U of A students propose specialized ICU for homeless Edmontonians
With one successful project under their belt, students in an advocacy class at the University of Alberta are making a new pitch to advance care for homeless emergency room patients.
On Tuesday, Student Advocates for Public Health laid out their vision for a specialised intensive care unit to treat the growing number of unhoused patients who disproportionately rely on emergency services.
The proposed 24/7 facility would offer a trauma-informed, multi-disciplinary approach aimed at improving outcomes for unhoused people and reducing the strain on Alberta's health-care system.
"Let's not treat them and street them. Let's greet them and treat them," said Imrose Bhullar, a public health master's student and member of Student Advocates for Public Health.
The team says their proposal is the first of its kind in Canada and builds on the success of the Bridge Healing Transitional Accommodation Program proposed by students from the same advocacy class in 2017.
The Bridge Healing Transitional Accommodation Program has transferred more than 300 unhoused ER patients directly into transitional housing since its launch in 2023.
In Alberta's February budget, the program received $1.8 million to continue its work, which has also been supported by private donors and the City of Edmonton.
The group cited research that found unhoused individuals rely on emergency services at a rate 8.5 times higher than the general population and said having a specialized ICU for people experiencing homelessness should be the next step, the group said.
"This crisis doesn't just affect unhoused individuals, it affects the entire health-care system," Bhullar said.
"Health-care workers are burned out, care is being delayed and patients are slipping through the cracks."
'We don't have enough capacity:' ER physician
The team recommended an approach that would connect patients to a continuum of care through health-care providers, social workers, housing navigators and rehabilitation
They proposed the creation of a 90-bed facility as an extension at the Royal Alexandra Hospital, which sees the most visits from unhoused patients annually in the province.
"There has been a surge in homelessness and substance use. We don't have enough capacity to meet the needs," said Dr. Robert Wittmeier, an emergency room physician based in the Royal Alex.
"It would be far better to bring people to a site like this where they have consistent expert care."
Among the proposal's fans is Bryan Kenny, who overcame chronic homelessness, substance use and mental illness to become an outreach worker.
"This project lined with bridged healing is going to close that gap," said Kenney, who works with AAWEAR, a peer-support group offering support to Albertans who use or used drugs.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Calgary Herald
a day ago
- Calgary Herald
Smoke free summers a thing of the past as Alberta gets hit with wildfire smoke from all sides
Wildfires burning across western Canada are having a major impact on the air quality in most of Alberta. Article content Article content Article content Smoke from wildfires burning in British Columbia, northern Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan are cumulatively worsening the air quality across municipalities in the province and experts are saying smoke-free summers are becoming a thing of the past. Article content Article content Article content Environment Canada's air quality health index (AQHI) is forecasting Edmonton will jump from a 9 out of 10 on Monday to a 10 on Tuesday. Article content Article content Article content Postmedia spoke with two experts in public health and medicine to discuss how Albertans can protect against the smoke, health risks and why does Alberta get so much smoke. Article content Low snow pack, warm and dry weather, and lack of precipitation are pointing to an unfavourable fire season for western Canada — specifically Alberta, says Jeff Brook, an associate professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. Article content Article content Brook said while there's smoke every summer, it is often just above the ground at low levels. However over the past 10 years, he said, researchers are seeing cases where smoke conditions are becoming progressively worse. Article content Article content Article content 'We generally think that the smoke particles are as harmful when we inhale them as regular pollution, and we need to treat them that way,' Brook said. Article content Article content Alberta getting more smoke in recent weeks is in part due to 'luck of the draw' and paired with weather patterns over multiple days as wildfires continue to burn, according to Brook. Article content Article content The reason why Edmonton might get more smoke is due to its proximity to the boreal forest regions, which are often very susceptible to fires. Article content Brook said smoke particles can endure quite readily even when indoors — half of what is outside will get inside. Article content Article content One of the best ways to protect against smoke particles, especially the smaller ones, is by using an air purifier. He said purchasing one is extremely effective, but for those who want to make one at home using a high quality furnace filter, box fan and card board would also be efficient.
Edmonton Journal
a day ago
- Edmonton Journal
Smoke free summers a thing of the past as Alberta gets hit with wildfire smoke from all sides
Article content Wildfires burning across western Canada are having a major impact on the air quality in most of Alberta. Smoke from wildfires burning in British Columbia, northern Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan are cumulatively worsening the air quality across municipalities in the province and experts are saying smoke-free summers are becoming a thing of the past. Article content Environment Canada's air quality health index (AQHI) is forecasting Edmonton will jump from a 9 out of 10 on Monday to a 10 on Tuesday. Postmedia spoke with two experts in public health and medicine to discuss how Albertans can protect against the smoke, health risks and why does Alberta get so much smoke. Why does Alberta get so much smoke during wildfire season and is it getting worse? Low snow pack, warm and dry weather, and lack of precipitation are pointing to an unfavourable fire season for western Canada — specifically Alberta, says Jeff Brook, an associate professor at the Dalla Lana School of Public Health at the University of Toronto. Brook said while there's smoke every summer, it is often just above the ground at low levels. However over the past 10 years, he said, researchers are seeing cases where smoke conditions are becoming progressively worse. Article content 'We generally think that the smoke particles are as harmful when we inhale them as regular pollution, and we need to treat them that way,' Brook said. Alberta getting more smoke in recent weeks is in part due to 'luck of the draw' and paired with weather patterns over multiple days as wildfires continue to burn, according to Brook. The reason why Edmonton might get more smoke is due to its proximity to the boreal forest regions, which are often very susceptible to fires. How do you keep your home smoke free and protect against it? Brook said smoke particles can endure quite readily even when indoors — half of what is outside will get inside. One of the best ways to protect against smoke particles, especially the smaller ones, is by using an air purifier. He said purchasing one is extremely effective, but for those who want to make one at home using a high quality furnace filter, box fan and card board would also be efficient. Article content Dr. Anne Hicks, an associate professor in pediatric respiratory medicine at the University of Alberta, said the only way to protect against wildfire smoke is to avoid breathing as much in as possible. She said surgical masks are a good option to filter out the larger smoke particles, but masks like N95, which are often used by health-care professionals, will filter between 95 to 99 per cent of particles. 'I can still smell smoke through my N95 masks, so those very small particles that get absorbed directly into your bloodstream are still passing through that mask. You can still exercise effectively in those masks, they feel kind of hot and sweaty and claustrophobic, but you have good oxygen coming in and waste gas going out, so they're a nice compromise,' Hicks said. What are the health risks associated with smoke? Hicks said in the short term, everybody will have a little irritation due to smoke whether it's in the eyes or nose, and the larger particles that settle into the throat may cause coughing, the health risks will likely be invisible for many people. Article content But for those with heart and lung disease, they might feel symptoms earlier on. Hicks added there's an increased risk of heart attacks and strokes when there are heavy smoke periods for older adults. Those with a respiratory infection are also at an increased risk of needing an emergency-room visit or hospitalization, as are people in high-risk groups such as infants, young children, seniors and those who have high outdoor exposure. 'If you can smell (the smoke), it's getting soaked into your body in some form or another. So in those cases you worry about asthma attacks or COPD attacks,' Hicks said. Brook said those who have a respiratory condition like asthma should ensure they are constantly carrying a puffer for when they feel exacerbations, just in case. Latest National Stories
Canada Standard
a day ago
- Canada Standard
Q&A: How Deep Energy Retrofits Can Unlock Health Care Savings in Alberta
Across Canada, provinces like British Columbia, Quebec, Nova Scotia, and Ontario are investing in energy retrofits to cut emissions, lower energy bills, and improve health. But Alberta stands apart-not for what it's doing, but for what it isn't. There, 42% of 598,000 homes built before 1980 need repairs and upgrades. But Alberta is the only province or territory that doesn't allow utilities to engage in demand-side management (DSM) programs-initiatives that help people use less energy by funding things like insulation, heat pumps, and efficient appliances. Amid increasing wildfire smoke, extreme heat, and rising energy prices, retrofit advocates are working to build institutional support for programs to make homes safer for Albertans. Though retrofits can be costly and complex, a new Pembina Institute report shows their full value emerges when health care savings are factored into the equation. For example, researchers in England found that poor housing conditions cost their country's health care system $3 billion each year. Simply fixing homes that were too cold would save the National Health Service $1.8 billion per year in avoided costs, the study found. In New Zealand, researchers uncovered remarkable health and energy savings from retrofits made during a multi-year insulation and clean heating program, writes Pembina. After tracking hospitalization rates, prescription costs, and mortality across retrofitted and non-retrofitted homes, they found that insulation had the most benefit, while the biggest health savings came from reduced mortality. The program had a net return of $1.03 billion in health and energy savings-for every dollar spent, four dollars were returned. The Energy Mix talked with report author Raidin Blue, an analyst with the Pembina Institute's buildings program, about Alberta's retrofit gap, its health and equity impacts, and what's needed to drive policy change. The Mix : Why is it important to highlight both health and energy savings when making the case for deep retrofits? View our latest digests Retrofits aren't just about energy-they have a broader value proposition that we aren't capturing. We believe deep retrofits can be key to making life more affordable for Canadians, which is a huge priority right now. The business case for deep retrofits needs to be expanded to include non-energy benefits: improved health and safety, enhanced resilience, and better insurance coverage. When all of that is factored in, deep retrofits make strong financial sense. The Mix : Who do you hope will act on this report-and what message do you want them to walk away with? Building owners. I want them to understand that health is tied to housing-we spend 90% of our lives indoors. Poor ventilation? Air quality issues can damage your lungs. Struggling to keep your home warm in winter? Chronic cold is linked to cardiovascular issues. Both owners and tenants can face serious health impacts from their buildings, and retrofits are a powerful solution. The Mix: You highlight vulnerable households-like low-income families and seniors-living in poor-quality housing, yet Alberta has no province-wide retrofit strategy. However, we are seeing targeted programs like the Metis Government's federally funded $9.24-million retrofit initiative. What would it take to build broader political or institutional support for retrofits in Alberta? And should the feds step up with funding? People in Alberta want to retrofit. The demand is there. It is great to see this initiative from the Metis Government. The City of Calgary also expanded its Home Upgrades Program, and 20-some communities are involved in Alberta Municipalities' Clean Energy Improvement Program (CEIP). Unfortunately, CEIP programs are often out of reach for vulnerable populations, since the funding is tied to property taxes-and many low-income families and seniors don't own their homes. In provinces and territories where there are utility-led Demand-Side Management (DSM) programs, retrofit initiatives are common, and many focus specifically on low-income housing. These programs offer stable, year-over-year funding that building owners can rely on. So a key first step would be for Alberta-a DSM outlier in Canada-to enable utilities to administer and invest in them. At the federal level, the Canada Greener Homes Affordability Program has allocated C$800 to $900 million across the country to support retrofits in low- to median-income homes. So far, Alberta is the only province not actively working to access those funds. In most other jurisdictions, they're managed through a combination of designated agencies and utilities. To advance deep retrofits in Alberta and across Canada, all levels of government need to work more closely with important players like Natural Resources Canada, Infrastructure Canada, Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation, insurance companies, and health authorities. We need to better understand the impacts of retrofits on everything from health to resilience to affordability-and then create stable supports and incentives. That's when building owners will begin to see real returns on deep retrofit investments-beyond just utility bill savings and emissions reductions. The Mix : You've drawn on international examples from Australia, New Zealand, and the United States. Are conditions in Alberta different enough that more local research is still needed? Where should that work start? It is great to see that Australia saved senior households $840 a winter-I think a health-focused retrofit study in Alberta would see significant health savings. We had hesitations with extrapolations because our examples vary from Alberta in both climate and by types of buildings-so we tried not to make direct comparisons. Alberta-specific pilots would showcase the health benefits of retrofits to building owners, local and provincial governments, and the retrofit industry as a whole. Fortunately, these benefits are likely to emerge even without extensive data collection or formal studies. A good starting point could be post-retrofit surveys, where program managers ask tenants about increased comfort or improvements in their overall health and well-being. From there, deeper research could explore reductions in sick days or asthma symptoms. This means working with health care providers to make stronger links between retrofits, health outcomes, and avoided health care costs. The Mix: Are there any promising examples in Canada-provincial or local-where health research is already influencing retrofit policy or program design? Canadians are really starting to make this connection between our built environment and health. For years people have discussed active transportation, walkable cities, and their health benefits. The University of Alberta has a Climate Change + Health Hub and the Housing for Health initiative because these are important issues to Albertans. Look to the 2021 heat dome, when 619 people died in British Columbia, 66 in Alberta. The B.C. government responded with a formal coroner's investigation and the province worked with utility BC Hydro to provide free air conditioners to vulnerable people. Similar programs were also launched in Oregon and Washington State. These are promising, but still just responses to acute events-they don't take a whole-building approach to deep retrofits. I want policy-makers and researchers to understand that-beyond heat waves-there are chronic health impacts associated with our housing. The Mix : What makes you optimistic that this framing will gain traction? Are decision-makers starting to think differently about the value of deep retrofits? Retrofits do make a difference and that gives me optimism. They are the one form of climate policy that does both climate mitigation and adaptation. They can make our homes healthier, safer, and more affordable. Part of our work over the next year will be to bring together all of these pieces for a complete deep retrofit business case. We just need coordinated efforts from all orders of government, utilities, insurance and investment sectors, and building owners, to keep Canadians healthy and safe. Source: The Energy Mix
