OPINION: The truth is out about Germany's far-right AfD - now ban the party
In the days leading up to the federal election last February, the whole of Germany held its breath, waiting for the
results and hoping for a brighter future. But sadly, this hope was misplaced.
When it was clear that the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party had won the second most votes (doubling its result from the previous election four years prior),
I got a call from my friend who was crying. She didn't have a German passport and feared that
someday, even if not today, she could be deported. In that case it wouldn't matter that she
had built up a whole life in Germany.
READ ALSO:
'A fifth of voters hate me' - How do foreigners in Germany feel about far-right surge?
A strong case for a constitutional ban
The AfD should be banned or at least restricted. People need to know how serious of a threat the party poses to the German political system, even more broadly, to democracy.
In Germany the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (or
Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz
- BfV) has the power to ban or closely monitor parties that might be a danger to the constitution.
Given that the BfV
formerly classified the AfD as a right-wing extremist group
on Friday, the time to do so is now.
The BfV has only ever banned two parties in history: the Socialist Reich Party (SRP) and the Communist Party of Germany (KPD).
More recently there were attempts to ban the National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD), which was known to promote far-right, neo-Nazi and ultranationalist positions. The first ban attempt failed in 2003 due to procedural errors, and then a subsequent attempt in 2017 was dismissed because the party was ruled to have too few supporters to be considered a serious threat. (However the party
did lose its public funding
.)
But this isn't the case with the AfD, which has now clearly established itself as one of Germany's top parties, yet holds positions that are similar to those of the NPD. Both parties oppose immigration, rail against non-traditional gender and family roles, and are critical of the European Union – arguing that Germany
would be better off to leave it
.
READ ALSO:
'Dexit' would cost Germany '€690 billion and millions of jobs'
Advertisement
Until recently, only some parts of the AfD were condemned by the BfV. Specifically, the party's state branches in Saxony, Thuringia, and Saxony-Anhalt were all officially declared 'unconstitutional' by the authority.
In my opinion, the AfD's state chapter in Thuringia, led by Björn Höcke, is the worst case of them all. Björn Höcke has made several public statements that should be taken as a warning as to the party's goals: He has said, 'Das Problem ist, dass Hitler als absolut böse dargestellt wird' (The problem is that Hitler is portrayed as absolutely evil).
Archive photo from 2020 shows demonstrators in Erfurt, Thuringia holding a march under the motto "Against fascism". Photo: picture alliance/dpa/dpa-Zentralbild | Bodo Schackow
He was also charged for incitement to hatred (or hate speech)
on two separate occasions
for saying, 'Alles für Deutschland' (Everything for Germany) on stage at his rallies. The phrase is banned in Germany, because it was commonly used by the Nazi Party's paramilitary group – the
Sturmabteilung
(SA). Höcke, who was a history teacher, denied knowing about the phrase's historical context, but was ultimately sentenced to pay thousands of euros in fines.
The fact that Höcke is still an active member of the AfD demonstrates the values the party holds.
FACT CHECK:
Are people punished for using Nazi slogans in Germany?
Advertisement
Why we should be concerned about 'unconstitutionality'
Perhaps I need to back up a little, and explain what it means for a party to be 'unconstitutional'.
The BfV defines a political party as 'unconstitutional' when it harms the dignity of human beings, the principle of democracy, and the rule of law.
The AfD, for example, does not see every human as equal and this is seen by the party's policies that promote exclusion and xenophobia. These policies, if enacted, would harm the dignity of certain groups.
Article 3
of the German basic law states that all humans should be treated equally, regardless of different characteristics, such as 'sex, descent, race, language, homeland and origin, faith, and religious or political views'.
German law also states that a public authority cannot stand above the law. To that end some AfD leaders have disregarded the state's monopoly on the use of force.
For example, former AfD spokesman Christian Lüth was let go in 2020, but only after being recorded suggesting that the AfD would actually benefit from Germany seeing more immigrants, and then adding, 'We can still shoot all the [migrants] afterwards. That's not an issue at all. Or gas, or whatever you want.'
Despite his dismissal, the fact that the AfD allowed someone with such extreme views to represent them in a public role for years is deeply concerning.
Advertisement
The party's influence has grown too great
Until recently the case for banning the AfD as a political party could have perhaps been disregarded due to the party's lack of influence. But now that the AfD is the second strongest power in Germany, and officially deemed to be opposed to Germany's 'free and democratic order', it's time for the BfV to take action.
Again and again we've seen
demonstrations with tens of thousands of protestors
rise up in opposition to the AfD and its right-wing policies.
Meanwhile, AfD members haven't shied away from voicing their intention to deport foreigners from Germany. The now infamous meeting in Potsdam that took place in November 2023, and was
revealed by
Correctiv
in January 2024, made it clear that leading AfD figures want not only to deport refugees and asylum seekers but really anyone they see as 'not German' or 'not assimilated'.
Another extremely alarming fact about that meeting is that it was attended not only by AfD members and right-wing extremists, but also members of the conservative Christian Democratic Union party (CDU), such as Ulrich Vosgerau (a judge), Alexander von Bismarck (a former mayor), Simone Baum (a municipal employee in Cologne) and several others. This is even more unnerving as the CDU is now the party set to lead Germany's federal government for the coming term.
READ ALSO:
Will Germany's Merz try to ban the far-right AfD?
Advertisement
It's understood that politics, not just in Germany but globally, have taken a sharp turn to the right in recent years. Currently we see Trump undermining democratic principles in the US and other right-wing parties rising in countries such as the Netherlands and Italy.
Germany is not an exception, but given its history most Germans agree it has an exceptional responsibility to ensure that extremist right-wing politics will not lead the country down a path that leads to tyranny, and mass murder, ever again.
INTERVIEW:
Is Germany at risk of repeating its dark history?
An important step must be taken – either in the form of a full ban, or at least a warning serious enough to wake people up to the fact that the AfD is becoming a serious threat. We are long past this being optional: it has now become a necessity.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Berlin, Paris urge restraint as Israel-Iran crisis escalates – DW – 06/14/2025
As the hostilities between Israel and Iran itensify, European leaders have called for calm, warning of the growing risk of a broader regional war. But Europe's role as a key mediator may be over amid stalled diplomacy. The latest flareup intensified Friday when Israel launched a targeted strike on Iran's Natanz nuclear facility, killing several senior military commanders and nuclear scientists. Tehran then retaliated to Israel's large-scale attacks with waves of missile strikes on Friday evening and early on Saturday. The attacks in an already unstable region have caused widespread concern across Europe. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte emphasized the urgency of avoiding further escalation, calling "for many allies — including the United States — to work ... to de-escalate.' Adding, "this was a unilateral action by Israel.' European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen echoed the sentiment in a post on X, urging "all parties to act with maximum restraint and work to de-escalate the situation.' Adding that in a call to Israel's President Isaac Herzog late on Friday she "reiterated Israel's right to defend itself and protect its people." Before writing that "at the same time, perserving regional stability is vital." Further calls for restraint Key European powers also appeared to rally behind Israel following its attack and Iran's counterstrikes. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz expressed strong support for Israel's "right to protect its existence and the security of its citizens.' Adding in a post on X that Iran's nuclear program presents "a serious threat to the entire region, and particularly to the state of Israel." A sentiment echoed by French President Emmanuel Macron, who similarly urged restraint while reaffirming Israel's right to self-defense. The French leader has previously described Iran's nuclear capabilities as a significant strategic and security challenge for both France and Europe. This alignment has drawn criticism from some analysts, who argue that Europe's support for Israel may undermine its credibility as a neutral mediator. "European capitals such as Berlin and Paris have come out in support of Israel, ignoring this was an unjustified action," Hugh Lovatt, a senior policy fellow with the Middle East and North Africa program at the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR), told DW. Israel launches strikes on Iran, sparking fears of wider war To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Julien Barnes-Dacey, director of the Middle East program at the ECFR, further warned that Germany and France's alignment with Israel runs the risk of isolating Iran. "If you are an Iranian, you would see this as Europeans siding with Israel in support of military action,' he told DW. Iran, meanwhile, demanded a firmer stance from Europe. Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, in a phone call with his Italian counterpart Antonio Tajani, called on the EU and the broader international community to condemn what Tehran called a "criminal attack.' IAEA report influences Europe European powers — particularly the so-called E3 of Germany, France, and the United Kingdom — position has been influenced in part by a recent resolution from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which found Iran in violation of its nuclear non-proliferation obligations. The resolution, introduced by the E3, has provided political backing for a toucher stance on Iran, reinforcing accusations of non-compliance. As diplomatic efforts to revive the 2015 Iran nuclear deal — formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) — continue between the United States and Iran, European powers have found themselves on the sidelines. Talks between the US and Iranian officials have taken place over recent months in Oman and Rome. The sixth round, reportedly scheduled for this weekend, was cancelled on Friday following the latest strikes. "Europe missed an opportunity to use diplomacy before military escalation took over,' Lovatt said. Both he and Barnes-Dacey believe Israel's strike was designed in part to disrupt efforts to revive the US-Iran nuclear talks. Hans Jacob Schindler, senior director at the Counter Extremism Project, told DW that the region is now "in a very dangerous escalation spiral,' with risks of further escalation increasing by the day. "The current assessment is that Israel can only delay Iran's nuclear program,' Lovatt added. With nuclear diplomacy faltering and military confrontation looming, Europe's role as a mediator — once central to the Iran nuclear deal — appears increasingly sidelined.
DW
10 hours ago
- DW
Israel attacks put pressure on Germany's Middle East policy – DW – 06/13/2025
Trapped between what it sees as a historical responsibility to Israel and international law and diplomacy, Germany is facing a tough foreign policy test after the latest Israeli attacks on Iran. Germany's foreign policy in the Middle East has always involved a delicate balancing act — a balancing act that just got a little more difficult. Israel's attack on Iran this week is likely to put further pressure on Germany's close relationship with Israel. Israel's security is part of Germany's so-called "Staatsräson," or "reason of state." Former Chancellor Angela Merkel popularized the term when she addressed the Knesset, Israel's parliament, in 2008. Although the idea has no official legal standing, Merkel's successor, Olaf Scholz, doubled down on it in the months after the militant group Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023. More recently though, the severe humanitarian consequences of Israel's ongoing offensive in the Gaza Strip have made it difficult for the German government to find a suitable position on the conflict there. Only a few days ago, Germany's new Chancellor Friedrich Merz said, "frankly speaking, I no longer understand what the goal of the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip is," during a television interview. "Harming the civilian population to such an extent, as has increasingly been the case in recent days, can no longer be justified as a fight against Hamas terrorism," he told German public broadcaster WDR. Despite those statements though, there have been no consequences. For example, Germany continues to send weapons to Israel. An apartment building in Teheran hit by Israeli airstrikes Image: Vahid Salemi/AP/dpa/picture alliance Germany's support to Israel The Israeli government is defending its latest strikes against Iran by saying it was acting against "an existential threat." Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz called it a "pre-emptive strike" because Iran was close to developing a nuclear bomb, something Israel wanted to prevent happening. The German government appears to share that opinion. In a press statement issued the morning of the first Israeli strikes, Merz said Israel had "the right to defend its existence and its citizens." Merz had spoken to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the phone and Netanyahu had informed him of the military action and its objectives. The press statement also said that the German government has repeatedly expressed concerns about the Iranian nuclear program. Iran's "nuclear program violates the provisions of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and poses a serious threat to the entire region, especially to the State of Israel," the German government statement said. The goal of any diplomatic intervention and de-escalation, which Germany supports, must be that Iran does not develop nuclear weapons, the statement concluded. Friedrich Merz (left) met Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel in 2024, when Merz was the leader of the German opposition Image: Kobi Gideon/GPO/dpa/picture alliance That reaction from the German government was to be expected, Hans-Jakob Schindler, senior director of the Netherlands-based Counter Extremism Project, told DW. "Now it is the direct negotiations between the US and the Iranians that are crucial," Schindler said. "The previous negotiating format — Germany, France, the UK and the US, with the Iranians — is not a part of this any longer. In this conflict the Europeans are increasingly spectators, rather than actors." Growing criticism of Israel Schindler does not believe that the current military escalation will change anything around Germany's position on Israel. "We're not just any other country. We're Germany, with the history of the Holocaust," he explained. "In that sense there's absolutely no other moral or ethical option than expressing solidarity with Israel." That does not mean that Germany has to approve of each Israeli military operation and every Israeli government decision, Schindler continued. "The new German government seems much more prepared to criticize than the previous one," he noted. During Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's visit to Washington in April 2025, US President Donald Trump (left) assured him of the US' support Image: Leah Millis/REUTERS Voices critical of the Netanyahu government had recently been growing louder in the German government, including in the governing coalition made up of conservatives from the Christian Democratic Union, or CDU, and the Christian Social Union, as well as the left-centrist Social Democrats, or SPD. Some members of the government seem to fear being pressured by Israel. At the end of last month, Germany's Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said Germany would not allow what he called "compulsory solidarity." During his visit to Cairo, Wadephul commented on the Iranian strikes that came in retaliation for the earlier Israeli ones. "We condemn the indiscriminate Iranian attack on Israeli territory in the strongest possible terms," Wadephul, a member of the CDU, said. "Iran is currently attacking Israel with hundreds of drones. There are initial reports of casualties. These developments are more than worrying." Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar had apparently informed him of the attack. Israel's months-long military offensive in Gaza has led Germany to be increasingly critical of Israeli actions Image: REUTERS After the Israeli attacks on Iran, SPD foreign policy specialist Rolf Mützenich told German public radio broadcaster Deutschlandfunk that Israel had the right to defend itself. However, that right should be connected to imminent danger and an existential threat. Whether those prerequisites had been present for Israel to base its attack on, would certainly be discussed at the United Nations Security Council, or UNSC. At the same time, Mützenich also confirmed the dangers posed by the Iranian nuclear program, adding that Teheran had also acted irresponsibly and was also part of the current escalation spiral. International law? Whether Israel's attack on Iran was legitimate under international law is also being discussed. Law experts say a preemptive strike is actually only permissible under certain, very specific conditions — for example, when there is an imminent threat that cannot be prevented any other way. Foreign policy spokesperson and co-chair of Germany's Left party, Jan van Aken, described the Israeli attack as "a serious violation of international law, which cannot be justified as self-defense." The UNSC should meet today in order to decide on the nature of this attack, van Aken said. "All sides must immediately deescalate, also to protect the affected civilian population in Iran and Israel," he added. A synagogue in Hannover: Jewish institutions are guarded by police in Germany (file photo, 2023) Image: Julian Stratenschulte/picture alliance/dpa Some German politicians also see danger developing inside their own country due to the Israeli attack on Iran. The country's Minister of the Interior Alexander Dobrindt said that, after talking to his counterparts in states around Germany, Israeli and Jewish institutions in Germany would get extra protection, so they are prepared in case a potential domestic threat develops. The Israeli Foreign Ministry also said it would close all consulates and embassies worldwide.
DW
15 hours ago
- DW
Germany updates: Berlin boosts security for Jewish sites – DW – 06/13/2025
The German government has increased protection for Jewish and Israeli institutions across the country. ChancellorFriedrich Merz said Israel's Prime Minister had briefed him by phone, after which he convened Germany's security cabinet. Berlin reaffirmed Israel's right to self-defense but urged both sides to avoid escalation, while Israel's embassy in Berlin remains closed "until further notice." Meanwhile, a leading economic institute says Germany's economy is showing tentative signs of a recovery. Below is a round-up of the major developments in Germany on Friday, June 13:
