Girl who lost home in Palisades fire meets favorite author
LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Calif. - A 5-year-old who lost her home in the Palisades Fire got a very special surprise.
Emily Calandrelli, author and the 100th woman in space, visited Lucy and brought signed copies of the little girl's favorite books that were lost in the fire.
"What do you want to me when you grow up?" Calandrelli asked Lucy.
"I think a scientist, a cook and someone that makes art," Lucy replied.
During the heartwarming encounter, Calandrelli surprised Lucy with a copy of "Reach for the Stars" and a box of the scientist's lab kit.
For more information on Emily Calandrelli's work, you can click here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cosmopolitan
10 hours ago
- Cosmopolitan
Materialists: Breaking Down the Ending of Dakota Johnson's New Movie
If you walked into Materialists expecting a glossy, upper-crust rom-com, you probably walked out blinking and confused. Celine Song's Materialists doesn't end with grand gestures or sweeping declarations. The film begins with a question: what if love were just another asset class? It ends with another: what if it isn't? By the time the closing credits roll, our central lover girl has made choices that feel like a settling of accounts. At first glance, the film looks like it might be a sleek satire—think High Fidelity in The Row. But like Past Lives, Song's breakout debut, Materialists is less interested in plotting a typical romantic arc than in studying the moment someone realizes they're tired of managing their own life like a startup. The woman at the center of all this calculation is Lucy (a whisper-perfect Dakota Johnson), a professional matchmaker for New York's elite—though 'matchmaker' hardly captures the strategic, Silicon-Valley-meets-Venus nature of her work. Her clients want love, but they want it optimized. So does Lucy. Or so she thinks. Lucy had a long-term relationship with John (Chris Evans, shaggy and emotionally vulnerable), a sweet but struggling actor. They lived together in a modest apartment but broke up because, as Lucy says, their lack of money was making them miserable. There was real affection between them, but also a gnawing sense that Lucy's ambition was outgrowing the life they'd built. Enter: Harry (Pedro Pascal), a wealthy tech founder who meets Lucy through her matchmaking work—and promptly falls for her instead. He's charming and stable, a penthouse kind of guy. He represents everything Lucy is supposed to want. Harry persists. He courts Lucy the way one might court a promising early-stage investment—lavishly, with patience. She caves, cautiously. Their relationship coincides with a professional upswing: Lucy's clients are coupling up, deals are closing, and her crown jewel match—between longtime client Sophie and a charming new prospect named Mark—feels like her magnum opus. But Materialists doesn't believe in upward trajectories. Sophie reports that Mark assaulted her, Lucy's carefully balanced portfolio of love and commerce collapses. The algorithm broke. And worse, it's personal. Harry, good on paper and good in practice, becomes collateral damage. Lucy, having sublet her apartment in anticipation of a couple's trip to Iceland, moves in with John. They travel upstate, slip into old rhythms, kiss at a wedding. But the fairytale doesn't click into place. When John asks the inevitable, 'Are we doing this again?' Lucy doesn't have an answer—only a growing awareness that she's still measuring her feelings against a spreadsheet she no longer believes in. Then comes the film's sharpest pivot: a call from Sophie. Mark is outside her apartment. The police won't help. Lucy and John race over, not as matchmaker and ex, but as people who care. They sit with her. They file the paperwork. It's a turning point—unflashy, deeply felt, and more intimate than any romantic gesture. And it makes the next one—John's proposal during a casual lunch in Central Park—feel earned, not just emotionally, but existentially. By the end, Lucy is offered a promotion she doesn't quite want, a life she no longer needs. She says maybe. She kisses John. The credits roll over a quiet tableau of marriage licenses being processed at the clerk's office. No sweeping score. No final kiss in the rain. Just a signature, a choice, and a recalibration. Materialists is not a film about choosing between men. It's a film about choosing between stories. Lucy doesn't reject ambition or romance—she just stops outsourcing her values to either. 'Materialists' is playing in theaters now. Buy Tickets
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
‘Materialists' Is Nothing Like Your Average Rom-Com
Midway through screening 'Materialists,' the follow-up to Celine Song's Oscar-nominated 'Past Lives,' I realize I have the A24 romantic comedy all wrong — partly because the movie is a bit too serious to fit, say, the Nora Ephron standard of rom-coms. Another reason is that the film's vague synopsis hardly does justice to the poignant commentary you discover at the heart of it. In 'Materialists,' a young, ambitious New York City matchmaker finds herself caught between Mr. Right and an imperfect ex. That premise plays out clearly in the film's glittering trailer, which stars Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal and Chris Evans in a simmering love triangle that looks like it would swell to the typical dramatic stakes most would expect from a romantic drama. At least that's what I thought. But after watching 'Materialists,' I found that a far more compelling narrative side-stepped that familiar trope — one that thoughtfully explores the perils of love and relationships, as well as the shift in today's dating culture. That was a smart move on Song's part, saving the film's strongest elements for the full viewing experience (something I wish more contemporary movie trailers would do). The initial draw of 'Materialists' obviously lies in its charming lead cast and the allure of a new American romance that's been grossly missing from theaters. However, the deeper story that unfolds within it is just as engrossing, and more importantly, subversive to the romance genre, offering profound self-reflection in addition to the anticipated happily-ever-after. 'Materialists' follows lowly paid matchmaker Lucy (Johnson) on her quest to help her elite New York City clientele of moneyed professionals find their perfect love matches (a storyline hatched from Song's own stint as a matchmaker). Lucy's process is something like negotiating a corporate deal, which requires noting every pesky detail her clients are looking for in a prospective partner — the ideal physique, shared interests and hobbies, a college degree, a six-figure salary and 6-foot height to match for some — among other superficial traits almost too ridiculous to list. One client, a middle-aged Black woman, demands a partner who is a through-and-through conservative Republican. Another, a white man close to his 50s, refuses to budge on his maximum age requirement, because a woman in her 30s and 40s is way too old for his taste, he says (even 29 is pushing it). A 27-year-old is more his speed. Lucy tolerates her clients' shameless requests with a nod and a smile, because that's the nature of her gig: fulfill the fantasy, supply the demand and find the best possible person to get the deal done. Because matchmaking, by her high-end agency's standards, is the business of finding value in a person's best qualities, mostly those physical and financial. In a sense, Lucy knows it's a demoralizing approach to finding love, but she herself has a contradictory relationship with the concept. At an office party thrown by her co-workers to celebrate her nine-marriage success rate, Lucy credits her skills to the golden matchmaker's rule: 'If a girl asks for a tall drink of water with a salary over $500,000, you deliver.' Funny enough, Lucy is just as materialistic in her own love life. She refuses to settle down until she meets the man of her dreams — someone who's painfully, 'achingly' rich. However, she brushes off the first 'unicorn,' as she calls such handsome and wealthy rarities, she meets at a client's wedding. The unicorn in question is Harry (Pascal), a handsome, charming, tall drink of water who's very, very rich — and only has eyes for Lucy. The problem is, she doesn't think she deserves the private equity broker's money or affections (or $12 million apartment) because, in her mind, she's worthless and has nothing better to offer but her winning matchmaking services. A failed actress in debt and only raking in $80,000 a year, Lucy is convinced that Harry can do better. He thinks otherwise. Lucy offers to introduce the eligible Manhattan bachelor to other women he'd be perfect for, but, in classic rom-dram fashion, Harry is determined to court only her. But there's a fork in his plan when Lucy's complicated waiter ex, John (Evans), crashes the party. In a flashback, we learn just how much history runs deep between the matchmaker and the struggling actor: They were together for five years to be exact, according to an anniversary date that went from bad to worse. It's while running late to dinner reservations (which come with a costly no-show fee) in John's old hoopty that Lucy realizes she's tired of being a broke woman dating a broke man in New York City (with roommates). So, they break up — but now this wedding is their chance at a reunion. It's unspoken when John and Lucy embrace, having gone years without seeing each other, but there's still unfinished business between the two. And just as Lucy is making a decent living helping others find love, John swoops in to remind her who introduced her to it in the first place. That's when you think 'Materialists' is going to veer off to follow a tangled affair between Lucy and her two suitors, faced with having to choose between a promising new love and an old flame. A tale as old as time. For the most part, this plotline continues throughout the remainder of the movie. I'll skip ahead to avoid major spoilers — just know Lucy makes a choice and gets her happy ending, even if it's not the conventional one she always imagined. That's not even the most interesting half of 'Materialists.' In fact, it pales in comparison to what Song really tries to get at in her sophomore feature film: how true soul connections rebuke the shallowness of the modern dating world, where singles are more concerned with finding an aspirational kind of love that looks good on paper. 'The things that are in the movie came from the truth I learned,' Song said in the film's production notes, referencing her time as a dating consultant. 'That there is a very funny, very dark objectification of each other's humanity, and therefore a very real commodification of each other, as we go through this thing that we call dating. But it's supposed to be in pursuit of love.' That's a message the writer-director drives home in the opening scene of 'Materialists,' which shows a prehistoric cave couple exploring what could be the first human marriage, as they wordlessly exchange a flower ring symbolic of today's diamond ring proposal. But there are no expensive gems to gawk at or flashy jewelry to show off to friends, family and, in today's time, social media — just two people in love. The disconnect between that and today's superficial box-checking culture, as well as the way love is nowadays in constant conversation with money, is something Song is particularly interested in probing in 'Materialists' — even if it takes a while to round out her point. Speaking on her film's intention, Song told the Los Angeles Times: 'We're not just showing up here to be in love and beautiful and get to be in a rom-com. We're also going to take this opportunity to talk about something. Because that's the power of the genre. Our favorite rom-coms are the ones where we get to start a conversation about something.' That dialogue finally takes shape in 'Materialists' after the indulgence of a tangled love triangle, when an unthinkable client crisis bursts Lucy's bubble about her line of work. At the start of the film, we meet the matchmaker's toughest client, Sophie (Zoë Winters). Not tough because she's difficult to please, or unattractive, or not a great catch — she just desperately wants to meet a nice guy who likes her for who she is. But that breed is seemingly hard to find in NYC, as Lucy struggles to find Sophie the perfect guy. Still, her client subjects herself to the indignities of futile dates in hopes of striking gold. However, the reality of that smacks Lucy in the face when she learns that one match she sent Sophie on a date with sexually assaulted her. Lucy's boss (Marin Ireland) breaks the news, instructing her not to reach out to Sophie or get too hung up on the assault. According to Lucy's boss, if you stay in the matchmaking business long enough, sexual violence becomes pretty common. Bleak, yet true to the ugliness of the real world. Song does something bold here by venturing into darker territory. However, I struggled to understand her point of using sexual trauma as a narrative device to awaken Lucy from her own callousness and expose the exploits of an industry. It's not enough to call attention to a social issue as sensitive as this without a proper resolution. While that sobering plot helps explain why Lucy is at a crossroads in her love liaison gig, it doesn't bring much clarity to her love life. That mystery lingers at the end of the film, when Lucy finally confronts her superficial ideologies of love. Maybe it's a soul-bearing declaration from John that pushes her to that point. Or perhaps an awkward encounter with Harry about an unbelievable cosmetic surgery — seriously, you have to hear the ridiculous explanation that lives up to the movie's title. Either way, 'Materialists' leaves us with a lot to ponder after the credits roll. The film puts itself in conversation with many of its references, from 'Sense and Sensibility' to 'Pride & Prejudice,' yet still manages to contribute to the romance canon with a unique modern lens. It doesn't hinge on the gamble of love as much as it does on the observation of what many perceive love to be. Whether it's finding financial security, the ideal person to grow old with, or a soulmate you can't live without, 'Materialists' offers no easy answers there. Only a disquieting truth that the concept will always be deeply misunderstood. 'Past Lives' Will Quietly Surprise You At Every Turn 'Picture This' Doesn't Work As A Comedy Or Romance 'The Idea Of You' Is A Pretty Underwhelming Book-To-Movie Adaptation
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Coolest Space Photos of 2025 Will Fill You With Cosmic Wonder
There's always something happening in space, and humanity is documenting it more quickly and clearly than ever before. Orbiting telescopes, astronauts and spacecraft are sending back a stream of photos that show off the diversity and wonder of the universe. Here are some of the best space photos of the year, so far. It wasn't just imagery of objects beyond Earth that caught our eye over the first half of the year. The European Space Agency's Sentinel-2 Earth-observing satellite documented the devastating Palisades Fire in California in January. The Jan. 7 view showed a large smoke plume stretching out over the Pacific Ocean. That was just the beginning of a series of wildfires that destroyed residences and buildings in Los Angeles County. NASA astronaut and astrophotographer extraordinaire Don Pettit shared a knockout view of Earth from the International Space Station in late February. "Cosmic colors at sunrise; never get tired of seeing what the new day brings," he said. This photo has it all: our planet, swirling aurora lights and a sweeping vista of stars. It's tough to land successfully on the moon. Firefly Aerospace pulled off the feat in March with its Blue Ghost Mission 1. The Blue Ghost lander captured a historic view of a sunrise from the surface of the moon. The image shows the pockmarked lunar surface with the bright flash of the sun topping the horizon. Many moon missions, including Intuitive Machine's 2025 attempt, go wrong. That makes Blue Ghost's sunrise image all the more poignant. It marks a hard-earned lunar success story. The James Webb Space Telescope delivered a wild view of Herbig-Haro 49/50 in March. NASA described the space object as "a frothy-looking outflow from a nearby protostar" and a "cosmic tornado." Look for the distant spiral galaxy in the upper left. The venerable Hubble Space Telescope celebrated 35 years in orbit in April. NASA and ESA partied down by releasing a series of Hubble anniversary images, including views of Mars and a barred spiral galaxy. It's hard to pick just one anniversary image to highlight, but the telescope's ethereal view of the Rosette Nebula and its smoky clouds of gas and dust stands out. The nebula is a place of active star formation. Hubble's image focuses on one small, scenic part of the Rosette. NASA astronaut Nichole Ayers got some full-moon photography in during May's "flower moon." Ayers had a front-row seat to the glowing lunar action from her perch on the International Space Station. Ayers shared a series of photos with Earth in the frame, emphasizing the relationship between our blue planet and our lunar neighbor. NASA's Perseverance rover has been trucking around Mars since early 2021. The wheeled explorer marked its 1,500th Martian day on May 10 by taking a fresh selfie. Percy took dozens of images of itself using a camera mounted on the end of its robotic arm. NASA stitched the shots together to create the selfie. Look deeper into the image to spot a swirling dust devil dancing in the background. "Having the dust devil in the background makes it a classic," said Perseverance imaging scientist Megan Wu. "This is a great shot." The year is not even half over. There are full moons, auroras, space launches and meteor showers coming down the line. Satellites are watching over Earth. Space telescopes are staring out into the cosmos and sending back postcards from our universe. Stay tuned for more stunning images.
