Neil Young weighs in on Trump-Springsteen feud: ‘We need a real president!'
Singer Neil Young speaks during a news conference before the last concert in his 'Honour the Treaties' tour in Calgary, Alta., Sunday, Jan. 19, 2014. (THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jeff McIntosh)
As Bruce Springsteen's feud with U.S. President Donald Trump drags on, it would appear that the all-American rockstar has some backup from across the border.
In a Tuesday blog post, Canadian musician Neil Young chimed into the ongoing social media battle between Trump and Springsteen, a vocal Democratic Party supporter and friend of former U.S. president Barack Obama. Springsteen launched a blistering rebuke of the president on tour, last week.
'The America I love, the America I've written about that has been a beacon of hope and liberty for 250 years is currently in the hands of a corrupt, incompetent and treasonous administration,' Springsteen told a Manchester, U.K., crowd last Thursday.
'Tonight we ask all who believe in democracy and the best of our American experiment to rise with us, raise your voices against authoritarianism and let freedom ring.'
In the days since, Trump's response has been stark, calling Springsteen, 75, a "dried out 'prune,'" but also threatening a federal investigation into his and other celebrities' involvement in Kamala Harris's 2024 presidential campaign.
'HOW MUCH DID KAMALA HARRIS PAY BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN FOR HIS POOR PERFORMANCE DURING HER CAMPAIGN FOR PRESIDENT?' asked the president, 78, in a Monday post to Truth Social.
'Candidates aren't allowed to pay for ENDORSEMENTS, which is what Kamala did, under the guise of paying for entertainment. In addition, this was a very expensive and desperate effort to artificially build up her sparse crowds. IT'S NOT LEGAL!'
The next day, Young took to his personal blog to share his two cents with Trump directly.
'Bruce and thousands of musicians think you are ruining America. You worry about that instead of the dyin' kids in Gaza. That's your problem,' the post reads. 'STOP THINKING ABOUT WHAT ROCKERS ARE SAYING. Think about saving America from the mess you made.'
Young also appealed to the president's supporters, telling Republicans to 'wake up' and calling Trump 'out of control.'
'We need a read president!' the post concludes.
It's not Young's first foray into digital-age activism.
In 2022, the musician announced he would pull his catalogue from Spotify over concerns of vaccine misinformation spreading on the platform. The boycott would last just over two years, along the way attracting support from fellow Canadian Joni Mitchell.
On the Springsteen feud, it seems that Young hasn't had the final word on the matter, just yet.
Wednesday morning, Trump shared a video on social media splicing together a clip of him hitting a golf ball with a second clip of Springsteen tripping onstage, complete with an animated golf ball bouncing off his back as he loses his footing.
'The President of the United States of America,' reads one commenter's reply to the post.
With files from The Associated Press and The Canadian Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trump and Musk to speak Friday after alliance descends into public feud, Politico reports
A war of words is beginning to emerge between U.S. President Trump and Elon Musk following the billionaire's White House exit. Joy Malbon has the details. WASHINGTON -- White House aides scheduled a call between Donald Trump and Elon Musk for Friday, Politico reported, after a huge public spat that saw threats fly over government contracts and ended with the world's richest man suggesting the U.S. president should be impeached. The reported call could ease the feuding after an extraordinary day of hostilities - largely conducted over social media - that marked a stark end to a close alliance. Shares in Musk's Tesla closed down over 14 per cent on Thursday, losing about US$150 billion in market value in the largest single-day decline in value in its history. In pre-market European trading on Friday they pared some of those losses, rising 5% after the Politico report that the two men were scheduled to speak. Musk had bankrolled a large part of Trump's presidential campaign and was then brought as one of the president's most visible advisers, heading up a sweeping and controversial effort to downsize the federal workforce and slash spending. The verbal punches erupted on Thursday after Trump criticized Musk in the Oval Office and the pair then traded barbs on their social media platforms: Trump's Truth Social and Musk's X. The falling-out had begun brewing days ago when Musk, who left his role as head of the Department of Government Efficiency a week ago, denounced Trump's sweeping tax-cut and spending bill. The president initially stayed quiet while Musk campaigned to torpedo the bill, saying it would add too much to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. Trump broke his silence on Thursday, telling reporters he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. As Trump spoke, Musk responded on X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million backing Trump and other Republicans in last year's election. In another post, Musk asserted that Trump's signature import tariffs would push the U.S. into a recession later this year. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' Trump posted. Minutes after the closing bell, Musk replied, 'Yes,' to a post on X saying Trump should be impeached, something that would be highly unlikely given Trump's Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress. Musk's businesses also include rocket company and government contractor SpaceX and its satellite unit Starlink. Musk, whose space business plays a critical role in the U.S. government's space program, said that as a result of Trump's threats he would begin decommissioning SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft. Dragon is the only U.S. spacecraft capable of sending astronauts to the International Space Station. Late on Thursday, Musk backed off the threat. In another sign of a possible detente to come, Musk subsequently wrote: 'You're not wrong,' in response to billionaire investor Bill Ackman saying Trump and Musk should make peace. Punching back Trump and Musk are both political fighters with a penchant for using social media to attack their perceived enemies, and many observers had predicted a falling-out. Musk hit at the heart of Trump's agenda earlier this week when he targeted what Trump has named his 'big, beautiful bill,' calling it a 'disgusting abomination' that would deepen the federal deficit. His attacks amplified a rift within the Republican Party that could threaten the bill's prospects in the Senate. Nonpartisan analysts say Trump's bill could add $2.4 trillion to $5 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt. A prolonged feud between the pair could make it harder for Republicans to keep control of Congress in next year's midterm elections if it leads to a loss of Musk's campaign spending or erodes support for Trump in Silicon Valley. 'Elon really was a significant portion of the ground game this last cycle,' said a Republican strategist with ties to Musk and the Trump administration who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity. 'If he sits out the midterms, that worries me.' On Tuesday, Musk posted that 'in November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.' Musk had already said he planned to curtail his political spending in the future. Musk's increasing focus on politics provoked widespread protests at Tesla sites, driving down sales while investors fretted that Musk's attention was too divided. By Nandita Bose and Andrea Shalal, Reuters Additional reporting by Jeff Mason, Joey Roulette and Jarrett Renshaw; Writing by Costas Pitas, Joseph Ax and Charlie Devereux; Editing by Don Durfee, Michael Perry and Frances Kerry
National Post
33 minutes ago
- National Post
Is Trump in the Epstein files? Does Musk have TDS? How a bromance was shattered
Elon Musk and Donald Trump had been inseparable for some time now. Article content Musk publicly endorsed Trump's presidency in a tweet less than an hour after the failed assassination attempt on the president's life. Their relationship began with mutual respect and compliments. Musk praised Trump's 'instinctual courage' in jumping up quickly after being grazed by a bullet and yelling 'fight, fight,' and Trump told rally attendees in Grand Rapids, Michigan: 'We have to make life good for our smart people and (Elon's) as smart as you get.' Musk engineered America PAC, a $1 million dollar daily giveaway aimed at getting voters in swing states to support Trump. In all, Musk donated around US$ 280 million to Trump's 2024 presidential campaign. After the election, Musk was put in charge of managing the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Musk visited the White House, often with his children. There were even sleepovers! Article content Article content Article content Alas, it now appears the honeymoon is over. And it just might be the most public break-up in history. Article content Article content The trouble appears to have began when Musk criticized Trump's massive tax cut and spending legislation, known as the ' One Big Beautiful Bill ' on Tuesday, posting on X, 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' The legislation is expected to add as much as $2.7 trillion in deficits over the next decade. Article content A pointed critique like that, coming from Musk, who had just finished his term last week as position as Special Government Employee leading DOGE in an effort to reduce government spending and increase efficiency, would've burned any president. Article content But Trump isn't just any president. Predictably, he took the comments very personally. Article content When asked about Elon's critique during a news conference at the White House Thursday, he made his hurt feelings known: 'Well, look, you know, I've always liked Elon and I was very surprised, you saw the words he had for me, the words… and he hasn't said anything about me that's bad, I'd rather have him criticize me than the bill.' Article content Article content 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore.' Article content Article content Trump then went into full attack mode, telling reporters that, 'Elon knew the inner workings of this bill, better than almost anybody sitting here,' and suggested that Musk, who is CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla, only had a problem with the bill when he found out that Trump would be cutting EV tax credits. Article content The feud then spilled out of the news conference onto their own respective social media platforms — Musk's X (formerly Twitter) and Trump's Truth Social resulting in a cross-platform flamewar. Article content It began with a quick succession of tweets from Musk on X. Article content Musk responded to Trump: 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill. In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.'
National Post
33 minutes ago
- National Post
Mia Hughes: Canadian Medical Association wants to force Alberta to ignore science on gender care
Article content The entire field is built upon research out of the Netherlands that has been shown to be methodologically flawed, and the diagnosis of gender dysphoria is shaped by political lobbying intended to reduce stigma and distress. Article content What's more, the Canadian Pediatric Society bases its recommendations on the field's standards of care which are set by the discredited World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH). In a recently withdrawn legal challenge to Alabama's youth gender medicine ban, WPATH was forced to disclose over two million internal emails that revealed the organization blocked independent systematic reviews that showed low-quality evidence, consulted 'social justice lawyers' when drafting its medical guidelines, and, at the Biden administration's request, removed almost all lower age limits from its adolescent chapter to avoid undermining state-level legal battles. Article content Reimer also stated, without irony, that medical decisions should be based on 'the best science.' Yet the best science — specifically the systematic reviews from Sweden, Finland, England, and a team of researchers in Canada — has all concluded the evidence base for paediatric medical transition is of very low certainty. Alberta's Bill 26 reflects that consensus. The CMA's position contradicts it. Article content This isn't the first legal challenge to Alberta's legislation. Late last year, Egale Canada — originally a gay rights charity that expanded into trans advocacy in the early 2000s — teamed up with the Skipping Stone Foundation and five families to contest the law. That move is surprising given early research conducted by leading figures in gender medicine, Psychologist/Sexologist Kenneth Zucker and Psychiatrist Susan Bradley, found that most children with early-onset gender dysphoria would grow up to be gay or lesbian if left untreated, and same-sex attracted teens are overrepresented in the adolescent patients who began flooding gender clinics in the 2010s and among detransitioners. That a gay rights group would back medical interventions that have the potential to sterilize homosexual adolescents is a tragic reversal of purpose. Article content In an interview, Dr. Jake Donaldson, one of three Alberta doctors who filed the challenge alongside the CMA, inadvertently highlighted the questionable rationale for these extreme medical interventions. He believes that puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones help gender-distressed youth blend in better as members of the opposite sex, which makes them 'safer and happier.' But even if that were true — and there is no high-quality evidence to suggest that it is — this approach only offers a superficial, short-term fix that ignores the deeper psychological struggles of these youth. And it can come at such immense long-term cost in the form of sterility, sexual dysfunction, and lifelong medical dependence. Article content 'Medicine is a calling,' explained the CMA president in her statement. 'Doctors pursue it because they are compelled to care for and promote the well-being of patients.' Article content Yet noble intentions are no safeguard against harm. History is littered with medical scandals. At the centre of each one, there were well-intentioned doctors who left a trail of devastation in their quest to help patients. The doctors who prescribed thalidomide didn't do so with the intention of causing major birth defects; the obstetricians who sent expectant mothers for prenatal X-rays didn't deliberately set out to cause childhood leukemia, and Walter Freeman famously believed his prefrontal lobotomies were a humane alternative to the deplorable conditions in insane asylums. Article content At this point, there is little doubt that paediatric gender medicine is destined to take its place in history alongside these medical catastrophes. Therefore, Alberta is not acting unreasonably; it is acting responsibly. By restricting unproven and irreversible treatments for minors, the province has commendably joined a global wave of governments re-asserting evidence and ethical principles in the face of medical groupthink. It is the CMA — not the Alberta government — that must reckon with its conscience. Article content Mia Hughes specializes in researching pediatric gender medicine, psychiatric epidemics, social contagion and the intersection of trans rights and women's rights. She is the author of ' The WPATH Files,' a senior fellow at the Macdonald-Laurier Institute, and director of Genspect Canada. Article content
