logo
First Nations leaders, candidates reach out to mobilize Indigenous voters

First Nations leaders, candidates reach out to mobilize Indigenous voters

CBC16-04-2025

Tania Cameron is logging a lot of time in her 2023 Ford Explorer these days.
"I'm already at 2,700 kilometres and 5,200 hours of drive time since the start of the campaign," Cameron said on a recent visit to Washagamis Bay First Nation, about 20 minutes southwest of Kenora, Ont.
"I am doing my best to get to every little town, every big city and all the First Nations in the riding. That's my goal. Whether I can get to all of it, we'll see."
Cameron is the NDP candidate for Kenora-Kiiwetinoong — the second-largest Ontario riding, covering one-third of the province. It's home to 38 First Nations, many of them remote.
It's one of 36 ridings across the country where the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) says the outcome of this federal election could be determined by First Nations voters. In these ridings, the percentage of First Nations voters is higher than 2021's margin of victory or where they are 10 per cent or more of all eligible voters.​
But Indigenous people are less likely to vote than non-Indigenous people. Every province and territory saw a decline in Indigenous voter turnout in 2021, according to Elections Canada.
First Nations leaders recognize that concern, and are encouraging community members to learn everything they need to get out and cast their ballots.
And candidates like Cameron are reaching out to people who may be interested in voting, even if others in their communities may not want to take part at all.
"If you want to participate in this colonized system of governance, then you are welcome to. If you don't want to, I totally respect that," said Cameron, a member of the Niisaachewan Anishinaabe Nation in Treaty 3.
She acknowledges some Indigenous people don't vote, because they view First Nations as sovereign within Canada. To some, voting could be seen as casting their own governing systems as illegitimate. First Nations were granted the right to vote federally in 1960.
Charles Fox, the Liberal candidate for Kenora-Kiiwetinoong, said there's a "hangover" from the time First Nations weren't allowed to participate in mainstream society. Many older Indigenous people have never voted, and young people haven't been taught the process, so he's also doing a lot of education on the doorstep.
For some, part of the challenge is having appropriate identification. Fox is directing residents to a list of acceptable documents on Elections Canada's website.
"I'm appealing to the leadership. I'm appealing to the younger generation.… We've got to participate. And that's my rationale for running. I'm not running for myself. I'm running for the future," said Fox, a member of the Bearskin Lake First Nation and former Nishnawbe Aski Grand Chief and Ontario Regional Chief.
"If you're going to influence policies in this country, we have to participate in this exercise, get a Member of Parliament into the House — the big house, as I tell them, the big band office. And he's got to be or she's got to be part of that debate to influence policy with the governing party."
'First Nations votes matter'
First Nations leaders recognize that concern, which is why they're encouraging Indigenous people to get educated on what they need, find out where to go, and then get out to cast their ballots.
For example, in Manitoba, the Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs, Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak, and Southern Chiefs' Organization (SCO) have joined together to launch "Rock the Vote" campaigns.
The goal is "to show to the electorate in Canada that First Nations votes matter," said SCO Grand Chief Jerry Daniels.
"We've got to show it through our vote. It's a sacred responsibility … so that when decisions are being made, they're made with your thoughts and your values in mind."
SCO Youth Chief Billy Bird, 18, will be voting in his first election on Apr. 28. He's been researching his local candidates and the federal party platforms, and has already made plans to go to the polls with his friends.
"It's up to us to empower the next generation to come and to get familiar with these positions and these opportunities. I think we have a really big influence in this election and I think that it's crucial that we get the youth to vote," he said.
"You know, we're still strong. We're still resilient. And we're still rising as Indigenous youth."
Daniels and Bird shared that message, and voting information, on the organization's podcast Fireside Chats.
Indigenous issues at the wayside this election
Although all three main parties have platforms on Indigenous issues, they haven't gotten much attention in this campaign. Daniels said that's making it difficult to generate interest for some First Nations people.
NDP leader Jagmeet Singh conceded that in Timmins last weekend, as he unveiled his plan for northern Ontario.
"I would say those critics are right," he said.
"I challenge the other parties to make Indigenous issues a fundamental and important issue in this campaign because it is fundamental and important."
WATCH | How candidates are engaging First Nation communities
The push to put Indigenous issues front and centre in the federal election
5 minutes ago
Duration 2:07
The riding of Kenora–Kiiwetinoong, in northwestern Ontario, is one of 36 identified by the Assembly of First Nations as being winnable based on the Indigenous vote. Cameron MacIntosh visits the region to see how candidates are engaging First Nation communities.
The AFN is reminding federal politicians not to overlook Indigenous priorities, including economic reconciliation, the well-being of First Nations children, and community safety and security.
Liberal Leader Mark Carney and Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre are offering similar-sounding energy development plans that would involve dealing with landholder rights, protected areas and Indigenous communities.
"[Some leaders are] talking about wanting to start mines up north and stuff like that. And those natives don't want that," said John Wassaykeesic, a resident of Washagamis Bay.
Back in Kenora, Fox says he's hearing many of the same concerns from Indigenous and non-Indigenous voters in his riding, including tariffs and sovereignty threats from the United States, the cost of living, health, homelessness and addiction, infrastructure, and resource development.
"I can bring the two societies together to address common issues," he said. "I've been doing this for most of my life."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: First Nations chief
Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: First Nations chief

CBC

time2 hours ago

  • CBC

Major projects will be slowed by court challenges if rights are violated: First Nations chief

The regional chief of the British Columbia Assembly of First Nations said Wednesday that governments should not speed up major projects at the expense of First Nations rights — and warned that projects will be slowed down by court challenges if First Nations are not consulted from the start. "We're asking the government to follow your own laws," Terry Teegee said, citing the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples that the federal government adopted. The government of Prime Minister Mark Carney introduced major economic legislation last week. The bill has two parts — one to break down federal barriers to internal trade and the other to fast-track major projects. It sets out five criteria to determine whether a project is in the "national interest." Those criteria include the project's likelihood of success, whether it would strengthen the country's resiliency and advance the interests of Indigenous Peoples, and whether it would contribute to economic growth in an environmentally responsible way. WATCH | Teegee pulls out of trade mission over similar B.C. legislation: Why this First Nation chief pulled out of a B.C. trade mission 9 days ago Duration 12:10 Over the weekend, B.C. Assembly of First Nations Regional Chief Terry Teegee announced he would not be attending a 10-day trade mission to East Asia with Premier David Eby. Teegee says his withdrawal was due to recent legislation from the province, meant to speed up infrastructure projects, which the chief says is not in compliance with the Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples Act. But First Nations leaders say their interests weren't considered when the legislation was being drafted and they were given just one week to review and bring comments forward on a briefing document on the bill. "It's probably going to take a lot longer to get approval for some of these projects because we're going to end up in court," Teegee said. "This is where we end up." The national chief of the Assembly of First Nations agreed. "It's not about the bill itself. It's about the process. And I think that ramming something through when you should be hearing from Canadians, from industry, from First Nations … is the wrong way to go," Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak said. "You don't want to end back up in court. You don't want to have civil unrest. Why not just invite us to the table?" WATCH | Carney's bill faces blowback: First Nations leaders have warned that widespread protests and blockades are possible if governments don't obtain affected Indigenous communities' free, prior and informed consent, as required by the UN declaration. The federal government has said that declaration doesn't amount to a veto — a statement Justice Minister Sean Fraser walked back last week following criticism from Woodhouse Nepinak. Teegee said "no government has a veto, meaning that when we come to a decision, all governments come into the room to make a decision together." "First Nations, certainly as a part of this, need to be part of the decision-making process," he added. Supporters also raise concerns Even groups that generally support development are raising concerns about the federal government's plan. Mark Podlasly, CEO of the First Nations Major Projects Coalition, said he was "surprised" First Nations were only given seven days to review parts of the legislation before it was introduced. "The answer will not automatically be 'no' from First Nations when a project comes along. It's just that Indigenous rights and involvement has to not only be included, but respected. That hasn't happened a lot in the Canadian past," he said. "There's also a question on the environment, and there's a question about who bears the impact of these projects if they're rushed through. It's going to be Indigenous Peoples, especially in parts of the country where there's mining or energy sources [on lands] that are integral to our lifestyle, our cultural practices." Podlasly said that while the federal legislation "seems to have Indigenous participation at its core," it's not clear what that participation will look like, especially under the tight two-year approval timeline the government seeks. He said First Nations can support projects and many do — but they don't want to be "caught at the back end" of decisions made without their knowledge or consent. "We're all operating with seven days' notice. That's what we're operating with. And time will tell," he said. The Assembly of First Nations is holding an emergency chiefs meeting on Monday to discuss what to do next. Woodhouse Nepinak vowed to follow their direction and said a legal review of the legislation is ongoing.

Liberals reject Bloc proposal to split Bill C-5 to speed 'consensual' lifting of internal trade barriers
Liberals reject Bloc proposal to split Bill C-5 to speed 'consensual' lifting of internal trade barriers

Vancouver Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Liberals reject Bloc proposal to split Bill C-5 to speed 'consensual' lifting of internal trade barriers

OTTAWA — Government House Leader Steven MacKinnon rejected the Bloc Québécois' proposal to split Bill C-5 in two parts, so that the sections on lifting internal trade barriers and the fast-tracking of major projects can be studied separately. Bloc House Leader Christine Normandin said earlier this week it made little sense that the bill, in its current form, would be sent to the House of Commons committee on transport as it falls under the mandate of Minister of Transport and Internal Trade Chrystia Freeland. Normandin instead suggested dividing the bill to study the portions on free trade and labour mobility in one committee and the fast-tracking of major projects in the national interest in another. She said the free trade portion is 'rather consensual' and could go 'a bit faster,' whereas the major projects portion would warrant more scrutiny. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. On Wednesday, MacKinnon offered a resounding 'no' to the Bloc's proposition. 'This is a bill that responds to economic conditions caused by the tariff war, among other things, and mobilizes premiers, mobilizes Canadians from coast to coast to coast behind projects of national significance,' he said. 'These projects have a certain urgency, as do interprovincial trade barriers that must fall,' he added. 'This is a very comprehensive bill. We understand that it's going to be debated, but it's something that we solicited and secured a mandate for.' Prime Minister Mark Carney said his intention is to see the bill passed before June 20 , when the House of Commons rises and MPs return to their ridings for the summer. 'It is a top priority for this government, and we will do everything to get it passed before the summer,' he said after C-5 was tabled on Friday. 'And if Parliament needs to sit longer, it should sit longer in order to get it passed. That's what Canadians expect.' MacKinnon said to date there is no consensus from other parties to sit into the summer. The part of the bill on lifting internal trade barriers would allow a good or service that meets provincial or territorial rules to have met federal requirements but also make it easier for workers to get a federal licence by recognizing provincial or territorial work authorizations. The second part, which is a bit more contentious, seeks to get projects deemed in the national interest — such as highways, pipelines, mines and nuclear facilities — built faster by having only one environmental assessment done and respecting federal conditions. On Wednesday, the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) once more expressed concern the Liberals were 'ramming' through this bill without giving First Nations time to properly study the text. 'I keep hearing that they want to push through this legislation right to the end of this month, and I think that that's the wrong way to go,' said AFN National Chief Cindy Woodhouse Nepinak during a press conference on Parliament Hill. Woodhouse Nepinak is expected to meet with Carney in July, presumably after the bill may have passed. She urged the government to slow down the process to allow meaningful consultation and study to occur with all the parties involved, including First Nations. 'Look, take the summer, take the time to listen to First Nations, take the time to listen to Canadians. And I think that'll make a more united country,' she said. Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre, on the other hand, is favourable to the fast-tracking of major projects like pipelines and dismissed the need for a consensus to move ahead. 'If you wait till everybody agrees on everything, nothing will happen. You're never going to get everybody to agree on every single project,' he told reporters on Monday. 'If the prime minister says he's going to wait until everyone agrees, then nothing will get done, which is what has been happening for the last decade,' he added. Woodhouse Nepinak said national chiefs before her were ignored in discussions on major projects, which caused civil unrest and lawsuits that slowed down the projects. 'Isn't it better to talk through things rather than always being in litigation?' she asked. 'It seems like First Nations always need to litigate, and then we get… results later.' 'Does Canada want to change that or not?' National Post calevesque@ Get more deep-dive National Post political coverage and analysis in your inbox with the Political Hack newsletter, where Ottawa bureau chief Stuart Thomson and political analyst Tasha Kheiriddin get at what's really going on behind the scenes on Parliament Hill every Wednesday and Friday, exclusively for subscribers. Sign up here . Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here .

Sir John A. Macdonald statue outside Ontario legislature freed after being in a box for five years
Sir John A. Macdonald statue outside Ontario legislature freed after being in a box for five years

Vancouver Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Sir John A. Macdonald statue outside Ontario legislature freed after being in a box for five years

TORONTO — The Sir John A. Macdonald statue outside the Ontario legislature is back in full view after spending the past five years in a box. The statue of Canada's first prime minister has been under hoarding since 2020, when it was vandalized with pink paint. The monument was one of many that were targeted across the country amid anti-racism protests and as Canadians grappled with the history of residential schools. Macdonald is considered an architect of the country's notorious residential school system, which took Indigenous children from their families in an effort to assimilate them. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. Progressive Conservative and Liberal members of a non-partisan board of the legislative assembly agreed earlier this month on a motion to remove the hoarding after the statue is cleaned. Speaker Donna Skelly says she recognizes the sensitivities surrounding Macdonald and welcomes Ontarians to come and share their views peacefully. Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store