Remembering Shubha Singh: Foreign Affairs Journalist and Unlikely Admirer of Prince Charles
Published : May 29, 2025 15:43 IST - 5 MINS READ
In the mid-1990s, the only person in the world who thought highly of Prince Charles (now King Charles III) was Shubha Singh, my colleague at The Pioneer. Charles's then-wife, Princess Diana, was globally beloved, and this was even before her fatal car crash in Paris in 1997. Prince Charles was much reviled: on seeing Camilla on TV, various acquaintances would seethe about the 'horsey-faced woman'.
Shubha, however, had a different view, and part of the reason was that she was our Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) correspondent. Besides dealing with India's mandarins in South Block and networking with the embassies in New Delhi, she was invited to state banquets for visiting dignitaries, including princes.
A perk of the MEA beat was that it was almost daily that one embassy or another held a reception. Our art writer Juliet Reynolds, an English expatriate with a caustic style, once whispered that a senior editor from the paper (and wife) did not miss a single embassy cocktail party, 'gobbling up all the food'.
Also Read | Daniel Ellsberg (1931-2023): 'Pentagon Papers' whistle-blower leaves a legacy of courage
Shubha, however, was not a glutton for hors d'oeuvres. She was tall and thin, among the seniormost of our political bureau. The bureau was headed by the late Padmanand Jha (Paddy), and we had been hired by the legendary Vinod Mehta when he launched a New Delhi edition of The Pioneer in 1991, the old Lucknow paper started by the English in the 19th century, famously counting Rudyard Kipling among its sub-editors.
It had fallen on hard times, however, and now looked drab and small-town. Industrialist Lalit Mohan Thapar bought it, and Vinod produced a beautifully designed newspaper with interesting stories that was the rage in Delhi for the three years he led it.
Shubha was full of grace. She never talked of her pedigree to her rag-tag bunch of colleagues. Her brother Ajay did a stint as Minister of State for Railways in V. P. Singh's short-lived (but momentous) government. I was unaware of this connection until our deputy bureau chief and resident quipster, KV Ramesh, referred to Ajay as the 'jeans-clad Jat'. Even Shubha laughed, though she never wore jeans; her daily wear was a nondescript salwar kameez and Rajasthani Bundi waistcoat.
Woman of vast knowledge
Shubha spoke often about the Pacific Island nation of Fiji, and her depth of knowledge about it puzzled me until she revealed that she had lived and taught at a school there. Her father, Captain Bhagwan Singh, was posted as High Commissioner (1971-1976) soon after Fiji's independence. He had served in the King's army during the Second World War and was India's first Jat IAS officer. He was also the grandson of an indentured worker, Ram Chander, taken from their ancestral village in Agra to Fiji in 1917. (Ajay represented Agra in the Lok Sabha, 1989-1991, and followed his father's footsteps as high commissioner to Fiji in 2005.)
Shubha was 38 when she joined The Pioneer from the Telegraph (I was 27). She was thin-faced, wore glasses that hid her shrewd eyes, and had thinning hair that she kept short. Her smile revealed full upper teeth, but when she was tickled her upper gums showed.
In a newspaper newsroom, activity is concentrated in the evening. The Pioneer bureau was a zany place, though we were steps from Vinod's door (and he had a habit of quietly strolling up from behind). Two of our colleagues in their mid-30s, Prakash Patra and the late GK Singh, would finish their copy first (our department had three computers) and then spend the evening with Patra ragging GK. Shubha would laugh the loudest.
She never spoke in anger. In KV's words, she had a 'sardonic sense of humour' and not 'a bad bone in her body'. She generously passed news tips to those of us on other beats. She broke the news of India's recognition of Israel (under then Prime Minister PV Narsimha Rao). Like the rest of us, she was politically left-of-centre. She was part of the gang that started the Indian Women's Press Corps in 1994.
Shubha was unflappable, even when one of our political correspondents, Faraz Ahmed, habitually made the filthiest of remarks that cannot be reproduced here. However, she did raise an eyebrow at KV's occasional double entendre, and this kept the quipster in check.
She and I chatted as I was the Home Ministry correspondent and used to regularly report from Kashmir (for which I am eternally grateful to Paddy and Vinod). Her network of foreign diplomats was, during those turbulent and violent years, always keen to hear the latest from Kashmir; so, she and I routinely exchanged notes.
One day, our conversation drifted to Prince Charles, who in the 1990s visited India more than once. I casually. disdained his neglect of the beautiful Diana. 'She's nothing but a melodramatic bimbo,' Shubha hissed, much to my surprise because she rarely used such strong words.
Also Read | Veteran journalist M.S. Prabhakara passes away
'What!' I exclaimed. 'Charles is no better.' Shubha countered by revealing that Charles was a deep and sensitive man. 'How do you know this?' I asked, incredulously.
She had sat next to him during a Rashtrapati Bhawan banquet that she was invited to as the MEA correspondent, and she had conversed with him throughout.
So what, I said.
She looked me in the eye. 'When you sit and talk to someone for a length of time, you get to know the person,' she said, with a mix of seriousness and passion. I could offer no reply.
Shubha passed away on May 25, weeks after turning 72. She had spent two years in agony, due to doctors' negligence at a corporate hospital. In 2023, after a routine gum cancer procedure, a tracheostomy mishap sent fire from her mouth down her airway. She was in and out of hospital since. Hopefully death was a merciful release.
Though many of my former colleagues have passed away over the years, this one hit me hard, even though we hadn't spoken in decades. Possibly that's because of recent bereavements. I wish I had kept in touch.
Aditya Sinha is a writer living on the outskirts of Delhi.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News18
an hour ago
- News18
‘Reconsider Indus Waters Treaty Suspension': Pakistan Sent 4 Letters To India, 3 After Op Sindoor
Last Updated: In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together' Pakistan has so far sent four letters expressing concerns over suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and urging India to reconsider the decision. After the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, India's Secretary of the Ministry of Jal Shakti, Debashree Mukherjee, wrote to Pakistan's Water Ministry Secretary, Syed Ali Murtaza. The letter unequivocally stated that India remains a victim of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan. India cited this context, alongside technical arguments, in communicating its decision to suspend its participation in the IWT. PAKISTAN'S LETTERS The first was dispatched in early May, before the launch of Operation Sindoor. Since then, three additional appeals have been sent by Murtaza. According to sources, all correspondence has been routed through the Ministry of Jal Shakti to the Ministry of External Affairs. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together". HOW IWT SUSPENSION HELPED INDIA India has since accelerated work on strategic water infrastructure projects related to the Indus river system. A key initiative is a 130-kilometre canal designed to link the Beas River to the Ganga Canal, with a proposed extension to the Yamuna River. The nearly 200-kilometre project includes a 12-kilometre tunnel, potentially enabling Yamuna water to reach Gangasagar. States such as Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, and Rajasthan are projected to benefit from this initiative. The government has stated that the work is progressing rapidly and is expected to be completed within two to three years. A Detailed Project Report (DPR) is also being prepared. WHAT IT MEANS FOR PAKISTAN Sources suggest the suspension of the treaty could significantly affect Pakistan's Rabi crops, while the Kharif season will remain relatively unaffected. Beyond agriculture, the disruption could impact daily life, potentially leading to a water availability crisis. Pakistan has reportedly approached the World Bank to mediate. However, the World Bank has so far declined to intervene in India's internal decision to suspend its participation in the treaty. India has emphasized the need to revisit and renegotiate the treaty to reflect 21st-century realities. The original treaty, drafted in the 1950s and 1960s, is increasingly viewed as outdated due to changing hydrological patterns, glacial melt, population growth, and the need for sustainable energy and water management. Despite India's push for modernisation, Pakistan has resisted renegotiation. According to Indian officials, this stance itself contravenes the treaty's provisions. Following the Pahalgam terror attack, India has also announced a range of diplomatic and strategic responses, including the suspension of its participation in the IWT. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published:


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
EAM Jaishankar begins 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue
New Delhi [India], June 6 (ANI): External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar on Friday flagged off the 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue with Central Asian representatives. The attendees included Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Murat Nurtleu of Kazakhstan, Foreign Minister Sirojiddin Muhriddin of Tajikistan, Deputy Chairman of Cabinet of Ministers and Foreign Minister Rashid Meredov of Turkmenistan, Foreign Minister Zheenbek Kulubaev of Kyrgyzstan and Foreign Minister Bakhtiyor Saidov of Uzbekistan. Jaishankar said in a post on X, 'With Central Asian colleagues at the start of the 4th India-Central Asia Dialogue.' '4th India-Central Asia Dialogue begins in Delhi,' Official Spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs said in a post on X. The 3rd meeting of the Dialogue was hosted by India in New Delhi in December 2021, as per a statement by the Ministry of External Affairs. India and Central Asia, in each other's 'Extended Neighbourhood', enjoy close and cordial contemporary diplomatic relations underpinned by millennia old cultural and people-to-people exchanges. The first India-Central Summit held virtually in January 2022 and the mechanism of India-Central Asia Dialogue, at the level of Foreign Ministers, have taken this relationship substantially forward, the statement said. At the 4th Dialogue, on 6 June 2025, the Ministers will discuss further strengthening of relations between India and Central Asian countries with particular focus on trade, connectivity, technology, and development cooperation. They will also share perspectives on challenges to regional security and other regional and global issues of mutual interest, the statement said. The Foreign Ministers will also participate in the India-Central Asia Business Council meeting being held on June 5 by MEA in collaboration with FICCI. The India-Central Asia Dialogue is a manifestation of mutual interest on the part of India and the Central Asian countries to forge even closer, wider and stronger partnership in a spirit of friendship, trust and mutual understanding. (ANI)


India Gazette
2 hours ago
- India Gazette
Putin navigating waters with consummate skill: says foreign affairs expert after Russia credits Trump for India-Pak mediation
New Delhi [India], June 6 (ANI): As Russian aide Yury Ushakov endorsed United States President Donald Trump's claim of mediating between India and Pakistan, former diplomat and foreign affairs expert K P Fabian said on Friday that it was simply a diplomatic move by Russia amid friction regarding the Ukraine war. The former diplomat said that the Russian president is 'navigating waters with consummate skill,' as the country has rejected Trump's demand for an unconditional ceasefire with Ukraine. He also voiced his belief that India could have acknowledged Trump's claim in a 'gracious way' without diminishing India's victory with Operation Sindoor. 'My personal view, let me repeat it, India could have acknowledged it (Trump's mediation claims) in a gracious manner without diminishing in any way from India's great victory. Now Russia has said it, partly true. Look at the context; Russia is being difficult with Trump about Ukraine. Trump has been asking for a practically unconditional ceasefire, which Putin has refused. So he was navigating waters with consummate skill,' Fabian told ANI here. While Fabian agreed that the US was in contact with both Islamabad and New Delhi but it was not India that had requested mediation, but it could be assumed that Pakistan did, which was subsequently pushed in the 'right direction' by the US. 'Both (US) Vice President Vance and Secretary of State (Marco) Rubio were in touch with both Islamabad and New Delhi. At some point in time, when the Indian Air Force was able to strike hard, Pakistan did not know what to do, whether to escalate or de-escalate or ask for a ceasefire. At that point, Washington pushed Pakistan in the right direction,' he said. Fabian, however, did not agree to Trump's claim of mediating talks, calling it a 'violence of the English language.' he said that mediation can only happen when both sides ask for it. 'Trump said there was mediation, now that is...a slight violence to the English language, because there can be mediation between A and B by C, only if A and B ask C. In this case, we may assume that Pakistan did ask, but we also know that India did not ask, so there was no mediation, from which it doesn't follow that Trump did not contribute to the ceasefire,' the former diplomat said. Both India and Pakistan announced an understanding on the cessation of hostilities on May 10, following the Pakistani Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) calling his Indian counterpart to discuss the issue. India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 and struck nine terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied-Kashmir in response to a ghastly terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in which 26 people were killed. The operation targeted terror infrastructure inside Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, eliminating over 100 terrorists linked to Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen. Following the strikes, Pakistan retaliated with cross-border shelling and attempted drone attacks. In response, India launched coordinated airstrikes that damaged key military infrastructure across 11 Pakistani airbases. (ANI)