Your favorite alcoholic beverage could be linked to deadly form of cancer, study finds
Following the surgeon general's January advisory linking alcohol consumption to seven types of cancer, a new study from the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has revealed another possible risk.
The research, recently published in the journal PLOS Medicine, classified alcohol as a carcinogen, highlighting a particular increased risk of pancreatic cancer.
The surgeon general's previous advisory named cancers of the breast (in women), colorectum, esophagus, voice box, liver, mouth and throat.
Psychedelics As Potential Mental Health Treatment Are Explored By Trump Administration
The researchers associated the pancreatic cancer risk with beer and spirits/liquor, but not with the intake of wine.
"Alcohol consumption is a known carcinogen, but until now, the evidence linking it specifically to pancreatic cancer has been considered inconclusive," said senior study author Dr. Pietro Ferrari, head of the IARC Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, in a press release.
Read On The Fox News App
"Our findings provide new evidence that pancreatic cancer may be another cancer type associated with alcohol consumption, a connection that has been underestimated until now."
For the study, researchers recruited 2.5 million participants with a median age of 57, following them for about 16 years.
Fda Approves First Ai Tool To Predict Breast Cancer Risk
Out of the group, 10,067 cases of pancreatic cancer were recorded.
Each increase of 10 grams of ethanol per day in alcohol consumption was associated with a 3% increase in the risk of pancreatic cancer, the study found.
Women who consumed 15 to 30 grams of alcohol (about one to two standard drinks) per day had a 12% increase in pancreatic cancer risk.
Men who consumed 30 to 60 grams (two to six standard drinks) per day had a 15% increased risk of pancreatic cancer, and intake of over 60 grams per day was associated with a 36% greater risk.
The research did have some limitations.
"This observational study examined alcohol intake evaluated at a single time point during mid-to-late adulthood and included a limited number of Asian cohorts," the researchers wrote.
"Further research is needed to better understand the role of lifetime alcohol consumption — for example, during early adulthood — and the influence of specific consumption patterns, such as binge-drinking."
Dr. Adam Scioli, an addiction psychiatrist at Caron Treatment Centers in Pennsylvania, previously commented to Fox News Digital that "alcohol is a toxin."
"There have been reports for years that it could be beneficial for one's health — but we know now that alcohol ingestion is one of the modifiable risk factors for cancer," Scioli, who is not affiliated with IARC, told Fox News Digital.
Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter
Dr. Marc Siegel, senior medical analyst for Fox News, was not involved in the study but spoke with Fox News Digital about the findings.
"This is in keeping with alcohol as a toxin that directly inflames and damages pancreatic cells," he said.
Around 75,000 Americans each year are diagnosed with a cancer that is in some way linked to alcohol use, according to Scioli.
Dr. Neha Pathak, WebMD's chief physician editor of health and lifestyle medicine, noted that the study highlights a new, independent risk factor for pancreatic cancer.
"What's important to know is that there really isn't a safe level of drinking when it comes to cancer risk," Atlanta-based Pathak, who also did not participate in the research, told Fox News Digital.
For more Health articles, visit www.foxnews.com/health
"This study reinforces that message — but it also shows how complex these links are, and how we need to keep digging deeper into the role of alcohol and different drinking habits in cancer development," she added.
Fox News Digital reached out to several beverage industry associations requesting comment.
Melissa Rudy of Fox News Digital contributed to this report.Original article source: Your favorite alcoholic beverage could be linked to deadly form of cancer, study finds
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mercury from centuries-old pollution still circulating in oceans, study finds
Toxins released by long-extinguished fossil fuel fires and gold smelters are showing up in the bodies of Arctic wildlife, according to new research pointing to mercury released by pollution hundreds of years ago still circulating in ocean currents. A paper published Thursday in Nature Communications sought to untangle a paradox: why levels of the potent neurotoxin mercury in Arctic whales and polar bears are increasing — despite steps the world has taken to curb mercury pollution. Those levels are now 20 to 30 times higher in Arctic wildlife than they were before the industrial era began, even as global mercury pollution has fallen since the 1970s. 'We've monitored mercury in Arctic animals for over 40 years. Despite declining global emissions since the 1970s, we see no corresponding decrease in Arctic concentrations — on the contrary,' coauthor Rune Dietz of Aarhus University, said in a statement. The researchers' conclusion: mercury released by pollution hundreds of years ago is still circulating in ocean currents, which convey it up to the Arctic. The findings come amid reports that the Trump administration is seeking to overturn rules limiting the release of mercury from U.S. power plants — a step that reverses a long campaign to slow its accumulation in the atmosphere. If these U.S. changes take place, the findings suggest, they will continue to contaminate the environment well into the 2300s. Mercury — particularly forms that have been processed by bacteria — wreaks havoc on the brain and body, disrupting the ability of humans and animals to move, sense and think. While a global effort has been successful in cutting levels of mercury in the atmosphere, Thursday's findings point to a mystery: Levels of the toxin in the muscle and tissue of top predators like seals and polar bears are still going up. In addition to being released into the environment from burning fossil fuels, mercury is also used to purify gold extracted in small-scale or wildcat mining — a practice that is still common in the world's forests, but has significantly decreased from its 19th Century peak. In gold rushes like those in 1850s California or the modern Amazon, miners used mercury to bind together gold together from a slurry of dirt and ore, and then burn it off to leave pure gold — sending the mercury into the atmosphere. From there, mercury rains down onto the land and flows into lakes and rivers, where bacteria break it down — as well as into the oceans, where that breakdown can take as much as 300 years. The same quality that lets mercury pull together gold flakes gives it an insidious role in the environment because animals cannot easily purge it from their bodies. That means mercury levels concentrate in the bodies of top predators — whether bears or humans. The long duration of mercury in oceans gives it time to make its own epic journey from 19th Century smelters to the modern Arctic, the scientists found. 'Transport of mercury from major sources like China to Greenland via ocean currents can take up to 150 years,' Dietz said. 'This helps explain the lack of decline in Arctic mercury levels.' Though China is working to phase out mercury mining and pollution from coal, the findings suggest a long lag time. Even if mercury pollution continues to decrease, the scientists projected, its levels will continue to go up in the Arctic. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
House bipartisan bill directs NSA to create 'AI security playbook' amid Chinese tech race
FIRST ON FOX – Rep. Darin LaHood, R-Ill., is introducing a new bill Thursday imploring the National Security Administration (NSA) to develop an "AI security playbook" to stay ahead of threats from China and other foreign adversaries. The bill, dubbed the "Advanced AI Security Readiness Act," directs the NSA's Artificial Intelligence Security Center to develop an "AI Security Playbook to address vulnerabilities, threat detection, cyber and physical security strategies, and contingency plans for highly sensitive AI systems." It is co-sponsored by House Select Committee on China Chairman Rep. John Moolenaar, R-Mich., Ranking Member Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., and Rep. Josh Gottheimer, D-N.J. LaHood, who sits on the House Intelligence Committee and the House Select Committee on China, told Fox News Digital that the legislative proposal, if passed, would be the first time Congress codifies a "multi-prong approach to ensure that the U.S. remains ahead in the advanced technology race against the CCP." The new bill follows another bipartisan legislative proposal, the "Chip Security Act," which he introduced in late May. That proposal aims to improve export control mechanisms – including for chips and high-capacity chip manufacturing – protect covered AI technologies with a focus on cybersecurity, and limit outbound investment to firms directly tied to the Chinese Community Party or China's People's Liberation Army. Chinese Bioweapon Smuggling Case Shows Us 'Trains Our Enemies,' 'Learned Nothing' From Covid: Security Expert "We start with the premise that China has a plan to replace the United States. And I don't say that to scare people or my constituents, but they have a plan to replace the United States, and they're working on it every single day. And that entails stealing data and infiltrating our systems," LaHood told Fox News Digital. "AI is the next frontier on that. We lead the world in technology. We lead the world when it comes to AI. But what this bill will do will again make sure that things are done the right way and the correct way, and that we're protecting our assets and promoting the current technology that we have in our country." Read On The Fox News App LaHood pointed to evidence uncovered by the committee that he said shows the CCP's DeepSeek used illegal distillation techniques to steal insights from U.S. AI models to accelerate their own technology development. He also pointed to how China allegedly smuggled AI chips through Singapore intermediaries to circumvent U.S. export controls on the technology. "As we look at, 'How do we win the strategic competition?' I think most experts would say we're ahead in AI right now against China, but not by much. It is a short lead," LaHood told Fox News Digital. He said he is confident his legislative proposals will put the U.S. "in the best position to protect our assets here and make sure that we're not shipping things that shouldn't go to AI that allow them to win the AI race in China." "Whoever wins this race in the future, it's going to be critical to future warfare capabilities, to, obviously, cybersecurity," LaHood continued. "And then, whoever wins the AI competition is going to yield really unwavering economic influence in the future. And so we're aggressive in this bill in terms of targeting those areas where we need to protect our AI and our companies here in the United States, both on the commercial side and on the government side, to put us in the best position possible." The "Advanced AI Security Readiness Act" calls on the NSA to develop a playbook that identifies vulnerabilities in AI data centers and developers producing sensitive AI technologies with an emphasis on unique "threat vectors" that do not typically arise, or are less severe, in the context of conventional information technology systems." The bill says the NSA must develop "core insights" in how advanced AI systems are being trained to identify potential interferences and must develop strategies to "detect, prevent and respond to cyber threats by threat actors targeting covered AI technologies." Amazon Announces $20B Investment In Rural Pennsylvania For Ai Data Centers The bill calls on the NSA to "identify levels of security, if any, that would require substantial involvement" by the U.S. government "in the development or oversight of highly advanced AI systems." It cites a "hypothetical initiative to build covered AI technology systems in a highly secure government environment" with certain protocols in place, such as personnel vetting and security clearance processes, to mitigate "insider threats." Though not directly related, the new bill is being introduced a week after FBI Director Kash Patel sounded the alarm on how the CCP continues to deploy operatives and researchers to "infiltrate" U.S. institutions. Patel laid out the risk in announcing that two Chinese nationals were charged with smuggling a potential bioweapon into the U.S. LaHood said that case further highlights "the level of penetration and sophistication that the CCP will engage in," but he added that his bill focuses on putting a "protective layer" on U.S. AI tech and "restricting outbound investment to China." He pointed to how the CCP also has bought up farmland around strategic U.S. national security locations, particularly in Montana, North Dakota and South Dakota. "If everything was an even playing field, and we were all abiding by the same rules and standards and ethical guidelines, I have no doubt the U.S. would win [the AI race], but China has a tendency and a history of playing by a different set of rules and standards," LaHood said. "They cheat, they steal, they take our intellectual property. Not just my opinion, that's been factually laid out, you know, in many different instances. And that's the reason why we need to have a bill like this." The bill comes as the Trump administration has been pushing to bolster artificial intelligence infrastructure in the United States, and major tech companies, including Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, OpenAI, Oracle and others, have made major investments in constructing AI-focused data centers and enhancing U.S. cloud computing. Last week, Amazon announced a $20 billion investment in constructing AI data centers in rural Pennsylvania. It followed a similar $10 billion investment in North Carolina. In late May, the NSA's Artificial Intelligence Security Center released "joint guidance" on the "risks and best practices in AI data security." The recommendations include implementing methods to secure the data used in AI-based systems, "such as employing digital signatures to authenticate trusted revisions, tracking data provenance, and leveraging trusted infrastructure." The center said its guidance is "critically relevant for organizations – especially system owners and administrators within the Department of Defense, National Security Systems, and the Defense Industrial Base – that already use AI systems in their day-to-day operations and those that are seeking to integrate AI into their infrastructure."Original article source: House bipartisan bill directs NSA to create 'AI security playbook' amid Chinese tech race
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Terraforming Mars: Will It Happen? Is It Even Possible?
Last week, the Trump administration released a presidential budget request that would cancel almost all NASA science missions in order to focus on putting humans on Mars. It's mainly a showy, we-can-do-it project. Mere weeks before, the CEO of a small San Francisco non-profit argued in a new paper that we need to start seriously considering terraforming Mars. The priorities of the two groups could not be more different. The lead author of the paper, Erika DeBenedictis, received the prestigious Astera Fellowship to found Pioneer Labs, a small startup dedicated to designing microbes for terraforming. In The Case for Mars Terraforming Research, published last month in Nature Astronomy, she and her co-authors explain why terraforming studies are important. They also address how little we still know about potentially terraforming Mars. The main takeaway: Mars is not ready for humans, and humans are not ready for Mars. For some readers, the question of colonizing Mars isn't why, but how. If that's you, feel free to skip ahead. But others might approach the matter with more skepticism. Space colonization has become a political byword, but opposition is far from new. Perhaps most famously (at least among us science geeks), Gil Scott-Heron's 1970 poem Whitey on the Moon contrasted the poverty conditions of many Black Americans with the perceived excess of the Apollo missions. "I can't pay no doctor bill (but Whitey's on the Moon)," he wrote. "Ten years from now, I'll be paying still (while Whitey's on the Moon)." From this vantage point, is spending billions on terraforming research anything more than a nationalist vanity project? DeBenedictis and her team argue that it is important. "Technologies developed for Mars habitation, such as desiccation-resistant probably benefit Earth," they write. In an older interview with the Astera Institute, DeBenedictis summed up this aspect of the paper's argument. "Researching the possibility of a green Mars involves an infinite number of steps, all of which are in the right direction. How do we make human presence net-positive for the surrounding environment, rather than net-negative?" Unlike the Trump administration, the study doesn't advocate for current human spaceflight to Mars. Instead, it proposes taking the questions of colonization seriously, starting from first principles. Should we? How would we? What would the future of Mars look like? You'd be forgiven for assuming terraforming is just science fiction. But unlike faster-than-light travel, this staple of space adventure has a real scientific basis behind it. The new study lays out a timeline for terraforming Mars, and it's a lot more rapid than you might expect. They propose that careful bioengineering can accelerate the formation of an ecosystem. Instead of the billions of years it took Earth to turn green, Mars could achieve it in a few decades. The key to this rapid progression would be the development of microbes that thrive on Mars. Bypassing the labyrinth of evolution, humans could combine traits of Earth-based microbes such as temperature tolerance (surface temperature on Mars swings from -150°C to +20°C), invulnerability to fierce radiation and toxic gas, and no preference for atmospheric pressure. Such species could lead to an algae-covered Mars within decades. How scientists would prevent such hardy microbes from disrupting ecosystems on Earth, the team doesn't address. According to their estimates, if all the water ice on Mars melted, it could form 10,000,000 km2 of ocean at a depth of 300m. That's far less than the amount of liquid water on Earth, but it's enough to support long-term life on Mars. In turn, the melting of Martian ice caps, which include both water and carbon dioxide ice, would increase atmospheric pressure. A thicker atmosphere would lessen the dramatic temperature swings between Martian night and day, in turn allowing the proliferation of life. Martian soil also includes the necessary components for agriculture. Science fiction author Andy Weir exploited this so his marooned protagonist could grow potatoes in the hit 2017 science-fiction novel The Martian. Such calculations have led planetary scientists to scour Mars for evidence of past life, mostly through remote sensing. (Soil samples are notoriously difficult to return to Earth for testing.) So far, they haven't found any evidence of life, only evidence of conditions necessary for life at some point in the distant past. So, are we missing something? This is where DeBenedictis and Pioneer Labs' vision of Mars colonization research differs most dramatically from that of Elon Musk and SpaceX. The gist of the new paper is not that terraforming should happen now, but that scientists from different disciplines need to consider terraforming when designing future projects. In planetary science, for example, the paper argues for continued research on everything we don't know about Mars. For instance, ice covers one-third of the planet. What's under it? More ice? Networks of caves? Liquid water? The answer could portend wildly different visions of a bioactive Mars. They also call for extensive simulations of dust storms, a notable feature of Martian weather. Right now, planetary scientists understand dust storms on Mars fairly well. But how would dust change the atmosphere in a warmer, wetter Mars? How would the new climate alter the strength of the dust storms? But perhaps the biggest open question for terraforming is whether Mars has enough electron acceptors to support life. Electron acceptors are molecules capable of transferring electrons -- and thereby energy -- down a chemical chain. They include carbon dioxide and nitrates, and are vital not only for photosynthesis, but also for human respiration. Despite their affiliation with Pioneer Labs, which focuses on microbe engineering, the authors don't call for the scientific community to jump on the terraforming bandwagon. "While the possibilities are exciting, anything as big as modification of a planetary climate has major consequences and would require careful thought," they write. "But until we do more research, we do not even know what is physically or biologically possible." In other words: research now, decide later. "Priorities include quantifying H2O, N2, and CO2 sample return, test missions for proof of concept of warming methods, and climate feedback studies," they explain, linking various NASA science directives with terraforming questions. Current NASA goals for Mars already support human exploration, they add. "No abrupt change of course is needed." But an abrupt change of course is in store for NASA. The presidential budget request cancels all Mars research missions except for the Martian Moons eXploration, which is mostly funded by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency. It still wants to put colonists on Mars, but without laying the scientific groundwork first. If science takes up Mars terraforming research, it will be without the United States.
