Our school curriculum still treats black African identity as a problem to be managed
Each June 16, we reprise our remembrance of the Soweto Uprising. We return to the haunting images of 1976 not only to honour the courage of the youth who rose up against injustice, but also to ask difficult, often uncomfortable questions about the state of education and social justice in South Africa today.
We bow our heads, quote Steve Biko, remember Hector Pieterson, and speak in solemn tones about freedom. But beneath this ritualised remembrance, in classrooms across the country – the very battlegrounds of 1976 – the foundations of injustice remain disturbingly intact.
Nearly 50 years after the Soweto Uprising, we must confront a hard truth: South Africa's education system remains structurally rooted in colonial and apartheid logic. Yes, the signage of apartheid has been removed. The language of the curriculum has shifted. The word transformation appears prominently in policy documents.
But the philosophical architecture, the very logic that shaped and continues to shape our schooling, remains steeped in coloniality. We did not rebuild the system from the ground up. Instead, we covered the cracks with cosmetic reforms, while ignoring the deep rot at its core.
The post-apartheid state has invested billions in education: building schools, training teachers, and integrating technology. Yet educational outcomes remain starkly unequal. Literacy levels are declining. Socioeconomic disparities persist.
And increasingly, learners feel alienated from what they are taught. The question is no longer 'how much are we spending?' but rather, 'what vision is guiding our investment?'
As the late Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o reminds us, 'Education is never neutral. It is always a function of the kind of society we want.' And therein lies our dilemma. We have failed to ask, in genuinely African terms: What kind of society are we trying to build? What kind of human being are we trying to cultivate?
Had we asked these questions honestly, we would have to acknowledge that the system was never designed to affirm the African child – instead, it was designed to alienate them. Hendrik Verwoerd, the chief architect of Bantu Education, made this explicit: the aim was not ignorance, but subordination. The goal was to mould black African learners into instruments of an anti-black economy: obedient, decontextualised and denied full human dignity.
Today, this process continues under different guises. The dominance of English, and the language of 'access', 'efficiency' and 'standardisation' serve as smokescreens for an untransformed system.
As Lwazi Lushaba argues, transformation is not about inviting the oppressed into colonial structures, it is about dismantling those structures entirely. Simphiwe Sesanti puts it more plainly: education in Africa must be rooted in African knowledge systems, not superficially adorned with cultural symbols, but fundamentally reimagined.
The current curriculum still treats black African identity as a problem to be managed. Learners encounter themselves through distorted lenses: as passive victims of history, as poor but resilient, or as cultural artefacts within a globalised world. This creates a disconnection from learning because the deeper assumptions shaping education in South Africa continue to reflect Western paradigms.
The late Kwasi Wiredu offered an alternative: conceptual decolonisation. This is not about token changes, but a radical shift in the frameworks we use to think. We cannot decolonise the curriculum while maintaining the very ideologies that diminish African ways of knowing. We must ask: What counts as knowledge? What is truth? Who is allowed to speak and in what language?
Language remains one of the most visible failures of the democratic era. Despite official commitments to multilingualism, English remains the gatekeeper. Learners are often subtly, or even overtly, rewarded for distancing themselves from their mother tongues.
Yet, as Mamokgethi Setati and Jill Adler have shown in their work on mathematics classrooms, language is more than a communication tool, it is a way of seeing, knowing, and being. Teaching mathematics or science in a foreign language does not merely slow comprehension; it fragments learners' cognitive and cultural identity. It teaches them that their home languages are suitable for jokes and prayers, but not for physics or philosophy.
This is the silent work of coloniality. It does not need to outlaw isiXhosa or Sesotho. It only needs to convince children that these languages are unfit for serious intellectual thought. And in doing so, it teaches them to doubt the value of their own minds.
That is why Molefi Kete Asante's call for Afrocentricity is so urgent. Afrocentricity is not nostalgia. It is a reorientation of knowledge production. It demands that African learners are not peripheral observers, but central agents in shaping what knowledge is and how it should be taught.
This echoes economist Samir Amin's call for economic delinking from the Global North. In education, we need a similar form of epistemic delinking, a refusal to accept European thought as the universal standard. This also means taking seriously the warnings of J Ndlovu-Gatsheni, who speaks of the 'coloniality of being': the lingering effects of colonialism on how we imagine ourselves and each other long after the colonisers have left.
So what are we really commemorating this Youth Day? If we are still schooling our youth into silence, into shame, into intellectual subjugation, then we are not honouring the legacy of 1976, we are betraying it.
This moment calls for more than memorial lectures, themed assemblies and hashtags. It calls for rupture. For refusal. For a radical reimagining of education not as a pathway into someone else's world, but as a means of reclaiming our own.
We must summon the courage to set aside borrowed tools and begin building with the raw materials of our own histories, languages, and philosophies. Only then, when we begin to rebuild education from the ground up on foundations that affirm African life and thought, can we truly say that we remember. DM
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
an hour ago
- Daily Maverick
Xenophobia is an attack on democratic life and must be stopped (Part 1)
To voice xenophobic statements and behaviour, as Gayton McKenzie has done, is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans, because freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. (Part one of a two-part series on xenophobia and democracy.) Gayton McKenzie's recent xenophobic statements have evoked some concern among political commentators and sections of the public. He is reported to have said that 'some of you here (have) the audacity to hire foreigners instead of South Africans'; 'I don't care how you used to do it. But for as long as I am the minister, there will be no foreigner that will work in an entity while a South African can do the same thing.'; and 'foreigners' employed by government departments needed to be 'out in three weeks… I said it, I want them out, get them out'. His utterances are not surprising since he has made similar public remarks before, and then, as now, there's been no remark from other members of the Government of National Unity (GNU) or the president himself. McKenzie, the leader of the Patriotic Alliance and Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture in the GNU, repeatedly enters this terrain — without facing consequences. We need to be clear why it is wrong to scapegoat poor people from other countries in the Global South. It's important to understand why we should be concerned as patriots and believers in democracy, not simply to remove McKenzie from the Cabinet and other individual expressions of displeasure. One of the reasons we should be concerned goes to the basis of freedom in South Africa, that the country, in the words of the Freedom Charter a nd the 1996 Constitution, belongs to all who live in it. That was first expressed in the Freedom Charter in 1955, and the charter was completely at odds with the notion of citizenship that came to be applied under apartheid South Africa. Then, all black people — and African people particularly — were denationalised and told, in the case of Africans, that their nationhood would be realised in the Bantustans, demarcated for African occupation and 'self-determination'. In post-apartheid South Africa, the emphasis on active and free citizens has itself contributed to denationalisation in that there is — in this discourse — no place allotted for people who have full rights as foreign nationals to participate in the South African body politic without being citizens. It was surprisingly part of the discourse of former UDF leaders when they celebrated the 40th anniversary of the front in 2023. (See here and here). We have to remedy this slippage and ensure the full rights of migrants to be present here, subject to them having relevant papers and not being without these due to the delay of Department of Home Affairs officials. If one says that freedom and liberties are allotted purely to those who have South African citizenship, you are running against the key principles of South African freedom which did not distinguish between the liberties of those who are citizens by virtue of birth in South Africa, and those who acquired rights to freedom in this country through other means. The notion of freedom advanced in South Africa derives from universalism, a desire to bring all people under its banner. This is not to say that there are not any rights allotted purely to citizens, but it is important that we put that in the context of South Africa belonging to all who live in this country. Hurtful attacks Freedom belongs to all, obviously — it is not freedom when some people are excluded. We must find the modalities for working this out in a way that does not repeatedly create hurtful attacks on foreign nationals, as with the poisonous food allegedly emanating from some of the spaza shops run by foreign nationals. When one examines the evidence, it's clear that a lower threshold is applied in making a claim of criminality against people who are foreign nationals. That lack of basic respect must end. It is important that we do not restrict our commentary on Gayton McKenzie's statements to whether or not he should remain a member of the Cabinet. McKenzie might be removed from the Cabinet, although it seems unlikely in the light of the low weight that is placed on xenophobic statements. But the problem of xenophobia remains. It will continue to be a serious question in that there is no clarity as to why or whether xenophobia is wrong, or whether we are confronted by xenophobic incidents in South Africa. It's important that we have people grow up in a country that does not condone any statements that are part of racism, and which does not require that the victim should be a citizen. There are certain values, mainly in regard to apartheid manifestations, but it does not seem to be a recognised moral question in people's minds to see xenophobia as serious wrongdoing. That must be remedied, because to voice xenophobic statements and behaviour is to spit on the freedom of all South Africans because, as mentioned earlier, freedom is universal. Excluding some means we do not have freedom. Naming Consequently, while the remedying of the question of xenophobia can be treated separately, it may be that it will not start to happen until the democratic foundations of the country are restored more generally. Commentary on xenophobia is inhibited by the hypersensitivity of ANC politicians who insist, as many autocrats have done in the past, on demanding that xenophobia is not called by that name. For example, then Police minister Nathi Mthethwa on 15 July 2010 said 'there is no such systematic thing as xenophobia in the country' and that violence against foreign nationals was perpetrated by 'criminal elements'. Just prior to this, the South African Communist Party stated that 'these are not xenophobic attacks… but acts of criminality'. It is simply crime in some cases, but generally there is a simple failure to treat xenophobia as a hate crime or other form of criminality. Feminists such as Adrienne Rich and African-American writers like James Baldwin have recognised the power of naming more generally, the name having a crucial impact on how a struggle or other phenomena are understood. Liberation movements were called terrorists by their opponents, and much of the discourse of the ANC and other liberation movements demanded that they be called by their name, freedom fighters, or alternatively a more neutral term like insurgents or armed militants. The power of naming is important for any attempt to combat xenophobia to succeed, because of statements to the media and other anti-xenophobic agencies by government spokespersons after xenophobic attacks not to call them xenophobia, but instead to call them 'crimes'. Such instructions are made aggressively, one suspects because the publicity is bad. McKenzie's threats against civil society and those fighting xenophobia are threats against our democracy. In a recent interview with The Africa Report, he said 'I will get rid of illegal foreigners. I will close this type of charity because we need patriotic charities in our country. I will close down the charities that are anti-government, that are anti-South African.' When asked if that included the Ahmed Kathrada Foundation, he said: 'I've never heard them speak about the poorest of the poor not having jobs. They must go to hell. I said it. They should go. They are a disgrace to the memory of Ahmed Kathrada.' We need to assert that in actions against xenophobia, we are in fact claiming our rights as heirs to South African freedom, as heirs to constitutionalism, the foundational values of the new democratic South Africa. These are being buried every year, and this very silence that we are now experiencing after the new xenophobic utterances of McKenzie is more important than the name 'Gayton McKenzie'. It has great importance as a claiming of democratic life and values in South Africa. Combating xenophobia in the rest of the world The question of xenophobia and combating it is in this context one of the true claims of fidelity to non-racialism, to tolerance and internationalism in South Africa. Beyond South Africa, both the late Pope Francis and the new Pope Leo XV have aligned themselves with anti-xenophobic forces and preached mutual respect. Pope Leo, from his earliest statements in masses and other occasions has taken up similar themes to Francis. At the same time, as both the Popes came to spread a message of peace and mutual respect, Donald Trump was elected to the US presidency for the second time with xenophobia at the centre of his message, as it had been in his previous presidency. We have had two contrasting examples in the world today at the level of world leaders, that of the Popes and that of Donald Trump. Obviously, there are other lesser figures who are making their marks in either of these directions or somewhere in between. South Africans, whatever their source of ethics, need to carefully consider the commentaries of faith-based organisations and others who have intervened on humanistic grounds. DM
The Citizen
2 hours ago
- The Citizen
China's clever trade deal with Africa – removal of tariffs on most goods
While the US is alienating other countries with high import tariffs, China is making friends in Africa by scrapping most import tariffs. While the rest of the world is sidetracked with the unrest in the Middle East and US President Donald Trump's on-again, off-again import tariffs, China made a clever trade deal with Africa to remove tariffs on most African exports. This not only boosts its trade potential, it also expands Beijing's influence. Brendon Verster, economist at Oxford Economics Africa, says as the US retreats and turns its focus inward, China's economic incentives deepen ties, reinforcing it as Africa's key partner. 'This shift may weaken the US's leverage and reshape global alliances in China's favour, despite risks from its slowing economy.' Last week, China announced plans to eliminate all tariffs on imports from 53 African sovereign states it maintains diplomatic ties with. Eswatini is the only exception due to its recognition of Taiwan's sovereignty. The Changsha Declaration on Upholding Solidarity and Cooperation of the Global South advances the full implementation of the Beijing Declaration reached in September 2024, which in turn aims to 'jointly build an all-weather China-Africa community with a shared future for the new era,' Verster says. 'The move can be considered a push by Beijing to capitalise on the chaos caused by Trump's 'Liberation Day' tariffs. Although the agreement text does not mention him by name, it does note that the parties agree that the frequent occurrence of unilateralism, protectionism and economic bullying has created severe difficulties for the economic and social development and the improvement of livelihood in African countries and other developing countries.' ALSO READ: China risks its moral high ground in escalating trade tensions China rather wants to resolve disputes Verster points out that in addition, the declaration states that the parties 'call on all countries and the US in particular, to return to the right track of resolving trade disputes through consultation based on equality, respect and mutual benefit. 'The new zero-tariff pledge marks a pronounced expansion of China's previous trade policy announced last year, which removed tariffs on imports from 33 countries globally that are deemed the least developed. 'Moreover, the continent's most underdeveloped economies, which already have full access to the Chinese market, will receive additional assistance to bolster their exports. These include measures on market access, inspection and quarantine and customs clearance.' Before the latest announcement, Chinese trade already dominated across Africa. Among the continent's major economies, the Asian giant outstrips the US as an export destination by a significant margin, especially in the DRC, accounting for 66% of goods exports, Angola (46.4%), Zimbabwe (20.1%) and Zambia (18.7%). ALSO READ: China challenges Trump's economic 'bullying' US ahead of China in some African economies However, Verster says, the US is still ahead of China in several economies, such as in Lesotho, Mauritius, Morocco, Egypt, Nigeria and Kenya. He also points out that apart from trade, China is almost on par with the US in terms of foreign direct investment (FDI). According to the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development's 2023 World Investment Report, FDI inflows to Africa from the US totalled $45 billion in 2021, down from $50 billion in 2017. FDI inflows from China were recorded at $44 billion in 2021, slightly higher than the $43 billion registered in 2017. This chart shows how China's trade deal solidifies an already solid position as Africa's key trade partner: Source: International Trade Centre, *Includes Hong Kong ALSO READ: SA eyes boost in trade with China at November expo China's removal of tariffs has implications for power dynamics with US Verster says China's step to remove all tariffs on most African goods has important implications for the continent as well as the evolving power dynamics between the US and China. 'From a geopolitical standpoint, China's move is a long-term bet on African alignment and growth as well as a deepening of its commitment to South-South cooperation. 'The US has been moving away from these policies and China's removal of tariffs is part of a wider architecture that also includes concessional loans and large-scale infrastructure spending. As Washington turns its focus inward and its engagement in Africa becomes increasingly transactional or conditional, Beijing is stepping in to fill the void with consistent and unconditional economic incentives.' He says China is entrenching its position as Africa's most significant economic partner and expanding the continent's export potential. 'The strategic move significantly boosts China's soft power and trade leverage, especially given the US's decisions to tighten trade restrictions and cut development funding. 'African countries stand to gain from potential export diversification, increased foreign exchange earnings and closer integration into global value chains. Still, the Chinese economy is losing steam, which could weigh on its import demand.' ALSO READ: China welcomes Cyril – and tightens ties with 8 agreements Africa to become major player in critical minerals market Verster says Africa is also poised to become a major player in the critical minerals market as the world shifts to sustainable practices. 'Beijing's move could be considered an attempt to keep the continent close as the scramble for critical minerals ramps up and China seeks to assert its dominance over these supply chains.' As China's trade diplomacy cultivates closer bilateral ties, the broader implication is a gradual decline in US influence in Africa. Verster believes that African leaders might be more inclined to support China's viewpoints on the global stage, which would diminish Western influence. 'Furthermore, Western attempts to establish international trade regulations or impose sanctions may lose their effectiveness as African economies become more integrated with Chinese supply chains and trade networks. 'In short, Beijing's zero-tariff policy is not just a trade initiative but a strategic manoeuvre to reshape its alliances with Africa, reduce the US's leverage and embed China more deeply in the African continent's economic and political future.'
The South African
2 hours ago
- The South African
BREAKING NEWS: Kaizer Chiefs announce another exit
By Aric Jabari 17-06-25 17:40 President Donald Trump's early G7 exit amid the Israel-Iran crisis sparks criticism, disrupts talks, and prompts EU calls for de-escalation. By Joshua Hendricks 17-06-25 17:33 Chiefs midfielder Castillo may be heading for a shock exit as doubts over his role under Nabi prompt his camp to explore off-season options. By Siseko Gwegwe 17-06-25 17:17 Former Kaizer Chiefs winger Junior Khanye is on Amakhosi's case again. He says the Betway Premiership giants shouldn't have signed Paseka Mako and Thabiso Monyane. By Joshua Hendricks 17-06-25 17:11 Chiefs have reignited their pursuit of Mashego, but Sundowns' contract extension could force Amakhosi into a transfer battle. By Garrin Lambley 17-06-25 17:10 The four African qualifiers for the revamped FIFA Club World Cup currently ongoing in the United States are set to become much richer. By Phumlani S Langa 17-06-25 16:58 Kendrick Lamar took his GNX tour to Drake's hometown of Toronto. Fans filled out the arena and celebrated the moment.
