logo
Eyewatering sums rich homeowners have lost on San Francisco condos in city's infamous 'leaning tower'

Eyewatering sums rich homeowners have lost on San Francisco condos in city's infamous 'leaning tower'

Daily Mail​16 hours ago

Rich homeowners lost millions of dollars after buying condos in San Francisco's leaning Millennium Tower.
Residents of the 419-unit high rise were informed in 2016 that the building had started sinking, which was also causing it to tilt.
By that time, multi-millionaires had already snatched up apartments and penthouses with some spending upwards of $10 million to build out their high rise homes.
The problems were resolved in 2023, f ollowing an extensive infrastructure project worth over $100 million, but the value of the homes inside have yet to rebound due to the litany of problems.
Craig D. Ramsey purchased a penthouse inside the building for $13 million after being convinced that once the issues were fixed the price of the unit would soar.
Ramsey had bought the property from the late venture capitalist Tom Perkins, who spent an astonishing $20 million to buy and build out the penthouse in 2009.
Ramsey, who already owned a unit in the building, told The Wall Street Journal: 'I knew there was an issue. I just thought about the value I was getting.'
In January of this year, Ramsey sold the property on for $9 million. Less than w hat Perkins had paid for the raw shell in 2009.
Ramsey, a tech entrepreneur who co-founded a firm sold to Saleforce for $1.3 billion, added: 'It was insignificant. I lost a couple million dollars. So what? You move on.'
The tech entrepreneur co-founded a software company that he sold to Salesforce for $1.3 billion in 2020, and owns other homes.
Ramsey had also parted ways with his smaller unit on the 54th floor for $2.725 million, representing a loss of 37 percent from the $4.3 million he paid in 2012.
The downtown San Francisco behemoth rests on a 10-foot deep concrete foundation made of soft soil and landfill.
The developer, Mission Street Development LLC, blamed the sinking problem on construction of the nearby Transbay Transit Center by the Transbay Joint Powers Authority for destabilizing the ground below the tower.
But according to local reports, the sinking started before the infrastructure project launched.
Overall, residents of the building were saddled with $6.8 million of the roughly $20 million extra the project ended up costing over the original budget.
It had originally been projected to cost around $100 million. During construction, however, the tower experienced more sinking and leaning.
The homeowners association is now determined to shift the narrative and help boost the value of the homes.
Dr. Joel Piser, resident and president of the board of the HOA, told the outlet: 'We've gotten so much negative press.
'We were easy targets—a bunch of people who have been successful in life and then are faced with this challenge.
'Now, we have something to counter it with. We have met the project's objective to stop the building from settling, and we're recovering.'
In an analysis by the outlet of nine sales that had closed this year as of late May, they found that on average a seller lost on average 20 percent.
Last year there was 16 recorded sales inside the building, with an average loss of 20.5 percent.
One owner sold a unit on the fifth floor for $720,000 in late last year, a 52 percent from what the seller paid in 2015.
At the start of this month there were 11 active listings inside the building on Zillow, ranging from $588,000 to $4.995 million, all besides two were listed for less than what was originally paid.
The glossy, 58-story, all-glass building, located at 301 Mission Street, was completed in 2009 and is the tallest residential building in the city.
Equipped with a 75-foot indoor lap-pool, a health club and spa, in-house cinema, and a restaurant and wine bar run by celebrity chef Michael Mina, all 419 apartments were quickly filled with wealthy residents when it opened.
Penthouse suites sold for more than $10million, with the cheapest apartment selling for $1.6million.
Gregg Lynn of Sotheby's Realty, told the outlet: 'There was incredible energy and enthusiasm about it. And consumers paid very high [prices].'
Lenders started blacklisting homes, forcing prospective buyers to either pay all cash, or find alternative financing.
Lawsuits were also filed by homeowners, that have since been resolved via a 'global settlement' completed in 2020. The terms of the settlement haven't been made public.
Part of the agreement, the Journal said, was that the defendants would compensate owners for the dip in their property value. The figures were kept confidential.
Ronald O. Hamburger, the structural engineer who oversaw the repair project, told the outlet that the project in itself was unprecedented.
His team installed 18 pilings to supper the building's foundation, then moved the weight onto the new pilings.
He said: 'It was like a bumper jack jacking up your car, only they were jacking up 200 million pounds.'
In an attempt to bring lenders, insurance companies and buyers back into the fray, the HOA also commissioned a short film to document the pile project.
Piser told the outlet that the aim was send a message that the building was open for business. He said that Citizens Bank has since cleared a $5 mortgage in the building.
Local agent Bryant Kowalczyk added: 'The financing aspect has gotten a fair amount of people off the sidelines. The building kind of has nowhere to go but up.'
Girish Mirchandani moved into the building earlier this year, paying $850,000 for a unit that the seller paid $1.545 million in 2016.
He told the outlet that the news of someone paying $9 million for a penthouse gave him the confidence and lenders opening up their books to those in the building.
Mirchandani said: 'I figured if someone's spending that on the penthouse, they've done their due diligence. Then, when my bank opened up lending there, it made it kind of a no-brainer.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement
Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement

The Guardian

time28 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Why female athletes are challenging the NCAA's $2.8bn settlement

College athletes spent decades fighting for the right to make money from their name, image and likeness (NIL). In 2021, they won. Now, a $2.8bn NCAA settlement is set to compensate hundreds of thousands of current and former athletes who missed out on those earnings. But not everyone thinks the deal is fair. Eight female athletes filed an appeal this week, arguing the agreement violates Title IX, the US law banning sex-based discrimination in education. They say the way the money is divided, largely favoring football and men's basketball players, shortchanges women by more than $1bn. Their appeal has paused all back payments, potentially delaying them for more than a year. However, the NCAA's new plan to allow schools to pay current players directly starting 1 July will still go ahead. So what does this all mean for athletes as well as the future of college sports? Here's what's going on … The NCAA agreed to pay $2.8bn to compensate athletes who were previously barred from earning income off their name, image, and likeness (NIL), including things like video game appearances, jersey sales, or social media sponsorships. The settlement covers athletes going back to 2016. It also clears the way for a major change: beginning 1 July 2025, colleges will be allowed to directly share revenue with current players, up to $20.5 million per school per year. It's a major shift from the NCAA's traditional amateurism model, which argued that athletes should only be compensated with scholarships, not salaries or endorsement income. Eight female athletes who competed in soccer, volleyball, and track have filed an appeal. Their names include Kacie Breeding (Vanderbilt) and Kate Johnson (Virginia), along with six athletes from the College of Charleston. They argue the deal violates Title IX, the federal law that bans sex-based discrimination in education. Specifically, they say the settlement gives up to 90% of the money to men in football and basketball, depriving women of $1.1bn in rightful compensation. Title IX is a 1972 US law requiring equal access and treatment for men and women in federally funded education programs, including athletics. Colleges must offer comparable resources, scholarships and participation opportunities across men's and women's sports. The female athletes argue that since NIL bans affected both genders equally, compensation for those bans must also be equitable, and that using historical TV revenue (which favors men's sports) ignores systemic barriers women have faced in marketing and media exposure. US district judge Claudia Wilken approved the settlement last week and rejected Title IX-based objections, saying they fell outside the scope of the antitrust case. The female athletes disagree and are now asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to intervene. Because of the appeal, no back pay will be distributed until the court rules. That delay could last several months or longer. According to the NCAA's lead attorney, the organization will continue funding the settlement pool, but the money will sit untouched until the case is resolved. The current payout formula is based on historical media revenue and licensing data. Because football and men's basketball generated the majority of money for schools – especially through TV contracts – those athletes stand to receive the most compensation. Critics say that approach bakes in decades of inequality, because women were denied the same marketing exposure and investment in the first place. Some worry that schools will cut so-called 'non-revenue' sports – like wrestling, swimming or gymnastics – to fund revenue-sharing with top athletes. Others fear this pushes college sports closer to a professional minor league system, undermining education and competitive balance. Still others say that without clear Title IX guidance, women may continue to be marginalized even in a post-amateurism era. The Ninth Circuit will now review the appeal. Briefs are due by 3 October, and while both sides say they'll push for speed, appeals in this court have been known to take 12 to 18 months. Until the case is resolved, no back payments will be made to athletes who played between 2016 and 2021. But the revenue-sharing era is coming, whether or not the NCAA is ready for it.

Easiest Way to Make $10,000 a Month Building AI Agents
Easiest Way to Make $10,000 a Month Building AI Agents

Geeky Gadgets

timean hour ago

  • Geeky Gadgets

Easiest Way to Make $10,000 a Month Building AI Agents

What if you could turn your passion for technology into a steady income of $10,000 a month? Imagine creating intelligent systems that work tirelessly, solving problems, automating tasks, and delivering value—all while you sleep. It might sound like a pipe dream, but with the rise of AI agents, this is no longer a fantasy. These autonomous, problem-solving programs are reshaping industries like e-commerce, healthcare, and finance, offering unprecedented opportunities for innovation and profit. Whether you're a seasoned developer or just starting out, building AI agents is one of the most exciting and accessible ways to tap into the booming AI economy. Christian Peverelli explains how you can design, deploy, and monetize AI agents to create a sustainable income stream. You'll uncover the secrets to identifying high-demand problems, using innovative tools like TensorFlow and PyTorch, and scaling your solutions to meet market needs. From crafting AI-powered chatbots for e-commerce to automating complex data analysis in healthcare, the possibilities are vast. But success requires more than just technical skills—it's about understanding how to deliver measurable value to businesses and users alike. Ready to see how this fantastic technology can work for you? Let's break it down step by step. How to Monetize AI Agents What Are AI Agents and Why Do They Matter? AI agents are software programs powered by artificial intelligence, capable of performing tasks autonomously without human intervention. Their applications span a wide range of industries, offering solutions to challenges that were once time-consuming or resource-intensive. Key areas where AI agents are making a significant impact include: E-commerce: Enhancing customer experiences by recommending products based on user behavior and purchase history. Enhancing customer experiences by recommending products based on user behavior and purchase history. Healthcare: Supporting medical professionals by analyzing patient data to assist in diagnosing diseases or predicting health outcomes. Supporting medical professionals by analyzing patient data to assist in diagnosing diseases or predicting health outcomes. Finance: Detecting fraudulent transactions, optimizing investment strategies, and automating financial reporting. Detecting fraudulent transactions, optimizing investment strategies, and automating financial reporting. Logistics: Streamlining supply chain operations, improving delivery efficiency, and reducing operational costs. To succeed in this field, focus on identifying specific problems that AI agents can solve. For instance, industries like healthcare and retail often demand automation to improve efficiency and reduce costs. Conduct thorough research to uncover opportunities where AI-driven solutions can deliver measurable value and address critical pain points. Step-by-Step Guide to Building AI Agents Building an AI agent requires a structured and methodical approach. By following these steps, you can create a functional and effective AI solution: Define the Problem: Clearly identify the specific problem your AI agent will address. A well-defined problem ensures your solution is targeted and impactful. Clearly identify the specific problem your AI agent will address. A well-defined problem ensures your solution is targeted and impactful. Collect and Prepare Data: Gather high-quality, relevant data to train your AI models. The success of your agent depends heavily on the accuracy and reliability of this data. Gather high-quality, relevant data to train your AI models. The success of your agent depends heavily on the accuracy and reliability of this data. Select a Framework: Use robust machine learning frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch to develop your AI agent. These tools offer flexibility and scalability for complex projects. Use robust machine learning frameworks like TensorFlow or PyTorch to develop your AI agent. These tools offer flexibility and scalability for complex projects. Train the Model: Train your AI model using the collected data, making sure it learns to perform the desired task effectively. Regular testing and validation are crucial during this phase. Train your AI model using the collected data, making sure it learns to perform the desired task effectively. Regular testing and validation are crucial during this phase. Deploy the Agent: Host and deploy your AI agent using cloud platforms such as AWS, Google Cloud, or Microsoft Azure. These platforms provide scalable infrastructure to handle varying workloads and ensure seamless performance. For smaller projects or those with limited budgets, open source platforms can serve as cost-effective alternatives while still offering robust functionality. Experiment with different tools and frameworks to find the best fit for your project's needs. EASIEST Way to Make 10,000/Month Building AI Agents Watch this video on YouTube. Here are more guides from our previous articles and guides related to AI agents that you may find helpful. Monetizing Your AI Agents Generating $10,000 per month from AI agents requires a clear and effective monetization strategy. Here are some proven approaches to consider: Subscription Models: Offer your AI agent as a service (AIaaS) with recurring monthly or annual fees. This model provides a steady and predictable revenue stream. Offer your AI agent as a service (AIaaS) with recurring monthly or annual fees. This model provides a steady and predictable revenue stream. Licensing: License your AI agent to businesses that require tailored solutions. This approach works well for industries with specific needs, such as healthcare or logistics. License your AI agent to businesses that require tailored solutions. This approach works well for industries with specific needs, such as healthcare or logistics. Freemium Models: Provide basic functionality for free and charge for advanced features or premium services. This strategy can attract a larger user base while generating revenue from power users. Provide basic functionality for free and charge for advanced features or premium services. This strategy can attract a larger user base while generating revenue from power users. Performance-Based Pricing: Charge clients based on measurable outcomes, such as increased sales, reduced costs, or improved efficiency. This model aligns your success with that of your clients, fostering trust and long-term partnerships. For example, if you develop a chatbot for an e-commerce platform, you could charge businesses a monthly fee based on the number of customer interactions it handles. This ensures a consistent revenue stream while demonstrating the tangible value of your solution. Scaling and Optimizing AI Agents Scaling and optimizing your AI agents are essential for maximizing profitability and making sure long-term success. As demand for your solution grows, your AI agent must handle increased workloads without compromising performance. Cloud platforms such as AWS and Google Cloud are particularly useful for scaling, as they allow you to add resources on demand. Efficiency is equally important. Optimize your AI models to reduce computational costs and improve response times. Techniques such as model compression, pruning, and quantization can help achieve these goals. Additionally, automate repetitive tasks in the development and deployment process to save time and resources, allowing you to focus on innovation and growth. Addressing Challenges in AI Deployment Deploying AI agents comes with its own set of challenges, but proactive planning and strategic solutions can help you overcome them. Common issues include: Data Privacy: Ensure compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR or CCPA by anonymizing sensitive data and implementing robust security measures. Transparency with clients about how data is used can also build trust. Ensure compliance with data protection regulations such as GDPR or CCPA by anonymizing sensitive data and implementing robust security measures. Transparency with clients about how data is used can also build trust. System Integration: Collaborate closely with clients to ensure your AI agent integrates seamlessly with their existing infrastructure. Compatibility and ease of use are critical for adoption. Collaborate closely with clients to ensure your AI agent integrates seamlessly with their existing infrastructure. Compatibility and ease of use are critical for adoption. Model Maintenance: Regularly update your AI models with new data to maintain accuracy and relevance. Continuous monitoring and improvement are essential to keep your solution effective over time. By addressing these challenges early and effectively, you can build trust with clients, enhance user satisfaction, and ensure the long-term success of your AI agents. Media Credit: Christian Peverelli – WeAreNoCode Filed Under: AI, Guides, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.

Highlights from Trump's business and income disclosure
Highlights from Trump's business and income disclosure

Reuters

time3 hours ago

  • Reuters

Highlights from Trump's business and income disclosure

SINGAPORE/NEW YORK, June 14 (Reuters) - Donald Trump reported more than $600 million in income from crypto, golf clubs, licensing and other ventures in a public financial disclosure report released on Friday. The annual financial disclosure form, which appeared to cover the 2024 calendar year, shows the billionaire president's push into crypto added substantially to his wealth. He also reported large fees from developments and revenue from his other businesses. A Reuters calculation shows the president reported assets worth at least $1.6 billion, overall. SOME HIGHLIGHTS FROM THE REPORT: INCOME FROM HOTELS AND GOLF: The income figures provided are essentially revenue, not net profit after subtracting costs. Total golf, restaurant and hotel-related income in the United States was $378 million plus another $22 million in management fees. Trump's three golf-focused resorts in Florida - Jupiter, Doral and West Palm Beach - and his private members' club at Mar-a-Lago generated at least $217.7 million in income. Trump National Doral, the expansive Miami-area golf hub known for its Blue Monster course, was the family's single largest income source at $110.4 million. Income from golf and hotels in Ireland and Scotland were 19 mln euros plus 28.7 million pounds sterling ($38.9 million). CRYPTO: Trump listed $1.16 million in income from his NFTs - digital trading cards in his likeness - while First Lady Melania Trump earned around $216,700 from license fees on her own NFT collection. ROYALTIES: Royalty money from a variety of deals was at least $26 million. That included $1.3 million from the Greenwood Bible (its website describes it as "the only Bible officially endorsed by Lee Greenwood and President Trump"); $2.8 million from Trump Watches, and $2.5 million from Trump Sneakers and Fragrances. OVERSEAS LICENSE FEES: License fees from foreign firms for the use of the Trump name generated upwards of $36 million, including $5 million from a development in Vietnam, $10 million in development fees from a project in India and almost $16 million for a Dubai project. TRUMP'S INVESTMENTS: Trump's four investment accounts showed bulk of his investments are in fixed income, with amounts up to $5 million each in a range of corporate, municipal and U.S. government debt. Equity investments were smaller, with a maximum of $250,000 in individual company stocks. Larger investments included more than $50 million in the Schwab Government Money Fund and as much as $25 million each in an Invesco short-term Treasury fund and in alternative investment manager Blue Owl Capital.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store