
Parties' selection of candidates for Presidential election becoming a late late show
By the end of May 1990, Mary Robinson had already been endorsed as the formal Labour and Workers' Party candidate for the presidential election in November of that year.
By contrast, coming into the last week of May 2025, just two independent candidates have declared they will seek to contest this year's November election: the Donegal businessman Peter Casey and the MMA fighter Conor McGregor.
While many names have been bandied around, political parties are only entering the foothills of their preparations. There has been a lot of shadowboxing and speculation, but little real movement so farto begin the process of choosing preferred candidates.
The pattern of when presidential candidates are announced is not consistent. In 1997, the identities of all six candidates were not revealed until late September. When Robinson stood in 1990, the Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael candidates, Brian Lenihan and Austin Currie, were not put forward until mid-September.
READ MORE
In 2011, the last presidential election where an incumbent wasn't a candidate, most of the runners declared early. David Norris, the early favourite, announced his candidacy that January. The eventual winner, Michael D Higgins, was officially endorsed by Labour in June; Fine Gael's Gay Mitchell in July. By then, two Independent candidates, Mary Davis and Seán Gallagher, had also declared.
Bertie Ahern and former minister Mary Hanafin have been mentioned, but colleagues are concerned about their association with the era of economic collapse
What is evident this year is that the bigger parties are holding back. It looks very much like it could be late summer or September when they, and a combination of parties on the left, finalise their candidates.
Part of the waiting game is strategic. 'If we are running a candidate, we should not aim to have everything ready to go until early September,' says a senior Fianna Fáil source.
The other reason for tarrying is intrinsic to what the Fianna Fáiler has just said. The question the party has to put to itself is whether or not it runs a candidate at all. The last time there was an official Fianna Fáil candidate was 28 years ago in 1997, when Mary McAleese was its candidate.
Sinn Féin faces the same quandary for different reasons. It had a dismal presidential election campaign in 2018, with its candidate Liadh Ní Riada receiving only 6.4 per cent of the vote, well below her party's support levels.
Richard Moore is a political communications adviser with direct experience of two presidential campaigns, those of Gay Mitchell in 2011 and Gavin Duffy in 2018. He says the first crucial decision for all the parties is whether they will even go to the starting line.
'Will the party be willing to run a candidate and burn €500,000 on a campaign? There's a risk there unless they are satisfied that their candidate will outperform the party's support (levels),' he says.
At this moment, only one party, Fine Gael, is certain to run its own candidate. Its executive council said this week that it will 'decide in the coming weeks the timeline and process for the selection of a Fine Gael candidate for the forthcoming presidential election'.
The names of two prominent party members – Mairéad McGuinness and Seán Kelly – are frequently mentioned. Party grandee Heather Humphreys this week announced she will not put her name forward. The probable candidate is the former EU Commissioner McGuinness, who also sought a nomination in 2011.
And what of Fianna Fáil? When you speak to its TDs, there are mixed views. Some point to the lack of an obvious candidate. 'I don't think there is any benefit in us contesting the election,' says one Minister of State bluntly.
Theirs is a minority view, however. Another TD argued that Fianna Fáil, as the largest party, should run a candidate, but that finding one will be difficult.
There are many nuances. The electorate can switch very quickly to another candidate if you say something that is controversial or make a mistake
Former taoiseach Bertie Ahern and former minister Mary Hanafin have been mentioned, but colleagues are concerned about their association with the era of economic collapse, which caused huge reputational damage to the party. Either could face uncomfortable questioning during a campaign that is often fractious and quite personalised.
Former ceann comhairle Seán Ó Fearghaíl, who is respected across party lines, has been mentioned but he quickly dismissed the prospect. 'Not in a million years, not under any circumstances,' he said. 'It's for not me. It's not where I want to be.'
So where should Fianna Fáil go? Ó Fearghaíl expresses a view that is shared by many of his colleagues: 'I do think the party should run a candidate, but it may need to look outside the fold to find somebody.'
That somebody would not be the Fine Gael candidate, whoever emerges. 'We can't ask our supporters to vote for Fine Gael,' said a Dublin Fianna Fáil TD. 'I just don't see many of them voting that way in the first instance.'
But as yet, no high-profile person has yet been identified or targeted by the party.
An outside candidate is the route down which Sinn Féin might ultimately go. It has been seeking internal feedback this month, with a letter sent to the membership asking them to become involved in a process that would 'help inform the leadership on the proposed route forward in relation to the upcoming Presidential Election'.
Earlier this year, the party's MP for North Belfast, John Finucane, was mentioned as a possibility, but the party seems to have cooled on that idea.
Sinn Féin has been involved in talks with the Social Democrats, Labour, People Before Profit and the Green Party on exploring a possible consensus left-wing candidate. Several names have been mentioned: Senator Frances Black, SDLP leader Claire Hanna and Independent TD Catherine Connolly.
In mid-May, Dr Mike Ryan, former deputy director of the World Health Organisation, became the latest well-known figure to be targeted by political parties for a potential presidential run. It is understood he has not been approached and has not considered the question as he is taking some time off.
Another potential big-beast candidate, Independent Senator Michael McDowell, has ruled himself out. The former minister for justice told The Irish Times: 'I'm not going to run.'
He said he has come to the conclusion that the Upper House is the place where he could most usefully serve.
For Moore, the election is never about parties, or policies, or issues, it's about the qualities that mark out the best candidate.
'The tribal loyalty towards parties is well and truly shot,' he says. 'My own view is that it ended with Brian Lenihan in 1990 (when the Fianna Fáil candidate was caught out in a lie that put paid to his campaign, over his attempt to persuade president Patrick Hillery not to dissolve the Dáil back in 1982).
'The Irish electorate is sophisticated and understands politics. They want somebody as President who will be presentable and not let the country down.
'The candidate has to be authentic and genuine and be able to show their qualities in the heat of the battle and under fierce media scrutiny.'
Will the party be willing to run a candidate and burn €500,000 on a campaign? There's a risk there unless they are satisfied that their candidate will outperform the party's support
There are a litany of candidates who started off as favourites and became also-rans during the course of bruising and intrusive campaigns: Brian Lenihan, Adi Roche, Mary Davis, David Norris and Seán Gallagher.
'On the face of it, it looks like a simple election,' adds Moore. 'There are many nuances. The electorate can switch very quickly to another candidate if you say something that is controversial or make a mistake.
'It's a much more difficult election than a general election in my view.'
There is no hard and fast rule on the optimum time to declare. Several interviewees remarked that the name of the next President has not even entered the public domain yet. For observers like Moore, however, that should take place sooner rather than later.
'In September, you run the risk of leaving it too late unless you have a superstar. Sure, the campaign will be short and sharp for all candidates, but you need to have a profile established before that,' he says.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Corporate tax receipts drop 30% as Trump's tariffs bite
Corporate tax receipts fell by 30 per cent in May, amounting to a loss of over €1.1 billion when compared to the same month last year, amid signs US tariffs may be denting the profitability of multinationals in Ireland. The latest exchequer returns for May, published by the Department of Finance, indicated that the Government collected just under €2.5 billion in corporate taxes last month, compared to almost €3.6 billion in May last year. The department insisted, however, that 'once-off factors' had boosted receipts in May last year which distorted the year-on-year comparison. Nonetheless with most EU exports currently facing a 10 per cent levy in the US, possibly rising to 50 per cent if negotiations between Brussels and Washington fail, exporting companies here may be predicting lower earnings READ MORE [ Subscriber Only Opinion Ireland cannot base its economic strategy on the 'Taco' theory – Trump Always Chickens Out Opens in new window ] On a cumulative basis, receipts from the business tax were up by €1.1 billion at €7.4 billion but this reflects once-off revenues from the EU court ruling against Apple. When they are removed, corporate tax receipts to the end of May were down 9.4 per cent at €5.7 billion. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said: ' May is one of the more important months for tax revenues, and the steady growth in most tax headings points to an economy that is in a relatively good position." 'The most notable feature of the May exchequer returns was in respect of corporation tax, which saw a marked year-on-year drop,' he said. 'While this reflects once-off factors last year, it nonetheless highlights the degree of concentration in the corporate tax base, wherein a small number of multinational firms can significantly impact on the overall tax yield,' Mr Donohoe said. 'In a context of unprecedented uncertainty in the international economic landscape, this serves as a timely reminder of Ireland's exposure to changes in the global trading environment, and of the vital importance of adhering to a sensible and sustainable budgetary strategy,' he said. Overall the latest exchequer data show the Government collected €38.2 billion in tax revenue during the first five months of the year. This was up nearly €3 billion or 8.5 per cent on the same period last year aided by positive increases in income tax and VAT. Income tax receipts, the Government's largest tax channel, generated €14.5 billion, €630 million more than last year, reflecting the State's strong labour market. Separate figures, published on Thursday, put the headline rate of unemployment near a historic low of 4 per cent. VAT receipts for the year so far were also up by €600 million at €11.4 billion. The sales tax reflects consumer activity. On the spending side, total gross voted expenditure for the five-month period amounted to just under €42 billion, up by €3.1 billion (8.1 per cent) on last year and €37 million (0.1 per cent) behind profile. At a headline level, an exchequer surplus of €4 billion was recorded compared to a surplus of €0.8 billion last year, an improvement of €3.2 billion. Excluding the once-off receipts arising from the Apple tax case, the underlying surplus was €0.7 billion.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Suspended solicitor's appeal over professional misconduct finding to be heard in July
A date has been fixed next month for an appeal by suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan over findings of professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a land deal in Co Mayo. On Friday, the president of the High Court, Mr Justice David Barniville, set a provisional hearing date of July 23rd for the appeal. Barrister Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, said he expected it to run for two days and Mr O'Callaghan would be among his side's witnesses. Barrister Ruadhán Ó Ciaráin, for Nirvanna, the concrete products manufacturer that brought the complaint against Mr O'Callaghan over the 2007 land deal to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, said it is expected to call two witnesses at most. READ MORE Last month, Mr Justice Barniville rejected a challenge by Mr O'Callaghan over the procedures adopted by the tribunal in reaching its findings last year of professional misconduct over the 2007 deal. On Friday, he made an order requiring Mr O'Callaghan to pay Nirvanna's costs in opposing that application. The rejection of Mr O'Callaghan's judicial review-type challenge cleared the way for the hearing of his full appeal. If he loses that appeal, the High Court will then consider whether or not to grant an application by the Law Society to strike him off. The society has agreed with the tribunal recommendation that Mr O'Callaghan be struck off, but the final decision on whether or not to grant a strike-off order must be made by the High Court president. The three-member tribunal last summer found Mr O'Callaghan guilty of four counts of professional misconduct over his handling of the 2007 land deal involving Nirvanna, a company of Co Mayo businessman Tom Fleming. [ Declan O'Callaghan: No end in sight as saga of suspended solicitor continues Opens in new window ] Now aged 80, Mr Fleming claimed Nirvanna never received €250,000 for selling the land to a now-deceased businessman. Mr O'Callaghan denied the sum was owed, and disputed the transaction was for 'sale' of the lands. The tribunal upheld the Nirvanna complaint, finding professional misconduct on grounds Mr O'Callaghan breached his duty of care to the company, provided inadequate professional services, and purported to act for vendor and purchaser in a transaction where there was 'a clear conflict of interest'. In recommending strike-off, it had regard to two findings of professional misconduct previously made by it in 1990 and 2019 against Mr O'Callaghan. He has been suspended as a solicitor since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now-defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon. The suspension was imposed pending a tribunal hearing of the society's application for an inquiry into matters arising from its investigation. Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report for that investigation included that Mr O'Callaghan withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child.

Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Windfarm must shut down three turbines and pay €360,000 damages to couple, High Court orders
A Co Wexford wind farm must fully shut down three of its six turbines and pay a total €360,000 damages, including €60,000 aggravated damages, to a couple over its adverse impact on them, a High Court judge has ordered. ABO Energy Ireland Ltd and ABO Energy O&M Ireland Ltd, operators of the wind farm at Gibbett Hill, near Bunclody, along with its owner, Wexwind Ltd, also face a potential legal costs bill of €2.3 million incurred by Raymond Byrne and Lorna Moorhead in their proceedings. Mr Justice Oisín Quinn refused to grant a stay, pending appeal, which would permit the three turbines closest to the couple's home to partially operate over certain fixed hours. The defendants failed to engage 'in any meaningful way' with the 'genuine and substantive' complaints made by the couple over 12 years since the turbines began operating in 2013, he said. READ MORE The defendants' 'seriously unimpressive' approach represented a threat to the goal of developing wind farms and wind energy here, he said. Addressing wind turbine noise in a substantial way was seen as 'critical' to the future success of wind as a major source of renewable energy. The trial had heard engineers and other experts are used to engaging with nearby residents and others and there are 'usually many solutions available', short of shutting down wind turbines, he noted. The defendants' approach merited aggravated damages, he said, but he would not award exemplary damages for reasons including the impact of the shut down order and positive behaviour of the defendants during the trial, including their admitting liability for nuisance on day 11 of the hearing. In their proceedings, the couple claimed the defendants wrongfully caused or permitted noise, vibration and shadow flicker to be emitted from the wind farm which caused, and continues to cause them, stress, anxiety and sleep disturbance, 'destroyed' the use and enjoyment of their property and devalued it. Represented by John Rogers SC, instructed by solicitor Joe Noonan, they initiated their action in 2018. The defendants had contested the claims but, last March, on the 11th day of the hearing of their full action, the defence admitted liability in relation to the claims of nuisance and they switched off the turbines from 10pm to 7am daily. At the end of the six week trial on April 4th, the defendants apologised for the nuisance and said they would also switch off the turbines from 7am to 11am at weekends and public holidays, pay damages for nuisance to date and into the future and address shadow flicker. In his 100 page judgment, Mr Justice Quinn said the plaintiffs' expert evidence was that the nuisance was 'one of the worst cases of wind farm noise impact' while the defence expert said it was 'an outlier'. He awarded annual damages of €10,000 and €15,000 respectively to Mr Byrne and Ms Moorhead for the 12 years of the nuisance from May 2013, meaning €120,000 and €180,000 general damages respectively. It was not appropriate to permit the defendants to pay additional damages rather than have the three turbines shut down, he held. The 'fair, just and appropriate' outcome was a permanent order directing their full shut down as that was the only order which would prevent what the defendants admitted was a serious nuisance. If an evidential basis for a solution, or combination of solutions, had been put forward by the defendants, that could have avoided the full shutdown of the turbines, he said. His conclusions, he stressed, were limited to the circumstances of this case, including the defendants decision to 'largely ignore' and then fail to engage in any meaningful way with a 'substantial and serious problem' they had belatedly admitted.