Federal government urged to speed up waste-to-energy technology implementation
KULAI: The Federal government should expedite the implementation of Waste-to-Energy (WTE) technology to reduce pollution at landfills, says state executive councillor Datuk Mohd Jafni Shukor.
The Johor housing and local government committee chairman said that several countries, including Singapore, have adopted this technology, which offers a cleaner and more sustainable alternative to conventional dumping methods.
"The Bukit Payung landfill project in Batu Pahat,is two years behind schedule and expected to be completed this year is among the sites set to use the WTE technology."
"We hope the Federal government can expedite the project as it could reduce the waste being sent to the Batu Empat landfill in Kota Tinggi, which has been causing odour pollution."
"I sympathise with the people living near the Batu Empat landfill, who have been suffering from the odour pollution," he said.
He made these comments at a press conference after officiating the Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) and career fair at Dewan Raya Putra.
Mohd Jafni said this when asked about the protest involving 50 Kampung Desa Makmur villagers, who called for the landfill to be shut down due to the odour pollution it has caused.
He said that the landfill, managed by the National Solid Waste Management Department, uses the traditional method of waste disposal.
"The landfill still adopts the traditional method where rubbish is dumped directly into the area, which may have caused the odour pollution."
"Unlike the sanitary landfill in Seelong, Kulai, which uses a more current method where the waste is buried and covered with a canvas," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Selangor laying the groundwork to phase out single-use plastic straws
Wong said authorities should roll out the initiative with incentives. SELANGOR is reviewing local laws to identify which authority should enforce the phasing out of single-use plastic straws. 'The process of identifying the authority in charge has begun,' said Jamaliah Jamaluddin. The state public health and environment committee chairman said when it came to the law, a series of discussions was needed. 'This is to ensure there's no conflict or loophole when it is approved at the Selangor State Executive Council (MMKN) level. We are currently undergoing that process,' she said. Puchong MP Yeo Bee Yin, said the straw ban was an awareness campaign promoted during her tenure as Minister of Energy, Technology, Science, Climate Change and Environment in 2018. The 'Say No to Single-use Plastic Straw' posters are still on the walls of some restaurants. 'We wanted the public to be aware that plastic straws are harmful. Many places, such as cafes, are still giving away biodegradable straws. 'However, places such as mamak stalls may be facing cost-related issues. 'Bigger food and beverage companies are already using biodegradable straws. However, plastic straws are still available due to cost and customer preferences,' she said. She added that under the Malaysia Plastic Sustainability Roadmap 2021–2030, the single- use plastic straw was among top 10 items listed to be phased out. 'We have to see this in totality and consider the progress we are making. I will certainly bring this matter up in Parliament,' said Yeo. The implementation of any new directive related to single- use plastics, including straws should be legally enforced to be effective, said Wong Si Peng. The Centre to Combat Corruption and Cronyism (C4 Centre) events and projects officer said institutionalised changes were needed for a positive outcome. She called for a bottom-up approach and the empowerment of local authorities to roll out the initiative with incentives. 'Ideas to ban or stop the use of certain items should not be implemented haphazardly; instead, they must be thoroughly thought out,' she said. Wong added that the issue of overflowing of landfills should be of great concern to all parties. She said one promising local council was Kota Kinabalu City Hall, which enforced a policy where no plastic bags were provided in shops, and no fee was collected. 'If you want a bag, you have to buy a recyclable one. This encourages people to bring their own bags when shopping,' she said. Wong hopes data is collected on these initiatives to reduce waste through the ban of single- use plastics, and that it is made publicly accessible. 'Such data is valuable to inform policy drafting,' she said. — By SHEILA SRI PRIYA
Malay Mail
12 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Does US law allow Trump to send troops to quell protests?
LOS ANGELES, June 9 — President Donald Trump has deployed National Guard troops to California after two days of protests by hundreds of demonstrators against immigration raids, saying that the protests interfered with federal law enforcement and framing them as a possible 'form of rebellion' against the authority of the US government. California Governor Gavin Newsom on Sunday said he had formally requested that the Trump Administration rescind 'its unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County' and return them to his command. What laws did Trump cite to justify the move? Trump cited Title 10 of the US Code, a federal law that outlines the role of the US Armed Forces, in his June 7 order to call members of the California National Guard into federal service. A provision of Title 10 - Section 12406 - allows the president to deploy National Guard units into federal service if the US is invaded, there is a 'rebellion or danger of rebellion' or the president is 'unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States.' What are National Guard troops allowed to do under the law cited in Trump's order? An 1878 law, the Posse Comitatus Act, generally forbids the US military, including the National Guard, from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Section 12406 does not override that prohibition, but it allows the troops to protect federal agents who are carrying out law enforcement activity and to protect federal property. For example, National Guard troops cannot arrest protesters, but they could protect US Immigration and Customs Enforcement who are carrying out arrests. What are the implications for freedom of speech? The First Amendment of the US Constitution guarantees the right to assembly, freedom of speech and the press. Experts have said that Trump's decision to have US troops respond to protests is an ominous sign for how far the president is willing to go to repress political speech and activity that he disagrees with or that criticizes his administration's policies. A demonstrator holds a US flag across from California Highway Patrol officers. — Reuters pic Is Trump's move susceptible to legal challenges? Four legal experts from both left- and right-leaning advocacy organizations have cast doubt on Trump's use of Title 10 in response to immigration protests calling it inflammatory and reckless, especially without the support of California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, who has said Trump's actions would only escalate tensions. The protests in California do not rise to the level of 'rebellion' and do not prevent the federal government from executing the laws of the United States, experts said. Title 10 also says 'orders for these purposes shall be issued through the governors of the States,' but legal experts said that language might not be an obstacle. Legislative history suggests that those words were likely meant to reflect the norms of how National Guard troops are typically deployed, rather than giving a governor the option to not comply with a president's decision to deploy troops. Could California sue to challenge Trump's move? California could file a lawsuit, arguing that deployment of National Guard troops was not justified by Title 10 because there was no 'rebellion' or threat to law enforcement. A lawsuit might take months to resolve, and the outcome would be uncertain. Because the protests may be over before a lawsuit is resolved, the decision to sue might be more of a political question than a legal one, experts said. A demonstrator strikes a Waymo self-driving car with a skateboard as another burns in the background during a protest against federal immigration sweeps in downtown Los Angeles June 8, 2025. — Reuters pic What other laws could trump invoke to direct the National Guard or other US military troops? Trump could take a more far-reaching step by invoking the Insurrection Act of 1792, which would allow troops to directly participate in civilian law enforcement, for which there is little recent precedent. Casting protests as an 'insurrection' that requires the deployment of troops against US citizens would be riskier legal territory, one legal expert said, in part because mostly peaceful protests and minor incidents aren't the sort of thing that the Insurrection Act were designed to address. The Insurrection Act has been used by past presidents to deploy troops within the US in response to crises like the 1794 Whiskey Rebellion and the rise of the Ku Klux Klan in the immediate aftermath of the American Civil War. The law was last invoked by President George H.W. Bush in 1992, when the governor of California requested military aid to suppress unrest in Los Angeles following the Rodney King trial. But, the last time a president deployed the National Guard in a state without a request from that state's governor was 1965, when President Lyndon Johnson sent troops to protect civil rights demonstrators in Montgomery, Alabama. — Reuters
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Almost RM800mil in loans for water projects
For the sacrificial feast: Fadillah (right) cutting up meat during a Program Ibadah Korban at Kampung Tupong Jaya, Kuching, in conjunction with Aidiladha. — Bernama KUCHING: A total of RM796.4mil in loans were provided to state governments this year to finance water supply projects, says Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof. The Deputy Prime Minister said the projects were among the Federal Government's measures to mitigate the impact of the south-west monsoon which is expected to bring dry weather and potential drought. He said as of May, 28 projects under the initiative were already underway, with 12 in Sabah, two each in Kedah and Perlis, one in Kelantan, three each in Pahang and Terengganu, and five in Sarawak. 'The projects are at various stages of completion. Some are under implementation and seven are expected to be completed this year,' he told reporters after attending a Hari Raya Aidiladha event at Kampung Tupong Jaya here yesterday, Bernama reported. Fadillah, who is Energy Transition and Water Transformation Minister, said the ministry is also focusing on resolving the issue of non-revenue water (NRW). He said NRW was caused by various factors such as system inefficiencies, pipe leakages, and water theft. 'When pipe connections are poorly installed, leakages happen. There are also old pipes that have started leaking. 'Overall, we estimate that the country loses 40% of its treated water. This incurs high costs. So our priority is to identify methods to reassess the piping systems and replace damaged pipes,' he added.
