Singapore election 2025: PAP defeats SDP to take Bukit Panjang with 61.41% of votes
[SINGAPORE] Both Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) leaders failed in their bids to win seats even though it was a mixed showing – SDP secretary-general Chee Soon Juan saw an improved showing at the polls even as he contested in a new Single-Member Constituency (SMC), while party chairman Paul Tambyah lost ground.
Dr Chee went up against People's Action Party (PAP) candidate Poh Li San in newly created Sembawang West SMC, and lost. Poh garnered 11,978 votes, or 53.19 per cent of valid votes, while Dr Chee trailed with 10,541 votes, or 46.81 per cent.
A total of 22,519 valid votes were cast, while 269 votes were rejected.
Before Sembawang West was carved out of Sembawang GRC in the latest review of electoral boundaries, Poh looked after the ward. In GE2020, the PAP team won Sembawang GRC with 67.29 per cent of the votes, against a team from the National Solidarity Party (NSP).
SDP previously contested Sembawang GRC in 2011 and 2006, when Dr Chee was not eligible to contest due to his undischarged bankruptcy. After his return to politics, the party did not contest the GRC in 2015 and 2020.
In GE2020, Dr Chee contested Bukit Batok SMC, garnering 45.20 per cent of the vote and losing to the PAP's Murali Pillai. The single seat has since been absorbed into the new Jurong East-Bukit Batok GRC.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
While Dr Chee failed to take the Sembawang West SMC seat, his 46.81 per cent vote share in the new SMC was also among the strongest of the losing parties' candidates.
The SDP peaked at three Parliamentary seats following the 1991 election, and had not held any seats since 1997. The 2020 general election (GE) was previously the closest they have gotten to a return to the political stage, as chairman Paul Tambyah and secretary-general Chee Soon Juan's vote shares crept above 45 per cent.
Losing steam in Bukit Panjang
Meanwhile, PAP candidate for Bukit Panjang SMC, Liang Eng Hwa, secured 61.41 per cent of the votes for the single-seat ward – defeating the SDP's chairman Paul Tambyah by a larger margin than in their previous face off.
Liang ended up with 19,116 votes. Meanwhile, Dr Tambyah trailed with 12,015 votes, representing 38.59 per cent of the vote share.
There were a total of 31,131 valid votes, while 350 votes were rejected.
Liang is a managing director at DBS, while Dr Tambyah is an infectious diseases expert at the National University Hospital.
Bukit Panjang SMC's boundaries remained unchanged from the 2020 General Election (GE). The straight fight for the constituency this year marked a rematch between Liang and Dr Tambyah.
PAP's margin of victory widened from the last election, when Liang secured 53.73 per cent of the vote, against Dr Tambyah's 46.27 per cent. That remains the slimmest margin of victory recorded for PAP in the SMC. Dr Tambyah's profile rose significantly then, on the back of the Covid-19 crisis.
Though GE2025 is the second time they are fighting against each other in the SMC, they have also faced off elsewhere. In 2015, Dr Tambyah was fielded in SDP's Holland-Bukit Timah team, while Liang contested the Group Representation Constituency on PAP's side.
The mixed results came as the SDP was embroiled in controversy after Marsiling-Yew Tee candidate Gigene Wong went off script to refer to teammate Ariffin Iskandar Sha Ali Akbar by a racial slur and mispronounced his name as 'elephant'.
She and Dr Chee apologised in later speeches. Dr Wong did not speak at any subsequent rallies.
On the campaign trail, both Dr Tambyah and Dr Chee had called for more opposition voices in Parliament, which they said would improve the PAP's governance. The SDP envisions a Singapore 'where everyone can thrive', with policies from healthcare to education.
The PAP had criticised their policies, calling them 'mere populist calls' to win seats in Parliament.
The SDP leaders also promised to make improvements on a municipal level, with more regular engagements and wise spending. In response, their opponents questioned their understanding of the roles of Members of Parliament.
For more election coverage, visit our GE2025 microsite
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
6 hours ago
- Straits Times
Kennedy replaces fired US CDC panel members, includes anti-vaccine proponents
US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr alleged that the prior panel members had conflicts of interest. PHOTO: REUTERS WASHINGTON - US Health Secretary Robert Kennedy Jr named eight members to serve on a key panel of vaccine advisers on June 11, including several who have advocated against vaccines, after abruptly firing all 17 members of the independent committee of experts. They will sit on the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee for Immunisation Practices, which advises the agency on who should get the shots after they are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. The group of eight - the minimum number allowed by the ACIP founding charter - includes four who have previously worked on committees associated with either the CDC, the Food and Drug Administration, or both. Others have published papers, posted on social media, or written online biographies with anti-vaccine views, including against the mRNA vaccine technology used in some of the newest immunizations such as the Covid-19 vaccine. Among them is Mr Robert Malone, one of the most prominent voices opposing mRNA vaccines. He is aligned with Mr Kennedy's Make America Healthy Again movement. The group also includes Mr Joseph Hibbeln, Mr Martin Kulldorff, Mr Retsef Levi, Mr Cody Meissner, Mr James Pagano, Mr Vicky Pebsworth and Mr Michael Ross. Mr Kennedy, who has long questioned the safety of vaccines contrary to scientific evidence, alleged that the prior panel members, many of whom were appointed by President Joe Biden, had conflicts of interest, without providing evidence of specific members' conflicts. He said the move was necessary 'to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science'. Committee members said their ACIP work follows rigorous vetting of their financial ties and that they must abstain from votes on any vaccine for which they have a conflict. Mr Kennedy said on X that the panel would attend the committee's June 25 meeting. Advisers had been expected to deliberate and vote on who should receive a number of vaccines, including the flu shot and 2025-26 Covid-19 vaccine boosters, and the meeting had been slated for June 25-27. No agenda has been published yet. Shares of vaccine makers Moderna and Pfizer, which both produced mRNA Covid vaccines, fell marginally while those of Novavax, which did not utilise mRNA in its vaccine, rose marginally in after-hours trading. New members It is unclear how new members of the panel have been vetted for conflicts of interest, or when the vetting process began. Mr Meissner and Mr Pebsworth have served on the FDA's Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee, and Mr Meissner also previously served on ACIP. Mr Pebsworth is now associated with the National Vaccine Information Centre, a group that advocates for vaccine exemptions and educates about vaccine injury. Mr Kulldorff is an architect of the Great Barrington Declaration, which called for a lighter public health response to Covid-19 in October 2020, and previously served on an ACIP vaccine safety subgroup. Mr Levi has in the past said mRNA vaccines can cause serious harm and death, especially among children, and called for their immediate withdrawal. Mr Ross, a professor at George Washington University, is an operating partner of Havencrest Capital Management, a firm focused on healthcare investments, according to its website. The FDA has found that the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines are generally safe and effective, but Commissioner Marty Makary has questioned the benefit of repeated annual shots for healthy, younger Americans. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
9 hours ago
- Business Times
Harvard crackdown: Can Singapore become its own intellectual leader?
THE US has long been a global science leader, with this best exemplified by its scientists creating a Covid-19 vaccine – amid a pandemic no less – within a year. Given that vaccine developments typically take a decade or more, this is nothing short of a feat, and something that has been decades in the making – a result of generous state funding for research and an openness to talent, among other factors. This is why US President Donald Trump's crusade against Harvard University and other top American institutions should give us pause, even if the fate of Ivy League colleges an ocean away may not seem, at first, to have major repercussions for Singapore. Alongside the on-and-off-again tariffs, immigration crackdown and slashing of government budgets, some observers may regard Trump's first 140 days as part of a natural ebb and flow in American politics. After all, the country has seen its fair share of upheavals in the last 249 years, having survived a civil war in the mid-19th century and, over 100 years later, lived through a particularly turbulent 1968 punctuated by two assassinations, heightened social unrest over the Vietnam War and issues related to values and race. Yet, even Americans appear spooked themselves. Experts and ordinary people, regardless of political leanings, are voicing concern that American democracy is being eroded and possibly sliding into autocracy, multiple surveys have shown. In particular, the administration's clampdown on its universities could have far-reaching consequences. America's embrace of diversity had long been part of its DNA, a trait that has drawn the world's brightest minds who, in turn, have kept its universities at the forefront of research and innovation that have resulted in life-saving drugs and key inventions. Some of these foreign talents remain in the country in pursuit of the American dream; others, equipped with new knowledge and skills, return home for the betterment of their motherland. Singapore too, has benefited from the return of US-trained scholars who have gone on to helm senior positions in government and the private sector. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up But all that is now in peril under the Trump administration, which has threatened to cut funding and foreign student quotas – actions that portend a brain drain and a possible curtailment of its research capabilities. The question is how long this crusade would last, and whether the damage wrought would be permanent. Meanwhile, foreign students and postgraduates have been targets of an immigration crackdown. Some have had their visas revoked, and others fear they would not be able to re-enter if they leave. Prospective students are naturally reconsidering their choice, given the uncertainty and apparent lack of transparency. Even researchers are hesitating to visit; a French scientist was denied entry in March because he had criticised the administration in a text message. In 2022 and 2023, Singapore sent about a quarter of its Public Service Commission scholarship recipients to the US, and many more students went at their own expense. But the latest developments raise the question whether the city-state should reconsider its reliance on the US for intellectual leadership. The imbroglio should also prompt Singapore to look afield at Europe and China, which are now seizing the opportunity to woo students and researchers seeking alternatives. A small but growing number of Singapore students have headed for European and Chinese universities over the years. And not least, Singapore might also take a leaf out of their playbook and do the same, since having a strong talent mix is what would augment its universities' standing. Rather than looking mainly to the West for intellectual leadership, Singapore has now an opportunity to build up its own for the region.
Business Times
a day ago
- Business Times
Temasek chairman-designate Teo Chee Hean resigns from GIC board
[SINGAPORE] Former senior minister Teo Chee Hean will resign from GIC's board of directors and from his role as chairman of the GIC International Advisory Board, with effect from Jun 30. Teo, 70, has served on the board of Singapore's sovereign wealth fund for 14 years, GIC said on Tuesday (Jun 10). He was first appointed as a director in December 2010, and took on the role of chairman of the International Advisory Board in April 2015. The news comes days after it was announced that Teo would become chairman of Singapore's state investment company, Temasek. On Jun 6, Temasek said that Teo would take over the role from Lim Boon Heng from Oct 9. Teo will first join the company's board of directors as deputy chairman on Jul 1. Senior Minister Lee Hsien Loong, who is chairman of GIC, said in a letter of appreciation for Teo that 'there are good reasons why we have a strict policy not to allow directors to serve simultaneously on both the GIC and Temasek Holdings boards'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'At a time when GIC's task is more consequential and also more difficult than ever, I shall miss (Teo's) calm presence and thoughtful interventions at GIC board deliberations,' SM Lee said. During his tenure at GIC, Teo helped the sovereign wealth fund navigate significant developments including the aftermath of the global financial crisis, the Covid-19 pandemic, rapid technological and climate change, as well as rising geopolitical uncertainty, GIC said. Lim Chow Kiat, chief executive of GIC, said: '(Teo's) geopolitical insights were particularly important, given the growing complexity and salience of these issues for GIC.' Teo announced his retirement from politics on Apr 23. During his 33-year political career, he served as deputy prime minister from 2009 to 2019, and as senior minister from 2019 to 2025. He was the coordinating minister for national security as well, and oversaw four units in the Prime Minister's Office: the Smart Nation and Digital Government Group, the National Security Coordination Secretariat, the National Population and Talent Division, and the National Climate Change Secretariat. He was defence minister from 2003 to 2011, and home affairs minister from 2011 to 2015.
