Gold from legendary 1708 shipwreck holding billions of dollars in treasure is seen in new images
More than three centuries after a legendary Spanish galleon loaded with treasure sank off the coast of Colombia, researches have uncovered new details about gold coins found scattered around the shipwreck.
Dubbed the "holy grail" of shipwrecks, the San Jose galleon was sunk by the British navy near Cartagena in 1708, killing most of the roughly 600 crewmembers on board. The ship was believed to be holding gold, silver, gemstones and other treasure worth billions of dollars.
Now researchers have analyzed intricately designed gold coins found near the wreck, confirming they are indeed from the iconic San Jose. The coins feature depictions of castles, lions and crosses on the front and the "Crowned Pillars of Hercules" above ocean waves on the back, according to a new study published Tuesday in the journal Antiquity.
High-resolution in situ photograph of cob hoard area in the port section of the stern, showing the obverse and reverse faces of coin, as they were observed on the seabed (photographs from ARC-DIMAR, 2022; figure by authors).
Daniela Vargas / Antiquity
Researchers, including experts from Colombia's navy, studied images taken by remotely operated vehicles of dozens of coins that are scattered around the shipwreck nearly 2,000 feet below the ocean's surface. The study's authors said the exact number of coins on the seabed is difficult to determine "due to the dynamic nature of the site." But an analysis of high-resolution images from the remotely operated vehicles shows each coin's average diameter is 32.5 millimeters and weighs roughly 27 grams.
On some of the coins, researchers were able to discern the letters "PVA" — representing a Latin motto meaning "Plus Ultra" or "Further Beyond." That adage was used on currency to signify the expansion of the Spanish monarchy in the Atlantic, the study's authors said. Numbers depicting the coins' denomination and the date of minting (1707) could also be seen.
Last August, Colombian authorities said one remotely operated vehicle surveyed the wreck, uncovering numerous artifacts, including an anchor, jugs and glass bottles.
The Colombian government announced last year it would begin extractions from the ship off its Caribbean coast, using multiple remotely operated vehicles. The ship was discovered in 2015, but its exact location has been kept secret to protect the storied wreck from potential treasure hunters.
Since its discovery, multiple parties have laid claim to the shipwreck, including Colombia, Spain and Indigenous Qhara Qhara Bolivians who claim the treasures on board were stolen from them. The wreck has also been claimed by U.S.-based salvage company Sea Search Armada, which says it first discovered the wreck more than 40 years ago.
The cause of the San Jose's sinking has also been debated. British documents indicate that the ship did not explode, according to Colombia's government, but Spanish reports suggest the ship was blown up in battle.
Either way, the ship — laden with chests of emeralds and about 200 tons of gold — sank with most of its crew while heading back from the New World to Spain on June 7, 1708.
In May 2024, Colombia declared the site of the shipwreck a "protected archeological area."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
14 hours ago
- Forbes
What's is happening to oceans
World leaders have gathered this week for the United Nations Ocean Conference in Nice, France. The UN Ocean Conference takes place every three years. It plays a vital role in bringing together governments, civil society, businesses, and scientists to build momentum for the flow of finances, partnerships, and global commitments. The conference will support the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 14: Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas, and marine resources for sustainable development. If you've seen the movie Oceans by David Attenborough, you might have some idea of the issues facing our oceans. But for those who haven't, this article offers a helpful introduction. Oceans are our planet's 'blue heart'— to borrow the words from UN Secretary-General's opening speech at this week's conference, so their health is vital. One reason for the poor state of the oceans is that they have not received enough attention. For instance, they are radically underfunded, receiving only 1% of climate finance. With so many topics about oceans being discussed in the media, those new to the topic might wonder where to start to stay informed. After all, ocean issues can involve sophisticated terminology that may make newcomers hesitant to follow along. Here are three words you should know this week to simplify your understanding of the issues. Over 90% of global fish stocks are affected by overfishing. While the word overfishing may sound self-explanatory, the nuance is essential: overfishing relative to what? Overfishing refers to a state where more fish are caught than can be sustainably replaced through natural reproduction in marine ecosystems. Such unsustainable fishing impacts biodiversity and ecosystem health and has serious social and economic consequences, especially for local communities. In many developing countries, fish are integral to livelihoods and food security. A study published in Nature last year found that many fishermen in Bangladesh are considering changing professions as their incomes continue to fall. The researchers surveyed and interviewed 100 fishermen. Although Bangladesh has over 1.7 million fishermen across 64 districts, the findings still capture an underrepresented group rarely reflected in scientific literature. Government subsidies are a major driver of overfishing. In 2018, about $35 billion was provided in global fisheries subsidies—surprisingly, nearly 80% of that went to large-scale industrial fishing operations rather than small-scale fishers. While these subsidies are often justified by the employment generated in the large-scale fishing economy, the broader environmental and social costs are turning out to be much higher. A significant step came in 2022 when countries adopted the WTO Agreement on Fisheries Subsidies. However, it has yet to come into force, as two-thirds of WTO members must ratify it. Experts at the FAIRR Initiative—an investor network raising awareness about the material risks and opportunities in the global food sector—argue that the treaty falls short, as it doesn't sufficiently limit subsidies that reduce operating costs like fuel used, which disproportionately benefit large vessels and incentivize overfishing. Bottom trawling is an industrial fishing method that involves dragging large nets along the sea floor. These nets, often weighing several tonnes, are attached to heavy metal gear and indiscriminately scoop up all marine life in their path. Even Marine Protected Areas are not spared. Based on satellite data analysis, over 20,000 hours of suspected bottom trawling occurred in United Kingdon's MPAs last year. Of the 377 the country controls, only 37 are fully protected from bottom trawling — mainly because they include ecologically sensitive features such as coral reefs, qualifying them for exclusion. It's important not to assume that all vessels involved in bottom trawling are from the UK; they also come from countries like France, and a small share of vessels from other countries. Earlier this week, the UK proposed banning bottom trawling in vulnerable marine habitats. However, even when marine areas are designated as protected, weak enforcement often allows these destructive practices to continue. Much of the fish caught through bottom trawling is discarded. These unintended catches — called bycatch — are not the target species and are thrown overboard. Reports from communities near bottom-trawling zones estimate that millions of pounds of fish are wasted as bycatch each year. While these fish may not matter to industrial fishing vessels, they represent lost food and income for local communities. About one in five fish is caught illegally or goes unreported. Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing causes losses of $10–23.5 billion annually. IUU exists due to weak monitoring systems, which experts call a lack of seafood traceability. The seafood supply chain involves multiple actors, fish species, vessel types, and fragmented management, making it hard to verify where fish are sourced. Last year, groups, including the FAIRR Initiative, WWF, and UNEP FI, began engaging with investors to encourage major seafood companies to adopt full-chain digital traceability systems. The first phase of this engagement that ended this month with a progress report found that only two out of seven assessed companies had robust traceability commitments—and even these often applied to only one type of fish or did not cover the whole supply chain. Much more needs to be done in this space, but at least these issues are no longer happening in the shadows—that is something to rejoice about. One big thing to expect from the Oceans Conference is a political declaration that will kickstart a new wave of action and solutions for our marine ecosystems. The momentum the world is building gives reason to believe that the future of our oceans will not be colorless, as depicted in David Attenborough's Oceans film after trawlers destroy the seabed but bright, full of life and bursting with colors.
Forbes
a day ago
- Forbes
We Need To Rethink How We Recommend Women On LinkedIn, Study Says
Reviewers use different words to recommend men and women on LinkedIn (Photo Illustration by Sheldon ... More Cooper/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) New research reveals that women are typically seen as concrete thinkers—task-oriented and detail-focused—while men are more often viewed as thinking more abstractly, focusing on strategy, vision, and the big picture. These beliefs about men and women even appear in LinkedIn recommendations, and they could have significant consequences for who gets hired, who gets promoted, and who is assigned the most menial tasks. The researchers conducted six studies to investigate whether people tend to associate men with abstract thinking, such as big-picture ideas and strategy, and women with concrete thinking, which is more focused on details and execution. In nearly every study, the same pattern emerged: women were seen as more concrete, and men as more abstract. The authors explain why this is a problem: 'When decision-makers perceive women as more concrete than men, they might pigeonhole women into administrative tasks that are low in status and power. If this is the case, then beliefs that women are more concrete than men could perpetuate gender inequality, with women being relegated to low-construal, low-status tasks more often than men because people believe they will execute these tasks more effectively.' Previous research shows that people who exhibit abstract thinking skills are perceived as having more power, are more likely to be regarded as experts and have greater potential for growth than those who are more concrete thinkers. In one of the studies, researchers analyzed written recommendations on the LinkedIn profiles of more than 500,000 professionals. They focused exclusively on the recommendation text, not the endorsed skills section. All of the profiles included in the study had at least one recommendation. The team then examined how often words associated with concrete thinking (such as 'detail' or 'exact') appeared compared to words reflecting abstract thinking (like 'visionary' or 'theoretical'). In the LinkedIn recommendations, women were once again more likely to be described with concrete terms, while men were more likely to be characterized with abstract terms. The researchers used different methods to analyze the text. First, they found women had 13% greater odds of being described with only concrete terms, and men had 22% greater odds of being described with only abstract terms. In a separate analysis, they found that words like 'detail,' 'details,' and 'exact' were more likely to appear near feminine pronouns, while abstract terms such as 'philosophical,' 'theoretical,' 'visionary,' 'vision,' 'farsighted,' and 'forward-looking' were more likely to appear near masculine pronouns. To be sure that these differences weren't simply a reflection of the kinds of jobs men and women tend to hold, the researchers controlled for both occupation and industry. They also eliminated profiles of professionals in executive roles, which tend to involve abstract thinking and are often held by men. In other words, women weren't being described as more concrete just because they worked in more detail-oriented roles. The stereotypes persisted even when comparing men and women in the same jobs. In other studies included in the research paper, participants were asked to describe fictional individuals based on brief profiles, and the same pattern emerged: men were described as more abstract, while women were described as more concrete. In one test, participants even linked 'concreteness' with women and 'abstractness' with men more quickly than the reverse, revealing that this bias likely occurs subconsciously. It's possible that one person can possess both abstract and concrete thinking abilities. In one of the six studies, women were rated higher than men on both concrete and abstract traits, but they were still seen as more concrete than abstract. And men were still rated more abstract than concrete. So, even when women are described as having abstract qualities, they're still seen as more concrete than abstract overall. It's important to note that the studies provide no evidence to suggest that women are actually more concrete thinkers or that men are more abstract. Instead, they show that people believe this to be true. Because women are often perceived as better suited for detail-oriented work, they may be more frequently assigned to those roles. Over time, doing this kind of work repeatedly can build expertise, reinforcing the stereotype and creating a self-fulfilling cycle that keeps women in support roles and men in strategic ones. So, the next time you write a LinkedIn recommendation, consider whether your compliments might be inadvertently reinforcing gender stereotypes. Even well-meaning words like 'detail-oriented' may subtly shape how others perceive someone's capabilities.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Photos show possible treasure from 300-year-old 'holy grail' of shipwrecks off Colombia
CARTAGENA, Colombia – An underwater mission to investigate a 300-year-old shipwreck off the coast of Colombia has revealed new photos of gold coins. The San José Galleon was sunk in 1708 by a British warship, bringing down the ship full of treasure, including gold coins. For years, the Colombian government has wanted to locate and recover the treasure from the San José, but the exact location of the ship has never been publicly revealed. How A 128-Year-old Great Lakes Shipwreck Was Found Thanks To An Invasive Animal Four unmanned vehicles have been deployed to investigate the shipwreck since 2015. In 2022, photos revealed the spatial distribution of the remains of the ship. A recent study published in Antiquity showed researchers analyzed high-resolution pictures of gold coins found around the shipwreck to try and determine if the wreck truly is the San Jose Galleon. How To Watch Fox Weather While it was difficult to determine the exact number of coins on the seafloor, researchers found the coins were estimated to have an average diameter of 32.5 mm and (1.3 inches) and probably weigh about 27 grams (about 1 ounce). Close analysis of the faces of the coins showed details of the Jerusalem Cross with the Quartered Shield of Castles and Lions, a symbol of Castile and Leon, within a dotted border, the study said. Historic Treasure Trove Of Gold, Jewelry Found In Czech Forest Details of the Crowned Pillars of Hercules above the waves of the sea could be seen on the coins' opposite side. According to the study, between the pillars of Hercules was an "L" indicating the coins were minted in Lima, Peru. An "8" on the coins proved they were the highest value of coins created at the time; an "H" referenced the mark of Francisco de Hurtado, the Chief Assayer in 1707. Shipwreck Found In Lake Superior Sank In 1940 During Storm, Taking Captain Down With It The year of minting was noted by a "707", meaning the coins were minted in 1707. These details indicate the shipwreck happened in 1708 and helps point to the route the ship took prior to its sinking. The study said the evidence supports the identification of the wreck as the San José article source: Photos show possible treasure from 300-year-old 'holy grail' of shipwrecks off Colombia
