
Djokovic-formed players union launches global revolt against ‘corrupt, illegal and abusive' tours
Tennis has been thrown into upheaval after a group of players launched a worldwide legal suit against what it called a 'corrupt, abusive and illegal' system.
This potentially landmark case mainly focusses on the calendar – with its short lay-off and restrictive approach to outside exhibitions – and on the punishing working conditions which leave so many players struggling with injuries or mental fatigue.
The class-action lawsuit – which is being filed in the USA, the UK and the European Union on Tuesday – has been brought by five names including former Wimbledon doubles champion Vasek Pospisil and former top-30 player Sorana Cirstea.
But the key backers of this case are the Professional Tennis Players Association – the rival players union formed by Novak Djokovic and Pospisil in 2020.
In October, Telegraph Sport reported exclusively on how PTPA chief executive Ahmad Nassar had – in his words – engaged 'multiple outside counsels to really dig in and be overt and aggressive on the many flaws of the current system.'
Today, that work has reached the next stage – direct legal confrontation with the three main tours: the ATP (who deal with the leading men), the WTA (the equivalent body for women), and the ITF (who run second-tier events).
In a statement, Nassar said that 'Tennis is broken … Players are trapped in an unfair system that exploits their talent, suppresses their earnings, and jeopardises their health and safety. We have exhausted all options for reform through dialogue, and the governing bodies have left us no choice but to seek accountability through the courts.'
He was supported by Pospisil, the Canadian former world No 25 who has become a locker-room figurehead for the PTPA. 'This is not just about money – it's about fairness, safety, and basic human dignity,' Pospisil said. 'I'm one of the more fortunate players and I've still had to sleep in my car when travelling to matches … No other major sport treats its athletes this way. The governing bodies force us into unfair contracts, impose inhumane schedules, and punish us for speaking out.'
The suit covers numerous areas including:
Suppression of rival tournaments by the tours
Fixing of prize-money so that tournaments cannot offer more than a specified amount
Use of rankings points to discourage players from appearing in rival events, including the Olympics
An exhausting 11-month schedule with hardly any downtime
Regular scheduling over-runs which result in matches being played in the small hours of the morning
The tours now face a complicated and potentially costly decision over whether to fight the case across three different global jurisdictions. The ATP probably have the financial reserves to do so, but the other two are less well resourced.
The antitrust lawsuit follows a similar case in golf where 11 professional players, including Phil Mickelson and Bryson DeChambeau, took legal action against the PGA Tour following the creation of LIV Golf. The legal complaint was dropped in June 2023 upon the 'merger deal' that the two parties agreed, although a full resolution is yet to be reached despite the intervention of Donald Trump, who has hosted recent peace talks at the White House.
Nassar insists that he isn't looking to bankrupt the tours. Instead, he wants to bring all parties back to the negotiating table, having demonstrated that he is serious about change. 'I would settle tomorrow,' he told Telegraph Sport, 'if we could get a real commitment to create a better environment for the players'.
This is not the first time that the tennis authorities have faced anti-trust suits, but in the past they have come from rival operators rather than the players who – in theory – hold a 50 per cent share in the ATP and WTA organisations.
This very structure – which lumps together tournaments and workforce in an uneasy compromise – is part of the problem. It prevents the two parties from thrashing out collective bargaining agreements on pay and working conditions, as would happen in any normal sport.
The push from the players comes after a year that saw a great deal of political manoeuvring with zero end result. In the early months of 2024, the four grand-slam events tried to float a new and streamlined 'Premium Tour' model, but ran into concerted resistance from the ATP and WTA.
More recently, ATP chairman Andrea Gaudenzi has been pushing to bring together the commercial rights of both men's and women's tours into one combined organisation. But this too has run into opposition from vested interests.
'The fact that the slams and the ATP have both been trying to change the structure shows that they know it is suboptimal,' Nassar said. 'But from the perspective of the players, whose careers are too short, change needs to happen now.'
The most recent legal precedent came in 2008 when the ATP reorganised the calendar and downgraded a tournament in Hamburg, which responded with a lawsuit on anti-competitive grounds. The ATP won the case.
According to an administrator familiar with the case, 'The ATP's defence relied on what I'd call the rule of reason. A lot of the rules on the tours are in theory anti-competitive but they were created to provide a rational organisation of the sport.'
Trump administration open to negotiations – just like Gaza, Ukraine and golf
The timing of the PTPA's legal suit is connected to the change of administration in the White House, insiders suggest.
Not only is the new Republican administration likely to create a more favourable environment for anti-trust suits than the Democrats, given its disdain of red tape, but Donald Trump himself is clearly interested in playing a role on the sporting stage.
Since his return to power, Trump has already held three meetings with Yasir Al-Rumayyan, who chairs not only the LIV Golf tour but also its financial backers the Saudi Arabian Public Investment Fund.
Those talks, which have also involved players Tiger Woods and Adam Scott, and PGA Tour commissioner Jay Monahan, have been intended to broker a peace deal with the two circuits. However, they have yet to reach a breakthrough in unifying the divided sport.
Now, according to sources, people connected to the Trump administration have expressed an interest in getting involved in the tennis case.
We might even suggest that Trump sees the growing rift between tennis players and administrators as another messy row that he can wade into, equating it not only with the golf schemozzle but also wider geopolitical issues in Ukraine and Gaza.
To Trump, these are all opportunities for grandstanding, regardless of their very different subject matter. Whether his involvement is likely to help bring the rival parties to an agreement is, however, another question.
There is also a possible personal connection between Trump and the PTPA in the form of Bill Ackman, the billionaire fund manager who is one of the president's many super-rich backers. A tennis enthusiast, Ackman is understood to have helped support the PTPA during its developmental stage.
More broadly, Trump is interested in the soft power of sport. Last month, he was the first sitting president to attend the Super Bowl. Last year, he challenged his predecessor Joe Biden to face him on the golf course during a chaotic presidential debate.
Trump has never bought a major sports franchise, but he did own the New Jersey Generals of the USFL – a short-lived rival to the NFL – and this is where he became close to the Republicans' future Georgia senate candidate Herschel Walker, a star running back who is now Trump's ambassador to the Bahamas.
While golf is Trump's favourite sport, he played tennis with Serena Williams in 2015 to mark the opening of a new set of courts at one of his golf courses. At last year's criminal trial for falsifying financial records over payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels, Trump's phone records were revealed, and Williams turned out to be on his frequent call list.
Williams did not seem happy to be asked about this detail during an interview with the New York Times, however. 'I talk to a lot of presidents,' she replied, 'I spoke to Barack, I spoke to the Clintons. I spoke to every president since I've been alive, including Ronald Reagan, I'll have you know.'
The ATP, WTA, ITF and ITIA have been approached for a response.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
18 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘Boultercanu' serve doubles delight as women's tennis returns to Queen's
Moments before Emma Raducanu and Katie Boulter walked on to court one to add a touch of pizzazz to a historic day at Queen's Club, a lady carrying an empty Pimm's jug went to go for a refill. 'I'm sorry but if you leave, we won't be able to let you straight back in,' she was told by a steward. 'You will have to queue.' The woman thought for a moment, looked at the packed stands, and returned to her seat. It turned out to be a wise decision. And not just because the queue to see the British pair – or 'Boultercanu' as the press had already anointed them – was snaking halfway around Queen's Club. For when the action began, Raducanu and Boulter proved to be an instant sensation as they walloped the doubles pair of China's Jiang Xinyu and Taiwan's Wu Fang-hsien 6-4, 6-2. But it was not only the quality of their play in their first match together that stood out. There were also plenty of laughs, high fives and jokes, which continued at the press conference afterwards. Asked whether they might be tempted to also give the doubles a whirl at Wimbledon, Raducanu played it straight. 'We're just going to keep trying to do as best as we can this week and take it from there.' But before she could go on, Boulter interjected: 'Scrap what she said,' she laughed. 'We're going for the Wimbledon title.' 'I was actually very nervous before the match,' added Raducanu. 'Probably more nervous than the singles, because I just didn't really necessarily know what to do. But Katie made me feel so comfortable, and I'm just so pleased to get a win on the board.' The only pity was that many fans on the first day of women's tennis at Queen's Club since 1972 were unable to watch, as the match was played in front of 1,000 spectators on court one rather than on the Andy Murray Arena, which holds 7,700 seats. 'I think it is very swear-word annoying,' one spectator, Helen Millinersaid as she waited outside. 'I booked tickets for the Andy Murray Arena months ago, and was hoping to see Radders and Katie on there, especially given it is such a historic day. I tried to get on to court one to see them, but the queue was incredibly long,. I was told it would take an hour to get on.' A spokesperson later explained the decision was down to contractual issues obliging the WTA to put predominately singles matches on the main court. Court one was so intimate that when Raducanu filled her water bottle after the first set, she was able to have a quick chat with some of the spectators that were less than a metre away from her. Not that she minded. 'I love playing on those smaller, outside courts where you really feel the support and the crowd gets into it,' said Raducanu, who showed no signs of a back spasm that had interrupted her preparations. 'I was filling my bottle up, and I was literally having a chat in the stands, because that's how close it is.' Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Those hoping to see the match on TV were also left disappointed as the BBC showed Sonay Kartal's match against Daria Kasatkina instead. But Kartal, who has moved into the top 50 in the world, certainly lived up to her billing as she played one of the best matches in her career to beat the world No 16 6-1, 3-6, 6-3. 'I was excited to be the first Brit on the Andy Murray Arena,' Katal said. 'I think it's an incredible court and the packed crowd was right behind me exactly when I needed it. I loved every second. It was super special.' Having a WTA 500 women's tournament is not the only change at Queen's this year. For the first time, there are also no line judges. It means that when a player hits a ball out, the crowd hears pre-recorded voices collected by the Lawn Tennis Association from its members and partners. Not that it was entirely successful. Several times when the ball clattered into the net, a cry of 'Out!' was heard. For the first time, spectators have colour-coded stickers under their seats. A green sticker means they can leave while play is going on. But if they have an orange one, they can only move at the end of a game. Red means they can only do so at a change of ends or a set. The good news for those coming to Queen's on Tuesday is that Boulter and Raducanu will be back in action in the singles – with Boulter kicking things off against Ajla Tomljanovic before Raducanu faces Cristina Bucșa. And, yes, both matches will be on the Andy Murray Arena.


BBC News
29 minutes ago
- BBC News
Why are line judges no longer used at Queen's?
You might have noticed something missing from the courts at Queen's Club this year - where have the line judges gone?A familiar sight around the edges of the courts for decades, the men and women who shout "out" and "fault" have been replaced by electronic line line calling uses cameras, computers and sensors to track a ball and is used by tennis umpires to judge whether a ball is in or season the men's tour - the ATP - has adopted the technology across all of its events, while the WTA - the women's tour - has also been using it at many of its events. A combined men's and women's event, such as Queen's, offers an easy opportunity for the technology to be used across the two tournaments. The ATP said the move to electronic line calling was to "optimise accuracy and consistency across tournaments, match courts and surfaces".A new women's event at Queen's started on Monday, while the men's tournament follows at the same venue a week later. What about Wimbledon? Wimbledon will end its 147-year use of line judges this summer, relying solely on electronic line technology will be in place for qualifying and the main Garros is the only Grand Slam tournament that still uses line judges and players are not allowed to use electronic replays to challenge human French Open want to maintain traditions synonymous with the 134-year-old tournament and are unwilling to lose human article is the latest from BBC Sport's Ask Me Anything team. What is Ask Me Anything? Ask Me Anything is a service dedicated to answering your want to reward your time by telling you things you do not know and reminding you of things you team will find out everything you need to know and be able to call upon a network of contacts including our experts and will be answering your questions from the heart of the BBC Sport newsroom, and going behind the scenes at some of the world's biggest sporting coverage will span the BBC Sport website, app, social media and YouTube accounts, plus BBC TV and radio. More questions answered... Why female tennis players are returning to Queen's after half a centuryWhen does the tennis grass court season begin?Why does French Open not have electronic line calling?


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Czech Lehecka opens grass campaign with win in Stuttgart
June 9 (Reuters) - Rising Czech force Jiri Lehecka began his Wimbledon build-up in impressive fashion with a 6-4 6-4 defeat of Benjamin Bonzi in the opening round of the Stuttgart Open on Monday. The eighth seed, whose last match on grass was in the Wimbledon fourth round in 2023, quickly got up to speed to overpower Bonzi, firing down 13 aces. Lehecka, 23, will face 2023 Stuttgart runner-up Jan-Lennard Struff next after he thumped down 30 aces during a 6-4 6-4 victory over Italy's Matteo Arnaldi, his first win against a top-50 opponent this season. American sixth seed Brandon Nakashima came through a battle against Britain's Jacob Fearnley, winning 4-6 7-6(4) 6-1. Top seed at the ATP 250 event is Alexander Zverev. Action also began at the Libema Open in Den Bosch with two-time runner-up Jordan Thompson beginning another run with a 6-4 6-4 defeat of American Aleksandar Kovacevic.