Iran, Hamas coordinated 2023 attack from 2021
Shafaq News/ Tehran and Hamas began planning October 7, 2023 attack in May 2021, Israeli report revealed on Monday.
According to I24 News report, Iran deliberately withheld certain information about the attack from former Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah at a specific point in the planning process.
The report provided what it called 'evidence of exchanged messages between leaders of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran, proving that the three parties were covertly complicit in preparing a joint attack on Israel.'
The exchanged messages between Iran and Hamas began as early as May 2021, following Operation "Guardian of the Walls," with discussions on rehabilitating Hamas for various purposes, including the large-scale attack, the report added.
Notably, the Gaza Health Ministry reports that 48,208 people have been killed and 111,655 injured in Israeli military operations, along with thousands remain missing under the rubble. In Israel, 1,139 people were killed in the October 7 attack, with more than 200 taken hostage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Shafaq News
33 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
Iran intercepts Israeli missiles over Tabriz, Khuzestan
Shafaq News/ Iranian air defenses thwarted missile attacks over Tabriz and Khuzestan provinces, as clashes with Israel intensified, Iranian media reported on Monday. One of the intercepted strikes reportedly targeted the Khuzestan Steel Company, a major industrial facility in Iran, with no recorded damage to production or administrative operations. In response to the Israeli attacks, Brigadier General Mohammad Pakpour, newly appointed commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) after Major General Hossein Salami was killed in Operation Rising Lion, pledged continued retaliation. 'Even if the Israeli attacks stop, we will continue our mission until the end,' Pakpour declared, affirming that Iranian attacks destroyed critical Israeli facilities and that Israeli casualties are being concealed. 'Only one building we targeted, which was completely destroyed, had 70 Israelis taking shelter in it.' Meanwhile, Iran's Civil Aviation Organization extended the closure of national airspace until 2:00 a.m. Tuesday, halting all domestic and international flights. The restriction, initially set to expire Monday afternoon, follows a similar measure enacted Sunday.
Shafaq News
33 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
US in perilous waters: Israel seeks green light for Fordow Action
Shafaq News/ Tensions between Israel and Iran have escalated to unprecedented levels, putting US strategic red lines to the test—particularly the conditions under which Washington would shift from passive backing to direct military involvement. While Israel continues to lobby for broad Western support, including from the United States, to strike Iran's heavily fortified Fordow nuclear facility, the Biden administration remains cautious. The central question now is: what exactly would prompt direct American military engagement? Israeli Appeal, American Hesitation According to Israeli broadcaster KAN, Israel has formally requested US assistance in launching a military strike against Fordow, a subterranean site regarded as one of Iran's most impenetrable nuclear installations. This appeal has been accompanied by diplomatic pressure on European allies—particularly the UK and France—to support defensive measures in response to Iran's drone and missile barrages launched under Operation True Promise 3. Despite these efforts, US officials have reiterated that Washington will not enter the conflict militarily unless American forces or interests in the Middle East come under direct attack. The administration has stressed that its objective remains containment—not escalation. Flexible Red Lines, Indirect Engagement Though publicly restrained, the United States has been deeply involved behind the scenes. Analysts say US defense and intelligence officials are quietly supporting Israel through covert intelligence and logistical assistance, quiet weapons and munitions transfers, diplomatic and moral backing, and indirect pressure on Iran by warning of accountability for proxy attacks. Dr. Patrick Clawson, a senior fellow at the Washington Institute, told Shafaq News, 'The United States is staying in the shadows, but the option to intervene remains on the table if Americans are killed or US interests are directly hit.' He emphasized that the real red line for Washington is 'the death of American soldiers or diplomats as a result of a direct Iranian attack—or one carried out through its proxies*.' Washington's Three-Point Red Line Analysts and former officials largely agree that US military intervention hinges on a tripartite threshold: -A direct attack on US forces or interests—whether in the Gulf, Iraq, or Syria -American fatalities, civilian or military, resulting from Iranian action or allied groups -A major threat to key US facilities or allies—such as an assault on an embassy or military base David Phillips, director of the Program on Peace-building and Rights at Columbia University and a former senior adviser to the US Department of State, told Shafaq News, 'Washington is still trying to avoid war, but it will not stand by if Tehran threatens US interests.' He added, 'Even proxy attacks—by groups like the Houthis or Iraq's Popular Mobilization Forces—could cross that line.' Trump's Strategic Ambiguity Ivan Sascha Sheehan, Executive Director of the School of Public and International Affairs at the University of Baltimore, pointed to a more 'dangerous' contingency considered under former President Donald Trump. Speaking to Shafaq News, Sheehan said, 'Trump consistently hinted at the military option if diplomacy fails,' suggesting the US could deploy B-2 stealth bombers equipped with Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs), also known as 'bunker busters,' capable of striking Fordow. He noted, 'Alliance with Israel doesn't necessarily require boots on the ground. The US could enable Israeli action by accelerating supply lines and operational coordination—without direct combat involvement.' For now, Washington remains committed to a policy of support without entanglement. While the Trump administration continues to arm, advise, and diplomatically back Israel, it is carefully avoiding being drawn into a wider regional war. *Iranian proxies—armed groups across the Middle East that receive financial, logistical, and military support from Tehran—play a central role in Iran's regional strategy. These factions, including Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, and several Iraqi forces such as Kataib Hezbollah and Asaib Ahl al-Haq, maintain close coordination with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), particularly the Quds Force, and are viewed by Western and Israeli officials as 'instruments' of Iranian influence and escalation across multiple fronts.
Shafaq News
33 minutes ago
- Shafaq News
In call with UK's Lammy: Iraqi FM warns of wider war
Shafaq News/ Iraqi Foreign Minister Fuad Hussein called on the international community to take steps to stop airspace violations and prevent escalation in the region, during a phone call with British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, on Monday. According to a statement from Iraq's Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Hussein underscored that Israel's repeated breaches of Iraqi airspace represent a grave violation of Iraq's sovereignty and international law, warning that the ongoing conflict between Israel and Iran could trigger severe regional and global consequences if not contained. The Iraqi FM also stressed the importance of the UK's diplomatic role in de-escalation efforts, either through the European tripartite coordination with France and Germany or in tandem with the United States. For his part, Lammy affirmed the importance of preventing interference by armed groups and reiterated that the UK had not taken part in any military operations. Lammy also noted that London was coordinating closely with Paris, Berlin, and Washington to unify positions on the crisis, urging all parties to return to negotiations over Iran's nuclear program. He warned against attacks on US or British forces in the region, regardless of the perpetrator, adding that any closure of the Strait of Hormuz would pose a major economic threat to the UK and Europe, likely driving inflation higher.
