Ottawa planning 'up-front' approval for projects deemed in the national interest
Social Sharing
The Liberal government will introduce legislation to assist in identifying projects in the national interest and provide "up-front regulatory approvals" to major projects, according to a federal document obtained by CBC News.
"Once a project is determined to be in the national interest, federal reviews will shift from 'whether' to build these projects to 'how' to best advance them," the document reads.
"It will streamline multiple decision points for federal approval and minimize the risk of not securing project approval following extensive project work."
The document was prepared by the Privy Council Office (PCO) and shared with Indigenous groups to outline the aims of proposed legislation. The PCO is the lead branch of the civil service, providing support to the prime minister and the cabinet.
The document states the legislation is likely to be introduced in early June. The Globe and Mail first reported this Thursday.
The legislation aims to create "a more flexible" regulatory framework for project approvals. Rather than a number of departments involved in the approval process, only one designated minister and department would be responsible for issuing a "conditions document" that would act as a project permit, the PCO document says.
In an exclusive interview with CBC's Power & Politics this week, Prime Minister Mark Carney emphasized that approving "major projects" will be a priority for his government.
"We need to move on these nation-building projects. So projects that bring Canada together, projects that diversify our economy, projects that help us export to new markets and really move this economy forward," Carney told host David Cochrane.
"The ask of provinces, the ask of the private sector is: Which projects do you have that reach those criteria? What we're going to do is fast-track the approval."
WATCH | Carney says 'more will be done' on energy:
Carney says 'more will be done' on energy, but conversation isn't all about pipelines
2 days ago
Duration 3:52
Asked by CBC's Power & Politics host David Cochrane about the separatist sentiment in Alberta, Prime Minister Mark Carney says his government is 'committed' to working with Canadians across the country.
The PCO document indicated that the government will consider a project within the national interest if it makes "an exceptional contribution to Canada's prosperity, advances economic security, defence security and national autonomy through improved movement of goods, services and people."
Project approval was a significant part of last week's throne speech read by King Charles. The speech promised to "unleash a new era of growth" by creating a federal project review office and reducing regulatory reviews "from five years to two."
Despite the proposed changes, the PCO document said fast-tracking project approvals will still respect the government's legal obligations to Indigenous communities, specifically the duty to consult.
Environmental group concerned
Reacting to the document, which makes no mention of climate change or protecting nature, Greenpeace Canada issued a statement saying it raises concerns.
"Moving quickly shouldn't mean moving in the wrong direction," said the environmental group's senior energy strategist, Keith Stewart.
"To truly honour the government's commitment to uphold world-leading environmental standards and respect Indigenous rights, it should be focusing on projects that address climate change and the affordability crisis, rather than fast-tracking the expansion of harmful fossil fuels."
"We need green grids and affordable homes, not new pipelines."
The document mentions the need for "mines, nuclear facilities, ports," but does not refer to low-carbon energy projects, such as a national electricity grid.
Carney told Power & Politics that "more needs to be done" to support Canada's energy sector, but said the conversation should go beyond pipelines.
"Canadians, yes, they want energy pipelines that make sense. They also want connections between our clean grids. They want actually less carbon, so they want carbon capture and storage … they want broader [mineral exporting] corridors, for example ... that open up whole swaths of the country to new trade so that we are sovereign in the most important components of the future," the prime minister said.
"All of those things are possible."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
30 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Wondering If UPS' 6.7%-Yielding Dividend Is Sustainable? Here's What You Need to Know.
I've read several articles recently suggesting that United Parcel Service (NYSE: UPS) should cut its dividend. The reasoning is that the world's largest package delivery company could create more value for shareholders if it did. While the idea of a dividend cut might be appealing to some, I suspect many income investors won't like it one bit. If you're in that group, you might be wondering if UPS' 6.7%-yielding dividend is sustainable. Here's what you need to know. Reasons for concern If UPS already had ample financial flexibility to fund its dividend and invest in growth, you probably wouldn't hear anyone talk about a potential dividend cut. The reality, though, is that there are some reasons for concern. Let's start with the dividend payout ratio. The closer this ratio is to 100%, the more precarious a company's dividend is. UPS' dividend payout ratio is a little over 95%. However, sometimes dividend payout ratios can be misleading. Why? They're based on earnings, which don't always give the best picture of a company's ability to fund its dividend program. Earnings can be weighed down by non-cash charges such as amortization and depreciation. A better metric to look at is free cash flow. In the first quarter of 2025, UPS generated free cash flow of nearly $1.5 billion. It paid $1.35 billion in dividends during the quarter. The company's payout ratio based on free cash flow is 90%. That gives UPS a little more breathing room to pay its dividend, but it's still not great. I also noticed that UPS Carol Tomé didn't talk about the dividend in the Q1 earnings call. But in the 2024 Q4 call, she said that the company had "plenty of liquidity to pay the dividend." It could be reading something between the lines that isn't there, but the absence of any discussion about management's commitment to the dividend could trigger a not-so-warm-and-fuzzy feeling for some income investors. Encouraging news Want some encouraging news for income investors? I have some for you. UPS' decision to slash its Amazon shipping volume in half by mid-2026 will help in several ways. The company plans to reduce total operational hours by roughly 25 million hours. It's cutting around 20,000 positions this year. UPS is closing 73 buildings by the end of June, with a total of 164 closures in the first phase of its network reconfiguration. Granted, reducing shipments for Amazon will also result in lower revenue. However, the reason behind the move was that this business isn't very profitable. UPS expects its operating margin and profitability to increase as a result of the Amazon glide-down. In addition, the package delivery giant has embarked on a major efficiency improvement project. UPS is using robots to automate label application, sorting, unloading and loading trailers, and more. By the end of 2025, the company expects to have 400 facilities partially or fully automated. With both the Amazon reductions and the efficiency improvements, UPS thinks it's on track to cut costs by $3.5 billion in 2025. This should boost free cash flow to some extent. The Trump administration's tariffs might not hurt UPS as much as anticipated, either. The U.S. International Court of Trade and the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia ruled last week that the president can't unilaterally impose some tariffs based on the International Economic Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA). Although the tariffs remain in place while the administration appeals the decisions, these court rulings could be upheld. Is UPS' dividend sustainable? So, is UPS' juicy dividend sustainable? I think so. That doesn't mean the company's board of directors won't ultimately decide to cut the dividend. However, at least for now, they don't necessarily have to make that call. And if the Amazon glide-down and efficient improvement initiatives pay off as much as expected, maybe UPS won't have to seriously consider a dividend cut for a long time to come, if ever. Should you invest $1,000 in United Parcel Service right now? Before you buy stock in United Parcel Service, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and United Parcel Service wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to171%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of May 19, 2025
Globe and Mail
35 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Lumina Gold Announces US$6.0 Million Wheaton Precious Draw
VANCOUVER, BC , Dec. 2, 2024 /CNW/ - Lumina Gold Corp. (TSXV: LUM) (OTCQB: LMGDF) (the "Company" or "Lumina") is pleased to announce that under the previously announced US$300 million precious metals purchase agreement (the "PMPA") with Wheaton Precious Metals International Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of Wheaton Precious Metals Corp., the Company has drawn an additional installment of US$6.0 million . The Company has now drawn US$44.9 million and can draw up to an additional US$3.1 million for specific pre-construction capital items. Investor Relations The Company is also pleased to announce that it has retained Oak Hill Financial Inc. ("Oak Hill") to provide investor relations services at a rate of C$10,000 per month for an initial three-month term beginning in January 2025 , then continuing month to month at the Company's election. Oak Hill will help Lumina to effectively communicate its latest corporate milestones with potential new investors, and further engage with the investment community on behalf of the Company. Oak Hill is an arms-length party to the Company and does not currently hold any interest in the securities of the Company (either directly or indirectly) nor does it hold any rights or options to acquire such an interest. Oak Hill is a leading Canadian investor marketing and distribution and corporate advisory firm, based in Ontario , focused on IIROC retail brokerage networks, servicing both asset managers and public companies. Oak Hill's experienced team of former asset management wholesalers, research analysts and capital market professionals specialize in building credibility for their clients to a network of over 10,000 Canadian IIROC retail brokers and over 300 North American funds. About Lumina Gold Lumina Gold Corp. (TSXV: LUM) is a Vancouver, Canada based precious and base metals development company focused on the Cangrejos Gold-Copper Project located in El Oro Province, southwest Ecuador . In 2023, the Company completed a Pre-Feasibility Study for Cangrejos, which is the largest primary gold deposit in Ecuador . Lumina has an experienced management team with a successful track record of advancing and monetizing exploration projects. Follow us on: Twitter, Linkedin or Facebook. Further details are available on the Company's website at To receive future news releases please sign up at LUMINA GOLD CORP. Marshall Koval , President & CEO, Director Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this news release. Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Information Certain statements and information herein, including all statements that are not historical facts, contain forward-looking statements and forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities laws. Such forward-looking statements or information include but are not limited to statements or information with respect to: the Company's ability to draw up to an additional US$3.1 million for specific pre-construction capital items, the Company's engagement of Oak Hill and the services to be provided . Often, but not always, forward-looking statements or information can be identified by the use of words such as "will" or "projected" or variations of those words or statements that certain actions, events or results "will", "could", "are proposed to", "are planned to", "are expected to" or "are anticipated to" be taken, occur or be achieved. With respect to forward-looking statements and information contained herein, the Company has made numerous assumptions including among other things, assumptions about: the Company's ability to meet its obligations under the PMPA; general business and economic conditions; the prices of gold and copper; and anticipated costs and expenditures. The foregoing list of assumptions is not exhaustive. Although management of the Company believes that the assumptions made and the expectations represented by such statements or information are reasonable, there can be no assurance that a forward-looking statement or information herein will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking statements and information by their nature are based on assumptions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the Company's actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements or information. These factors include, but are not limited to: risks associated with the business of the Company; business and economic conditions in the mining industry generally; the supply and demand for labour and other project inputs; changes in commodity prices; changes in interest and currency exchange rates; risks relating to inaccurate geological and engineering assumptions (including with respect to the tonnage, grade and recoverability of reserves and resources); risks relating to unanticipated operational difficulties (including failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications or expectations, cost escalation, unavailability of materials and equipment, government action or delays in the receipt of government approvals, industrial disturbances or other job action, and unanticipated events related to health, safety and environmental matters); risks relating to adverse weather conditions; political risk and social unrest; changes in general economic conditions or conditions in the financial markets; and other risk factors as detailed from time to time in the Company's continuous disclosure documents filed with Canadian securities administrators. The Company does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
‘Mission impossible': Why the Bank of Canada faces ‘risky' June rate decision
The Bank of Canada is set for an interest rate decision on Wednesday. Tiff Macklem, governor of the central bank, holds a press conference at the Bank of Canada in Ottawa on Wednesday, March 12, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick OTTAWA — OTTAWA — Few would confuse Hollywood action star Tom Cruise with Bank of Canada governor Tiff Macklem. But while Cruise rides a plane in tailspin to his latest box office smash, some economists say Macklem finds himself in his own high-stakes circumstances with the central bank's interest rate decision on Wednesday. Macklem's mission is to chart a path for interest rates that keeps Canada's economy afloat at a precarious moment without straying from its inflation-taming mandate. 'It really is mission impossible,' said Andrew DiCapua, principal economist at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. The latest data show price pressures could be building up again in Canada at the same time some economists warn of a tariff-induced slowdown on the horizon, pulling monetary policy in opposite directions. 'The bank really is in a difficult position here, but they really should be resuming rate cuts to get their interest rates lower to somewhere around two per cent, again, to cushion the Canadian economy for what's to come,' DiCapua argued. The Bank of Canada's policy rate stands at 2.75 per cent following a pause at the central bank's last decision in April, snapping a streak of seven consecutive cuts. Most economists expect the central bank will hold rates again on Wednesday. In April, Macklem said the Bank of Canada would pause issuing any formal forecasts and be less forward-looking than usual until it gained more certainty on how the economy would react to ever-shifting tariff threats. President Donald Trump threw a new wrench into the gears of global trade late Friday when he announced plans to double existing tariffs on steel and aluminum entering the United States to 50 per cent starting Wednesday. After Statistics Canada reported a surprisingly strong 2.2 per cent annualized rise in real gross domestic product for the first quarter on Friday, money markets were betting overwhelmingly in favour of another rate hold this week. BMO last week firmed up its call for another hold in response to the latest economic data, now projecting a cut to instead come in July. 'The key point here is that the GDP figures are sending no obvious distress signals so far in 2025,' BMO chief economist Doug Porter said in a note to clients. But the question for some economists isn't what the economy has done — it's what comes next. The Bank of Canada's own surveys of businesses published in early April showed sentiment was 'sharply' lower amid the tariff uncertainty, with many firms putting investment and hiring plans on hold. StatCan said the main reason Canada's economy was growing in the first quarter was because many businesses were trying to rush ahead of the tariffs, ramping up exports and stockpiling inventories. Macklem said at the G7 Finance Ministers' Summit in Kananaskis, Alta., last month that the Bank of Canada was expecting a run-up in economic activity in the first quarter, but that the months that follow 'will be quite a bit weaker.' 'They're really waiting for a shoe to drop, so to speak,' said DiCapua. There were early signs of economic pain in the April jobs figures released last month, with the trade-sensitive manufacturing sector contracting by roughly 31,000 positions and the unemployment rate rising two ticks to 6.9 per cent. A slowing economy usually takes the steam out of inflation as Canadians swap spending for saving, but April inflation data showed underlying price pressures were instead heating up. Cutting interest rates can encourage businesses and consumers to spend — mitigating an economic hit — but also risks fuelling inflationary pressures. 'Outside of the current situation that we're in, I would say that the Bank of Canada should be holding interest rates,' DiCapua said. 'But the data that we are seeing come in, especially through the labour market ... is going to move the Canadian economy into a very weak position that should keep prices at bay. So it's kind of a risky balance here.' Stephen Brown, deputy chief North America economist at Capital Economics, said he expects the central bank will deliver three more quarter-point cuts at every other decision to bring the policy rate down to two per cent before the end of the year. 'Our view at Capital Economics is that it's worth cutting again in June as insurance against those downside risks and try and protect the economy a bit,' he said. There are also 'psychological' reasons for a June cut, Brown argued. Should the Bank of Canada keep rates elevated, businesses and consumers may hold back even more on their spending decisions, which can become a self-fulfilling prophecy that weakens the economy. 'If the bank doesn't cut here, because they're still very concerned about inflation, that's telling businesses and consumers that the bank doesn't necessarily have their back,' Brown said. CIBC chief economist Avery Shenfeld is among those calling for a rate hold this week. He said he sees the case for an interest rate cut too, but doesn't think the Bank of Canada's June decision is its final reckoning. 'No one interest rate decision in isolation would ever be a fatal error one way or the other, but I think the clock will start to tick louder on getting some interest rate relief if the economy remains soft,' Shenfeld said. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 2, 2025. Craig Lord, The Canadian Press
