Northamptonshire police apologise to Harry Dunn's family for failures investigating his death
Police investigating the death of the teenage motorcyclist Harry Dunn have apologised for 'clear and significant shortcomings' after a scathing review found the force 'failed his family on a number of fronts'.
The 118-page report, which examined every aspect of Northamptonshire police's investigation, found a failure in senior leadership meant a critical incident was not declared when it should have been.
It also criticised the force for not arresting the driver involved, Anne Sacoolas, after the crash, and not informing Dunn's family she had left the country until 10 days after they were notified she had done so.
The force's head of protective services, assistant chief constable Emma James, said: 'On behalf of Northamptonshire police, I want to apologise to Harry's family for what is now clear was a failure on our part to do the very best for the victim in this case, Harry, and his family who fought tirelessly in the years that followed to achieve justice for him.'
She said the 'picture which emerges' from the review was one of a force that had 'failed the family on a number of fronts, and we hope the findings – which are troubling in several respects – will provide some answers to questions which the family will have wanted to know in the years that have passed'.
Dunn was 19 years old in 2019 when he was killed after his motorcycle collided with a car driven by Sacoolas, a US citizen who was driving on the wrong side of the road outside RAF Croughton.
Sacoolas returned to the US after Dunn's death, forcing his family to launch a years-long campaign for justice that resulted in her being convicted of causing death by careless driving in December 2022.
Northamptonshire police's chief constable, Ivan Balhatchet, commissioned an independent review into how police handled the case after severe criticism from Dunn's family over a number of years.
The review, published on Wednesday, made 38 separate recommendations, with the former chief constable Nick Adderley coming under particular censure for his communication with the family.
There was also sharp criticism of the forensic recovery process and the discovery more than four years later of human tissue on Harry's clothing, which led to his family holding a second funeral in March 2024.
The review concluded that Dunn's family 'lost trust and confidence' in the force and that as a 'direct result' of Adderley's actions, the investigation team struggled to rebuild relationships.
Dunn's mother, Charlotte Charles, said: 'Today's review report confirms what we have known for years, that we were failed by the very people we should have been able to trust.
'Harry was left to die on the roadside. Sacoolas was not arrested, even though the police had every power to do so. She fled the country, and they didn't tell us. They mishandled vital evidence, including Harry's clothing, which we now know was left in storage for years with his remains still on it.
'These are failures no family should ever have to endure. I remain so angry at Adderley to this day.'
Adderley was later dismissed for gross misconduct after it was found he had been wearing a Falklands war medal despite being 15 at the time of the conflict.
Northamptonshire's police, fire and crime commissioner, Danielle Stone, said: 'Harry's family were profoundly let down when they most needed to have trust in Northamptonshire police.
'I have apologised to Harry's family – I am dismayed by how they were treated, and I know that no words can make up for the harm caused. This report is clear and unflinching. Now it has been published, I will ask the chief constable for assurance that the recommendations are being implemented, so that no other family has the same experience as Harry Dunn's.'
Radd Seiger, a spokesperson for Dunn's family, said the report 'lays bare a series of grave errors' but praised the force for 'putting transparency first'. He said: 'It marks a real turning point compared to the disastrous and toxic Adderley regime.'
James said: 'I hope some good comes out of this. We have taken a deep look at ourselves and hope the transparent way we have identified failings of the past will go some way to rebuilding the confidence of Harry's family and friends going forward as well as of the wider public at large.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
32 minutes ago
- The Independent
Kneecap ‘plasters' London with message of support for group member due in court
Rap group kneecap has said it has 'plastered' London with messages of support for one of its members who is due to appear in court accused of a terrorism offence. Liam Og O hAnnaidh, who performs under the stage name Mo Chara, is accused of displaying a flag in support of Hezbollah at a gig in November last year. The 27-year-old is due to appear at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Wednesday following the alleged incident during a gig at the O2 Forum in Kentish Town, north London. The charge Og O hAnnaidh faces alleges he displayed a flag in a public place, 'in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a supporter of a proscribed organisation' – namely Hezbollah. Kneecap described the prosecution as a 'witch hunt' in a post on X on Tuesday evening. The post including a short video which appeared to show a billboard that had been displayed in London with the words 'more blacks, more dogs, more Irish, Mo Chara'. The Metropolitan Police said the force had charged O hAnnaidh, who appears on the court list as Liam O' Hanna, after initially being made aware of a video from the gig at the O2 Forum which had been posted online. In a separate event shortly after the terrorism charge, O hAnnaidh could be seen in social media videos entering the stage with tape covering his mouth. The Met previously said the Belfast rap trio were under investigation after clips posted online appeared to show the band calling for the deaths of MPs and shouting 'up Hamas, up Hezbollah'. Kneecap said they have 'never supported' Hamas or Hezbollah, both of which are banned in the UK.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE Writer of Adolescence backs call by mother of murdered trans teen for ban on smartphones in schools
THE creator of Netflix hit Adolescence has backed calls by the mother of murdered transgender teenager Brianna Ghey to ban smartphones in schools. Jack Thorne told Esther Ghey her campaigning around restricting smartphone and social media use for under 16s was 'remarkable' and agreed better legislation was needed to help parents navigate the dangers of the internet. He also urged the Government to stand up to global tech giants to protect children. Mr Thorne, a five times Bafta award-winner, was speaking to Ms Ghey for the latest episode of the Mail's Parents versus The Internet podcast, which is released today. Ms Ghey, 38, admitted she found it difficult to watch Adolescence, which follows the story of Jamie, a 13-year-old boy who stabs and murders a girl in his class, and his parents, who struggle to accept what he has done. Following Brianna's murder, in February 2023, Ms Ghey called for compassion and empathy for the parents of her 15-year-old killers, Scarlett Jenkinson and Eddie Ratcliffe. She has also since become friends with Emma Jenkinson, Scarlett's mother. Ms Ghey said: 'It was such a powerful watch, and there were so many things in it that resonated. I feel like I've lived this. From the start, I really understood and had empathy for the other families, because they too have lost a child. 'The ending of Adolescence, where Eddie (Jamie's father) is on the bed crying, I thought to myself, 'the amount of times that I've done that in Brianna's bedroom.' And I imagine that the perpetrators' parents did as well. So, it was extremely powerful. This horrific crime that happened has impacted so many people. It's like a ripple effect.' Brianna documented her transition to her thousands of followers on TikTok and, prior to her death, Ms Ghey had been very worried about how many strangers she was speaking to online. The 16-year-old, who was hospitalised with an eating disorder, also accessed upsetting self-harm and pro-anorexia content on social media. Mr Thorne, who has a nine-year-old son, admitted he feels 'scared' for his son's future and revealed he has signed up to the Smartphone Free Childhood campaign and is committed to not allowing him access to social media until he is 14. He said the new Online Safety Act, which the Government hopes will help protect children from harm but has been criticised for being too weak, has holes in it a 'mile wide' and schools and parents needed more help from Whitehall to implement phone and social media bans. He also cited the election of Donald Trump, who was supported by the bosses of Facebook, Twitter and Google at his inauguration, as being a barrier to better legislation and protection for children. 'The Government is in a really difficult position,' he said. 'The election of Trump, those three men sitting behind him at his inauguration, are the tech giants, the richest men in the history of the world, and they wield so much power. 'If we're trying to negotiate our way into securing jobs, securing trade agreements, it is very hard to stand up against those three mighty giants. I know that there are MPs that are absolutely determined to make change happen, I just hope that they can get enough public support behind them, because I don't see the Government being able to lead on this. 'I think (Technology Minister) Peter Kyle is anti it, and he's in a position of extreme importance, and I think Keir Starmer is unsure as to what the best course of action is (but) I am utterly sure that they should be legislating, because parents need to be safe from being the arbiters of this, because (that) puts them at war with their children.' Mr Thorne said he was watching with interest the situation in Australia, where the Government has pledged to ban social media for under 16s. 'I think eventually it will go the way of cigarettes,' he said. 'Eventually, they'll realize that this is as damaging as cigarettes. But in the short term, it's really interesting that possibly the most masculine culture I know of, the Australian culture, is the one that's going for this. And if they can make it a success, the good that could do around the world, not least in standing up to (the likes of) Elon Musk, and proving that it doesn't damage their economy. To stand up to Musk would be huge.' Adolescence is Netflix's second most popular programme of all time and has been watched by a staggering 141million people worldwide. It stars break-out teen actor Owen Cooper, who plays killer Jamie Miller, and Stephen Graham, who plays his father, Eddie, and also co-wrote the hit four-part series. Listen to the full episode now by searching for Parents v The Internet wherever you get your podcasts.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Which serial killer was described as the WORST villain to ever set foot in the Old Bailey? New Mail podcast explores the horrifying history of murderous doctors that terrorised Victorian England
In the latest episode of the Mail's 'An Appointment with Murder' podcast, forensic psychiatrist Dr. Andrew Johns and police surgeon Dr. Harry Brunjes examine the Victorian period's most notorious medical murderers. Medical murderers are those who pervert their positions of trust, as doctors or nurses, to prey on the public. As modern medicine emerged during the Victorian period, so too did a new breed of killer – doctors who turned healing into harm. One medical murderer featured on the podcast has been almost forgotten by history, but in his day was described by Charles Dickens as 'the worst villain to ever set foot in the Old Bailey'. His name was William Palmer, but the press knew him as 'Palmer the Poisoner', after his role in one of the most notorious murder cases of the 19th century. Palmer the Poisoner William Palmer, born in Rugeley, Staffordshire in 1824, was a doctor who used cyanide and strychnine to systematically murder family members and friends for financial gain. His subsequent trial became one of the first high-profile poisoning cases to capture national attention. 'Before Jack the Ripper, there was William Palmer', Dr Harry Brunjes told the podcast. 'William studied medicine in London and qualified at the age of 22. He had a reputation different from most doctors – he was known to be profligate, a drinker, a womaniser and a gambler. 'He poisoned family and friends for money – to cash in on a legacy or an insurance policy. 'The case which brought him to public attention was that of John Cook, a friend who he had murdered by poisoning in 1855. Palmer received £12,000 from Cook, which in today's money would be worth £1.2 million.' Before his conviction and execution for Cook's murder, Palmer is believed to have killed several family members, including his wife, brother, mother-in-law, and four of his children. As a doctor, Palmer could sign his own family members' death certificates, suspiciously listing 'convulsions' as the cause of death for all of his children. The era worked in his favour - potent poisons like strychnine and cyanide were relatively new and produced symptoms that mimicked common diseases like cholera. High infant mortality rates also provided cover, making it believable that one family could lose four children in the unsanitary conditions of Victorian cities. 'It was thought that he killed his children to avoid the expense', Dr Harry Brunjes explained. 'He also found a way to stop more children recurring, because he killed his wife Anne Palmer, not long after taking a life insurance policy out against her. 'He gave her a diagnosis of cholera, but poisoning was later the suspicion. A year after killing his wife, he killed his brother, Walter, who died shortly after William took out an insurance policy. 'Later that year, he murdered Cook and in 1856, was hanged at Stafford prison.' Palmer was caught when a post-mortem examination of John Cook revealed evidence of poisoning, leading to his immediate arrest for murder. While Palmer may be overshadowed by other notorious Victorian murderers, his crimes have an enduring legacy, as Dr. Andrew Johns explained. 'Palmer's preferred poison was strychnine added to an alcoholic drink. His notoriety gives us the expression, what's your poison – when you're asked – what would you like to drink?' For a complete and chilling history of medical murderers of the Victorian period, search for An Appointment with Murder now, wherever you get your podcasts.
