."We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer," Zelenskyy left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defence missile by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause."They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots," Trump said. "And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100 per cent effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing."Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defence systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth toward the Ukrainian reporter."That's a very good question," Trump said about the query about Patriots. "And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband."Ukraine has been front and centre at recent NATO summits. But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Zelenskyy was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly boondoggle that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won reelection in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Putin and spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds (USD 95 million) raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.