
Protesters on both sides take to downtown Valparaiso for International Workers Day
Hundreds gathered Thursday afternoon along the north side of Indiana Avenue in front of the Porter County Courthouse in Valparaiso to protest the Trump administration.
Part of the national 50501 Movement, the event was put on by NWI Activists on International Workers Day. Nearly every protester held a sign. They addressed a variety of complaints from assaults on the Constitution to immigration and abortion.
English mastiff/boxer mix Dozer wore a T-shirt that read, 'No migrants tried to eat me.' 'I couldn't find any brave humans, so he's my peaceful protest companion,' said his owner Gina Beilman of Hebron.
'Where do I start?' she said with a deep breath when asked why she came out. She narrowed it down to women's rights, the economy and immigration.
'I think it's going to take people coming out in huge numbers to make a difference. I think Republicans are really going to have to feel the pushback. Our votes are going to take them out mid-term. Then there's no incentive for them to kiss the ring and wear the kneepads.'
Her allusion to President Donald Trump taking on the mantle of a king was echoed in many signs. Some read: 'No king,' 'We the People will never accept a king,' and 'They're eating the checks. They're eating the balances.'
People took turns using a megaphone. One of the first chants when the two-hour event began at noon was 'Protect the Constitution!' which was echoed by the crowd.
Then it switched to 'Black, white, gay, straight, love does not discriminate!'
The majority of the crowd was middle-aged and older adults, though there were young people and at least one small child. One older man's sign read, 'Stop the oligarchs' sedition!' It was another popular theme with others reading 'Billionaires are not like us!' 'Fire Musk!' and 'Stop the 3 'Musk'eteers Musk, Trump, Vance.'
A string of pick-up trucks toting Trump banners and flags drove around the square, honking and gesturing. 'They're flipping us off,' someone in the crowd said.
The crowd then took to turning their backs on the motorists when they turned the corner at Indiana Avenue and chanting 'Trump is stinky!' On the southwest corner of Indiana Avenue and Washington Street, James Ferguson shouted, 'Close the borders. Deport the illegals,' while holding up a sign that read 'Trans is a mental illness not an identity.'
'I'm here every time,' he said of the 50501 protests that occur roughly every two weeks. 'I support our country and a lot of the people over on the Democrat side seem to want to tear it down.'
The protesters were saying the same about Trump. 'The one thing we all agree is it's all related to the White House regime,' said co-organizer Lisa Nicole of the wide range of grievances against the Trump administration. In the distance, an image of the Statue of Liberty held her gray face in her hands.
A few feet away Cari wore a Handmaid's Tale bonnet that read, 'Impeach Trump.' She didn't want to give her last name. 'I'm quite undercover,' she said. 'I'm afraid of the regime.'
Kevin Ledbetter, of Valparaiso, was feeling more emboldened at this, his sixth anti-Trump rally this year. 'It's turned into a kleptocracy and an oligarchy,' he said of the nation. 'I'm totally against the lack of due process not being given. The Constitution guarantees that people get due process, not just the citizens.'
He's been to protests in Crown Point, Michigan City and Valparaiso and says they keep getting bigger as well as a little more diverse age-wise. Louis Garcia, of Hobart, and Nicolas Ayala, of Valparaiso, were some of the younger people in attendance.
They hadn't even planned on protesting but were walking by and decided to stay. 'I think it's really fun,' Garcia said. 'I think it's really cool that they're doing this.'
Both young men said they'd protest again, and both have family in the country illegally, though that's up for interpretation according to Ayala's hastily printed cardboard sign that read, 'No one is illegal on stolen land.'
'They're going out less and less,' Garcia said.
By 1 p.m. a handful of counterprotesters had taken to the sidewalk themselves, walking past the full length of the crowd with a flag that read 'Trump Won.'
Cpt. Joe Hall, public information officer for Valparaiso Police, said the main priority of his force, which had at least half a dozen officers present, and their colleagues from the Porter County Sheriff's Office, who were also on hand with therapy K-9 Australian Labradoodle Porter, is to maintain public safety at such events.
He referred questions of permitting to Valparaiso City Attorney Patrick Lyp.
The counterprotesters all said they did not have permits while the 50501 group spent over half an hour discussing permitting with county commissioners at the last board of commissioners meeting and also received a permit from the Valparaiso Board of Works.
'By definition, that's your right,' Lyp said of a person protesting on a public sidewalk.
He clarified that 'a gathering of more than two or three does affect public safety. Without exception, we support folks' rights to express their opinions in a manner that's safe.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
The U.S. government relies on SpaceX to support NASA and other agencies, and the company has received more $20 billion in federal contracts for it. As Musk and Trump threaten to cut ties, here's what that would mean for the U.S.'s space ambitions.


Business Insider
28 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Trump Ready to Ditch His Tesla Car amid Musk Fallout: 'I Might Just Get Rid of It'
WASHINGTON — June 7, 2025 President Donald Trump is distancing himself from Elon Musk—publicly and materially. According to The Washington Post, Trump has told aides in recent days that he is considering selling or giving away the red Tesla (TSLA) Model S he purchased in March, a gesture that once symbolized his support for Musk. Confident Investing Starts Here: 'I might just get rid of it,' Trump told aides, according to a senior White House official who spoke on the condition of anonymity. The car, still parked near the White House as of this week, has become a visible casualty of the rapidly souring relationship between Trump and Musk. The split followed Musk's harsh criticism of the administration's latest domestic policy bill, which he publicly called a 'disgusting abomination.' That comment triggered a sharp response from the president, both publicly and privately. On Air Force One, when asked by a reporter about Musk's alleged drug use, Trump replied: 'I don't want to comment on his drug use. I don't know what his status is.' 'I read an article in The New York Times. I thought it was, frankly, it sounded very unfair to me.' But privately, Trump has reportedly told associates that Musk is 'crazy' and blamed his behavior on drug use, according to The New York Times. Musk Gave No Public Comment on the Car—But a Hint at Peace? As of Saturday afternoon, Elon Musk has not issued any public statement specifically addressing Trump's decision to unload the Tesla. However, he did respond to a suggestion from investor Bill Ackman on X that the two men should reconcile for the good of the country. 'You're not wrong,' Musk replied—his only recent public comment that could be interpreted as a gesture toward de-escalation. Beyond that, Musk has been active on X in recent days, directing criticisms at others, including Steve Bannon and critics of Tesla, but has avoided commenting directly on Trump's actions regarding the car or federal contracts. Trump Weighs Tesla Breakup The sale—or symbolic disposal—of the Tesla would mark a final, visual severing of a political and personal alliance that once had significant policy weight. Musk had been one of Trump's most prominent business backers, and the March purchase of the Model S was, at the time, framed by aides as a nod of approval to the entrepreneur's role in the administration. Now, according to officials, the car is being referred to inside the West Wing as a political relic. And while no final decision has been made, staff say it's become a quiet but pointed symbol of Trump's intent to distance himself from Musk for good. Trump himself, speaking about Musk during a press gaggle on June 6, said: 'I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Whether the car is sold, donated, or simply removed from view, it now stands as a monument to one of the most dramatic falling-outs in recent political history. Is Tesla Stock Still a Buy? Meanwhile, Wall Street isn't exactly bullish on Musk's flagship automaker. According to TipRanks, Tesla currently holds a 'Hold' rating based on 37 analyst reviews over the past three months. It's a split camp: 16 analysts rate it a Buy, 10 say Hold, and 11 recommend Sell — a clear reflection of the uncertainty swirling around the company. The market seems just as cautious. The average 12-month price target for TSLA is $284.37, suggesting a 3.7% downside from its current level.

36 minutes ago
Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown
As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.'