U of A students propose specialized ICU for homeless Edmontonians
With one successful project under their belt, students in an advocacy class at the University of Alberta are making a new pitch to advance care for homeless emergency room patients.
On Tuesday, Student Advocates for Public Health laid out their vision for a specialised intensive care unit to treat the growing number of unhoused patients who disproportionately rely on emergency services.
The proposed 24/7 facility would offer a trauma-informed, multi-disciplinary approach aimed at improving outcomes for unhoused people and reducing the strain on Alberta's health-care system.
"Let's not treat them and street them. Let's greet them and treat them," said Imrose Bhullar, a public health master's student and member of Student Advocates for Public Health.
The team says their proposal is the first of its kind in Canada and builds on the success of the Bridge Healing Transitional Accommodation Program proposed by students from the same advocacy class in 2017.
The Bridge Healing Transitional Accommodation Program has transferred more than 300 unhoused ER patients directly into transitional housing since its launch in 2023.
In Alberta's February budget, the program received $1.8 million to continue its work, which has also been supported by private donors and the City of Edmonton.
The group cited research that found unhoused individuals rely on emergency services at a rate 8.5 times higher than the general population and said having a specialized ICU for people experiencing homelessness should be the next step, the group said.
"This crisis doesn't just affect unhoused individuals, it affects the entire health-care system," Bhullar said.
"Health-care workers are burned out, care is being delayed and patients are slipping through the cracks."
'We don't have enough capacity:' ER physician
The team recommended an approach that would connect patients to a continuum of care through health-care providers, social workers, housing navigators and rehabilitation
They proposed the creation of a 90-bed facility as an extension at the Royal Alexandra Hospital, which sees the most visits from unhoused patients annually in the province.
"There has been a surge in homelessness and substance use. We don't have enough capacity to meet the needs," said Dr. Robert Wittmeier, an emergency room physician based in the Royal Alex.
"It would be far better to bring people to a site like this where they have consistent expert care."
Among the proposal's fans is Bryan Kenny, who overcame chronic homelessness, substance use and mental illness to become an outreach worker.
"This project lined with bridged healing is going to close that gap," said Kenney, who works with AAWEAR, a peer-support group offering support to Albertans who use or used drugs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Canada Standard
3 hours ago
- Canada Standard
Q&A: How Deep Energy Retrofits Can Unlock Health Care Savings in Alberta
Across Canada, provinces like British Columbia, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Ontario are investing in energy retrofits to cut emissions, lower energy bills, and improve health. But Alberta stands apart-not for what it's doing, but for what it isn't. There, 42% of 598,000 homes built before 1980 need repairs and upgrades. But Alberta is the only province or territory that doesn't allow utilities to engage in demand-side management (DSM) programs-initiatives that help people use less energy by funding things like insulation, heat pumps, and efficient appliances. Amid increasing wildfire smoke, extreme heat, and rising energy prices, retrofit advocates are working to build institutional support for programs to make homes safer for Albertans. Though retrofits can be costly and complex, a new Pembina Institute report shows their full value emerges when health care savings are factored into the equation. For example, researchers in England found that poor housing conditions cost their country's health care system $3 billion each year. Simply fixing homes that were too cold would save the National Health Service $1.8 billion per year in avoided costs, the study found. In New Zealand, researchers uncovered remarkable health and energy savings from retrofits made during a multi-year insulation and clean heating program, writes Pembina. After tracking hospitalization rates, prescription costs, and mortality across retrofitted and non-retrofitted homes, they found that insulation had the most benefit, while the biggest health savings came from reduced mortality. The program had a net return of $1.03 billion in health and energy savings-for every dollar spent, four dollars were returned. The Energy Mix talked with report author Raidin Blue, an analyst with the Pembina Institute's buildings program, about Alberta's retrofit gap, its health and equity impacts, and what's needed to drive policy change. The Mix : Why is it important to highlight both health and energy savings when making the case for deep retrofits? View our latest digests Retrofits aren't just about energy-they have a broader value proposition that we aren't capturing. We believe deep retrofits can be key to making life more affordable for Canadians, which is a huge priority right now. The business case for deep retrofits needs to be expanded to include non-energy benefits: improved health and safety, enhanced resilience, and better insurance coverage. When all of that is factored in, deep retrofits make strong financial sense. The Mix : Who do you hope will act on this report-and what message do you want them to walk away with? Building owners. I want them to understand that health is tied to housing-we spend 90% of our lives indoors. Poor ventilation? Air quality issues can damage your lungs. Struggling to keep your home warm in winter? Chronic cold is linked to cardiovascular issues. Both owners and tenants can face serious health impacts from their buildings, and retrofits are a powerful solution. The Mix: You highlight vulnerable households-like low-income families and seniors-living in poor-quality housing, yet Alberta has no province-wide retrofit strategy. However, we are seeing targeted programs like the Metis Government's federally funded $9.24-million retrofit initiative. What would it take to build broader political or institutional support for retrofits in Alberta? And should the feds step up with funding? People in Alberta want to retrofit. The demand is there. It is great to see this initiative from the Metis Government. The City of Calgary also expanded its Home Upgrades Program, and 20-some communities are involved in Alberta Municipalities' Clean Energy Improvement Program (CEIP). Unfortunately, CEIP programs are often out of reach for vulnerable populations, since the funding is tied to property taxes-and many low-income families and seniors don't own their homes. In provinces and territories where there are utility-led Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs, retrofit initiatives are common, and many focus specifically on low-income housing. These programs offer stable, year-over-year funding that building owners can rely on. So a key first step would be for Alberta-a DSM outlier in Canada-to enable utilities to administer and invest in them. At the federal level, the Canada Greener Homes Affordability Program has allocated C$800 to $900 million across the country to support retrofits in low- to median-income homes. So far, Alberta is the only province not actively working to access those funds. In most other jurisdictions, they're managed through a combination of designated agencies and utilities. To advance deep retrofits in Alberta and across Canada, all levels of government need to work more closely with important players like Natural Resources Canada, Infrastructure Canada, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, insurance companies, and health authorities. We need to better understand the impacts of retrofits on everything from health to resilience to affordability-and then create stable supports and incentives. That's when building owners will begin to see real returns on deep retrofit investments-beyond just utility bill savings and emissions reductions. The Mix : You've drawn on international examples from Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Are conditions in Alberta different enough that more local research is still needed? Where should that work start? It is great to see that Australia saved senior households $840 a winter-I think a health-focused retrofit study in Alberta would see significant health savings. We had hesitations with extrapolations because our examples vary from Alberta in both climate and by types of buildings-so we tried not to make direct comparisons. Alberta-specific pilots would showcase the health benefits of retrofits to building owners, local and provincial governments, and the retrofit industry as a whole. Fortunately, these benefits are likely to emerge even without extensive data collection or formal studies. A good starting point could be post-retrofit surveys, where program managers ask tenants about increased comfort or improvements in their overall health and well-being. From there, deeper research could explore reductions in sick days or asthma symptoms. This means working with health care providers to make stronger links between retrofits, health outcomes, and avoided health care costs. The Mix: Are there any promising examples in Canada-provincial or local-where health research is already influencing retrofit policy or program design? Canadians are really starting to make this connection between our built environment and health. For years people have discussed active transportation, walkable cities, and their health benefits. The University of Alberta has a Climate Change + Health Hub and the Housing for Health initiative because these are important issues to Albertans. Look to the 2021 heat dome, when 619 people died in British Columbia, 66 in Alberta. The B.C. government responded with a formal coroner's investigation and the province worked with utility BC Hydro to provide free air conditioners to vulnerable people. Similar programs were also launched in Oregon and Washington State. These are promising, but still just responses to acute events-they don't take a whole-building approach to deep retrofits. I want policy-makers and researchers to understand that-beyond heat waves-there are chronic health impacts associated with our housing. The Mix : What makes you optimistic that this framing will gain traction? Are decision-makers starting to think differently about the value of deep retrofits? Retrofits do make a difference and that gives me optimism. They are the one form of climate policy that does both climate mitigation and adaptation. They can make our homes healthier, safer, and more affordable. Part of our work over the next year will be to bring together all of these pieces for a complete deep retrofit business case. We just need coordinated efforts from all orders of government, utilities, insurance and investment sectors, and building owners, to keep Canadians healthy and safe. Source: The Energy Mix
Calgary Herald
4 days ago
- Calgary Herald
Want to be inspired? Here are four Alberta women being recognized for their life-changing achievements
There's no shortage of women who are helping to shape Alberta's future, including the four who were given awards as part of a Heritage Park program Friday afternoon. Article content The 2025 Women Making History in Alberta Awards recognize extraordinary leadership, innovation and service, thanks to the work of extraordinary Albertans. Article content Article content Article content History Maker in the Making Award: Catriona Le May Doan is CEO of Sport Calgary, as well as being a beloved Olympian and sport inclusion champion. Winning Olympic gold in the 500-metre speedskating event in both the 1998 and 2002 Winter Games, she was the first Canadian female to defend an Olympic gold medal. That led Doan to become a broadcaster, motivational speaker and a leader in the world of sports, particularly in terms of ensuring all children are able to participate. Entrepreneurial and Innovator Award: Dr. Kristina Rinker is a professor at the University of Calgary and co-founder/chief scientific officer at Syantra Inc. As a biomedical innovation leader, she helped develop a groundbreaking breast cancer test that is a non-invasive blood test which detects cancer in early stages. Her accolades include a City of Calgary International Award and Research Impact Award. The Vera Burns Award: Dr. Elaine Joughin is a retired pediatric surgeon and educator, whose work has impacted thousands over the decades and continents. She was the first female pediatric orthopedic surgeon at Alberta Children's Hospital. Her volunteer work has taken her to Thailand, Uganda and Ecuador, where she has mentored surgeons. She continues to influence pediatric care through app development, education and community service. Community Builder Award: Janice McTighe, founder of Renfrew Educational Services, is an advocate for children with disabilities. After seeing a lack of resources for one of her own children, McTighe created a groundbreaking organization to support kids with disabilities. Renfrew has achieved international acclaim and is seen as a model for education excellence when it comes to special needs education. There are now four Renfrew campuses, with another on the way. McTighe's past awards include the Alberta Order of Excellence and a Top 7 Over 70 award. Article content
Edmonton Journal
4 days ago
- Edmonton Journal
Opinion: Province needs to make realistic investments in team-based primary health care
Article content The Alberta government made improving access to primary care health services a priority in its health system reforms. Yet, the $644 million it announced in this year's budget to connect every Albertan to a primary care team and improve access to front-line health services falls short of the funding necessary to achieve this. Family doctors cannot continue to deliver care without a well-resourced and supported team. Refocusing the system around team-based care — in which patients have timely access to family doctors, nurse practitioners and other health-care professionals — is a critical, long-term project. The government must be clear-sighted about the investments needed to build a system that delivers for all Albertans.
