Support for market traders rejected
A motion to financially support displaced market traders in Wolverhampton has been defeated.
Traders said they had suffered financial loss as well as ill health since Bilston Outdoor Market relocated last year to make way for a £5.2m upgrade of the site.
A plea for financial support, asking City of Wolverhampton Council to "step in immediately" was defeated at a full council meeting this week.
A statement from the council said major projects were rarely completed without "some level of disruption".
Anita Stanley said two traders had suffered ill health and another had quit.
The Reform UK ward member for Bilston North said traders had also been informed improvements would not be completed until 2026, rather than before Christmas, as originally planned.
Stanley's motion called on the council to put together a financial package to offset trader's losses, freeze rents, and issue an apology letter - but it was defeated at a full council meeting.
Cabinet Member for Resident Services, councillor Bhupinder Gakhal, said the Bilston market scheme had "been shaped" by the people who use it - and the council had positive feedback from traders and residents throughout the consultation.
He said: "I want to be absolutely clear we will not cut back on our ambition for Bilston. I see the new market as a key development, the catalyst for even further investment in and around it.
"Major, multimillion-pound projects are rarely completed without some level of disruption.
"We know from talking to market traders and local businesses that the current situation has created some positives and some negatives.
"We will continue to listen to and work with them to make this is as pain-free as we can, whilst preparing them for the bigger prize and opportunities the scheme will create."
After listening to traders' ideas in March, the council said phase two of the project would find a way of "better connecting footfall" from the bus station to the indoor market.
Gakhal said the council was also announcing a £15,000 fund to increase footfall through events in the area.
"I am determined to ensure that traders have a big say in how this is used but I'm clear that it will benefit both the indoor and outdoor markets and the wider town centre", he said.
Follow BBC Wolverhampton & Black Country on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Financial support bid for displaced market traders
City of Wolverhampton Council
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Public invited to decide how MPs' pay should be set
Parliament's expenses watchdog wants around 20 members of the public to take part in a review of how it sets MPs' pay. The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (Ipsa) says the "citizens' forum" will help shape pay and expenses policy from next year onwards. The group will meet four times in September, and make recommendations alongside a wider online consultation expected to run until the autumn. Ipsa's review will also look at how the pay of British MPs compares to politicians in other countries. MPs' basic salary is currently £93,904, following a 2.8% annual rise in April. MPs' pay set to increase 2.8% to £93,904 in April Forum could examine assisted dying law - Labour The watchdog is legally mandated to review how it determines MPs' salaries and expenses following each general election. Previous reviews have used online consultations to gather views, but this is the first time members of the public have been asked to participate directly in the process. It is expected around 20 to 25 people will be recruited via a postal lottery of 10,000 addresses, with the aim of selecting a group that is broadly representative of the wider UK population. Those taking part will be asked to make recommendations to Ipsa's board as part of the review, which must conclude before April next year. Ipsa says those taking part must be aged 18 or over, and do not need any prior knowledge, or an interest in politics. The move is the latest example of a British body using a co-called citizens' assembly model when making a decision, following its widespread use in Ireland. It has previously been employed by the Scottish government to discuss constitutional questions after Brexit. Westminster committees have used it to decide recommendations on climate change and social care. Supporters say the model can help make decisions more democratic, although critics have questioned the extent to which panels of volunteers are ever able to reflect wider views in the broader population. The model had been tipped for wider government use after Sue Gray, Sir Keir Starmer's then chief of staff, said Labour would use it to decide contentious issues such as where houses should be built and how to reform the House of Lords. Ms Gray entered Downing Street after the election but was replaced after three months, and those plans appear to have been shelved. Ipsa was created in the wake of the 2009 expenses scandal to take on the task of setting MPs' pay, which was previously decided by MPs themselves. The watchdog does not currently have a set formula for deciding MPs' annual salaries. Instead, it says it balances data on public sector pay against the economic context, and pay in the "wider working population". In recent years it has experimented with linking annual awards, which take effect each April, to average public sector pay figures published the previous October. However, it has not always stuck rigidly to using this figure. In 2023, it recommended a higher pay rise for MPs, arguing the official data had failed to capture cost of living bonuses awarded elsewhere in the public sector. This year, it recommended a lower rise, by linking its 2.8% rise to initial Treasury plans for the public sector, which have since been increased after the government accepted a series of recommendations from pay review bodies last month. In a report published last year, Ipsa found that in 2023 British MPs were paid more than counterparts in countries including France and New Zealand. But they were paid less than equivalents in Ireland, Germany, Canada, Australia and the United States, the survey found. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to read top political analysis, gain insight from across the UK and stay up to speed with the big moments. It'll be delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
A third of renters could be ‘forced out' by average rent rise, research finds
Millions of renters could be forced to move house despite Labour's pledged protections, campaigners say, as new research lays bare the toll of massive rent increases. Over two-thirds of renters say they would definitely (34 per cent) or probably (34 per cent) need to move home if given a rent rise of £110, polling from the Renters' Reform Coalition (RRC) shows. The research comes ahead of Labour's Renters' Rights Bill, which is expected to pass later this year. The legislation will bring an end to controversial Section 21 'no-fault' eviction notices, as well as empowering tribunals to protect tenants from unreasonable rent increases. But this does not go far enough, the RRC argues, pointing out that a £110 rent rise is an increase of 7.9 per cent on the average rent, close to the current average rent increase of 7.5 per cent. This means it is unlikely that tribunals will be able to provide adequate protection against 'backdoor eviction' via rent rises, which the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government says they should do. Furthermore, research by the group finds that the average decision made by tribunals in the first half of 2025 saw tenants receive a rent increase of more than £240 per month. The polling also reveals the stark impact even a market rate increase can have on renters, following years of consecutive rental market increases during the Covid pandemic and cost of living crisis. Around 85 per cent of renters said they would need to make changes to their spending to afford a rent rise of £110. Of these, 32 per cent said they could cut back on non-essential spending, while 24 per cent said they would need to cut back on essentials. A further 14 per cent said they would be forced to use savings or borrow money, and 13 per cent said they would have no way of affording the rise. Only 14 per cent of renters said they would be able to afford the increase with no changes to their spending. Average rents increased to £1,339 in May, up 7 per cent in the year. This is up nearly 30 per cent from when rents began to rise for years prior to 2021, up nearly 30 per cent from £1,034. This figure is more than four times the 7 per cent rise in the four years from May 2016 to May 2021, with the average rent rising from £954. Tom Darling, director at the RRC said the government's Renters' Rights Bill is 'long overdue', adding that it will 'give renters more rights and protections and should help drive up housing standards'. He added: 'But the rent rise eviction loophole is a serious gap in the legislation. Even after section 21 is abolished, our research suggests as many as a third of renters will still face being pushed out of their homes and communities by rent increases, and landlords will be able to use rent hikes they know tenants cannot afford to threaten or intimidate. 'A cap on rent increases would be simple to implement, putting money back into renters' pockets and giving them real long-term security in their homes." A Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: 'Our landmark Renters' Rights Bill will ensure that landlords are only able to increase rents once a year to the market rate, and tenants will be able to challenge unreasonable rent increases through the first-tier Tribunal. 'This will prevent unscrupulous landlords using rent increases as a backdoor means of eviction, while ensuring rents can be increased to a fair rate.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'Amazing' Durham café announces sudden closure over 'burden' rising costs
An 'amazing' Durham café has closed after rising costs became 'more and more of a burden'. Maple Patisserie, on Durham's Riverwalk, announced 'with a heavy heart' on Monday (June 30) that it has shut the doors. Founded in 2022, the family-run business has become known for serving up 'excellent' hot drinks and 'truly amazing' pastries. But today, the business confirmed on social media that it had decided to close, thanking customers for their support over the years. A statement said: 'With a heavy heart, we have decided to close Maple Patisserie. 'We feel like it's the right time to leave with the ever rising costs becoming more and more of a burden. We couldn't have done it without you, and for that we are forever grateful. 'So sincerely, thank you from the bottom of our hearts to everyone that has ever supported the business and enjoyed Maple desserts. We will miss it always. Farewell.' The closure has already been met with sadness online, with one person saying: 'Absolutely gutted. You are going to be a big miss. 'Have so many happy memories coming in to see you guys. All the best for the future and we will be in touch for the next birthday cake.' Another added: 'So gutted for you both, you have put your heart and soul into it. You will be a big miss for so many people who loved coming to your shop.' Read more: North East family's 'nightmare' wait for son's body after his sudden death in China 'Deeply saddened' headteacher of Mylo Capilla pays tribute to 'cherished' teen 'Botox' probe into adverse reactions continue with 28 people reporting symptoms The news comes just days after another Riverwalk venue - Estabulo - was left with questions over its future after enforcement agents took control of the site. A forfeiture notice - a document used by a landlord to terminate a lease - was placed on the windows of the site, saying bailiffs have re-entered. A spokesperson for Estabulo said there has been 'no official confirmation regarding the permanent closure of the restaurant'.
