Andre Fu reimagines Bangkok's Dusit Thani, blending modernity and heritage in reborn landmark
In the heart of Bangkok, overlooking
Lumpini Park, stands the reborn Dusit Thani hotel – razed in 2019 after a blockbuster half-century run and now completely rebuilt under the direction of
Hong Kong's André Fu . On every metric, it's a remarkable second act, not least because the Cambridge University-trained, Royal Institute of British Architects-qualified architect has breathed new life into this legendary property without succumbing to nostalgia or sterile modernity.
Advertisement
In a city flooded with luxury hotels, Fu's reimagining stands apart with singular clarity, the new incarnation, which opened last September, arguably representing his most sophisticated achievement since The Upper House in Hong Kong catapulted him to design stardom 16 years ago.
The lotus leaf-inspired hexagonal ceiling of the lobby at Dusit Thani Bangkok. Photo: courtesy Dusit Thani
Forget the usual hotel revival playbook, where designers cling to the past or erase it entirely. Step into Fu's lobby, with its lotus leaf-inspired hexagonal ceiling – an arresting three-dimensional construct that echoes the original – and you experience something more nuanced: a space that nods to Thai heritage without becoming a cultural museum. It's Thai design with the dust blown off.
When the original
Dusit Thani opened, in 1970, it dominated Bangkok's skyline as Thailand's tallest building. For five decades, it thrummed as the city's social heartbeat, hosting royal events, global leaders and celebrities in its restaurants, bars and ballrooms. The hotel's golden spire,
inspired by Wat Arun , became a distinctive silhouette on the Bangkok horizon.
A pillar from the old Dusit Thani Bangkok's Benjarong restaurant now stands in the lobby of the new, Fu-designed hotel. Photo: courtesy Dusit Thani
But time had taken its toll. Low ceilings and outdated facilities no longer met the standards of modern hospitality. Rather than settle for another renovation, the third-generation owners, the Donavanik family, made the difficult decision to demolish the original structure for something new, tapping Architects 49 and OMA Asia for the glossy new 39-storey tower.
Advertisement
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Asia Times
2 days ago
- Asia Times
A US cavalier talks 'imminent' war in Singapore
In his recent speech in Singapore, US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth pledged to defend the region against Chinese aggression and encroachment. This should have reassured the audience presumed to be concerned about China's assertiveness. Yet, possibly, the room listening to him wasn't quite ready to believe what they were hearing. The past few months have been full of surprises for Asia. Technically, Japan is still at war with Russia, just as South Korea is with North Korea. And yet, both Russia and North Korea are fighting in Ukraine— a country that has been left hanging by the US because Washington is (was?) seeking to turn Russia (and maybe also North Korea?) against China. This situation is spreading anxiety in Asia. China may suddenly look more straightforward, reliable and easier to talk to. Plus, Chinese jet fighters look more formidable than French fighters because the French aircraft (adopted by the Indian Air Force) performed poorly compared to the Chinese ones (adopted by Pakistan) in the recent bilateral clash. Furthermore, everyone in the region— starting with the US's closest allies— is scrambling to understand what kind of trade deal they can make with America. It is all creating huge uncertainty in the region. So far, no one feels they have a clear picture, and no one has a deal. Then, America doesn't address these issues, but comes and lambasts China. Maybe Japanese, or Thai or South Korean, could say: 'Sure, China is my biggest concern in the long term. But geography doesn't change, and what if America doesn't have my back in one or two years? It dropped me about Russia and North Korea, it bugs me about my trade surplus, but it wants me to push harder on China. Sure, I'll do it, but I'll need to hedge my bets— at the very least.' These contradictory statements and actions are causing massive unease in Asia. Many (maybe all) American regional allies are getting cold feet about the US. Their feet are getting even colder because, despite many warnings, America doesn't seem to realize the gravity of the situation and that Asia can't be separated from what is happening in Europe. In the 1950s and 1960s, the Korean and Vietnam Wars had a massive impact on Europe. To cap it all, the Chinese—and thus true believers in conspiracy theories—could see this erratic US behavior as evidence that the US administration is caught in a loop of irrationality or is penetrated by Russia. Moscow could likely fuel those suspicions. And still, the pragmatic Chinese would be puzzled: if the Russians are so good at plotting in Washington, why didn't they get a peace deal in Ukraine already? Thus, short of certainty, Beijing would not sensibly talk to Washington without a clear picture of what was happening. It would realistically wait to see the developments with the US and the world. This also impacts Europe, now closely following Asian developments, and Russia. Moscow has fewer incentives to seek peace in Ukraine when the whole American fabric seems to be unraveling. America can decide to be cavalier about all of this, and the problems will certainly fester and rot transpacific and transatlantic trust, weakening US clout in the regions and the world. Or it can decide to address these concerns, which need profound rethinking. This article first appeared on Appia Institute and is republished with kind permission. Read the original here.
Asia Times
22-05-2025
- Asia Times
Trump's coming currency war has Asia in its sights
TOKYO – Asia's latest bull market is in wishful thinking as governments around the region believe that they can avoid an epic currency clash with Donald Trump's White House. Officials in Tokyo, Seoul, Beijing and elsewhere claim to have it on good authority that they can keep their exchange rates separate from US tariff negotiations. It's not clear where this collective delusion comes from, but suffice it to say, a brawl over yen, won and yuan valuations is coming. The same likely goes for the Indonesian rupiah, Thai baht and Vietnamese dong as Trump's trade negotiation team gets around to shaking down Asia writ large. One reason Asian governments are in denial that US trade negotiators will try to coerce them into appreciating their currencies is what they're hearing from Scott Bessent. For now, at least, the US Treasury secretary is the face of Team Trump in Asia. Yet Bessent is merely the 'good cop' to Peter Navarro's 'bad cop.' And it's Navarro who's likely to have the last word on exchange rates, a topic on which he and Trump are more aligned. Trump, as Asia is learning the hard way, changes his mind on virtually every topic with metronomic regularity. That is, except for his five-decade belief that Asia is stealing American jobs and prosperity — often via weak currencies. In the 1980s, it was Japan in particular that animated the then-New York real estate mogul. On television and radio talk shows, Trump rarely missed a chance to rail about how Japan had 'sucked the blood' out of American households. This was around the time of the 1985 'Plaza Accord,' a deal that sent the yen sharply higher versus the dollar. It's something Trump apparently hopes to repeat with China. Trump once owned the iconic New York Plaza Hotel, where the seeds of Japan's 1990s deflation nightmare were planted. He's now angling to engineer a sharply stronger yuan at his Mar-a-Lago Florida lair. 'Market participants will closely watch for any signs that the Trump administration is indeed seeking a weaker US dollar,' says Carol Kong, a currency strategist at Commonwealth Bank of Australia. China knows better. Xi Jinping's Communist Party spent years studying how the fallout from that 1985 deal is still undermining Japan's economy. Look no further than the Bank of Japan's inability to push official interest rates above 0.5% three-plus decades after deflation first hit. Few risks fear Xi's party more than 'Japanification.' As such, any hope Trump, Bessent or Navarro have to drive the yuan sharply higher is almost certainly to be dashed. China's not a Group of Seven member. Any effort to force a revaluation on Beijing could be countered by stronger efforts to anchor the exchange rate. Though that might not be in China's best interest, Xi's party may decide the end justifies the means if Trump moves on to another target. Nor does Japan seem remotely open to discussing a stronger yen. Or to be rushed into a bilateral trade pact with Trump. As Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba told the parliament on Monday: 'We will not follow other countries simply because they are moving forward. Of course, we will keep time limits in mind during negotiations, but we have no intention of compromising our national interests by becoming overly fixated on them.' Trump won't be happy with Ishiba's position. It's a world away from the obsequiousness Trump 1.0 enjoyed from Ishiba's Liberal Democratic Party mate Shinzo Abe. Back then, Prime Minister Abe complimented Trump profusely, handed him lavish gifts and even nominated him for a Nobel Peace Prize. Ishiba is cut from very different cloth, something Team Trump is learning the hard way. As Ishiba argues, a bilateral free-trade deal is a complicated, labyrinthine and time-consuming process. In 2019, an impatient Trump agreed to a 'deal' with Tokyo that excluded the auto sector. The wildcard is what Trump does now. A more rational US president would be inviting Ishiba, the leaders of South Korea and other top Asian economies to the White House to forge a united front against Chinese trade practices that irk Trump. A rational Trump would be pulling Europe into those discussions, too. But that's not the style of a leader who exited a Trans-Pacific Partnership designed to do just that. The day Trump took the US out of TPP in 2017 was one of the best moments of Xi's dozen-plus-year presidency. One possibility: Trump grows tired of Ishiba's foot-dragging and starts gunning for the Japanese leader on social media and during near-daily press gaggles in front of roaring airplane engines. This could include Trump's Treasury Department slapping the dreaded 'currency manipulator' label on Tokyo. Naturally, Japanese officials are anxious to manage the currency issue. Finance Minister Katsunobu Kato plans to find an opportunity to discuss dollar-yen considerations with Bessent at this week's Group of Seven meeting in Canada. Suspicions are rife that Trump is pressuring Bessent — a hedge fund veteran who presumably knows better than — to will a weaker dollar into existence. Given the downward pressure on the dollar, it's clear traders aren't buying denials from US Treasury officials they don't intend to press the issue with Asian counterparts. Trump, of course, is angling for a weaker dollar at home, too. One way is to prod the Federal Reserve to slash borrowing costs. He's even threatened to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell if he doesn't lower rates. Another: cajoling Bessent's team to depreciate the dollar unilaterally, perhaps using currency intervention. Or, more radically, by defaulting on US debt. On the campaign trail last October, Trump observed: 'I say to the Republicans out there – Congressmen, Senators – if they don't give you massive cuts, you're going to have to do a default.' Trump went on to say that 'I don't believe they're going to do a default because I think the Democrats will absolutely cave, will absolutely cave because you don't want to have that happen. But it's better than what we're doing right now because we're spending money like drunken sailors.' For now, Japanese automakers appear to be eating Trump's 25% auto tax. But for how long? In April, Japan's motor vehicle exports fell 5.8% in value. 'Japan's manufacturers are deeply integrated into global supply chains, so trade policy flip-flops risk creating whiplash that would ripple through the economy, hurting growth,' says Stefan Angrick, an analyst at Moody's Analytics. 'In all, Japan's manufacturers are in for a tough time.' Economist Yutaro Suzuki at Daiwa Securities notes that exports to the US were rising until March. Yet since the tariffs, we're now seeing a 'reversal of the move,' Suzuki says. Not that the fundamentals are on the dollar's side, as the US national debt careens toward US$37 trillion. 'The structural bear case against the dollar has begun to play out: investors are rethinking under-hedged asset exposures to the US that could lead to a prolonged valuation adjustment lower,' write Bank of America strategists. This fiscal trajectory prompted Moody's Investors Service to revoke Washington's last AAA credit rating last week. Even if the downgrade doesn't provoke aggressive selling of US Treasuries, it 'highlights the deteriorating fiscal outlook and comes at a time when markets are already attuned to fiscal risks,' says David Mericle, chief US economist at Goldman Sachs. George Saravelos, global head of FX research at Deutsche Bank, notes that the 'combination of diminished appetite to buy US assets and the rigidity of a US fiscal process that locks in very high deficits is what is making the market very nervous.' That's why Larry Summers, US Treasury secretary under President Bill Clinton, argues that 'we're being treated by global financial markets like a problematic emerging market.' In a note to clients, Eurizon SLJ Capital economist Joana Freire warns that about $2.5 trillion of dollars hoarded by Asian exporters and institutional investors 'pose sharp downside risks to the dollar vis-a-vis these Asian currencies.' The odds of dollar weakness intensifying are increasing even if the US-China trade war eases. 'Easing trade tensions have removed a significant headwind on the dollar over the short-term, but the medium- and long-term impact on the US economy will be felt in the coming weeks and months,' says Win Thin, a strategist at Brown Brothers Harriman. Strategist Osamu Takashima at Citigroup notes that even if Washington doesn't 'aggressively pursue' a weak dollar, the currency's trajectory is lower based on the state of America's finances. An auction of 20-year US government bonds on Wednesday (May 21) met with noticeably soft demand. Bad enough that it caught the attention of top lawmakers on Capitol Hill. Texas Representative Chip Roy, one of the Republican Party's leading fiscal hawks, called the 'horrible bond auction' an omen of things to come. The troubling auction 'certainly reinforced this notion' that 'the balance of power seems to be shifting in favor of higher yields' amid 'runaway' debt issuance and government deficits, says Marios Hadjikyriacos, a senior investment analyst at brokerage XM. Yet it's doubtful that the dollar's nearly 9% drop versus the yen or 9.5% loss versus the euro this year will satisfy Trump World. The same with the dollar's 6.9% drop versus the Korean won since Jan. 1. Trump wants markedly bigger drops in the dollar across the board, regardless of the impact stronger currencies would have on Asia's export-geared economies. Asian governments would be wise to put their game faces on when sitting down to the tariff negotiating table. Follow William Pesek on X at @WilliamPesek
RTHK
19-05-2025
- RTHK
China's factory output grows in April despite tariffs
China's factory output grows in April despite tariffs National Bureau of Statistics spokesperson Fu Linghui says the impact of external shocks increased in April, but major economic indicators showed steady and rapid growth. Photo: RTHK China's industrial output expanded faster than expected in April despite the impact of astronomical tariffs, highlighting the resilience of the economy while fuelling optimism over the growth outlook following the easing of trade tensions between Beijing and Washington. Official data released by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) on Monday showed that the country's industrial output grew 6.1 percent year-on-year, stronger than analysts' expectations of a 5.2 percent rise, while slowing down from the 7.7 percent jump in March. The figures indicate that the impact of US tariffs was not particularly pronounced. Growth of retail sales, a key gauge of consumption, slowed in April, rising by 5.1 percent from a year earlier, missing analysts' estimates of 5.5 percent growth. This compared with 5.9 percent annual growth the previous month. Growth in fixed-asset investment for the first four months of this year, including property and infrastructure investment, also slightly slowed, expanding by four percent, following a rise of 4.2 percent for the period from January to March. But the urban jobless rate showed signs of improvement as it fell to 5.1 percent in April from 5.2 percent in March, at a time when the Sino-US trade war led economists to warn about substantial job losses in the country. "Generally speaking, despite increasing impact of external shocks in April, with the synergy of macro policies, major indicators witnessed steady and fast growth, and the national economy maintained the new and positive development momentum," said NBS spokesperson Fu Linghui, at a press briefing in Beijing. "However, we should be aware that there are still many unstable and uncertain factors in the external environment, and the foundation for sustained economic recovery needs to be further consolidated. "At the next stage, we must move faster to create a new pattern of development, and coordinate domestic economic work and endeavours in the international economic and trade field," he told reporters. Separately, Fu noted that the country's foreign trade has been able to withstand increased external shocks, with exports of mechanical and electrical machinery rapidly growing. Fu added that the country will continue to expand demand and optimise the industrial structure, while promoting producer prices to return to a reasonable range. Authorities, he added, will also continue to give full play to the role of macro policies to stimulate demand. Earlier this month, Beijing announced a package of stimulus measures, including interest rate cuts and a major liquidity injection, to prop up the economy and stabilise businesses and employment, just before a trade agreement was reached by China and the US following talks in Geneva. The trade agreement between the two countries, which included rolling back most of the tariffs they imposed on each other for 90 days, marked a significant step for the world's two largest economies to de-escalate trade tensions. That also prompted a slew of global investment banks to raise their forecasts for China's economic growth this year while paring back expectations for more proactive stimulus as Beijing strives to reach its growth target of around 5 percent this year.
