Budget: Healthcare crisis in South Africa, Godongwana makes a commitment to frontline services
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana used his Budget address on Wednesday to commit to improve healthcare in the country.
Image: GCIS
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana has reaffirmed the government's commitment to restoring critical frontline health services and investing in infrastructure to improve access to basic healthcare, following a powerful plea from a University of Cape Town medical student.
Delivering his budget on Wednesday, Godongwana revealed that earlier this month, he received a letter from Sarah Stein, a medical student at UCT, detailing the dire conditions healthcare workers face in public hospitals.
Her first-hand account moved the minister and helped reinforce the urgency behind the increased health budget allocations.
'Working in public hospital with way too few resources punches you in the gut every day. It's not just the trauma of seeing your patient die, it's having no gloves in a delivery room; no alcohol swabs to clean wounds; and knowing that nurses stop at the shop on their way to work to buy their own gloves and masks because the clinic has run out.
"Where waiting times for a scan are months long, and surgery delays needlessly let disease progress to the point of being inoperable. It's the limited beds in high care that mean doctors are regularly forced to decide whose life is worth saving more because there's only space for one,' Stein wrote.
Godongwana said her account was one of the reasons why the budget maintains the spending trajectory presented in the main budget on 12 March.
'Addressing the persistent spending pressures to restore critical frontline services and invest in infrastructure is critical for improving access to basic services and lifting economic prospects,' the minister said.
Over the medium-term expenditure framework (MTEF) period, the provincial health sector budget will total R845 billion. An additional R20.8b will be allocated over three years to employ 800 post-community service doctors, procure essential goods and services, and reduce accruals that have hindered service delivery.
Godongwana said this increase would also help the sector deal with personnel budget pressures that have been growing steadily across provinces.
The Department of Health's total expenditure is expected to rise to R275.5b in 2025/26, R288.5b in 2026/27, and R301.7b in 2027/28.
This marks a gradual but consistent increase aimed at restoring both infrastructure and human capacity in the public health system.
The overall increase to the health function's baseline is R7b or 0.85%, from R858.8b in the 2024 MTEF to R865.8b in the 2025 MTEF.
The bulk of the increase, R4.6 billion, will go to the provincial equitable share to support implementation of the 2025 public sector wage agreement.
This will ease the salary pressures that have led to understaffing, particularly in rural and high-pressure facilities.
Godongwana also outlined the future of National Health Insurance (NHI) funding, with R858m allocated to the NHI indirect grant in 2025/26 and R259 million in 2026/27.
While the amounts remain modest compared to the scale of the NHI rollout, they represent continued state backing of the controversial universal healthcare project.
The Finance Minister said stories like Stein's highlight the real-world impact of funding decisions and the urgency of getting resources to the frontline.
[email protected]
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana pledges to improve healthcare.
Image: GCIS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
TimesLIVE
11 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
NHI is fiscally impossible, says the Health Funders Association
The Health Funders Association (HFA) has described the National Health Insurance (NHI) Act as fiscally impossible and has tabled a hybrid funding model that will enable private healthcare providers to provide services in tandem with the NHI. The HFA, accounting for 46% of the private healthcare market and representing 21 medical schemes and three administrators, this week became the latest entity to legally challenge the NHI for undermining the right of medical aid members to choose how to access health services. HFA commissioned an independent study released this week which found the NHI required substantial tax far beyond South Africa's fiscal capacity. 'What's more, the proposed model offers no guarantee of improved outcomes, while restricting the mechanisms that currently drive quality and innovation in health care,' said the FHA. Commenting on the report, HFA CEO Thoneshan Naidoo said South Africa needs a healthcare system that delivers equitable, quality care for all. 'However, in its current form, and without private sector collaboration, the NHI Act is fiscally impossible and operationally unworkable, and threatens the stability of the economy and health system affecting everyone in South Africa,' he said. Naidoo said the NHI Act centralises control of all healthcare financing in a single, state-run fund, removing the ability of medical schemes to offer cover for healthcare services reimbursable by the NHI. 'We continue to advocate for a more inclusive, hybrid funding model that incorporates medical schemes in NHI. We believe such a model would expand access to care while protecting the rights of all South Africans,' said Naidoo. The NHI, which introduces universal health coverage, has been challenged in court by Solidarity, the Board of Healthcare Funders, the South African Private Practitioners Forum, the Hospital Association of South Africa and the South African Medical Association. Foster Mohale, the health spokesperson, on Friday confirmed the department had received court papers. 'This is case number six. We have an evolving court process and we'll allow that process to take its course,' said Mohale. FHA commissioned a report by Genesis Analytics, which showed that personal income tax will need to increase from the current average rate of 21% to an average of 46% of income, pushing marginal tax rates in the lowest income bracket from 18% to 41%, and in the highest bracket from 45% to 68%. The Genesis model also considered a scenario of pooling existing healthcare expenditure, citing that personal income tax would need to increase from its average of 21% to 31%. At the same time, medical scheme members would face a 43% reduction in the level of healthcare services relative to what they currently received. 'In simple terms, the equation for medical scheme members therefore becomes 'Pay 1.5 times more tax for 43% less healthcare'. Such tax increases are fiscally impossible, particularly given South Africa's narrow personal income tax base of 7.4-million tax payers,' said the FHA.
eNCA
18 hours ago
- eNCA
Health Funders Association challenges NHI Act over cost and constitutionality
JOHANNESBURG – The Health Funders Association (HFA) is mounting a legal challenge against key aspects of the newly signed National Health Insurance (NHI) Act, citing serious constitutional and economic concerns. HFA CEO Thoneshan Naidoo says while the organisation supports the goal of universal healthcare, the current NHI framework is fundamentally flawed. 'The debate around national health insurance has been ongoing for years,' said Naidoo. 'Unfortunately, despite consistently raising our concerns, we've now been forced to take legal action.' The HFA commissioned an independent expert to assess the economic impact of implementing the NHI as it currently stands. The findings are stark: For South Africa to provide the same level of care promised under the NHI -- equivalent to what private medical schemes currently offer -- it would require the country's 7.4 million taxpayers to double their current tax contributions , a cost Naidoo says is simply unaffordable. In addition to the financial strain, Naidoo highlighted a massive shortfall in human resources. 'To provide the same level of care across the population, we would need an additional 286,000 healthcare professionals, which the country currently does not have,' he added. Naidoo maintains the Act, in its current form, is economically unsustainable and constitutionally questionable, and does not align with the realities of South Africa's healthcare infrastructure. The legal challenge is expected to intensify debate around the future of healthcare reform in the country.
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Experts warn NHI is economic suicide
Lower earners could face marginal tax rates of 41%, sparking concern that NHI funding will punish the most vulnerable. Research just released by the Health Funders Association (HFA) is the most-stark warning yet that the ANC's push to implement the National Health Insurance (NHI) is not only doomed to failure, it is going to drag down our economy with it. The HFA commissioned Genesis Analytics – an independent economic consultancy with experience in over 115 countries – to build a financial and economic model to test the viability of NHI and to compare the system with those in similar, middle-income countries. The analysis was that, for NHI to fund a level of care equivalent to what medical scheme members now receive, personal income tax would have to increase by 2.2 times (a 115% increase in tax) from the current average rate of 21% to an average of 46% of income. This would push marginal tax rates in the lowest income bracket from 18% to 41% and in the highest bracket from 45% to 68%. ALSO READ: Health funders also heading to court about NHI Act HFA estimated that were VAT used, it would have to increase from 15% to 36%. Even a hybrid public-private system would require personal income tax to increase by 47%. HFA is going to court to fight the proposals – and they aren't the only ones. This is simply financial madness. NOW READ: Health minister defends nearly R10 million legal spend on NHI court battles
