logo
AbbVie Announces New Data Demonstrating Atogepant (QULIPTA® / AQUIPTA®) Achieves Superiority Across All Endpoints in Phase 3 Head-to-Head Study Compared to Topiramate for Migraine Prevention

AbbVie Announces New Data Demonstrating Atogepant (QULIPTA® / AQUIPTA®) Achieves Superiority Across All Endpoints in Phase 3 Head-to-Head Study Compared to Topiramate for Migraine Prevention

Associated Press4 hours ago

NORTH CHICAGO, Ill., June 18, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV) today announced positive topline results from its Phase 3 TEMPLE multicenter, randomized, double-blind, head-to-head study evaluating the tolerability, safety and efficacy of atogepant (QULIPTA® / AQUIPTA®, 60 mg once daily) compared to the highest tolerated dose of topiramate (50, 75 or 100 mg/day) in adult patients with a history of four or more migraine days per month.1
The study met the primary endpoint of treatment discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs), demonstrating that atogepant, a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist, had fewer discontinuations due to AEs than topiramate, an anticonvulsant medication also approved for migraine prevention. Over the 24-week double-blind treatment period, discontinuation due to AEs was significantly lower with atogepant (12.1%) compared to topiramate (29.6%), representing a relative risk of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.28, 0.59; p<0.0001).1
The study also met all six secondary endpoints, including a key measure of clinical efficacy: 64.1% of patients on atogepant achieved a ≥50% reduction in mean monthly migraine days (MMD) during months 4 to 6 of the double-blind treatment period compared to 39.3% of patients on topiramate (p<0.0001).1
'These TEMPLE data affirm recommendations from the American Headache Society and International Headache Society, highlighting the role of CGRP pathway inhibitors as first-line preventive treatment options for migraine,' said Roopal Thakkar, M.D., executive vice president, research and development, chief scientific officer, AbbVie. 'This study demonstrates our commitment to improving treatment options and advancing care standards for people living with this debilitating disease.'
Migraine continues to be underdiagnosed and undertreated, despite significant burden on patients' lives.2 It is a complex neurological disease that affects approximately 14% of the global population and ranks as the second leading cause of disability worldwide.2 Despite its prevalence and disabling impact, there are numerous gaps in patient care related to the standards for preventive treatment. Notably, over 50% of people currently using preventive medications still qualify for further preventive treatment, indicating that their current therapies may not be providing sufficient relief.3
'Far too often, people living with migraine struggle with meeting their treatment goals despite available and accessible preventive options,' said Jaclyn Duvall, M.D., neurologist and founder of Headache Specialists of Oklahoma. 'The TEMPLE data provide a patient-centered measure of treatment effectiveness by capturing both efficacy and tolerability, representing a meaningful way to evaluate the real-world impact of treatment persistence in migraine prevention.'
The AE profile of atogepant observed in this active-controlled study was generally consistent with its established safety profile from prior studies.1
Atogepant, marketed as AQUIPTA® in the EU and QULIPTA® in the U.S., Canada, Israel and Puerto Rico, is approved in 60 countries. Atogepant is a once-daily oral CGRP receptor antagonist, proven to prevent both episodic and chronic migraine in adults.
Full results from the TEMPLE study will be presented at an upcoming medical meeting.
About the TEMPLE Study
TEMPLE is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled trial evaluating the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of atogepant versus topiramate in adult patients with a history of four or more migraine days per month. The trial randomized 545 participants with episodic or chronic migraine aged 18 and older across 73 sites in Europe, Israel and Canada.
The study was conducted in two distinct periods. In the initial 24-week Double-Blind Treatment Period, which included a 6-week up-titration phase and an 18-week maintenance phase, participants were randomized to receive either atogepant (60 mg once daily) or the highest tolerated dose of topiramate (ranging from 50 to 100 mg/day). Following this, eligible participants continued into a 52-week Open-Label Treatment Period, during which all received atogepant (60 mg once daily). Throughout the study, patient reported outcomes were regularly collected and patients were continuously monitored for safety and tolerability through clinical assessments and lab tests.
The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who discontinued the study treatment due to AEs during the 24-week double-blind treatment period. An electronic diary (eDiary) was used to collect data on headache frequency, duration, symptoms, acute medication use, and various patient-reported outcomes. More information on the TEMPLE trial can be found on www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05748483).
About Atogepant
Atogepant is a once-daily orally administered CGRP receptor antagonist specifically developed for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults. CGRP and its receptors are expressed in regions of the nervous system associated with migraine pathophysiology. Studies have shown that CGRP levels are elevated during migraine attacks. Atogepant, marketed as AQUIPTA® in the EU and QULIPTA® in the U.S., Canada, Israel and Puerto Rico, is approved in 60 countries.
U.S. Uses and Important Safety Information
What is QULIPTA® (atogepant)?
QULIPTA is a prescription medicine used for the preventive treatment of migraine in adults.
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION FOR QULIPTA®
Do not take QULIPTA if you have had an allergic reaction to atogepant or any ingredients in QULIPTA.
Before taking QULIPTA, tell your healthcare provider about all your medical conditions, including if you:
Tell your healthcare provider about all the medicines you take, including prescription and over-the-counter medicines, vitamins, and herbal supplements. QULIPTA may affect the way other medicines work, and other medicines may affect how QULIPTA works. Your healthcare provider may need to change the dose of QULIPTA when taken with certain other medicines.
QULIPTA can cause serious side effects, including:
The most common side effects of QULIPTA are nausea, constipation, and fatigue/sleepiness. These are not all the possible side effects of QULIPTA.
QULIPTA is available in 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg tablets.
You are encouraged to report negative side effects of prescription drugs to the FDA. Visit www.fda.gov/medwatch or call 1-800-FDA-1088.
If you are having difficulty paying for your medicine, AbbVie may be able to help. Visit AbbVie.com/PatientAccessSupport to learn more.
Please see full Prescribing Information.
Globally, prescribing information varies; refer to the individual country product label for complete information.
About AbbVie in Migraine
At AbbVie, we are committed to empowering people living with migraine disease. We advance science that enables healthcare providers to care for people impacted across the spectrum of migraine. Through education and partnerships with the migraine community, we strive to help those with migraine navigate barriers to care, access effective treatments, and reduce the impact of migraine on their lives.
In the United States, AbbVie is the only company with three prescription treatments designed to meet patient needs across the spectrum of migraine to help patients living with this debilitating disease.
About AbbVie
AbbVie's mission is to discover and deliver innovative medicines that solve serious health issues today and address the medical challenges of tomorrow. We strive to have a remarkable impact on people's lives across several key therapeutic areas – immunology, oncology, neuroscience, and eye care – and products and services in our Allergan Aesthetics portfolio. For more information about AbbVie, please visit us at www.abbvie.com. Follow @abbvie on LinkedIn,Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter), and YouTube.
Forward-Looking Statements
Some statements in this news release are, or may be considered, forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words 'believe,' 'expect,' 'anticipate,' 'project' and similar expressions and uses of future or conditional verbs, generally identify forward-looking statements. AbbVie cautions that these forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, challenges to intellectual property, competition from other products, difficulties inherent in the research and development process, adverse litigation or government action, changes to laws and regulations applicable to our industry, the impact of global macroeconomic factors, such as economic downturns or uncertainty, international conflict, trade disputes and tariffs, and other uncertainties and risks associated with global business operations. Additional information about the economic, competitive, governmental, technological and other factors that may affect AbbVie's operations is set forth in Item 1A, 'Risk Factors,' of AbbVie's 2024 Annual Report on Form 10-K, which has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as updated by its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and in other documents that AbbVie subsequently files with the Securities and Exchange Commission that update, supplement or supersede such information. AbbVie undertakes no obligation, and specifically declines, to release publicly any revisions to forward-looking statements as a result of subsequent events or developments, except as required by law.
ALL-NEUR-250043
Contact(s):
Global Media:
Amber Landis
+1 (231) 557-6596
[email protected]
U.S. Media:
Sara Sanders
+1 (973) 307-6145
[email protected]
References
View original content: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/abbvie-announces-new-data-demonstrating-atogepant-qulipta--aquipta-achieves-superiority-across-all-endpoints-in-phase-3-head-to-head-study-compared-to-topiramate-for-migraine-prevention-302484421.html
SOURCE AbbVie

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

SCOTUS rules on state ban on gender transition 'treatments' for minors in landmark case
SCOTUS rules on state ban on gender transition 'treatments' for minors in landmark case

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

SCOTUS rules on state ban on gender transition 'treatments' for minors in landmark case

The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that a Tennessee law banning gender-transition treatments for adolescents in the state is not discriminatory. At issue in the case, United States v. Skrmetti, was whether Tennessee's Senate Bill 1, which "prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow 'a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor's sex' or to treat 'purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor's sex and asserted identity,'" violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Writing for the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts said that the law in question is not subject to heightened scrutiny "because it does not classify on any bases that warrant heightened review." All three liberal justices notably dissented in the case. That law in question prohibits states from allowing medical providers to deliver puberty blockers and hormones to facilitate a minor's transition to another sex. It also targets healthcare providers in the state who continue to provide such procedures to gender-dysphoric minors – opening these providers up to fines, lawsuits and other liability. The court's ruling comes after many other states have moved to ban or restrict medical treatments and procedures for transgender adolescents, drawing close attention to the case. During the oral arguments, justices on the Supreme Court appeared reluctant to overturn Senate Bill 1, with Chief Justice Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggesting that state legislatures, rather than courts, are best equipped to regulate medical procedures. The Constitution leaves such questions "to the people's representatives," Roberts said, rather than to nine justices on the Supreme Court, "none of whom is a doctor." Justice Samuel Alito cited "hotly disputed" medical studies on the alleged benefits of such medical treatments. He also referred to other research from Great Britain and Sweden that reported on the negative consequences teens experienced after undergoing gender transition treatments. Alito told the government's attorney that those studies "found a complete lack of high-quality evidence showing that the benefits of the treatments in question here outweigh the risks." "Do you dispute that?" Alito asked during oral arguments. Justice Sonia Sotomayor, however, countered with evidence from underage individuals that were denied treatment. "Some children suffer incredibly with gender dysphoria, don't they? I think some attempt suicide?" she said. "The state has come in here and, in a sharp departure from how it normally addresses this issue, it has completely decided to override the views of the parents, the patients, the doctors who are grappling with these decisions and trying to make those trade-offs." The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are the petitioners in the case, representing the parents of three transgender adolescents and a Memphis-based doctor who treats transgender patients. The Biden administration had previously joined the petitioners in the case via a federal law that allows the administration to intervene in certain cases certified by the attorney general to be of "general public importance." However, the Trump administration notified the Supreme Court in February that the government would be changing its stance on the constitutionality of the law, saying the Tennessee law does not violate the equal protection clause. Also at issue was the level of scrutiny that courts should use to evaluate the constitutionality of state bans on transgender medical treatment for minors, such as SB1, and whether these laws are considered discriminating on the basis of sex or against a "quasi-suspect class," thus warranting a higher level of scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution. That was another focus of the oral arguments in December, as petitioners and respondents battled for more than two hours over the level of scrutiny that the court should apply in reviewing laws involving transgender care for minors, including SB1. Tennessee argued then that its law can still withstand even the test of heightened scrutiny, contending in a court brief that it does have "compelling interests" to protect the health and safety of minors in the state and "in protecting the integrity and ethics of the medical profession." The high court's decision comes at a time when transgender rights are a hotly contested topic. President Donald Trump cracked down on the issue almost immediately after being sworn in to his second White House term in January. Just weeks after his inauguration, Trump signed an executive order preventing biological men from competing in women's sports. The order, titled "Keeping Men Out of Women's Sports," was signed on National Girls and Women in Sports Day. It prohibits schools and colleges that receive federal funds and are subject to Title IX from allowing transgender-identifying biological men onto women's sports teams and into women's locker rooms and restrooms. If such institutions fail to comply with the order, they could become subject to investigations and lose federal funds. The Trump administration's policies on transgender rights have inevitably become the targets of legal challenges launched by advocacy groups, medical organizations and individuals who claim they are discriminatory. This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.

Chicken dishes sold at Kroger and Walmart recalled due to possible listeria contamination
Chicken dishes sold at Kroger and Walmart recalled due to possible listeria contamination

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Chicken dishes sold at Kroger and Walmart recalled due to possible listeria contamination

FreshRealm is recalling pre-made chicken fettuccine alfredo meals sold at Kroger and Walmart over concerns the ready-to-eat meals could possibly be contaminated with listeria, the Department of Agriculture said on Wednesday. According to a notice from the USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS), FreshRealm, which provides meals to retailers and food delivery services like Blue Apron and Amazon Fresh, is voluntarily recalling all chicken alfredo dishes produced before June 17 "out of an abundance of caution." The recalled products have the USDA mark of inspection on the product label and establishment numbers "EST. P-50784," "EST. P-47770," or "EST. P-47718" printed on the packaging, according to FSIS. "FSIS is concerned that some products may be in consumers' refrigerators or freezers. Consumers who have purchased these products are urged not to consume them," the agency's announcement online says. "These products should be thrown away or returned to the place of purchase." The recalled products include: 32.8-oz. tray packages containing "MARKETSIDE GRILLED CHICKEN ALFREDO WITH FETTUCCINE Tender Pasta with Creamy Alfredo Sauce, White Meat Chicken and Shaved Parmesan Cheese" with best-by date 06/27/25 or prior. 12.3 oz. tray packages containing "MARKETSIDE GRILLED CHICKEN ALFREDO WITH FETTUCCINE Tender Pasta with Creamy Alfredo Sauce, White Meat Chicken, Broccoli and Shaved Parmesan Cheese" with best-by date 06/26/25 or prior. 12.5 oz. tray packages containing "HOME CHEF Heat & Eat Chicken Fettuccine Alfredo with pasta, grilled white meat chicken, and Parmesan cheese" with best-by date 06/19/25 or prior. Possible link to Listeria The chicken dishes could be linked to a possible outbreak strain of listeria which has been associated with three deaths and one fetal loss. Seventeen people in 13 states have also gotten sick as a result of the outbreak. FSIS is currently investigating and has not yet determined the source of contamination, according to the notice. The agency says it is working with public health partners to "identify whether a specific ingredient in the chicken fettucine alfredo may be the source of this strain of Lm." So far, the FSIS investigation has identified two ill people who said they bought chicken fettuccine alfredo products that matched the description of FreshRealm products. Two additional ill individuals purchased chicken fettuccine alfredo products that could be traced back to FreshRealm establishments, according to FSIS. Consuming food contaminated with listeria can lead to a serious infection called listeriosis, which can cause fever, muscle aches, headache, a stiff neck and other symptoms. Older adults, people with weak immune systems and pregnant women and their newborns are especially susceptible to the infection. In serious cases, listeriosis can be fatal. "People in the higher-risk categories who experience flu-like symptoms within two months after eating contaminated food should seek medical care and tell the health care provider about eating the contaminated food," the FSIS says.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store