Blaise Metreweli: MI6 distances new chief from Nazi grandfather
MI6 has cast distance between its new chief and her grandfather, who was this week revealed to have been a Nazi spy known as "the butcher".Blaise Metreweli was announced as the incoming head of the Secret Intelligence Service earlier this month. She will be its first female "C" in its 116-year history.With little known about her wider backstory, several newspapers reported on Friday that her grandfather was Constantine Dobrowolski, who defected from Soviet Russia's Red Army to become the Nazis' chief informant in Chernihiv, Ukraine.However, the Foreign Office, which speaks on behalf of MI6, said Ms Metreweli "neither knew nor met her paternal grandfather".
A spokesperson added: "Blaise's ancestry is characterised by conflict and division and, as is the case for many with eastern European heritage, only partially understood."It is precisely this complex heritage which has contributed to her commitment to prevent conflict and protect the British public from modern threats from today's hostile states, as the next chief of MI6."The Daily Mail, which first revealed the family link, reports that it found hundreds of pages of documents in an archive in Freiburg, Germany, which showed Mr Dobrowolski was known as "The Butcher" or "Agent No 30" by Wehrmacht commanders.He reportedly signed off letters to his Nazi superiors with "Heil Hitler" and said he "personally" took part in "the extermination of the Jews".The archive documents are said to suggest Mr Dobrowolski looted the bodies of Holocaust victims, was involved in the murdering of local Jews, and laughed while watching the sexual assault of female prisoners.After the war, Mr Dobrowolski's wife, Barbara, and two-month-old son fled to Britain, and she married David Metreweli in 1947. Her son took his stepfather's name, but the Mail reports that on some official documents his surname was still Dobrowolski.Mr Dobrowolski's son would go on to be a radiologist and UK armed forces veteran, and his daughter, Ms Metreweli, was born in 1977. She has not responded to the recent reports herself.She joined MI6 - which gathers intelligence overseas - in 1999, and is currently responsible for technology and innovation there. She will be the agency's 18th head when she takes over later this year from Sir Richard Moore, a senior civil servant. Upon her appointment, she said in a statement that she was "proud and honoured" to have been asked to lead.Ms Metreweli is a Cambridge graduate, a rower and has previously had operational roles in the Middle East and Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Putin's ‘suicide bikers' speed into no man's land to cause chaos
Into the chaos of no man's land ride the Russian soldiers. Flying across the steppe at 50mph on cheap Chinese motorbikes, their objective is to breach Ukrainian defences and cause havoc behind enemy lines. But few will ever make it. Most are picked off by drones or artillery fire. Some self-destruct by crashing in the mogul field of shell craters. The life expectancy of those who do survive the journey is little improved, stranded and surrounded by the enemy as they are. 'Basically it's a suicide mission,' Yevhen, a lieutenant captain in Ukraine's 28th brigade, said flatly. 'Because they never come back.' Nonetheless, these latter-day cavalry charges — on what the Russian army refers to as its 'iron horses' — are a growing feature of Moscow's military strategy, in response to the ever greater pervasiveness of drones, which account for up to 70 per cent of all casualties.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Which counties have reintroduced conscription in Europe?
For the first time in decades, European countries are discussing compulsory military service. The Ukraine-Russia war and the ongoing instability in the Middle East have renewed calls for increased defence spending and measures to improve national security. On Wednesday, NATO leaders pledged to increase defence spending to five per cent of GDP by 2035. The decision taken at a summit in the Hague was hailed by Donald Trump, who called it a 'big win for Europe and… Western civilisation'. Several European states already have existing laws mandating military conscription, with 13 countries requiring certain citizens to do some form of service. The latest to reintroduce compulsory service was Latvia in January 2024 – more than 16 years after it dropped the measure in 2007. Other countries, such as Germany and Italy, are considering adopting policies to boost their armed forces. Let's take a look at which European countries citizens are expected to serve: Austria has mandated military service continuously since the 18th century. All male citizens aged 18 to 25 are required to serve in the armed forces, or if they prefer, perform civilian service. The military service lasts six months, while the alternative, which includes driving ambulances and working in retirement homes is for nine months. Women are not obliged to do service but may enter voluntarily. Due to its precarious political relationship with neighbouring Turkey and the wider Middle East, Cyprus enforces conscription for eligible male citizens. Men, including those born from just one Greek Cypriot parent, aged 18 or over, must serve 14 months in the Cypriot National Guard. They are then transitioned to the country's reserve forces, where they continue to serve until they reach 50. Men over 18 are conscripted for between four and 12 months of military service in Denmark. Women are currently exempt from the obligation, but will be required to complete service from 2026, under new plans announced last year. The Danish government has also indicated it will extend the basic service time from four to 11 months by 2026. Estonia currently requires all males aged between 18 and 27 to perform military service. Those with ideological or religious objections may complete civilian national service instead. Around 3,200 conscripts enter the forces every year in the eastern European nation, which shares a 180-mile border with Russia. Like many other Scandinavian countries, Finland conscripts all males for military service or equivalent civilian service. Depending on their role, most military conscripts serve between six and 12 months. Non-military service has a fixed length of 347 days. Conscription has been a core policy of Greece since 1914, with all men aged 19 to 45 required to do service. Male citizens serve 12 months in either the army, navy or air force. Conscientious objectors may instead perform 15 months of civilian service. Another country bordering Russia, Latvia reinstated compulsory military service for all men aged 18 to 27 in January 2024, having suspended it in 2006. Conscripts must now serve a minimum of 11 months in the National Armed Forces or National Guard. The law allows for those who oppose service for religious or ideological reasons to serve for 11 months in one of the areas of the Ministry of Defence. Lithuanian males are subject to conscription between the ages of 18 and 23. Up to 4,000 conscripts are selected every year via a random system, although most young people have signed up voluntarily since the scheme was introduced in 2015. There are also military volunteering opportunities for both women and those up to the age of 38. Moldova maintains mandatory conscription for males aged 18 and above. Conscripts typically serve a year. But the country is transitioning from a system of compulsory military service to professionally contracted armed forces. Since 1907, Norway has formally had a policy of conscription, with the obligation extending to women as of 2015. Enforcement of compulsory military service was practised loosely, with the system highly selective and not all those eligible are called up. Alongside neighbouring Norway, Sweden is one of just two European countries that practice conscription for both men and women. Like Norway, all 18-year-olds are tested, but not all are required to do service. Conscientious objectors have the right to apply for alternative service and then become part of the civilian reserve. Swiss male citizens must complete either mandatory military service from 20 or civilian service. In a referendum held in 2013 to abolish the practice, 73 per cent voted to retain the compulsory service requirement. Those deemed unfit for service are exempt but must pay an additional three per cent of annual income tax until the age of 37, unless they are affected by a disability. Conscription was reintroduced in Ukraine in 2014 following the war in Donbas. Current president Volodymyr Zelenskyy had originally planned to abolish mandatory service in January 2022, but was forced to change course following the Russian invasion a month later. Men over 25 are conscripted into the forces and remain in the active reserve until 55. In Croatia, men aged 18 to 30 will be conscripted from 2026. The country reintroduced the policy after a 17-year hiatus, with training expected to be shortened and focused on core military skills. Serbia's government announced at the end of last year it will reinstate compulsory military service from November. Serbian men will be required to complete compulsory military service consisting of 60 days of training and 15 days of exercises. More Trending Other countries have announced proposals to reintroduce conscription but have yet to implement them. Italy's deputy prime minister Matteo Salvini proposed universal military service for six months for both men and women. In Germany, conservative leaning politicians have also eyed a return to mandatory service. Politico reported that the current drive would focus on increasing voluntary recruitments but leave the door open to a possible obligatory requirement in the future. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Map shows safest countries to be in if global conflict breaks out MORE: Russia accuses 'frenzied' Nato of being a masochist MORE: If Britain went to war I wouldn't hesitate to enlist
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
US attacks on Iran redraw calculus of use of force for allies and rivals around globe
For US allies and rivals around the world, Donald Trump's strikes on Iran have redrawn the calculus of the White House's readiness to use force in the kind of direct interventions that the president said he would make a thing of the past under his isolationist 'America First' foreign policy. From Russia and China to Europe and across the global south, the president's decision to launch the largest strategic bombing strike in US history indicates a White House that is ready to employ force abroad – but reluctantly and under the extremely temperamental and unpredictable leadership of the president. 'Trump being able to act and being willing to act when he saw an opportunity will definitely give [Vladimir] Putin pause,' said Fiona Hill, a former Trump national security adviser and one of the principal authors of the UK's strategic defence review. While Trump has pulled back from his earlier warnings about potential regime in Iran, going from tweeting 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' to 'NOW IS THE TIME FOR PEACE!' within 72 hours, he has nonetheless reinforced Russian perceptions of the United States as an unpredictable and aggressive rival that will not unilaterally abandon its ability to use force abroad. 'It has some pretty dire warnings for Putin himself about what could happen at a time of weakness,' Hill said. 'It will just convince Putin even more that no matter what the intent of a US president, the capability to destroy is something that has to be taken seriously.' It also shows a shift in the calculus in Washington DC, where hawks – along with Israel's Benjamin Netanyahu – were able to convince Trump that launching a strike on Iran was preferable to pursuing negotiations that had not yet failed. That could have knock-on effects for the war in Ukraine, where Republicans and foreign policy hardliners have grown more vocal about Putin's attacks on cities and the need for a tougher sanctions strategy. Although he hasn't changed his policy on resuming military support to Ukraine, Trump has is publicly more exasperated with Putin. When Putin offered Trump to mediate between Israel and Iran, Trump said he responded: 'No, I don't need help with Iran. I need help with you.' In the immediate term, however, the strikes on Iran are unlikely to have an impact on Russia's war in Ukraine. 'I don't see it as having a big impact on the Ukraine war, because although Iran was very helpful at the beginning stages in providing Russia with [Shahed] drones, Russia has now started manufacturing their own version and have actually souped them up,' said Max Boot, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, during a roundtable discussion. More broadly, Trump's attacks could undermine a growing 'axis of resistance' including Russia and China, given the pair's reluctance to come to Iran's aid beyond issuing strong condemnations of the attacks during security discussions under the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) being held in China this week. 'It also shows that Russia is not a very valuable friend, because they're not really lifting a finger to help their allies in Iran and returning all the help that they've received,' Boot added. The strike could also have implications for China, which has escalated military pressure around Taiwan in recent months and has been holding 'dress rehearsals' for a forced reunification despite US support for the island, according to testimony from Adm Samuel Paparo, the commander of US Indo-Pacific Command. Trump had promised a tough line on China, and many of his top advisers are either China hawks or believe that the US military should reposition its forces and focus from Europe and the Middle East to Asia in order to manage China as a 'pacing threat'. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion Yet his previous hesitance to use US force abroad could have emboldened Beijing to believe that the US would not come to the direct aid of Taiwan if a military conflict would break out – the one wild card in what would otherwise likely be a lopsided conflict between China and Taiwan. Experts cautioned that the stakes are far different, and the conflicts too far removed, in order to draw direct conclusions about Trump's readiness to intervene if a conflict broke out between China and Taiwan. Trump's administration appears further embroiled in Middle East diplomacy than it wanted and its pivot to focus on China has been delayed as well. And while some close to the military say the strikes have regained credibility lost after some recent setbacks, including the withdrawal from Afghanistan, others have said that it won't send the same message for military planners in Moscow or Beijing. 'We shouldn't conflate willingness to use force in a very low risk situation with deterring other types of conflicts or using force when it's going to be incredibly costly – which is what it would be if we were to come to the defence of Taiwan,' said Dr Stacie Pettyjohn of the Center for a New American Security during an episode of the Defense & Aerospace Air Power podcast. Around the world, US rivals may use the strikes to reinforce the image of the US as an aggressive power that prefers to use force rather than negotiate – a message that may break through with countries already exhausted with a temperamental White House. 'The fact that it all happened so fast, there wasn't much multilateral involvement or chance for diplomacy, I think, is something Russians can point to as an indication of, you know, imperialism to the global south,' said Aslı Aydıntaşbaş, a fellow in the Center on the United States and Europe at Brookings during a conference call. 'But also in their talking points to United States and western allies, they will definitely make a point of highlighting this as something great powers do, and in a way that normalizes Russia's language on its own [conflicts].
