The long and deadly walk Gazans are forced to take for a food parcel
Carrying empty sacks and plastic containers, many walked for hours in hopes of collecting basic food supplies for their families.
Gazans are forced to travel long, often dangerous distances — through active combat zones — to reach new, controversial aid distribution sites.
The journey is impossible for many disabled or injured people, as well as the elderly and families with small children.
Many of those who can take the risk of being killed in an active war zone and of being shot during chaotic scenes at aid centres say the journey for aid is worth it.
Ahmed Bashir, 36, walked more than 12 kilometres to reach the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) centre. "My feet and back hurt," says the father of several children, "but coming back with a parcel of food is a victory."
The package — containing flour, rice, pasta, sugar, salt, and tea — can last a family about a week, Bashir estimates.
"Every morning I wake up wondering if I can feed my children today."
Still, Bashir, who lives with his children in the al-Mawasi humanitarian zone after being driven from his home during Israel's Gaza offensive, feels conflicted. "It feels like we're being manipulated. Like they want us to forget where we come from."
Israeli soldiers have been accused of opening fire and killing dozens of people seeking aid amid chaotic scenes during the distribution of food in the new centre in Rafah in Gaza's south.
GHF employees have denied killings and say they fire warning shots when Palestinians rush to the front, forcing employees of the US company to retreat.
Israel halted aid deliveries in March
Most of the population in Gaza has been desperate for food since Israel began blocking all aid deliveries to the Gaza Strip in March, before it ended a ceasefire with the Islamist Hamas.
It has justified its moves as increasing pressure on the group to release the remaining hostages.
According to Israel, at least 20 hostages are still alive and being held in Gaza by Hamas or affiliated militant groups.
The fate of three other captives remains uncertain, while the bodies of 35 abductees have been identified. Former hostages have described their captivity as brutal, recounting experiences of torture, humiliation and being kept in chains.
Israel began its offensive in Gaza more than a year and a half ago after the Hamas-led attacks in October 2023 which killed around 1,200 people.
Israel's offensive has since killed more than 53,000 according to the Hamas-led Health Ministry. External analysis suggests the death toll is significantly higher in reality.
According to the GHF, which was established just a few months ago, the controversial aid system requires one representative from each Palestinian family to visit a distribution centre every five days to collect a food parcel.
According to the organization, around 8,000 food parcels have been distributed so far — each intended to sustain roughly 5.5 people for 3.5 days — providing a total of approximately 462,000 meals.
In its initial phase, the system is expected to reach only about 60% of Gaza's population. Roughly two million Palestinians live in the war-torn territory, many of whom have been displaced multiple times by ongoing fighting.
UN considers the new aid mechanism dangerous
With the establishment of four initial distribution points in the southern and central Gaza Strip, Israel says it aims to bypass the United Nations and other international aid organizations.
The stated goal is to prevent Hamas from intercepting supplies or profiting from them. However, UN officials have criticized the plan, noting that Israel has not provided concrete evidence that aid is being diverted by Hamas.
The United Nations has also warned that the new aid mechanism is both inefficient and unsafe. Critics say the system fails to meet the basic standards of humanitarian relief and that Israel is using hunger to kettle starving civilians into Gaza's south.
"Aid should be coordinated by the United Nations, not by an unknown foundation," says Ibtisam Abu Salem, a nurse from central Gaza.
Adding to the disruption, deliveries are frequently halted whenever the Israeli army issues new evacuation orders — a recurring occurrence in the volatile region.
Many residents say they are physically and emotionally exhausted, worn down not only by fear of attacks but also by the repeated calls to flee their homes.
Locals suspicious of new system
Many in Gaza express scepticism and mistrust of the new system. "We don't know who is behind it," says Ibrahim Abdul Jawad, who lives in the City of Gaza in the north.
He believes that people are afraid that the operators are working with the Israeli military and that there could be arrests or pressure to help Israeli intelligence services in the distribution centres.
The Hamas-controlled Interior Ministry has called on residents to boycott the new distribution mechanism, claiming the new system is part of an intelligence gathering operation.
"We don't want any help from unknown groups," says Abu Chalid, an elderly man who comes from Beit Lahia in the north of the coastal strip.
Forced to flee to Nuseirat in central Gaza during the war, he shares the concern about potential arrests at the newly established aid distribution centres.
"We trust [the UN agency for Palestinian refugees] because it has been here for decades," says the Palestinian, who used to be a farmer.
The UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA) employs around 13,000 people in the Gaza Strip. Israel accuses the organization of being infiltrated by the Islamist Hamas.
Israel has not provided evidence to back up its claim, which the UN body denies.
Jalal Hamatu, another father, speaks with bitter clarity: "The world is debating our existence while we starve. We don't need speeches — we need bread."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
30 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Dems press Trump admin. for response to China-backed cyberattacks
A group of Democratic lawmakers are pressing the Trump administration to clarify who is leading the government's efforts to eradicate China-backed hackers from U.S. critical infrastructure and telecom networks. Why it matters: Roughly 1,000 people have already left the nation's top cyber agency this year through voluntary buyouts and other workforce cuts. Those cuts could create dangerous weaknesses in the nation's cyber defenses, the lawmakers argue in a letter exclusively shared with Axios. Zoom in: Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-N.Y.) sent a letter today to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard demanding more clarity on who is leading the response against two major China-backed cyberattacks uncovered during the Biden administration. Democratic Reps. Raja Krishnamoorthi, Kathy Castor, Ro Khanna, Haley Stevens, Shontel Brown and Jill Tokuda joined Torres as signatories. The lawmakers are also requesting Noem and Gabbard provide an update on any ongoing investigations into both the Volt Typhoon attacks on U.S. critical infrastructure and the Salt Typhoon campaign to surveil high-profile individuals' cell phones. The group is also asking for an update on how proposed budget cuts and the recent workforce reductions at CISA will impact those investigations. What they're saying: "This is not a partisan issue. It is a matter of grave consequence for the security of America both at home and abroad," the lawmakers write. "We owe it to the American people to protect them from the specter of a cyber 9/11 at the hands of our most formidable foreign adversary." Threat level: For years, top American officials have been warning about increasing cyber threats from China. China-backed Volt Typhoon has been prepositioning in critical infrastructure — such as water utilities, power plants and railways — for at least five years, according to congressional testimony. Salt Typhoon, another Chinese government-backed group, was caught hacking into several high-profile politicians' phones last year, including President Trump's. "Somewhere, Xi Jinping is smiling at America's insistence on degrading its own cyber capabilities," the lawmakers write.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What is genocide and is it happening in Gaza?
Rights groups, lawyers and some governments are describing the Gaza war as "genocide" and calling for a ceasefire but Israel, created in the aftermath of the Nazi Holocaust of Jews, vehemently rejects the explosive term. Israel says it is seeking to wipe out Gaza's Islamist rulers and free its hostages still held in the occupied Palestinian coastal strip since the Hamas militant attack in Israel on October 7, 2023. But Israel's devastating war on Gaza -- largely populated by descendants of Palestinian refugees who were expelled from or fled what became Israeli land in 1948 -- has killed tens of thousands of civilians and sparked growing global outrage. The accusation against Israel of genocide has been made with increasing force from quarters ranging from "Schindler's List" star Ralph Fiennes to Amnesty International and some Israeli historians. What does the legal term really mean and who can decide whether it applies? What is 'genocide'? The word genocide -- derived from the Greek word "genos", for race or tribe, and "cide", from the Latin for "to kill" -- was coined in 1944 by Raphael Lemkin. Lemkin, a Polish Jew who had fled to the United States, used it to describe the crimes committed by Nazi Germany during the Holocaust. It was used for the first time within a legal framework by an international military tribunal at Nuremberg to try Nazi leaders for their crimes in 1945. However, those accused were eventually convicted on charges of crimes against humanity. It has been recognised within international law since 1948 and the advent of the UN Genocide Convention. That text defines genocide as any of five "acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group". These five acts include killing members of the group, causing them serious bodily or mental harm, imposing living conditions intended to destroy the group, preventing births and forcibly transferring children out of the group. Regardless of the definition, the qualification of "genocide" has been hugely sensitive over the decades. What is happening in Gaza? Israel's military offensive on Gaza since October 2023 has killed 54,677 people, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the occupied Palestinian territory. The United Nations has said the territory's entire population of more than two million people is at risk of famine, even if Israel said last month it was partially easing the complete blockade on aid it imposed on Gaza on March 2. Despite international calls for an end to the war, a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas remains elusive. The latest war started after Hamas fighters attacked Israel on October 7, 2023. The attack resulted in the deaths of 1,218 people, mostly civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures. Of the 251 hostages seized, 55 remain in Gaza, including 32 the Israeli military says are dead. Who speaks of 'genocide' in Gaza? In December 2023, South Africa brought a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ), the United Nations' highest judicial organ, alleging that Israel's Gaza offensive breached the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. Israel denies the accusation. In rulings in January, March and May 2024, the ICJ told Israel to do everything possible to "prevent" acts of genocide during its military operations in Gaza, including by providing urgently needed humanitarian aid to prevent famine. While no court has so far ruled the ongoing conflict is a genocide, human rights groups and international law experts -- including several who are Israeli -- have used the term to describe it. Amnesty International has accused Israel of carrying out a "live-streamed genocide" in Gaza, while Human Rights Watch has alleged it is responsible for "acts of genocide". A UN committee in November found Israel's warfare in Gaza was "consistent with the characteristics of genocide". And a UN investigation concluded in March that Israel carried out "genocidal acts" in Gaza through the destruction of the strip's main IVF clinic and other reproductive healthcare facilities. Omer Bartov, an Israeli scholar of the Holocaust, wrote in August last year that "Israel was engaged in systematic war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocidal actions". Fellow Israeli historians Amos Goldberg and Daniel Blatman in January co-wrote an article in which they said: "Israel is indeed committing genocide in Gaza." Western governments have largely refrained from using the word, with France's President Emmanuel Macron saying it was not up to a "political leader to use to term but up to historians to do so when the time comes". But Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has used it, while Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has accused Israel of "premeditated genocide". What does Israel say? Israel alleges it is exercising its right to security and "self defence", an argument echoed by its staunch ally the United States. Israel has dismissed accusations of genocide as "blatant lies" and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has accused the UN Human Rights Council of being "an antisemitic, corrupt, terror-supporting and irrelevant body". He has said UN experts should instead focus on "crimes against humanity and the war crimes committed by the Hamas terrorist organisation in the worst massacre against the Jewish people since the Holocaust", referring to October 7. The International Criminal Court (ICC) in November issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and former Israeli defence minister Yoav Gallant over alleged crimes against humanity and war crimes in Israel's war in Gaza -- including starvation as a method of warfare. It also issued an arrest warrant for Hamas military chief Mohammed Deif over allegations of crimes against humanity and war crimes in the October 7 attack, but the case against him was dropped in February after confirmation Israel had killed him. ICC prosecutor Karim Khan also initially sought warrants against Hamas leaders Yahya Sinwar and Ismail Haniyeh, but dropped those applications after their deaths in Israeli attacks. Who decides and when? Thijs Bouwknegt, a genocide expert, said the Israeli policy in Gaza seemed to be "designed to make a civilian population either perish or leave" but a court would have to decide if it was genocide. "It bears the hallmarks of it but we still have to wait and see whether it actually was," said the historian, who has conducted research for the ICC and observed trials over genocide in Rwanda and former Yugoslavia. In the case of Rwanda, in which the United Nations said extremist Hutus killed some 800,000 Tutsis and moderate Hutus in 1994, it took a decade for the International Criminal Tribunal to conclude genocide had happened. It was not until 2007 that the ICJ recognised as genocide the murder by Bosnian Serb forces of almost 8,000 Muslim men and boys in Srebrenica in 1995 during the Bosnian war. "The threshold for genocide is nearly impossible to meet," Bouwknegt explained. "You have to prove that there was an intent and that there was the only possible explanation for what happened." Has there been intent? French-Israeli lawyer Omer Shatz said "there is no doubt that war crimes, crimes against humanity are being committed" in Gaza. But the international law expert agreed intent was more difficult to prove. That is why, after the ICC issued an arrest warrant against Netanyahu and Gallant, he filed a report with the court in December arguing they were among eight Israeli officials responsible for "incitement to genocide in Gaza". "If incitement is established, that establishes intent," he told AFP. His 170-page report lists such alleged incitements, including Gallant at the start of the war saying Israel was fighting "human animals" in Gaza and far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich urging "total extermination" in the Palestinian territory. It cites President Isaac Herzog failing to differentiate between Palestinian militants and civilians when he spoke of "an entire nation out there that is responsible" for the October 7 attack. Mathilde Philip-Gay, an international law expert, said it was ultimately up to a judge to decide on whether the genocide label applied. But, she warned: "International law cannot stop a war." "The judiciary will intervene after the war. The qualification (of genocide) is very important for victims but it will come later," she said. What now? The 1948 Genocide Convention says signatories can call on UN organs "to take such action... for the prevention and suppression of acts of genocide". But while it implies they should act to stop any such crime from occurring, it does not detail how. Activists have called for an arms embargo and sanctions against Israel. The European Union last month ordered a review of its cooperation deal with Israel and Britain halted trade talks with the government. But the United States and Germany, two major weapons suppliers, are not likely to want to review their relationship with Israel. cf-cl-ah/sjw/giv
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israeli Finance Minister says banks should not obey EU sanctions on settlers
By Steven Scheer JERUSALEM (Reuters) -Israel's Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich on Thursday condemned the country's banks that have refused to provide services to Israeli settlers sanctioned by the European Union and warned they may have to pay compensation to them. The EU last year imposed sanctions on five Israeli settlers for violence against Palestinians and Smotrich said there were reports of sanctions being considered against other settlers. But in a letter to the banking supervisor, he said Israeli banks should not follow a "zero risk" policy since it leads to the abandonment of Israeli clients "under the guise of compliance with foreign sanctions." In a statement quoting his letter to the regulator, Smotrich called on banks to use their legal, economic, and international strength to fight "unjust sanctions". "The banks' enormous profits enable them to take measured risks on behalf of their clients — especially when it comes to a national moral injustice," Smotrich, who leads the far-right Religious Zionism party, said. Should banks continue to comply with sanctions and harm clients, Smotrich said he intended to promote immediate legislation that would require banks to pay substantial compensation to affected customers. He also intends to require the Bank of Israel itself to offer banking services to citizens targeted by sanctions. Responding to the letter, the Bank of Israel said that while banks must comply with international sanctions to avoid an array of risks, a draft directive it published on Thursday aimed to ensure appropriate banking services were available for the affected customers. "Circumventing foreign sanctions regimes through the Israeli banking system exposes banking corporations to multiple risks, including compliance risks, anti-money laundering and counter-terror financing risks, legal risks, and reputational risks," the central bank said. But it said it has taken steps to comply with sanctions "without banks resorting to blanket refusals to serve such customers." While the sanctions in question concern Israeli settlers, the EU is reviewing its broad pact governing its political and economic ties with Israel in the face of mounting international pressure on Israel amid complaints about the lack of humanitarian aid reaching Gaza in the wake of the war triggered by Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 attack.