logo
UC Health, Blue Shield contract dispute could disrupt care for thousands in California

UC Health, Blue Shield contract dispute could disrupt care for thousands in California

Thousands of Californians who get medical care at UC Health through Blue Shield of California — including many in the Bay Area who go to UCSF and One Medical, a UCSF affiliate — may need to find a different health insurer or pay out-of-network rates for services if the parties cannot reach a new contract by July 10.
UC Health and Blue Shield, two of California's largest health care industry players, are renegotiating contracts to establish how much Blue Shield will reimburse for services provided by UC Health hospitals, clinics and other facilities. One Medical is an affiliate of UCSF Health, one of the six UC Health academic health centers.
In the Bay Area, this could impact residents insured by Blue Shield who get care at UCSF Medical Center, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospitals in San Francisco and Oakland, UCSF Medical Group and UCSF Benioff Children's Physicians, UCSF said in a notification posted online this month. It includes people on CalPERS plans, employer plans, Covered California plans and Medicare plans (including Medicare Advantage) offered or administered by Blue Shield.
The dispute could also affect people insured by Blue Shield who are members of the popular primary care provider One Medical, which is an affiliate of UCSF.
Services will remain in-network through July 9.
UCSF Health community hospitals at Saint Francis and St. Mary's are not affected by the negotiations and will remain in-network.
Neither UC Health nor Blue Shield would specify how many of its patients or members could be affected. But it's at least in the tens of thousands, as this potential contract termination would impact about 35,000 CalPERS members who have Blue Shield plans and receive care from UC Health, according to CalPERS.
Contract negotiations between health care providers and insurers are common and often involve disagreements over reimbursement rates. Last year, UC Health and Anthem Blue Cross, another major insurer in the state, similarly had a dispute over contract renegotiations that lasted months. It eventually resulted in the two parties reaching a new contract.
'UC Health continues to do our part to negotiate with Blue Shield in hopes of reaching a new, fair agreement to preserve in-network access to UC Health locations without interruptions for Blue Shield of California members,' the UC Office of the President said in a statement.
'Despite months of negotiations, the University of California Health system administrators have decided to end its contract with Blue Shield of California on July 10, 2025, unless a new agreement is reached with higher reimbursement rates,' Blue Shield of California said in a statement. 'It is our desire to reach an agreement that ensures members continue to have access to UC Health hospitals and providers at reasonable costs that are sustainably affordable for our customers. We will continue to negotiate with UC Health system administrators in good faith.'
One Medical declined to comment. The provider recently sent members a notice saying it was informed by UCSF that unless an agreement is reached between Blue Shield and UC, One Medical providers in the Bay Area will no longer be in-network with Blue Shield of California as of July 10.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gavin Newsom Reacts to Donald Trump's 'Unprecedented' Medicaid Move
Gavin Newsom Reacts to Donald Trump's 'Unprecedented' Medicaid Move

Newsweek

time26 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Gavin Newsom Reacts to Donald Trump's 'Unprecedented' Medicaid Move

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has expressed concern for the privacy of immigrants in his state, following reports that the Trump administration has shared Medicaid data with immigration officials. An internal memo and emails obtained by the Associated Press showed that Medicaid officials unsuccessfully sought to block the data transfer, citing legal and ethical concerns. Nevertheless, two top advisers to Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. ordered the dataset handed over to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the emails show. Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) were given just 54 minutes on Tuesday to comply with the directive. "We deeply value the privacy of all Californians," Newsom's office told Newsweek in a statement. "This action by the federal government has implications for every person on Medicaid, but it is especially alarming for our immigrants and American mixed-status families who are already under relentless, indiscriminate attack by this administration. The federal government continues to instill fear across this nation and shroud its continued violation of Americans' privacy rights in propaganda." Newsweek reached out to DHS and the Department for Health and Human Services for comment via email and contact form Friday afternoon. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer granted an emergency temporary restraining order to stop President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard, on June 12, 2025, at the California... California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks after U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer granted an emergency temporary restraining order to stop President Donald Trump's deployment of the California National Guard, on June 12, 2025, at the California State Supreme Court building in San Francisco. More Santiago Mejia/San Francisco Chronicle via AP Why It Matters Reports of increased data sharing between federal agencies for the purpose of immigration enforcement have caused concerns for several weeks. The Trump administration has said the data is vital in finding illegal immigrants who should be deported. What To Know The dataset included the information of people living in California, Illinois, Washington state and Washington, D.C., all of which allow non-U.S. citizens to enroll in Medicaid programs that pay for their expenses using only state taxpayer dollars. CMS transferred the information just as the Trump administration was ramping up its enforcement efforts in Southern California. Newsom's office said it was concerned about how deportation officials might utilize the data, especially as federal authorities conduct immigration raids with the assistance of National Guard troops and Marines in Los Angeles. Besides helping authorities locate migrants, experts said, the government could also use the information to scuttle the hopes of migrants seeking green cards, permanent residency or citizenship if they had ever obtained Medicaid benefits funded by the federal government. CMS announced late last month that it was reviewing some states' Medicaid enrollees to ensure federal funds have not been used to pay for coverage for people with "unsatisfactory immigration status." In a letter sent to state Medicaid officials, CMS said that the effort was part of Trump's February 19 executive order titled "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Open Borders." As part of the review, California, Washington and Illinois shared details about non-U.S. citizens who have enrolled in their state's Medicaid program, according to a June 6 memo signed by Medicaid Deputy Director Sara Vitolo that was obtained by AP. The memo was written by several CMS officials under Vitolo's supervision, according to sources familiar with the process. The data includes addresses, names, Social Security numbers and claims data for enrollees in those states, according to the memo and two people familiar with what the states sent to CMS. Both people spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to share details about the data exchange. CMS officials attempted to fight the data sharing request from Homeland Security, saying that complying would violate federal laws, including the Social Security Act and the Privacy Act of 1974, according to Vitolo's memo. "Multiple federal statutory and regulatory authorities do not permit CMS to share this information with entities outside of CMS," Vitolo wrote, further explaining that the sharing of such personal data is allowed only for directly administering the Medicaid program. Sharing information about Medicaid applicants or enrollees with DHS officials would violate a "longstanding policy," wrote Vitolo, a career employee, to Trump appointee Kim Brandt, deputy administrator and chief operating officer of CMS. The legal arguments outlined in the memo were not persuasive to Trump appointees at HHS, which oversees Medicaid. Four days after the memo was sent, on June 10, HHS officials directed the transfer of "the data to DHS by 5:30 ET today," according to email exchanges obtained by AP. Former government officials said the move was unusual because CMS, which has access to personal health data for nearly half of the country, does not typically share such sensitive information with other departments. "DHS has no role in anything related to Medicaid," said Jeffrey Grant, a former career employee at CMS. Beyond her legal arguments, Vitolo said sharing the information with DHS could have a chilling effect on states, perhaps prompting them to withhold information. States, she added, needed to guard against the "legal risk" they were taking by giving federal officials data that could be shared with deportation officials. A 'Concerning' Development All states must legally provide emergency Medicaid services to non-U.S. citizens, including to those who are lawfully present but have not yet met a five-year wait to apply for Medicaid. Seven states, along with the District of Columbia, allow immigrants who are not living legally in the country to enroll—with full benefits—in their state's Medicaid program. The states launched these programs during the Biden administration and said they would not bill the federal government to cover those immigrants' health care costs. The Trump administration has raised doubts about that pledge. Nixon said that the state's Medicaid programs for immigrants "opened the floodgates for illegal immigrants to exploit Medicaid—and forced hard-working Americans to foot the bill." All of the states—California, New York, Washington, Oregon, Illinois, Minnesota and Colorado—have Democratic governors. As a result of his state's budget woes, Newsom announced earlier this year that he would freeze enrollment in the program. Illinois will shut down its program for roughly 30,000 non-U.S. citizens in July. The remaining states have not yet submitted the identifiable data to CMS as part of the review, according to a public health official who has reviewed CMS' requests to the states. What People Are Saying U.S. Health and Human Services spokesman Andrew Nixon told AP that the data sharing was legal: "With respect to the recent data sharing between CMS and DHS, HHS acted entirely within its legal authority—and in full compliance with all applicable laws—to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them." California Governor Gavin Newsom's office, in a statement sent to Newsweek: "Sharing Medicaid beneficiary information with the Department of Homeland Security—which is itself legally dubious—will jeopardize the safety, health, and security of those who will undoubtedly be targeted by this abuse, and Americans more broadly. "Federal law requires emergency care to be provided to all to save lives, and the federal government helps pay for it for low-income individuals, regardless of immigration status. Every state should be concerned about this data sharing and its implications for the safety and health of its communities. We will continue to vigorously defend Californians' privacy rights and explore all avenues to protect their information and safety." What Happens Next Republicans in Congress are continuing to look to limit undocumented immigrants from accessing federal programs while continuing to scrutinize whether sanctuary jurisdictions allow them to receive benefits. This article contains reporting by The Associated Press.

RFK Jr. Hands Medicaid Data to ICE as It Ramps Up War on Immigrants
RFK Jr. Hands Medicaid Data to ICE as It Ramps Up War on Immigrants

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

RFK Jr. Hands Medicaid Data to ICE as It Ramps Up War on Immigrants

The Trump administration is giving the personal data of Medicaid-enrolled immigrants to the Department of Homeland Security, according to the Associated Press. The Department of Homeland Security forced the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services—which is part of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Department of Health and Human Services—to hand over personal information, an unprecedented move. This is yet another clear invasion of privacy aimed to help ICE find immigrants' names, homes, and jobs and identify immigrants receiving aid so that they can revoke green card applications and target permanent residency seekers. Most of the data covers residents of California, Illinois, Washington state, and Washington, D.C.—all states that let noncitizens enroll in Medicaid, and all states that are seeing ramped-up ICE raids and protests in response. CMS tried to fight DHS's request, arguing that they'd be violating the Social Security Act and the Privacy Act of 1974, and in general going against 'longstanding policy' of not giving people's personal Medicaid data to a department that has nothing to do with Medicaid just because they are immigrants. 'We deeply value the privacy of all Californians,' Gavin Newsom said in a statement. 'This potential data transfer brought to our attention by the AP is extremely concerning, and if true, potentially unlawful, particularly given numerous headlines highlighting potential improper federal use of personal information and federal actions to target the personal information of Americans.'

ASCP and NCPA Announce Joint Recommendations to Manufacturers to Effectuate Medicare's Maximum Fair Price (MFP)
ASCP and NCPA Announce Joint Recommendations to Manufacturers to Effectuate Medicare's Maximum Fair Price (MFP)

Associated Press

time2 hours ago

  • Associated Press

ASCP and NCPA Announce Joint Recommendations to Manufacturers to Effectuate Medicare's Maximum Fair Price (MFP)

ALEXANDRIA, VA / ACCESS Newswire / June 13, 2025 / The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP) and the National Community Pharmacists Association (NCPA) have announced joint recommendations to pharmaceutical manufacturers aimed at helping to support pharmacies facing material cash flow concerns under Medicare's Drug Price Negotiation Program (MDPNP). The two organizations, both of which represent pharmacists committed to high-quality care for all patients including Medicare beneficiaries, expressed concerns about the impact of the MFP, which is part of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program (MDPNP). This was included in the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 and enables Medicare to directly negotiate the prices of certain single-source medications without generic or biosimilar competition. CMS selected 10 drugs for an initial round of negotiations in 2023. These included medications for diabetes, heart failure, and peripheral artery disease. These negotiated prices, the highest that a Medicare Part D beneficiary or plan sponsor will have to pay for targeted medications, are slated to go into effect on January 1, 2026. While ASCP and NCPA fully support ensuring fair medication prices for Medicare beneficiaries, an analysis conducted for NCPA found that under MFP, pharmacies may face manufacturer refund payment delays of more than 21 days, beyond the 14-day Medicare prompt pay standard. At the same time, pharmacies could lose nearly $11,000 in weekly cash flow and $43,000 annually. Over 93% of independent pharmacies surveyed by NCPA state they may not be able to stock some medications targeted for price reductions because of cash flow and reimbursement below cost; and most LTC pharmacies anticipate closures, staff layoffs, service reductions, and medications shortages stemming from the MDPNP. Pharmacists at greatest risk for these negative impacts include sole proprietors in rural and urban areas, pharmacies that heavily rely on prescription revenue, and long-term care pharmacies. To address these concerns, ASCP and NCPA made several key recommendations to manufacturers, including the following: 'Most independent pharmacies and long-term care pharmacies care for populations that are heavily dependent on Medicare. It's critical that they are compensated in a fair and timely manner. Otherwise, they will face massive cash-flow problems and not be able to provide prescription services to their Medicare patients. A recent NCPA survey found that 93 percent of independent pharmacists would consider opting out of the program unless those concerns are addressed. That would be a disaster for Medicare beneficiaries and the program itself,' said Doug Hoey, NCPA's CEO. 'The IRA presents unprecedented threats to long-term care pharmacy as well as new opportunities to build a constructive, transactional relationship between pharmacists and manufacturers,' said Chad Worz. 'In developing and presenting these recommendations, we are hoping to send a fair and equitable framework that rekindles the historical partnership between pharmaceutical manufacturers and pharmacies. This, first and foremost, benefits patients while also protecting the sustainability of pharmacies and innovators. We look forward to continuing our constructive conversations with impacted manufacturers.' ASCP and NCPA urge manufacturers to incorporate these recommendations into their MFP effectuation plans by September 1, 2025, ensuring pharmacies remain viable and patients retain access to essential medications. About ASCP: The American Society of Consultant Pharmacists (ASCP) is the only international professional society devoted to optimal medication management and improved health outcomes for all older persons. ASCP's members manage and improve drug therapy and improve the quality of life of geriatric patients and other individuals residing in a variety of environments, including nursing facilities, sub-acute care and assisted living facilities, psychiatric hospitals, hospice programs, and home and community-based care. About NCPA: Founded in 1898, the National Community Pharmacists Association is the voice for the community pharmacist, representing over 18,900 pharmacies that employ more than 205,000 individuals nationwide. Community pharmacies are rooted in the communities where they are located and are among America's most accessible health care providers. Contact Information Melissa Blacketer Senior Director of Communications [email protected] 703-739.1311 SOURCE: ASCP press release

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store